Producing public goods in the EU: European integration processes in the fields of refugee protection and climate stability

References

• Ahrens, J., Hoen, H. W., & Ohr, R. (2005). Deepening integration in an Enlarged EU: A club–theoretical perspective. Journal of European Integration, 27(4), 417–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036330500367366
   Google Scholar
• Arce, M. D. G., & Sandler, T. (2001). Transnational public goods: Strategies and institutions. European Journal of Political Economy, 17(3), 493–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-2680(01)00042-8
   Google Scholar
• Aspinwall, M., & Greenwood, J. (1998). Collective action in the European Union: Interests and the new politics of associability. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Betts, A. (2003). Public goods theory and the provision of refugee protection: The role of the joint-product model in burden-sharing theory. Journal of Refugee Studies, 16(3), 274–296. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/16.3.274
   Google Scholar
• Betts, A. (2009). Protection by persuasion: International cooperation in the refugee regime. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Betts, A. (2010). Global migration governance. The emergence of a new debate (Briefing Paper). Department of Political Science and International Relations, University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. A., & Risse, T. (2017). From the Euro to the Schengen crises: European integration theories, politicization, and identity politics. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(1), 83–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1310281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossong, R., & Rhinard, M. (2013). European internal security as a public good. European Security, 22(2), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2012.727181
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M., & Musgrave, R. A. (1999). Public finance and public choice: Two contrasting visions of the state. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (1999). The calculus of consent: Logical foundations of constitutional democracy (Vol. 3). Liberty Fund. (Original work published 1962).
   Google Scholar
• Carbone, M. (2007). Supporting or resisting global public goods. Global Governance, 13(2), 179–198. https://doi.org/10.2307/27800653 doi: 10.1163/19426720-01302004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, P. (2010). The plundered planet. Why we must—and how we can—manage nature for global prosperity. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collignon, S. (2017). The governance of European public goods. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2015a, September 15). Council decision (EU) 2015/1523 of 14 September 2015 establishing provisional measures in the area of international protection for the benefit of Italy and of Greece. OJ L 239, Brussels: Council of the European Union. Retrieved September 20, 2019, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32015D1523&from=EN.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2015b, September 24). Council decision (EU) 2015/1601 of 22 September 2015 establishing provisional measures in the area of international protection for the benefit of Italy and Greece. OJ L 248. Brussels: Council of the European Union. Retrieved September 20, 2019, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32015D1601&from=EN.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksen, E. O. (2004). Reflexive integration in Europe. In E. O. Eriksen (Ed.), Making the European polity reflexive integration in the EU (pp. 9–29). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2009). 2020 Climate & energy package. Retrieved June 20, 2019, from https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/strategies/2020_en#tab-0-0.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2011). The added value of the EU budget. Commission Staff Working Paper. Brussels: European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/budget/library/biblio/documents/fin_fwk1420/working_paper_added_value_EU_budget_SEC-867_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2015, May 13). Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: “A European Agenda on Migration”. COM (2015) 240 final. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved September 20, 2019, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52015DC0240&from=en.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2019, March 6). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council and the Council: “Progress report on the Implementation of the European Agenda on Migration”. COM(2019) 126 final. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved September 20, 2019, from https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/what-we-do/policies/european-agenda-migration/20190306_com-2019-126-report_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Council, Council of the European Union. (2014). The 2030 climate and energy framework. European Council/Council of the European Union. Retrieved June 20, 2019, from https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/climate-change/2030-climate-and-energy-framework/.
   Google Scholar
• Fuest, C., & Pisani-Ferry, J. (2019). A Primer on Developing European Public Goods (EconPol Policy Report 16/2019). EconPol.
   Google Scholar
• Kaul, I., Conceição, P., Le Goulven, K., & Mendoza, R. U. (2003). Why do global public goods Matter Today? In P. C. Kaul, K. Le Goulven, & R. U. Mendoza (Eds.), Providing global public goods: Managing Globalization (pp. 2–20). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaul, I., Grunberg, I., & Stern, M. A. (1999). Defining global public goods. In I. Kaul, I. Grunberg, & M. A. Stern (Eds.), Global public goods: International cooperation in the 21st century (pp. 2–19). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaul, I., & Le Goulven, K. (2003). Institutional Options for producing global public goods. In I. Kaul, P. Conceição, K. Le Goulven, & R. U. Mendoza (Eds.), Providing global public goods: Managing globalization (pp. 371–409). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaul, I., & Mendoza, R. U. (2003). Advancing the concept of public goods. In I. Kaul, P. Conceição, K. Le Goulven, & R. U. Mendoza (Eds.), Providing global public goods: Managing globalization (pp. 78–111). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelemen, R. D. (2010). Globalizing European Union environmental policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(3), 335–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501761003662065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kok, M., Brons, J., & Witmer, M. (2011). A global public goods perspective on environment and poverty reduction implications for Dutch foreign policy (PBL publication number: 555075001). PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs Treasury Directorate, Ministry of the Economy, Finance and Industry. (2002). Global public goods. Paris. Retrieved September 20, 2019, from https://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/biens_publ_gb.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Myatt, D. P. (2008). Collective action (new perspectives). In S. N. Durlauf, & L. E. Blume (Eds.), The new Palgrave dictionary of economics (pp. 881–884). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M. (1987). Collective action. In J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, & P. Newman (Eds.), The new Palgrave: A dictionary of economics (Vol. 1, pp. 474–477). Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pachocka, M. (2016). Understanding the Visegrad Group states’ response to the migrant and refugee crises 2014+ in the European Union’. Yearbook of Polish European Studies, 19, 101–132. http://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.desklight-64f1a0f0-82af-46a2-9f66-740571c18c4e.
   Google Scholar
• Pachocka, M., & Visvizi, A. (2018). Rethinking the twin migration and refugee crises in Europe through the lens of safety and security. In C. E. Pacheco Amaral, V. Cucerescu, G. Gabrichidze, I. Horga, A. Kruglashov, E. Latoszek, & M. Pachocka (Eds.), The European Union and the Eastern partnership: Security challenges (pp. 453–470). Tipografia ‘Print-Caro’.
   Google Scholar
• Penttinen, S., Sartori, N., & Talus, K. (2014). Governance challenges of the EU’s 2030 energy and climate framework (Working Paper). Rome Istituto Affari Internazionali.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. A. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 36(4), 387–389. https://doi.org/10.2307/1925895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler, T. (1977). Impurity of defence: An application of the economics of alliances. Kyklos, 30(3), 443–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1977.tb02203.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartor, O., Spencer, T., Bart, I., Cochran, I., Colombier, M., Neuhoff, K., Szpor, A., Tuerk, A., & Wins, T. (2014). The EU’s 2030 climate and energy framework and energy security (Research Report). Climate Strategies.
   Google Scholar
• Schemm-Gregory, R. (2009). Europa als ein Club voller Clubs. Eine clubtheoretisce Betrachtung des politischen Systems der Europäischen Union [Europe as a club full of clubs. Club theoretical perspectives on the political system of the EU]. Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Skjærseth, J. B. (2018). Implementing EU climate and energy policies in Poland: Policy feedback and reform. Environmental Politics, 27(3), 498–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1429046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spolaore, E. (2015). The political economy of European integration. In H. Badinger, & V. Nitsch (Eds.), The routledge handbook of the economics of European integration (pp. 435–448). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Suhrke, A. (1998). Burden-sharing during refugee emergencies: The logic of collective versus national action. Journal of Refugee Studies, 11(4), 396–415. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/11.4.396
   Google Scholar
• TEU (Treaty on European Union). (2016). Consolidated version, OJ C 202. Retrieved June 7, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• TFEU (Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union). (2016). Consolidated version, OJ C 202. Retrieved June 7, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Thielemann, E. (2018). Why refugee burden-sharing initiatives fail: Public goods, free-riding and symbolic solidarity in the EU. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNHCR. (2001, September 12). ‘UNHCR’s observations on the European commission’s proposal for a council directive on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals and stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection. COM(2001) 510 final, 2001/0207 (CNS). Brussels: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Retrieved September 20, 2019, from https://www.refworld.org/docid/3c6a69254.html.
   Google Scholar
• Windhoff-Héritier, A. (2002). Common goods: Reinventing European and international governance. Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Zito, A. R., Burns, C., & Lenschow, A. (2019). Is the trajectory of European Union environmental policy less certain? Environmental Politics, 28(2), 187–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1549779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar