References
- Abbott, K., & Snidal, D. (2000). Hard and soft law in international governance. International Organisation, 54(3), 421–456. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2601340 doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/002081800551280
- Asmus, R. (2008). Europe’s eastern promise: Rethinking NATO & EU enlargement. Foreign Affairs, 87(1), 95–106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/20020270
- Baas, D. (2010). Approaches and challenges to political risk assessment: The view from export development Canada. Risk Management, 12(2), 135–162. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/rm.2009.19
- Crisen, S. (2000). NATO and Europe in the 21st Century. Woodrow Wilson Center.
- European Commission. (2019). What the European Commission does? https://ec.europa.eu/info/abouteuropean-commission/what-european-commission-does/law/areas-eu-action_en
- Fearon, J. (1997). Signaling foreign policy interests. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41(1), 68–90. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002797041001004
- Haftel, Y. Z., & Thompson, A. (2013). Delayed ratification: The domestic fate of bilateral investment treaties. International Organization, 67(2), 355–387. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818313000052
- Jakobson, J. (2010). Old problems remain, new ones crop up: Political risk in the 21st century. Business Horizons, 53, 481490. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2010.04.003
- Jarvis, D., & Griffiths, M. (2007). Learning to fly: The evolution of political risk analysis. Global Society, 21(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13600820601116435
- Katchanovski, I. (2011). Puzzles of EU and NATO accession in post-communist countries. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 12(3), 304–319. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15705854.2011.596308
- Kavanagh, J. (2014). U.S. security related agreements in force since 1955: Introducing a new database. RR763. RAND Corporation.
- Kay, S. (1998). NATO and the future of European security. Rowman and Littlefield.
- Kim, T. (2011). Why alliances entangle but seldom entrap states. Security Studies, 20(3), 350–377. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2011.599201
- Kimball, A. (2006). Alliance formation and conflict initiation: The missing link. Journal of Peace Research, 43(4), 371–389. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343306064816
- Kimball, A. (2017). Examining informal defence and security arrangement’s legalization: Canada-US agreements, 19552005. International Journal: Canada’s Journal of Global Policy Analysis, 72(3), 380–400. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0020702017723931
- Kimball, A. (2018). Future uncertainty, strategic defence, and North American defence cooperation: Rational institutionalist arguments pragmatically suggest NORAD’s adaptation over replacement. In C. Leuprecht, J. Sokolsky, & T. Hughes (Eds.), North American strategic defence in the 21st century (pp. 122–137). Springer Books.
- Koremenos, B. (2008). When, what, and why do states choose to delegate. Law & Contemporary Problems, 71(1), 151192. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/27592225
- Koremenos, B. (2013). The continent of international law. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 57(4), 653–681. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002712448904
- Koremenos, B., Lipson, C., & Snidal, D. (2001). The rational design of international institutions. International Organization, 55(4), 761–799. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/002081801317193592
- Lanoszka, A. (2018). Tangled up in rose? Theories of alliance entrapment and the 2008 Russo-Georgian war. Contemporary Security Policy, 39(2), 234–257. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2017.1392102
- Lasas, A. (2010). European Union and NATO expansion: Central and Eastern Europe. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Leeds, B. (2003). Alliance reliability in times of war: Explaining state decisions to violate treaties. International Organization, 57(4), 801–827. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818303574057
- Lipson, C. (1991). Why are some international agreements informal? International Organization, 45(4), 495–538. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300033191
- Marshall, M., Gurr, T., & Jaggers, K. (2017). Polity IV project: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2017. Retrieved February 2019, from http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscrdata.html
- Mattes, M., & Savun, B. (2010). Information, agreement design, and the durability of civil war settlements. American Journal of Political Science, 54(2), 511–524. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00444.x
- Milner, H. (1997). Interests, institutions, and information: Domestic politics and IR. Princeton UP.
- NATO. (2020). Partnership for peace. Retrieved July 29, 2020, from https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_50349.htm
- Piedrafita, S., & Torreblanca, J. (2005). The three logics of EU enlargement: Interests, identities and arguments. Politique européene, 15(hiver), 29–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3917/poeu.015.0029
- PRS Group. (2019). International country risk guide. Retrieved February, 2019, from https://www.prsgroup.com/explore-ourproducts/international-country-risk-guide/
- Reiter, D. (2001). Why NATO enlargement does not spread democracy. International Security, 25(4), 41–67. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/01622880151091899
- Sandler, T. (2004). Global collective action. Cambridge University Press.
- Schimmelfennig, F., & Sedelmeier, U. (2005). The politics of EU enlargement: theoretical and comparative perspectives. In The politics of European Union enlargement: Theoretical approaches. Routledge.
- Schwarz, O. (2016). Two steps forward one step back: What shapes the process of EU enlargement in South-Eastern Europe? Journal of European Integration, 38(7), 757–773. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2016.1203309
- Shanks, R. (1986). Insuring investment and loans against currency inconvertibility, expropriation, and political violence. Hastings International and Comparative Law Review, 9, 417–437. https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_international_comparative_law_review/vol9/iss3/2
- Smith, M., & Timmins, G. (2000). The EU, NATO and the extension of institutional order in Europe. World Affairs, 163(2), 80–89. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/20672601
- Snider, L. (2005). Political risk: The institutional dimension. International Interactions, 31(3), 203–222. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03050620500294176
- Snyder, G. (2007). Alliance politics. Cornell UP.
- Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). (2019). Military expenditure data, 1949–2017. SIPRI.
- United States Department of State. (2018). Treaties in force: A list of treaties and other international agreements of the US in force on January 1, 2018. Office of the Legal Advisor, US Department of State.
- von Stein, J. (2017). Compliance with international law. In V. Asal (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of international studies (2017, pp. 1–25). Oxford UP. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.55
- Wagner, U. (2016). Estimating strategic models of international treaty formation. The Review of Economic Studies, 83(4), 1741–1778. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdv054
- Wiarda, H. (2002). The politics of European enlargement: NATO, the EU, and the new US-European relationship. World Affairs, 164(4), 178–197. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/20672639
- Zorn, C., Box-Steffensmeier, J., & Arnold, L. (1997). The strategic timing of position taking in Congress: A study of the North American free trade agreement. American Political Science Review, 91(2), 324–338. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2952359