Speaking doom about the EU

References

• Abbarno, A. J., & Zapryanova, G. M. (2013). Indirect effects of eurosceptic messages on citizen attitudes toward domestic politics. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(4), 581–597. doi: 10.1111/jcms.12025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adam, S., Antl-Wittenberg, E.-M., Eugster, B., Leidecker-Sandmann, M., Maier, M., & Schmidt, F. (2017). Strategies of pro-European parties in the face of a Eurosceptic challenge. European Union Politics, 18(2), 260–282. doi: 10.1177/1465116516661248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balzacq, T. (2005). The three faces of securitization: Political agency, audience and context. European Journal of International Relations, 11(2), 171–201. doi: 10.1177/1354066105052960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budge, I. (2002). Mapping policy preferences: 21 years of the comparative manifestos project. European Political Science, 1(3), 60–68. doi: 10.1057/eps.2002.33
   Google Scholar
• Burgers, C., Konijn, E. A., & Steen, G. J. (2016). Figurative framing: Shaping public discourse through metaphor, hyperbole, and irony. Communication Theory, 26(4), 410–430. doi: 10.1111/comt.12096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzan, B., Waever, O., & De Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Boulder: Lynn Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Crabtree, C., Golder, M., Gschwend, T., & Indriðason, I. H. (2015). Campaign sentiment in European party manifestos. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Political Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United Sates.
   Google Scholar
• de Wilde, P. (2011). No polity for old politics? A framework for analyzing politicization of European integration. Journal of European Integration, 33(5), 559–575. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2010.546849
   Google Scholar
• de Wilde, P., & Zürn, M. (2012). Can the politicization of European integration be reversed? Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(SUPPL.1), 137–153. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02232.x
   Google Scholar
• Diez, T., Von Lucke, F., & Wellmann, Z. (2016). The securitisation of climate change. London: Routlegde.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2018). Standard Eurobarometer 90. Eurobarometer Surveys. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2019). 2019 European election results: Turnout by year. Retrieved from https://election-results.eu/turnout/.
   Google Scholar
• Garretsen, H., & Stoker, J. (2017, 17 January). Het sentiment in verkiezingsprogramma’s 2017 op de snijtafel. Me Judice.
   Google Scholar
• Grande, E., & Hutter, S. (2016). Introduction: European integration and the challenge of politicisation. In S. Hutter, E. Grande, & H. Krisei (Eds.), Politicising Europe: Integration and mass politics (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green-Pedersen, C. (2012). A giant fast asleep? Party incentives and the politicisation of European integration. Political Studies, 60(1), 115–130. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00895.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grotenhuis, R. (2016). Nation-building as necessary effort in fragile states. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harryvan, A., & Hoekstra, J. (2013). Euroscepsis? Europese integratie in de verkiezingsprogramma’s en campagnes van Nederlandse politieke partijen. Internationale Spectator, 67(4), 52–56.
   Google Scholar
• Harryvan, A. G., & Van der Harst, J. (2013). 2006–2011: Europa boven aan de agenda [2006–2011: Europe an agenda priority]. In A. G. Harryvan & J. Van der Harst (Eds.), Verloren Consensus: Europa in het Nederlandse Parlementair-Politieke Debat 1945–2013 (pp. 251–284). Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Boom.
   Google Scholar
• Harryvan, A. G., & Van der Harst, J. (2017). Het Europese integratiebeleid van de Nederlandse regering, 1945–2017. [The European integration policy of the Dutch government, 1945–2017]. Internationale Spectator, 71(2), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2008). A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 1–23. doi: 10.1017/S0007123408000409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2017). Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(1), 109–135. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2017.1310279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutter, S., & Grande, E. (2014). Politicizing Europe in the national electoral arena: A comparative analysis of five west European Countries, 1970–2010. Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(5), 1002–1018. doi: 10.1111/jcms.12133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutter, S., & Kerscher, A. (2014). Politicizing Europe in hard times: Conflicts over Europe in France in a long-term perspective, 1974–2012. Journal of European Integration, 36(3), 267–282. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2014.885752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Idema, R. (2014). A tossing and turning giant. Politicisation of the EU issue in the Netherlands 2002–2012 (Master’s Thesis). University of Twente, Twente.
   Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S. (1987). Television news and citizens’ explanations of national affairs. American Political Science Review, 81(3), 815–831. doi: 10.2307/1962678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopecky, P., & Mudde, C. (2002). The two sides of Euroscepticism. European Union Politics, 3(3), 297–326. doi: 10.1177/1465116502003003002
   Google Scholar
• Lazaridis, G., & Wadia, K. (Eds.). (2015). The securitisation of migration in the EU debates since 9/11. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Leconte, C. (2015). From pathology to mainstream phenomenon: Reviewing the Euroscepticism debate in research and theory. International Political Science Review, 36(3), 250–263. doi: 10.1177/0192512115576236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynggaard, K. (2012). Discursive institutional analytical strategies. In T. Exadaktylos & C. M. Radaelli (Eds.), Research design in European studies (pp. 85–104). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, G., Hooghe, L., Steenbergen, M. R., & Bakker, R. (2007). Crossvalidating data on party positioning on European integration. Electoral Studies, 26(1), 23–38. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2006.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miklin, E. (2014). From “sleeping giant” to left-right politicization? National party competition on the EU and the Euro crisis. Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(6), 1199–1206. doi: 10.1111/jcms.12188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parlement.com. (2019). Kabinetscrisis 2012: de Catshuiscrisis. Retrieved from https://www.parlement.com/id/vj1ped4lzuz8/kabinetscrisis_2012_de_catshuiscrisis
   Google Scholar
• Semetko, H. A., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93–109. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02843.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, E., Jones, M. D., McBeth, M. K., & Radaelli, C. M. (2017). The narrative policy framework. In C. M. Weible, & P. A. Sabatier (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 173–213). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Szczerbiak, A., & Taggart, P. (2003). Theorising party-based Euroscepticism: Problems of definition, measurement and causality. SEI Working Paper No 69 European Parties Elections and Referendums Network Working Paper No 12.
   Google Scholar
• Tillie, J., Van Holsteyn, J., Van der Kolk, H., & Aarts, K. (2016). Rumoer – Nederlandse kiezers en politiek 1998–2012 [Noise – Dutch voters and politics 1998–2012]. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dorp, M., & Harryvan, A. (2012). Publiek draagvlak voor Nederlands EU-lidmaatschap onverminderd groot: Hardnekkig voortbestaan van permissieve consensus. Internationale Spectator, 66(6), 317–320.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dorp, M., & Hoekstra, J. (2012). Europa, eindelijk een verkiezingsthema, De Hofvijver. Retrieved from: http://www.montesquieu-instituut.nl/.
   Google Scholar
• van Holsteyn, J. J. M. (2007). The Dutch parliamentary elections of 2006. West European Politics, 30(5), 1139–1147. doi: 10.1080/01402380701617522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Keulen, M., & Vollaard, H. (2015). Het Europees functioneren van het Nederlandse parlement. [The European functioning of the Dutch parliament]. In H. Vollaard, J. Van der Harst, & G. Voerman (Eds.), Van Aanvallen! naar verdedigen? De opstelling van Nederland ten aanzien van Europese integratie, 1945–2015 (pp. 183–222). Den Haag: Boom.
   Google Scholar
• Volkens, A., Krause, W., Lehmann, P., Matthieß, T., Merz, N., Regel, S., & Weßels, B. (2019). The manifesto data collection. Manifesto project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Version 2019b. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB).
   Google Scholar
• Vollaard, H., & Voerman, G. (2015). De Europese opstelling van politieke partijen. In H. Vollaard, J. Van der Harst, & G. Voerman (Eds.), Van Aanvallen! naar verdedigen? De opstelling van Nederland ten aanzien van Europese integratie, 1945–2015 (pp. 99–182). Den Haag: Boom.
   Google Scholar
• Zürn, M. (2014). The politicization of world politics and its effects: Eight propositions. European Political Science Review, 6(1), 47–71. doi: 10.1017/S1755773912000276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar