395
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Challenges to the nation-state in the context of European integration: an overview of the tension between citizenship rights and neoliberalism

, &

References

  • Agustín, O. G. (2014, March 10). Mobilization and deliberation. EU for the Citizens? E-International Relations. Retrieved September 26, 2017, from http://www.e-ir.info/2014/03/10/moblization-and-deliberation-eu-for-the-citizens/
  • Bauböck, R., & Guiraudon, V. (2009). Introduction: Realignments of citizenship: Reassessing rights in the age of plural memberships and multi-level governance. Citizenship Studies, 13(5), 439–450. doi: 10.1080/13621020903174613
  • Beiner, R. (2003). Liberalism, nationalism, citizenship. Essays on the problem of political community. Vancouver: UBC Press.
  • Borges, M. (2013). Citizenship and post-armed conflict statebuilding: Re-engaging with power and politics in spaces of intervention: The illustrative case of Guatemala (PhD Dissertation). University of Coimbra.
  • Bosniak, L. (2000). Citizenship denationalized. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 7(2), 447–509.
  • Brown, W. (2010). Walled states, waning sovereignty. New York: Zone Books.
  • Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos. Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. New York: Zone Books.
  • Burchill, S., & Linklater, A. (1996). Theories of international relations. New York: St. Martin's Press.
  • Chryssochoou, D. (2010). Europe’s contested democracy. In M. Cini, & P.-S. B. Nieves (Eds.), European union politics (pp. 377–389). Oxford: Oxford UP.
  • Daly, M. (2008). Whither EU social policy? An account and assessment of development in the Lisbon Social inclusion process. Journal of Social Policy, 37(1), 1–19. doi: 10.1017/S0047279407001468
  • De Clerck-Sachsse, J. (2012). Civil society and democracy in the EU: The paradox of the European citizens’ initiative. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 13(2), 299–311. doi: 10.1080/15705854.2012.702574
  • European Parliament. (2015). “The impact of the crisis on fundamental rights across Member States of the EU Comparative analysis”, Directorate General for Internal Policies, Policy Department C: Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs. Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, PE 510.021.
  • Faist, T. (2001). Social citizenship in the European union: Nested membership. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 39(1), 37–58.
  • Ferrajoli, L. (2010). Derechos y garantías. La ley del más débil. Madrid: Trotta.
  • Follesdal, A., & Hix, S. (2006). Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: A response to Majone and Moravcsik. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(3), 533–62.
  • Gerbaudo, P. (2017). The indignant citizen: Anti-austerity movements in Southern Europe and the anti-oligarchic reclaiming of citizenship. Social Movement Studies, 16(1), 36–50. doi: 10.1080/14742837.2016.1194749
  • Gleick, P., Burns, W., Chalecki, E., Cohen, M., Cushing, K. K., Mann, A. … Wong, A. (2002). The World’s Water 2002-2003: The Biennial Report on Freshwater Resources. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • Greenwood, J. (2012). The European citizen’s initiative and EU civil society organisations. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 13(3), 325–336. doi: 10.1080/15705854.2012.702576
  • Habermas, J. (1995). Citizenship and national identity. Some reflections on the future of Europe. In R. Beiner (Ed.), Theorizing citizenship (pp. 255–282). Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Habermas, J. (2005). Tres modelos de democracia. Sobre el concepto de una política deliberative. Polis, Revista de Louisiana Universidad Bolivariana [ online] 4, 10. Retrieved 25 October, 2015, from http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=30541007> ISSN 0717-6554
  • Held, D., & McGrew, A. (Eds.). (2003). The global transformations reader. (2nd ed.) London: Polity.
  • Hermann, C. (2007). Neoliberalism in the European Union. Studies in Political Economy, 79. Spring. doi: 10.1080/19187033.2007.11675092
  • Hoover, J., & de Heredia, M. I. (2011). Philosophers, activists, and radicals: A story of human rights and other scandals. Human Rights Review, 12(2), 191–220. doi: 10.1007/s12142-010-0172-9
  • Jacobs, F. G. (2007). Citizenship of the European union—A legal analysis. European Law Journal, 13(5), 591–610. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00385.x
  • Janoski, T. (1998). Citizenship and civil society: A framework of rights in liberal, traditional and social democratic regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kohler-Koch, B. (2009). The three worlds of European civil society—what role for civil society for what kind of Europe? Policy and Society, 28(1), 47–57. doi: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2009.02.005
  • Kymlicka, W., & Norman, W. (1995). Return of the citizen: A survey of recent work on citizenship theory. In R. Beiner (Ed.), Theorizing citizenship (pp. 283–322). Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Lehning, P. B. (1999). European citizenship: Towards and European identity? Working Paper Series in European Studies, 2, 3.
  • Lopes, P. D. (2008). Water with Borders: the Institutional Postponement of International Water Trade. In International Studies Association Annual Convention Proceedings. [February 5, 2015].
  • Mackert, J., & Turner, B. S., (Eds.). (2017). The transformation of citizenship, volume 2: Boundaries of inclusion and exclusion. London: Routledge.
  • Magnette, P. (2005). Citizenship: The history of an idea. Colchester: ECPR Press.
  • Marshall, T. H. (1964). Class, citizenship and social development. New York: Doubleday.
  • Marshall, T. H. (1992). ‘Citizenship and social class. In T. Bottomore (Ed.), Citizenship and social class (pp. 1–51). London: Pluto Press.
  • Martiniello, M. (1994). Citizenship of the European union: A critical view. In R. Bauböck (Ed.), From Aliens to citizens: Redefining the Status of immigrants in Europe (pp. 29–47). Avebury: Aldershot.
  • Migdal, J. S. (2001). State in society: Studying How states and societies transform and constitute One another. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Neocosmos, M. (2006). Can a human rights culture enable emancipation? Clearing some theoretical ground for the renewal of a critical sociology. Southern African Review of Sociology, 37(2), 356–379. doi: 10.1080/21528586.2006.10419163
  • Ortiz, F. R. (2012). Las máscaras de la crisis. Madrid: Libros de la Catarata.
  • Ortiz, F. R. (2013). Europa: Una deriva liberal que prolonga la crisis, cuestiona los principios democráticos y banaliza el mal. Papeles de Relaciones Ecosociales y Cambio Global, 123, 29–40.
  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Sassen, S. (2002). Towards post-national and de-nationalized citizenship. In B. S. Turner, & I. Engin (Eds.), Handbook of citizenship studies (pp. 277–291). London: Sage Publications.
  • Sassen, S. (2015). Losing control? Sovereignty in an age of globalization. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Sbragia, A. M. (1994). The community as polity: The political economy of regulation. APSA-CP American Political Science Association – Comparative Politics.
  • Sommers, M. R. (2008). Geneologies of citizenship. Markets, statelessness and the rights to have rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
  • Sorensen, G. (2006). The transformation of the state. In H. Colin, M. Lister, & M. David (Eds.), The state: Theories and issues (pp. 190–208). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Sousa Santos, B. (2002). The processes of globalization. Eurozine, August 22. Retrieved November 25, 2015, from http://www.eurozine.com/articles/2002-08-22-santos-en.html
  • Sousa Santos, B. (2004). Democratizar la democracia: Los caminos de la democracia participativa. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  • Sousa Santos, B. (2005). El milenio huérfano. Madrid: Trotta.
  • Sousa Santos, B. (2006). Globalizations. Theory, Culture and Society, 23(2–3), 393–399. doi: 10.1177/026327640602300268
  • Sousa Santos, B. (2007). Globalización y democracia. Archipiélago, 73-74, 111–125.
  • Stewart, A. (2001). Theories of power and domination: The politics of empowerment in late modernity. London: Sage Publications.
  • Teglas, P. (2012). The European Citizens’ Initiative (un)successful tool of deliberative democracy; present state and future perspectives. ECIT Foundation. Retrieved September 26, 2017, from (available at http://ecit-foundation.eu/wpcontent/uploads/2015/11/Peter_Tegas_The_European_Citizens_Initiative_2015.pdf
  • Turner, B. S. (1993). Citizenship and social theory. London: Sage Publications.
  • UNDP. (2014). Human development report 2014. Sustaining human progress: Reducing vulnerabilities and building resilience. New York: United Nations Development Programe.
  • Wiener, A. (1997). Making sense of the new geography of citizenship: Fragmented citizenship in the European union. Theory and Society, 26(4), 529–560. doi: 10.1023/A:1006809913519

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.