National parliaments and the European Union: capturing the distributive consequences of democratic intergovernmentalism

References

• Bellamy, R. (2013). ‘An ever closer union among the peoples of Europe’: Republican intergovernmentalism and demoicratic representation within the EU. Journal of European Integration, 35(5), 499–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2013.799936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellamy, R., & Castiglione, D. (2013). Three models of democracy, political community and representation in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(2), 206–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.746118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, K. (2004). Models of electoral system change. Electoral Studies, 23(3), 363–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3794(03)00020-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau, A. (2004). Fairness and electoral reform. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 6(2), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2004.00132.x
   Google Scholar
• Bol, D. (2016). Electoral reform, values and party self-interest. Party Politics, 22(1), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068813511590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, I. (2012). A ‘virtual third chamber’ for the European Union? National parliaments after the treaty of Lisbon. West European Politics, 35(3), 441–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2012.665735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, I. (2013). Bicameral or tricameral? National parliaments and representative democracy in the European Union. Journal of European Integration, 35(5), 531–546. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2013.799939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, I. (2019). National parliaments in the democratic politics of the EU: The subsidiarity early warning mechanism, 2009–2017. Comparative European Politics, 17(6), 919–939. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-018-0137-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, H., & Héritier, A. (2007). Introduction: Contested competences in the European Union. West European Politics, 30(2), 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380701238741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorino, N., Pontarollo, N., & Ricciuti, R. (2019). Supranational, national and local dimensions of voter turnout in European parliament elections. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 57(4), 877–893. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Follesdal, A., & Hix, S. (2006). Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: A response to majone and moravcsik. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(3), 533–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00650.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, M., & Hobolt, S. B. (2015). European elections and the European voter. In J. Richardson, & S. Mazey (Eds.), European Union: power and policy-making (pp. 399–418). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Héritier, A., Moury, C., Schoeller, M. G., Meissner, K. L., & Mota, I. (2015). The European parliament as a driving force of constitutionalisation. European Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• Hix, S. (1998). Elections, parties and institutional design: A comparative perspective on European Union democracy. West European Politics, 21(3), 19–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402389808425256
   Google Scholar
• Hix, S. (2002). Parliamentary behavior with two principals: Preferences, parties, and voting in the European parliament. American Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 688–698. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hix, S., & Marsh, M. (2011). Second-order effects plus pan-European political swings: An analysis of European parliament elections across time. Electoral Studies, 30(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2010.09.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huysmans, M. (2019). Euroscepticism and the early warning system. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 57(3), 431–447. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karatepe, I. D., Scherrer, C., & Tizzot, H. (2020). Das mercosur-EU-abkommen: Freihandel zu lasten von umwelt, klima und bauern. Greens/EFA Group in the European Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• Kiiver, P. (2012). The early warning system for the principle of subsidiarity: Constitutional theory and empirical reality. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kreppel, A. (2002). The European parliament and supranational party system: A study in institutional development. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lelieveldt, H. (2014). The European Parliament should return to a ‘dual mandate’ system which uses national politicians as representatives instead of directly elected MEPs. LSE European Politics and Policy – EUROPP blog.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, P. (2009). Representative versus responsible government (MPIFG Working Paper).
   Google Scholar
• Majone, G. (2002). The European commission: The limits of centralization and the perils of parliamentarization. Governance, 15(3), 375–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/0952-1895.00193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, M. (1998). Testing the second-order election model after four European elections. British Journal of Political Science, 28(4), 591–607. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712349800026X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon, A., & Peet, J. (2011). Beyond the European parliament: Rethinking the EU’s democratic legitimacy. Centre for European Reform.
   Google Scholar
• Mühlböck, M. (2012). National versus European: Party control over members of the European parliament. West European Politics, 35(3), 607–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2012.665743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naurin, D., & Rasmussen, A. (2011). New external rules, new internal games: How the EU institutions respond when inter-institutional rules change. West European Politics, 34(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.523540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolaïdis, K. (2013). European demoicracy and its crisis. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(2), 351–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunez, L., & Jacobs, K. T. E. (2016). Catalysts and barriers: Explaining electoral reform in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 55(3), 454–473. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, C. F., Karlsson, C., & Hjerpe, M. (2017). Assessing the European union’s global climate change leadership: From Copenhagen to the Paris agreement’. Journal of European Integration, 39(2), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2016.1275608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patberg, M. (2016). Against democratic intergovernmentalism: The case for a theory of constituent power in the global realm. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 14(3), 622–638. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mow040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reif, K., & Schmitt, H. (1980). Nine second-order national elections - a conceptual framework for the analysis of European election results. European Journal of Political Research, 8(1), 3–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1980.tb00737.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renwick, A. (2010). The politics of electoral reform: Changing the rules of democracy. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renwick, A. (2011). Electoral reform in Europe since 1945. West European Politics, 34(3), 456–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.555975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roos, M. (2020). Becoming Europe’s parliament: Europeanization through MEPs’ supranational activism, 1952–79. Journal of Common Market Studies, 58(6), 1413–1432. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (2015). Political legitimacy in a non-optimal currency area. In O. Cramme, & S. B. Hobolt (Eds.), Democratic politics in a European Union under stress (19-47). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (2017). De-constitutionalisation and majority rule: A democratic vision for Europe. European Law Journal, 23(5), 315–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2013). Democracy and legitimacy in the European Union revisited: Input, output and ‘throughput’. Political Studies, 61(1), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00962.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A., & Wood, M. (2017). Conceptualizing throughput legitimacy: Procedural mechanisms of accountability, transparency, inclusiveness and openness in EU governance. Public Administration, 97(4), 727–740. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Servent, A. R. (2014). The role of the European parliament in international negotiations after Lisbon. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(4), 568–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.886614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. (2016). David cameron’s eu renegotiation and referendum pledge: A case of déjà vu?’. British Politics, 11(3), 324–346. https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2016.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G. (1990). Nested games: Rational choice in comparative politics. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gruisen, P., & Huysmans, M. (2020). The early warning system and policymaking in the European Union. European Union Politics, 21(3), 451–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116520923752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolkenstein, F. (2019). The revival of democratic intergovernmentalism, first principles and the case for a contest-based account of democracy in the European Union. Political Studies, 68(2), 408–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719850690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wurzel, R. K. W., Liefferink, D., & Di Lullo, M. (2019). The European council, the council and the member states: Changing environmental leadership dynamics in the European Union. Environmental Politics, 28(2), 248–270. doi:10.1080/09644016.2019.1549783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar