Illiberal thought collectives and policy networks in Hungary and Poland

References

• Agh, A. (2015). De-Europeanization and de-democratization trends in Ece: From the Potemkin democracy to the elected autocracy in Hungary. Journal of Comparative Politics, 8(2), 4–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfahír. (2019). Komoly feszültség Orbán közvetlen környezetében. https://alfahir.hu/2019/09/09/matolcsy_gyorgy_varga_mihaly_gazdasag_korrupcio.
   Google Scholar
• Appel, H., & Orenstein, M. A. (2018). From triumph to crisis: Neoliberal economic reform in postcommunist countries. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ausserladscheider, V. (2019). Beyond economic insecurity and cultural backlash: Economic nationalism and the rise of the far right. Sociology Compass, 13(4), e12670. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ban, C. (2016). Ruling ideas: How global neoliberalism goes local. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Behr, V. (this issue). Challenging European values. The promotion of anti-liberal values as a European countermodel in Poland.
   Google Scholar
• Béland, D., & Cox, R. H. (2011). Ideas and politics in social science research. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blokker, P. (2019). Populist counter-constitutionalism, conservatism, and legal fundamentalism. European Constitutional Law Review, 15(3), 519–543. https://doi.org/10.1017/S157401961900035X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blokker, P. (2020). Building democracy by legal means? The contestation of human rights and constitutionalism in east-Central Europe. Journal of Modern European History, 18(3), 335–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/1611894420925756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bluhm, K., & Varga, M. (2018). New conservatives in Russia and East Central Europe. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bluhm, K., & Varga, M. (2020). Conservative developmental statism in East Central Europe and Russia. New Political Economy, 25(4), 642–659. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2019.1639146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blyth, M. M. (1997). “Any more bright ideas?” The ideational turn of comparative political economy. Comparative Politics, 29(2), 229–250. https://doi.org/10.2307/422082
   Google Scholar
• Bockman, J., & Eyal, G. (2002). Eastern Europe as a laboratory for economic knowledge: The transnational roots of neoliberalism. American Journal of Sociology, 108(2), 310–352. https://doi.org/10.1086/344411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohle, D., & Greskovits, B. (2019). Politicising embedded neoliberalism: Continuity and change in Hungary’s development model. West European Politics, 42(5), 1069–1093. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2018.1511958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2006). On justification: Economies of worth (Vol. 27). Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1979). Symbolic power. Critique of Anthropology, 4(13–14), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X7900401307
   Google Scholar
• Bozóki, A. (2015). The illusion of inclusion: Configurations of populism in Hungary. In M. Kopeček, & P. Wciślik (Eds.), Thinking Through transition (pp. 275–312). Central Europen University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burawoy, M. (2001). Transition without transformation: Russia’s involutionary road to capitalism. East European Politics and Societies, 15(2), 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325401015002004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzogány, A., & Varga, M. (2018). The ideational foundations of the illiberal backlash in Central and Eastern Europe: The case of Hungary. Review of International Political Economy, 25(6), 811–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2018.1543718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, A. (2015a, January 16). Orbanomics wins praise for protecting mortgage owners. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/fd6e3b54-b2c7-3da9-af80-9f0d9a4d7e6f.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, A. (2015b, June 9). ‘Orbanomics’ confounds critics as Hungary’s economy recovers. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/027eaf9a-05e9-11e5-b676-00144feabdc0.
   Google Scholar
• Cahill, D., & Humphrys, E. (2019). Rethinking the ‘neoliberal thought collective’thesis. Globalizations, 16(6), 948–965. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2018.1560182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. L., & Pedersen, O. K. (2015). Policy ideas, knowledge regimes and comparative political economy. Socio-Economic Review, 13(4), 679–701. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwv004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEE Market Watch. (2018, June 14). Poland’s govt to propose hiking minimum wage by 5.7% to PLN 2,220. Central European Financial Observer. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-poland-protests/thousands-march-in-warsaw-demanding-higher-public-sector-pay-idUSKCN1M20PE.
