Combatting physical threats posed via digital means: the European Commission's developing approach to the sale of counterfeit goods on the Internet

Bibliography

• Acquah, D. (2015). Trends on the implementation of the EU customs regulation: For better or for worse? Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 10, 775–784. doi: 10.1093/jiplp/jpv147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bently, L., & Sherman, B. (2014). Intellectual property law (4th ed.). Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Borrás, S., & Jacobsson, K. (2004). The open method of co-ordination and new governance patterns in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy, 11, 185–208. doi: 10.1080/1350176042000194395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadhurst, R. (2006). Developments in the global law enforcement of cyber-crime. Policing, 29, 408–433. doi: 10.1108/13639510610684674
   Google Scholar
• C-324/09. (2011). L’Oréal SA v eBay International AG (No. EU:C:2011:474).
   Google Scholar
• Cardwell, P. J. (2013). The changing nature of European regulatory governance. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), Handbook on the politics of regulation (pp. 536–547). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2007). Regulatory agencies? The challenges of balancing agency autonomy and political control. Governance, 20, 499–520. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00368.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cirlig, C.-C. (2014). Overcoming transatlantic differences on intellectual property: IPR and the TTIP negotiations. European Parliamentary Research Service. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=LDM_BRI(2014)140760
   Google Scholar
• Clark, B., & Schubert, M. (2011). Odysseus between Scylla and Charybdis? The ECJ rules in L’Oréal v eBay. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 6, 880–888. doi: 10.1093/jiplp/jpr143
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2008). Council resolution on a comprehensive European anti-counterfeiting and anti-piracy plan (No. OJ C 253).
   Google Scholar
• Council Regulation No 3295/94. (1994). Laying down measures to prohibit the release for free circulation, export, re-export or entry for a suspensive procedure of counterfeit and pirated goods.
   Google Scholar
• Council Regulation No 3842/86. (1986). Laying down measures to prohibit the release for free circulation of counterfeit goods.
   Google Scholar
• Council Regulation No 386/2012. (2012). Of 19 April 2012 on entrusting the office for harmonization in the internal market (trade marks and designs) with tasks related to the enforcement of intellectual property rights, including the assembling of public and private-sector representatives as a European observatory on infingements of intellectual property rights.
   Google Scholar
• Directive 2000/31/EC (2000). On certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the internal market.
   Google Scholar
• Directive 2004/48/EC. (2004). On the enforcement of intellectual property rights.
   Google Scholar
• Drahos, P., & Braithwaite, J. (2002). Information feudalism: Who owns the knowledge economy? London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Egeberg, M., Trondal, J., & Vestlund, N. M. (2015). The quest for order: Unravelling the relationship between the European Commission and European Union agencies. Journal of European Public Policy, 22, 609–629. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2014.976587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EU Observatory on Infringements of Intellectual Property Rights. (2015). About us [WWW Document]. Retrieved from https://oami.europa.eu/ohimportal/en/web/observatory/about-us.
   Google Scholar
• European Alliance for Access to Safe Medicines. (2008). The counterfeiting superhighway.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (1976). Memorandum on the creation of an EEC trade mark (No. SEC(76) 2462).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (1984). Proposal for a Regulation laying down measures to discourage the release for free circulation of counterfeit goods (No. COM(84) 705).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (1991). Report on the functioning of the system set up by Council Regulation No 3842/86 (No. SEC(91) 262).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (1993). Proposal for a council regulation laying down measures to prohibit the release for free circulation, export or transit of counterfeit and pirates goods (No. COM(93) 329).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (1998). Green paper: Combating counterfeiting and piracy in the single market (No. COM(98) 569).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2000). Follow-up to the green paper on combating counterfeiting and piracy in the single market (No. COM(2000) 789).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2001). European governance: A white paper (No. COM(2001) 428). Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2003). Proposal for a directive of the European parliament and of the council on measures and procedures to ensure the enforcement of intellectual property rights (No. COM(2003) 46).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2008). European agencies: The way forward (No. COM(2008) 135). Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2009). Enhancing the enforcement of intellectual property rights in the internal market (No. COM(2009) 467 final).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2010). Application of Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights (No. COM(2010) 779 final). Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2011a). Single market act: Twelve levers to boost growth and strengthen confidence “working together to create new growth” (No. COM(2011) 206). Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2011b). A single market for intellectual property rights: - boosting creativity and innovation to provide economic growth, high quality jobs and first class products and services in Europe (No. COM(2011) 287). Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2011c). Memorandum of understanding.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2013). Report on the functioning of the memorandum of understanding on the sale of counterfeit goods via the internet (No. COM(2013) 209).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2015). A digital single market strategy for Europe (No. COM(2015) 192).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. (2013). Cybersecurity strategy of the European Union: An open, safe and secure cyberspace (No. JOIN(2013) 1). Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Observatory on Counterfeiting and Piracy. (2010). Evidence and right of information in intellectual property rights.
   Google Scholar
• European Observatory on Counterfeiting and Piracy. (2017). About us [WWW Document]. Retrieved from https://euipo.europa.eu/ohimportal/en/web/observatory/about-us.
   Google Scholar
• European Observatory on Infringements of Intellectual Property Rights. (2013). Work programme 2013.
   Google Scholar
• European Observatory on Infringements of Intellectual Property Rights. (2014). Multiannual plan 2014–2018.
   Google Scholar
• European Observatory on Infringements of Intellectual Property Rights and Europol. (2015). 2015 situation report on counterfeiting in the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (1985). Report on the proposal from the Commission of the European Committees for a Regulation laying down measures to discourage the release for free circulation of counterfeit goods (No. A2–119/85).
   Google Scholar
• Europol. (2013). SOCTA - The serious organised crime threat assessment. The Hague.
   Google Scholar
• Fafinski, S., Dutton, W., & Margetts, H. (2010). Mapping and measuring cybercrime (Forum Discussion Paper No. 18). Oxford Internet Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Falkner, G. (2013). The JCMS annual review lecture is the European Union losing its credibility? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 51, 13–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrand, B. (2014). Networks of power in digital copyright law and policy: Political salience, expertise and the legislative process. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Farrand, B. (2015). Lobbying and lawmaking in the European Union: The development of copyright law and the rejection of the anti-counterfeiting trade agreement. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 35, 487–514. doi: 10.1093/ojls/gqu028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrand, B., & Carrapico, H. (2012). Copyright law as a matter of (inter)national security? - The attempt to securitise commercial infringement and its spillover onto individual liability. Crime, Law and Social Change, 57, 373–401. doi: 10.1007/s10611-011-9356-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiger, C. (2012). Weakening multilateralism in intellectual property lawmaking: A European perspective on ACTA. The WIPO Journal, 3(2), 166–177.
   Google Scholar
• Godart, B. (2010). IP crime: The new face of organized crime: From IP theft to IP crime. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 5, 378–385. doi: 10.1093/jiplp/jpq025
   Google Scholar
• Grant, W. (2012). Economic patriotism in European agriculture. Journal of European Public Policy, 19, 420–434. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2011.640797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grauman, B. (2012). Cyber-security: The vexed question of global rules. An independent report on cyber-preparedness around the world (No. February). Security & Defence Agenda Report.
   Google Scholar
• Heinonen, J. A., Spink, J., & Wilson, J. M. (2014). When crime events defy classification: The case of product counterfeiting as white-collar crime. Security Journal. doi: 10.1057/sj.2014.18
   Google Scholar
• Heisenberg, D. (2013). Informal governance and the decision-making of the council of ministers. In T. Christiansen & C. Neuhold (Eds.), International handbook on informal governance (pp. 374–394). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Helmke, G., & Levitsky, S. (2004). Informal institutions and comparative politics: A research agenda. Perspectives on Politics, 2, 725–740. doi: 10.1017/S1537592704040472
   Google Scholar
• Herlin-Karnell, E. (2015). Constructing Europe’s area of freedom, security, and justice through the framework of regulation: A cascade of market-based challenges in the EU’s fight against financial crime. German L.J., 16, 49. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2445420
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. (2011). The UK cyber security strategy: Protecting and promoting the UK in a digital world. London: HM Government.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson and Johnson. (2011). Response to public consultation on the future of electronic commerce in the internal market and the implementation of the Directive on Electronic commerce (2000/31/EC).
   Google Scholar
• Julià-Barceló, R., & Koelman, K. J. (2000). Intermediary liability: Intermediary liability in the e-commerce directive: So far so good, but it’s not enough. Computer Law & Security Review, 16, 231–239. doi: 10.1016/S0267-3649(00)89129-3
   Google Scholar
• Kleine, M. (2013). Informal governance in the European Union: How governments make international organizations work. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kur, A. (1997). Harmonization of the trademark laws in Europe: An overview. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 28, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Leontiadis, N., & Hutchings, A. (2015). Scripting the crime commission process in the illicit online prescription drug trade. Journal of Cybersecurity, 1, 81–92.
   Google Scholar
• Levi-Faur, D. (2005). The rise of regulatory capitalism: The global diffusion of a new order. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598, 12–32. doi: 10.1177/0002716204272371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi-Faur, D. (2012). Regulatory networks and regulatory agencification: Towards a single European regulatory space. In B. Rittberger & A. Wonka (Eds.), Agency governance in the EU (pp. 32–51). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Levi-Faur, D., & Jordana, J. (2005). Globalizing regulatory capitalism. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598, 6–9. doi: 10.1177/0002716204272612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackey, T. K., & Liang, B. A. (2013). Pharmaceutical digital marketing and governance: Illicit actors and challenges to global patient safety and public health. Globalization and Health, 9, 45. Retrieved from https://globalizationandhealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1744-8603-9-45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moet Hennesy-Louis Vuitton. (2011). LVMH Submission: EC Public consultation on the future of electronic commerce in the internal market and the implementation of the Directive on electronic commerce.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, M. (2011). A Europe that protects: Moving to the next stage of cross-border law enforcement cooperation. The Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles, 84, 125–150. doi: 10.1350/pojo.2011.84.2.506
   Google Scholar
• Peukert, A. (2011). A European public domain supervisor. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 42, 125–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez-Montes, C. (2010). Emerging scholars series: A re-examination of the original foundations of Anglo-American trademark law. Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, 14, 91. Retrieved from http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/iplr/vol14/iss1/9/
   Google Scholar
• Rizzuto, F. (2012). The liability of online intermediary service providers for infringements of intellectual property rights. Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, 18, 4–15.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez, J. (2008). 750,000 lost jobs? The dodgy digits behind the war on piracy [WWW Document]. Ars Technica. Retrieved from http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2008/10/dodgy-digits-behind-the-war-on-piracy/
   Google Scholar
• Savola, P. (2014). Proportionality of website blocking: Internet connectivity providers as copyright enforcers. Jipitec, 5, 116–138.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, M., & Maillefer, C. (2015). How Europe deals with private imports of counterfeit and pirated goods. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 10, 262–268. doi: 10.1093/jiplp/jpv031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. D. (2004). Cybercriminal impacts on online business and consumer confidence. Online Information Review, 28, 224–234. doi: 10.1108/14684520410543670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spitzlinger, R. (2011). On the idea of owning ideas: Applying locke’s labor appropriation theory to intellectual goods. Masaryk University Journal of Law & Technology, 5, 273. Retrieved from https://journals.muni.cz/mujlt/article/view/2588
   Google Scholar
• Stacey, J. (2013). Informal governance in the EU: The European Commission versus the European Parliament. In T. Christiansen & C. Neuhold (Eds.), International handbook on informal governance (pp. 395–411). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, T. (2015). Cyber security and the politics of time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, B. A., Chermak, S. M., Wilson, J. M., & Freilich, J. D. (2014). The nexus between terrorism and product counterfeiting in the United States. Global Crime, 15, 357–378. doi: 10.1080/17440572.2014.919227
   Google Scholar
• Swartout, C. M. (2011). Toward a regulatory model of internet intermediary liability: File-sharing and copyright enforcement. Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 31, 499. Retrieved from https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njilb/vol31/iss2/15/
   Google Scholar
• Treadwell, J. (2012). From the car boot to booting it up? eBay, online counterfeit crime and the transformation of the criminal marketplace. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 12, 175–191. doi: 10.1177/1748895811428173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trondal, J., & Jeppesen, L. (2008). Images of agency governance in the European Union. West European Politics, 31, 417–441. doi: 10.1080/01402380801939636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Ooik, R. (2005). The growing importance of agencies in the EU: Shifting governance and the institutional balance. In D. Curtin & P. R. A. Wessel (Eds.), Good governance and the European Union (pp. 125–152). Cambridge: Intersentia.
   Google Scholar
• Zemer, L. (2007). The idea of authorship in copyright. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar