Are post-Soviet leaders doomed to be populist? A comparative analysis of Putin and Nazarbayev

References

• Akopov, P. (2016, October 27). Putin predrek marginalizatsiyu nadnatsional’noi elity. Vzglyad. Retrieved from https://vz.ru/politics/2016/10/27/840601.html
   Google Scholar
• Amagoh, F., & Bhuiyan, S. (2010). Public sector reform in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Central Asia Business Journal, 3, 12–20.
   Google Scholar
• Applebaum, A. (2013, February). Putunism: The Ideology. LSE, Strategic Update 13.2.
   Google Scholar
• Babaeva, S. (2000, February 29). Sam sebe rezhisser [His own producer], Izvestiya.
   Google Scholar
• Berelowitch, A. (2018). Three populists – Putin, Berlusconi, Sarkozy (pp. 67–79). Moscow: Political encyclopedia.
   Google Scholar
• Brownlee, J. (2007). Authoritarianism in an age of democratisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brusis, M. (2016). The politics of legitimation in post-Soviet Eurasia. In M. Brusis, J. Ahrens, & M. S. Wessel (Eds.), Politics and legitimacy in post-Soviet Eurasia (pp. 11–18). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Busygina, I. (2016). Putin’s Russia: The state-building strategy. Russian Politics, 1, 70–94. doi: 10.1163/24518921-00101004
   Google Scholar
• Busygina, I. (2018). Russian foreign policy as an instrument for domestic mobilization. Policy Brief, Norwegian Institute of International Affairs, N 2.
   Google Scholar
• Busygina, I., & Filippov, M. (2013). “Resource curse” and Foreign policy: Explaining Russia’s approach towards the EU. In J. Godzimirski (Ed.), Russian energy in a changing world (pp. 91–111). Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Busygina, I., Filippov, M., & Taukebaeva, E. (2018). To decentralize or to continue on the centralization track: The cases of authoritarian regimes in Russia and Kazakhstan. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 9, 61–71. doi: 10.1016/j.euras.2017.12.008
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, S. (2005). Kazakhstan: Power and the elite. London: IB Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Dave, B. (2007). Kazakhstan-ethnicity, language and power. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De Spiegeleire, S., Skinner, C., & Sweijs, T. (2017). The rise of populist sovereignism. Hague: The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Fish, S. (2017). What is Putinism? Journal of Democracy 28(4), 61–75. doi: 10.1353/jod.2017.0066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeden, M. (1996). Ideologies and political theory: A Conceptual approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freeden, M. (2003). Ideology: A short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Furman, D. (2005). The regime in Kazakhstan. In B. Rumer (Ed.), Central Asia: At the end of the transition (pp. 195–267). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Geddes, B. (1999). What do we know about democratization after twenty years? Annual Review of Political Science 2, 115–144. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gidron, N., & Bonikowski, B. (2019). Varieties of populism: Literature review and research agenda. Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University, Working Paper N 13-0004.
   Google Scholar
• Hadenius, A., & Teorell, J. (2006). Authoritarian regimes: Stability, change, and pathways to democracy, 1972–2003. Kellogg Institute, Working Paper N 331, November.
   Google Scholar
• Hadiz, V., & Chryssogelos, A. (2017). Populism in world politics: A comparative cross-regional perspective. International Political Science Review, 38(4), 399–411. doi: 10.1177/0192512117693908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, K. A. (2010). Venezuela’s Chavismo and populism in comparative perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, S. (2013). Authoritarian landscapes. New York: Springer Science and Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Inozemtsev, V. (2015, December 16). Rossiya 2020: naskol'ko eshe khvatit “putinskoi stabil’nosti”. RBK. Retrieved from https://www.rbc.ru/opinions/economics/26/12/2014/549bd30e9a79473ce3b3c556
   Google Scholar
• Isaacs, R. (2010). Informal politics and the uncertain context of transition: Revisiting early stage non-democratic development in Kazakhstan. Democratization, 17(1), 1–25. doi: 10.1080/13510340903453773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones Luong, P., & Weinthal, E. (2001). Prelude to the resource curse explaining: Oil and gas development strategies in the Soviet successor states and beyond. Comparative Political Studies, 34, 367–399. doi: 10.1177/0010414001034004002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, N. (2013). ‘Kazakhstan’s changing geopolitics: The resource economy and popular attitudes about China’s growing regional influence’. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 54(1), 110–133. doi: 10.1080/15387216.2013.778542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krastev, I. (2006). New threats to freedom: Democracy “doubles”. Journal of Democracy, 17(2), 52–62. doi: 10.1353/jod.2006.0030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassila, J. (2018). Putin as a non-populist autocrat. Russian Politics, 3, 175–195. doi: 10.1163/2451-8921-00302002
   Google Scholar
• Melvin, N. (2002). Patterns of centre-regional relations in Central Asia: The cases of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and Uzbekistan. In J. Hughes & G. Sasse (Eds.), Ethnicity and territory in the former Soviet Union (pp. 165–194). London: Frank Cass.
