1,301
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Accession conditionality and migration diplomacy: Turkey’s dual identity in migration policy negotiations with the EU

References

  • Açıkgöz, M. (2015). Turkey’s visa policy: A migration-mobility nexus. Turkish Policy Quarterly, 14(2), 97–107.
  • Adamson, F. B., & Tsourapas, G. (2019). Migration diplomacy in world politics. International Studies Perspectives, 20(2), 113–128. doi: 10.1093/isp/eky015
  • Alpan, B., & Diez, T. (2014). The devil is in the ‘domestic’? European integration studies and the limits of Europeanisation in Turkey. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 16(1), 1–10. doi: 10.1080/19448953.2013.864180
  • Aydın, U., & Kirişci, K. (2013). With or without the EU: Europeanisation of asylum and competition policies in Turkey. South European Society and Politics, 18(3), 375–395. doi: 10.1080/13608746.2013.799729
  • Bölükbaşı, T., Ertugal, E., & Özçürümez, S. (2010). The impact of the EU on Turkey: Toward streamlining Europeanisation as a research programme. European Political Science, 9, 464–480. doi: 10.1057/eps.2010.79
  • Börzel, T. (1999). Towards convergence in Europe? Institutional adaptation to Europeanisation in Germany and Spain. Journal of Common Market Studies, 37(4), 573–596. doi: 10.1111/1468-5965.00197
  • Bürgin, A. (2012). European Commission’s agency meets Ankara’s agenda: Why Turkey is ready for a readmission agreement. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(6), 883–899. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2011.614151
  • Cowles, M. G., & Risse, T. (2001). Transforming Europe: Conclusions. In M. G. Cowles, J. A. Caporaso, & T. Risse (Eds.), Transforming Europe: Europeanization and domestic change (pp. 217–237). New York, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Elgström, O., & Strömvik, M. (2005). The European Union as an international negotiator. In O. Elgström & C. Jönsson (Eds.), European Union negotiations: Processes, networks and institutions (pp. 117–128). Oxon: Routledge.
  • European Commission. (2003). Wider Europe – neighbourhood: A new framework for relations with our Eastern and Southern neighbours. Brussels.
  • European Commission. (2013). Roadmap towards a visa-free regime with Turkey. Brussels.
  • European Commission. (2014). Report from the commission to the European parliament and the council on progress by Turkey in fulfilling the requirements of its visa liberalisation roadmap. Brussels.
  • European Commission. (2015). EU-Turkey joint action plan. Brussels.
  • European Commission. (2016). Report from the commission to the European parliament and the council, third report on progress by Turkey in fulfilling the requirements of its visa liberalisation roadmap. Brussels.
  • European Council. (2016). EU-Turkey Statement, 18 March 2016. Brussels: Foreign Affairs & International Relations.
  • Freyburg, T., Lavenex, S., Schimmelfennig, F., Skripka, T., & Wetzel, A. (2009). EU promotion of democratic governance in the neighbourhood. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(6), 916–934. doi: 10.1080/13501760903088405
  • Grabbe, H. (2005). The EU’s transformative power: Europeanization through conditionality in central and Eastern Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Greenhill, K. M. (2010). Weapons of mass migration: Forced displacement, coercion and foreign policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Greenhill, K. M. (2016). Open arms behind barred doors: Fear, hypocrisy and policy schizophrenia in the European migration crisis. European Law Journal, 22(3), 317–332. doi: 10.1111/eulj.12179
  • Huysmans, J. (2006). The politics of insecurity: Fear, migration and asylum in the EU. London, UK: Routledge.
  • İçduygu, A. (2014). Turkey’s migration transition and its implications for the Euro-Turkish transnational space. In S. Aydın-Düzgit, D. Huber, M. Müftüler-Baç, E. F. Keyman, J. Tasci, & N. Tocci (Eds.), Global Turkey in Europe II: Energy, migration, civil society and citizenship issues in Turkey-EU relations (pp. 81–106). Roma: Edizioni Nuova Cultura.
  • İçduygu, A., & Aksel, D. B. (2014). Two-to-Tango in migration diplomacy: Negotiating readmission agreement between the EU and Turkey. European Journal of Migration and Law, 16, 337–363. doi: 10.1163/15718166-12342060
  • Langbein, J., & Börzel, T. (2013). Introduction: Explaining policy change in the European Union’s Eastern neighbourhood. Europe-Asia Studies, 65(4), 571–580. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2013.766042
  • Official Journal of the European Union. (2014). Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Turkey on the Readmission of Persons without Authorisation.
  • Paoletti, E. (2010). The migration of power and North-South inequalities: The case of Italy and Libya. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Radaelli, C. M. (2003). The Europeanization of public policy. In K. Featherstone & C. M. Radaelli (Eds.), The politics of Europeanization (pp. 27–56). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Schimmelfennig, F., & Sedelmeier, U. (2004). Governance by conditionality: EU rule transfer to the candidate countries of central and Eastern Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(4), 669–697.
  • Schimmelfennig, F., & Sedelmeier, U. (2005). Introduction: Conceptualizing the Europeanization of central and Eastern Europe. In F. Schimmelfenning & U. Sedelmeier (Eds.), The Europeanization of central and Eastern Europe (pp. 1–28). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Sedelmeier, U. (2011). Europeanisation in new member and candidate states. Living Reviews in European Governance, 6(1), 1–52.
  • Thiollet, H. (2011). Migration as diplomacy: Labor migrants, refugees, and Arab regional politics in the oil-rich countries. International Labor and Working Class History, 79, 103–121. doi: 10.1017/S0147547910000293
  • Tsourapas, G. (2017). Migration diplomacy in the Global South: Cooperation, coercion and issue linkage in Gaddafi’s Libya. Third World Quarterly, 38(10), 2367–2385. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2017.1350102
  • UNHCR. (2016). Global Trends: Forced Displacement in 2015. Geneva: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.
  • Wolff, S. (2014). The politics of negotiating EU readmission agreements: Insights from Morocco and Turkey. European Journal of Migration and Law, 16(1), 69–95. doi: 10.1163/15718166-00002049

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.