   Google Scholar
• Cichocki, M. (2005). Władza i pamięć [Power and memory]. Ośrodek Myśli Politycznej.
   Google Scholar
• Cichocki, M. (2016). Polen neu denken Europabild und Europapolitik der PiS. OSTEUROPA, 191–200.
   Google Scholar
• Coman, R. (2020). Transnational economists in the Eurozone crisis: Professional structures, networks and ideas. New Political Economy, 25(6), 978–991. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2019.1669547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coman, R., & Volintiru, C. (2021). Dissensus over liberal values and democracy. How political and economic transformations are affected by anti-liberal ideas?. European Politics and Society.
   Google Scholar
• Csehi, R. (2019). Neither episodic, nor destined to failure? The endurance of Hungarian populism after 2010. Democratization, 26(6), 1011–1027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csillag, T., & Szelényi, I. (2015). Drifting from liberal democracy: Traditionalist/neo-conservative ideology of managed illiberal democratic capitalism in post-communist Europe. Intersections. East European Journal of Society and Politics, 1(1), 18–48. https://doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v1i1.28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czupryn, A. (2016, March 20). Konserwatyści. Byli zapleczem prawicy, dziś mają realną władzę w Polsce. Polska Times. https://polskatimes.pl/konserwatysci-byli-zapleczem-prawicy-dzis-maja-realna-wladze-w-polsce/ar/9763109/3.
   Google Scholar
• Dąbrowska, E. (2019). New conservatism in Poland: The discourse coalition around “Law and Justice”. In K. Bluhm, & M. Varga (Eds.), New conservatives in Russia and East Central Europe (pp. 178–197). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dąbrowska, E., Buzogány, A., & Varga, M. (2019). The “Budapest–Warsaw express”: Conservatism and the diffusion of economic policies in Poland and Hungary. In K. Bluhm, & M. Varga (Eds.), New Conservatives in Russia and East Central Europe (pp. 178–197). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dakowska, D. (2017). What (ever) works. Les organisations internationales et les usages de «bonnes pratiques» dans l’enseignement supérieur. Critique Internationale, 77(4), 81–102. https://doi.org/10.3917/crii.077.0081
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, J., & Hanley, S. (2016). The fading mirage of the “liberal consensus”. Journal of Democracy, 27(1), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2016.0015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dönmez, P., & Zemandl, E. (2019). Crisis of capitalism and (de-) politicisation of monetary policymaking: Reflections from Hungary and Turkey. New Political Economy, 24(1), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2017.1421624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enyedi, Z. (2016). Paternalist populism and illiberal elitism in Central Europe. Journal of Political Ideologies, 21(1), 9–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2016.1105402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleck, L. (2012). Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache. Einführung in die Lehre vom Denkstil und Denkkollektiv. Suhrkamp. (Original work published 1935).
   Google Scholar
• Flickenschild, M., & Afonso, A. (2018). Networks of economic policy expertise in Germany and the United States in the wake of the great recession. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(9), 1292–1311. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1518992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fodor, G. G., & Stumpf, I. (2007). A ‘jó kormányzás’ két értelme.Avagy a demokratikus kormányzás programja és feltételei [The two meaning of ‘good governance’. Or the programme and conditions of democratic governance]. Nemzeti Érdek, 3, 76–95.
   Google Scholar
• Fourcade-Gourinchas, M., & Babb, S. L. (2002). The rebirth of the liberal creed: Paths to neoliberalism in four countries. American Journal of Sociology, 108(3), 533–579. https://doi.org/10.1086/367922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganev, V. I. (2005). The “triumph of neoliberalism” reconsidered: Critical remarks on ideas-centered analyses of political and economic change in post-communism. East European Politics and Societies, 19(3), 343–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325405277924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawin, D. (2006). Obecny rząd i spór o model polskiej modernizacji [The current government and the debate over Polish modernization]. In A. Smolar (Ed.), Jaka Polska? Czyja Polska? [What kind of Poland? Whose Poland?] (pp. 251–256). Fundacja im. Stefana Batorego.
   Google Scholar
• Goraus-Tańska, K. (2017). The Family 500+: Battling Child Poverty in Poland. Eurasian Perspectives (World Bank). http://blogs.worldbank.org/europeandcentralasia/family-500-battling-child-poverty-poland.
   Google Scholar
• György, L. (2017). Egyensúlyteremtés – A gazdaságpolitika missziója. Századvég.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296. http://www.jstor.org/stable/422246. https://doi.org/10.2307/422246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helgadóttir, O. (2016). The Bocconi boys go to Brussels: Italian economic ideas, professional networks and European austerity. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(3), 392–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1106573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holesch, A., & Kyriazi, A. (2021). Democratic backsliding in the European Union: The role of the Hungarian-Polish coalition. East European Politics, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2020.1865319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J., & Barnes, A. (2015). Financial nationalism and its international enablers: The Hungarian experience. Review of International Political Economy, 22(3), 535–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2014.919336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. (2021). … Because the homeland cannot be in opposition: Analysing the discourses of Fidesz and law and justice (PiS) from opposition to power. East European Politics, 37(2), 332–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2020.1791094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopeček, M., & Wciślik, P. (2015). Thinking through transition: Liberal democracy, authoritarian pasts, and intellectual history in East Central Europe After 1989. Central European University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kornai, J. (1996). Paying the bill for goulash communism: Hungarian development and macro stabilization in a political-economy perspective. Social Research, 63(4), 943–1040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovács, J. M. (2019). The right hand thinks. On the sources of György Matolcsy’s economic vision. In J. M. Kovács, & B. Trencsényi (Eds.), Brave new Hungary: Mapping the “system of national cooperation” (pp. 111–135). Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Krasnodębski, Z. (2006). Modernizacja po polsku. In J. Kloczkowski, & M. Szułdrzyński (Eds.), Drogi do nowoczesności. Idea modernizacji w polskiej myśli politycznej (pp. 193–210). Ośrodek Myśli Politycznej. http://www.omp.org.pl/artykul.php?artykul=222#_ftnref27.
   Google Scholar
• Krastev, I. (2011). Paradoxes of the new authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy, 22(2), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2011.0027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krcmaric, D., Nelson, S. C., & Roberts, A. (2020). Studying leaders and elites: The personal biography approach. Annual Review of Political Science, 23(1), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050718-032801
   Google Scholar
• Król, M. (2015). Byliámy głupi [We were stupid]. Czerwone i Czarne.
   Google Scholar
• Layder, D. (1998). Sociological practice: Linking theory and social research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Legutko, R. (2016). The Demon in Democracy. Totalitarian Temptations in Free Societies.
   Google Scholar
• Lendvai-Bainton, N., & Szelewa, D. (2021). Governing new authoritarianism: Populism, nationalism and radical welfare reforms in Hungary and Poland. Social Policy & Administration, 55(4), 559–572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J. Y. (2011). Demystifying the Chinese economy. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, J. Y. (2012). New structural economics: A framework for rethinking development and policy. The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Magyar, B. (2016). Post-communist Mafia state. Central European University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mándi, T. (2015). Politikai gondolkodás. In A. Körösényi (Ed.), A magyar politikai rendszer (pp. 13–34). Osiris.
   Google Scholar
• Mannheim, K. (1954). Ideology and Utopia. An introduction in knowledge of sociology. Harcourt, Brace & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Mannheim, K. (1955). Ideology and Utopia: An introduction to the sociology of knowledge (L. Wirth & E. Shils, Trans.). A Harvest Book, Harcourt, Brace and World (Original work published 1936).
   Google Scholar
• Matolcsy, G., & Cséfalvay, Z. (2009). Jövőkép – Megújított szabadelvű és szociális piacgazdaság Magyarországon [Image of the future – The reformed liberal and social market economy in Hungary]. Magyar Gazdaságfejlesztési Intézet.
   Google Scholar
• Matyja, R. (2015). Songs of innocence and songs of experience: Polish conservatism 1979–2011. In M. Kopeček, & P. Wciślik (Eds.), Liberal democracy, Authoritarian pasts, and intellectual history in East Europe after 1989 (pp. 201–236). Central European University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, J. (2010). The varied roles of ideas in politics. In D. Beland & R. Henry Cox (Eds.), Ideas and politics in social science research (pp. 23–46). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P., & Plehwe, D. (2015). The road from Mont Pèlerin: The making of the neoliberal thought collective. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miszerak, M., & Rohac, D. (2017, March 6). A Polish plan runs into economic reality. Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/a-polish-plan-runs-into-economic-reality-1488833317.
   Google Scholar
• Morawiecki, M. (2016, October 21). The Polish case for less economic liberalism. Politico.
   Google Scholar
• Morawiecki, M. (2017). Strategia na rzecz Odpowiedzialnego Rozwoju Do roku 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Mudge, S. L. (2018). Leftism reinvented: Western parties from socialism to neoliberalism. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neumayer, L. (2008). Euroscepticism as a political label: The use of European Union issues in political competition in the new member states. European Journal of Political Research, 47(2), 135–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00721.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orenstein, M. A., & Bugarič, B. (2021). Work, family, fatherland: The political economy of populism in Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of European Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1832557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palonen, E. (2018). Performing the nation: The Janus-faced populist foundations of illiberalism in Hungary. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 26(3), 308–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piasecki, M. A. (2015). Was Viktor Orbán’s unorthodox economic policy the right answer to Hungary’s economic misfortunes? International Journal of Management and Economics, 46(1), 41–71. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijme-2015-0021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plehwe, D. (2018). Neoliberal thought collectives: Integrating social science and intellectual history. In D. Cahill, M. Cooper, M. Konings, & D. Primrose (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of neoliberalism (pp. 85–97). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Polska Agencja Prasowa. (2015). Paweł Szałamacha – ideowy zwolennik programu PiS ma byc szefem MF. Polish Press Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Prawo i Sprawiedliwość. (2014). Zdrowie, praca, rodzina. Program Prawa i Sprawiedliwośći 2014 [Health, work, family. The 2014 program of Law and Justice]. PiS.
   Google Scholar
• Pula, B. (2018). Globalization under and after socialism: The evolution of transnational capital in Central and Eastern Europe. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rae, G. (2007). Back to the future: The resurgence of Poland’s conservative right. Debatte: Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe, 15(2), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/09651560701483329
   Google Scholar
• Rae, G. (2008). Two rights make a wrong? The remaking of Polish politics after the 2007 parliamentary elections. Debatte: Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe, 16(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/09651560801987245
   Google Scholar
• Rajcsányi, G. (2015). Intellectual background: “The democratic transition is in progress as We speak” interview with András Lánczi and Gyula Tellér. In J. O’Sullivan, & K. Pócza (Eds.), The second term of Viktor Orbán beyond prejudice and enthusiasm (pp. 234–252). Social Affairs Unit London.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos, J., & Torres, P. (2020). The right transmission: Understanding global diffusion of the far-right. Populism, 3(1), 87–120. https://doi.org/10.1163/25888072-BJA10001
   Google Scholar
• Scheiring, G. (2019). Dependent development and authoritarian state capitalism: Democratic backsliding and the rise of the accumulative state in Hungary. Geoforum. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.08.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheiring, G. (2020). The retreat of liberal democracy. Authoritarian capitalism and the accumulative state in Hungary. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Sebők, M., Makszin, K., & Simons, J. (2021). Mission adapted: The hidden role of governors in shaping central bank operating missions in Hungary. East European Politics, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2021.1907351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields, S. (2015). Neoliberalism redux: Poland’s recombinant populism and its alternatives. Critical Sociology, 41(4-5), 659–678. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920513501349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slobodian, Q. (2018). Globalists: The end of empire and the birth of neoliberalism. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, A. (2011). Telling policy stories: An ethnographic study of the use of evidence in policy-making in the UK. Journal of Social Policy, 40(2), 237–255. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279410000723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strange, S. (1988). States and markets. Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Stumpf, I. (2009). Az állam újrafelfedezése és a Neoweberiánus állam. Századvég.
   Google Scholar
• Szarek, L. (2019). China’s model economist in Poland. https://www.echo-wall.eu/plus-one/chinas-model-economist-poland.
   Google Scholar
• Szczerbiak, A. (2015). How will Poland’s law and justice party govern? LSE European Politics and Policy (EUROPP) Blog.
   Google Scholar
• Szikra, D. (2014). Democracy and welfare in hard times: The social policy of the Orbán government in Hungary between 2010 and 2014. Journal of European Social Policy, 24(5), 486–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928714545446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szikra, D. (2019). Ideology or pragmatism? In J. G. Kovács, & B. Trencsényi (Eds.), Brave New Hungary: mapping the “system of national cooperation” (pp. 225–240). Lexington.
   Google Scholar
• Tellér, G. (2014). Született-e Orbánrendszer 2010–2014 között? Nagyvilág, 59(3), 346–367.
   Google Scholar
• Toplišek, A. (2020). The political economy of populist rule in post-Crisis Europe: Hungary and Poland. New Political Economy, 25(3), 388–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2019.1598960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tóth, A., Neumann, L., & Hosszú, H. (2012). Hungary’s full-blown malaise. In A triumph of failed ideas, in European models of capitalism in the crisis (pp. 137–157). European Trade Union Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Trencsényi, B., Kopeček, M., Gabrijelčič, L. L., Falina, M., & Baár, M. (2018). A history of modern political thought in East Central Europe: Vol. II: Negotiating modernity in the ‘short twentieth century’ and beyond. Part II: 1968–2018. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vachudova, M. A. (2019). From competition to polarization in Central Europe: How populists change party systems and the European Union. Polity, 51(4), 689–706. https://doi.org/10.1086/705704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varga, M. (2021). The return of economic nationalism to East Central Europe: Right-wing intellectual milieus and anti-liberal resentment. Nations and Nationalism, 27(1), 206–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varga, M., & Buzogány, A. (2020). The foreign policy of populists in power: Contesting liberalism in Poland and Hungary. Geopolitics. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2020.1734564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varga, M., & Buzogány, A. (2021, April). The family tree of illiberalism: Lineages and alignments. Illiberalism Studies Program Working Papers No. 5. https://www.illiberalism.org/family-tree.
   Google Scholar
• Volk, S. (2019). Speaking for “the European people”? How the transnational alliance Fortress Europe constructs a populist counter-narrative to European integration. Politique européenne, (4), 120–149. https://doi.org/10.3917/poeu.066.0120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, S. (2019, February 10). Viktor Orbán: No tax for Hungarian women with four or more children. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/feb/10/viktor-orban-no-tax-for-hungarian-women-with-four-or-more-children.
   Google Scholar
• Zalewski, F. (2016). L’émergence d’une démocratie Antilibérale en Pologne. Revue detudes comparatives Est-Ouest, 47(4), 57–86. https://doi.org/10.4074/S0338059916004034
   Google Scholar
• Zalewski, F. (2020). Le PiS, ou l’invention de la mémoire identitaire. Revue detudes comparatives Est-Ouest, 1(1), 7–26. doi:10.3917/receo1.511.0007
   Google Scholar