   Google Scholar
• Merkel i Macron obmanyvayut ves’ mir. (2018, November 20). Expert on-line. Retrieved from http://expert.ru/2018/11/20/merkel-i-makron/
   Google Scholar
• Moffitt, B. (2016). The global rise of populism: Performance, political style, and representation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 542–563. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., & Caltwasser, C. R. (Eds.). (2012). Populism in Europe and in the Americas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O Beachain, D., & Kevlihan, R. (2013). Threading a needle: Kazakhstan between civic and ethno-nationalist state-building. Nations and Nationalism, 19(2), 337–356. doi: 10.1111/nana.12022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliker, O. (2017). Putinism, populism and the defense of liberal democracy. Survival, 59(1), 7–24. doi: 10.1080/00396338.2017.1282669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peskov nazval Putina liderom politicheskogo Olimpa. (2018, January 28). Vedomosti. Retrieved from https://www.vedomosti.ru/politics/news/2018/01/29/749264-peskov-nazval-putina-liderom-politicheskogo-olimpa
   Google Scholar
• Peskov: Putin ne uchastvuet v obsuzhdenii pensionnoi reformy. (2018, June 15). Radio Svoboda. Retrieved from https://www.svoboda.org/a/29291829.html
   Google Scholar
• Petrov, N. (2018). The evolution of Populism in Russian Politics. Moscow: Political Encyclopedia, 89–101.
   Google Scholar
• Pomeranz, W., & Smith, K. (2016, May 31). Commentary: Putin’s domestic strategy: Counting the trees, missing the forest. Reuters. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-putin-domestic-commentary/commentary-putins-domestic-strategy-counting-the-trees-missing-the-forest-idUSKCN0YM08V
   Google Scholar
• Poslanie Presidenta Respubliki Kazakhstan N.A. Nazarbaeva Narodu Kazakhstana, April 2003. Retrieved from http://www.akorda.kz/ru/addresses/addresses_of_president/poslanie-prezidentarespubliki-kazakhstan-n-a-nazarbaeva-narodu-kazakhstana-aprel-2003-g_1342416495
   Google Scholar
• The President of Kazakhstan Nursultan Nazarbayev’s Address to the Nation of Kazakhstan. (2017, January 31). Official site of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Retrieved from http://www.akorda.kz/en/addresses/addresses_of_president/the-president-of-kazakhstan-nursultan-nazarbayevs-address-to-the-nation-of-kazakhstan-january-31-2017
   Google Scholar
• Putin ob’yavil ob uchastii v presidentskikh vyborakh. (2017, December 6). BBC News. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/russian/news-42177483
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, N. (2008). State, regime and Russian political development. Limerick Papers in Politics and Public Administration, No. 3.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, N., & Milne, S. (2017). Populism and political development in hybrid regimes: Russia and the development of official populism. International Political Science Review, 38(4), 412–425. doi: 10.1177/0192512117697705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutland, P. (2000). Putin’s path to power. Post-Soviet Affairs, 16(4), 313–354. doi: 10.1080/1060586X.2000.10641490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryabov, A. (2018). The reasons for the rise of populism in developed countries and its absence in the post-Soviet space. Moscow: Political Encyclopedia, 37–47.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, B. (2008). The thin ideology of populism. Journal of Political Ideologies, 13(1), 95–110. doi: 10.1080/13569310701822289
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. (2015, November). The code of Putinism, PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo No. 399.
   Google Scholar
• Vassiliev Glinski, D. (2000, November). The essence of Putinism: The strengthening of the privatized state, PONARS Policy Memo 147.
   Google Scholar
• Von Soest, C., & Grauvogel, J. (2015, August). How do non-democratic regimes claim legitimacy? Comparative insights from post-Soviet countries, GIGA Research Programme, N 277.
   Google Scholar
• Weyland, K. (2001). Clarifying a contested concept: Populism in the study of Latin American politics. Comparative Politics, 34(1), 1. doi: 10.2307/422412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar