Advanced bioengineering technologies for preclinical research

References

• Duval K, Grover H, Han L-H, et al. Modeling physiological events in 2D vs. 3D cell culture. Physiology. 2017;32:423–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kacy Cullen D, Wolf JA, Vernekar VN, et al. Neural tissue engineering and biohybridized microsystems for neurobiological investigation in vitro (part 1). Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 2011;39:201–240.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kimura H, Sakai Y, Fujii T. Organ/body-on-a-chip based on microfluidic technology for drug discovery. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2018;33:43–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SH, Sung JH. Organ-on-a-chip technology for reproducing multiorgan physiology. Adv Healthcare Mater. 2018;7:1700419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada KM, Cukierman E. Modeling tissue morphogenesis and cancer in 3D. Cell. 2007;130:601–610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoarau-Véchot J, Rafii A, Touboul C, et al. Halfway between 2D and animal models: are 3D cultures the ideal tool to study cancer-microenvironment interactions? IJMS. 2018;19:181.
   Google Scholar
• Edmondson R, Broglie JJ, Adcock AF, et al. Three-dimensional cell culture systems and their applications in drug discovery and cell-based biosensors. Assay Drug Dev Technol. 2014;12:207–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanti A, Teo J, Stefanini C. In vitro immune organs-on-chip for drug development: a review. Pharmaceutics. 2018;10:278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson AC, Crim MJ, Franklin CL. A brief history of animal modeling. Mo Med. 2013;110:201–205.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Conn PM. source book of models for biomedical research. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Seok J, Warren HS, Cuenca AG, et al. Genomic responses in mouse models poorly mimic human inflammatory diseases. Natl Acad Sci. 2013;110:3507–3512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polini A, Del Mercato LL, Barra A, et al. Towards the development of human immune-system-on-a-chip platforms. Drug Discov Today. 2018;24:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancaster MA, Knoblich JA. Organogenesis in a dish: modeling development and disease using organoid technologies. Science. 2014;345:1247125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi G, Manfrin A, Lutolf MP. Progress and potential in organoid research. Nat Rev Genet. 2018;19:1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eiraku M, Takata N, Ishibashi H, et al. Self-organizing optic-cup morphogenesis in three-dimensional culture. Nature. 2011;472:51–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato T, Vries RG, Snippert HJ, et al. Single Lgr5 stem cells build crypt-villus structures in vitro without a mesenchymal niche. Nature. 2009;459:262–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi T. Organoids for drug discovery and personalized medicine. Ann Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2019;59:447–462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancaster MA, Renner M, Martin C-A, et al. Cerebral organoids model human brain development and microcephaly. Nature. 2013;501:373–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huch M, Knoblich JA, Lutolf MP, et al. The hope and the hype of organoid research. Development. 2017;144:938–941.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang Y, Eglen RM. Three-dimensional cell cultures in drug discovery and Development. SLAS Discov. 2017;22:456–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unger C, Kramer N, Walzl A, et al. Modeling human carcinomas: physiologically relevant 3D models to improve anti-cancer drug development. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014;79:50–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul Weiss ACT. Reconstitution of complete organs from single-cell suspensions of chick embryos in advanced stages of differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1960;46:1177–1185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle J, Luan B, Cruz TF, et al. Characterization of proteoglycan accumulation during formation of cartilagenous tissue in vitro. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1995;3:117–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandel RA, Boyle J, Gibson G, et al. In vitro formation of mineralized cartilagenous tissue by articular chondrocytes. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 1997;33:174–181.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• St-Pierre J-P, Gan L, Wang J, et al. The incorporation of a zone of calcified cartilage improves the interfacial shear strength between in vitro-formed cartilage and the underlying substrate. Acta Biomater. 2012;8:1603–1615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St-Pierre J-P, Wang Q, Li SQ, et al. Inorganic polyphosphate stimulates cartilage tissue formation. Tissue Eng Part A. 2012;18:1282–1292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Croos JNA, Dhaliwal SS, Grynpas MD, et al. Cyclic compressive mechanical stimulation induces sequential catabolic and anabolic gene changes in chondrocytes resulting in increased extracellular matrix accumulation. Matrix Biol. 2006;25:323–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandel RA, Grynpas M, Pilliar R, et al. Repair of osteochondral defects with biphasic cartilage-calcium polyphosphate constructs in a sheep model. Biomaterials. 2006;27:4120–4131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung JH, Yu J, Luo D, et al. Microscale 3-D hydrogel scaffold for biomimetic gastrointestinal (GI) tract model. Lab Chip. 2011;11:389–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang G, Wang L, Wang S, et al. Engineering three-dimensional cell mechanical microenvironment with hydrogels. Biofabrication. 2012;4:042001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tibbitt MW, Anseth KS. Hydrogels as extracellular matrix mimics for 3D cell culture. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009;103:655–663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeForest CA, Anseth KS. Advances in bioactive hydrogels to probe and direct cell fate. Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng. 2012;3:421–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown GE, Khetani SR. Microfabrication of liver and heart tissues for drug development. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018;373:20170225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khetani SR, Bhatia SN. Microscale culture of human liver cells for drug development. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;26:120–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware BR, Berger DR, Khetani SR. Prediction of drug-induced liver injury in micropatterned co-cultures containing iPSC-derived human hepatocytes. Toxicol Sci. 2015;145:252–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger DR, Ware BR, Davidson MD, et al. Enhancing the functional maturity of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived human hepatocytes by controlled presentation of cell-cell interactions in vitro. Hepatology. 2015;61:1370–1381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radisic M, Park H, Shing H, Consi T, Schoen F, Langer R, Freed LE, Vunjak-Novakovic G. Functional assembly of engineered myocardium by electrical stimulation of cardiac myocytes cultured on scaffolds, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:18129–18134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulloch NL, Muskheli V, Razumova MV, Korte FS, Regnier M, Hauch KD, Pabon L, Reinecke H, Murry CE. Growth of engineered human myocardium with mechanical loading and vascular coculture, Circ Res 2011;109:47–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang D, Shadrin IY, Lam J, et al. Tissue-engineered cardiac patch for advanced functional maturation of human ESC-derived cardiomyocytes. Biomaterials. 2013;34:5813–5820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnbull IC, Karakikes I, Serrao GW, et al. Advancing functional engineered cardiac tissues toward a preclinical model of human myocardium. Faseb J. 2014;28:644–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legant WR, Pathak A, Yang MT, et al. Microfabricated tissue gauges to measure and manipulate forces from 3D microtissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:10097–10102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thavandiran N, Dubois N, Mikryukov A, et al. Design and formulation of functional pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiac microtissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:E4698–707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiburcy M, Hudson JE, Balfanz P, et al. Defined engineered human myocardium with advanced maturation for applications in heart failure modeling and repair. Circulation. 2017;135:1832–1847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunes SS, Miklas JW, Liu J, et al. Biowire: a platform for maturation of human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Nat Methods. 2013;10:781–787.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao Y, Zhang B, Liu H, et al. Microfabricated perfusable cardiac biowire: a platform that mimics native cardiac bundle. Lab Chip. 2014;14:869–882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amano Y, Nishiguchi A, Matsusaki M, et al. Development of vascularized iPSC derived 3D-cardiomyocyte tissues by filtration layer-by-layer technique and their application for pharmaceutical assays. Acta Biomater. 2016;33:110–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathur A, Loskill P, Shao K, et al. Human iPSC-based cardiac microphysiological system for drug screening applications. Sci Rep. 2015;5:8883.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abaci HE, Coffman A, Doucet Y, et al. Tissue engineering of human hair follicles using a biomimetic developmental approach. Nat Commun. 2018;9:5301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vioux-Chagnoleau C, Lejeune F, Sok J, et al. Reconstructed human skin: from photodamage to sunscreen photoprotection and anti-aging molecules. J Dermatological Sci Suppl. 2006;2:S1–S12.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Michniak-Kohn BB. Tissue engineered human skin equivalents. Pharmaceutics. 2012;4:26–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feng Y, Mitchison TJ, Bender A, et al. Multi-parameter phenotypic profiling: using cellular effects to characterize small-molecule compounds. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2009;8:567–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asmani M, Velumani S, Li Y, et al. Fibrotic microtissue array to predict anti-fibrosis drug efficacy. Nat Commun. 2018;9:2066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Z, Huebsch N, Koo S, et al. Contractile deficits in engineered cardiac microtissues as a result of MYBPC3 deficiency and mechanical overload. Nat Biomed Eng. 2018;2:955–967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maffioletti SM, Sarcar S, Henderson ABH, et al. Three-dimensional human iPSC-derived artificial skeletal muscles model muscular dystrophies and enable multilineage tissue engineering. Cell Rep. 2018;23:899–908.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Lin Y, Davis KM, et al. Robust bioengineered 3D functional human intestinal epithelium. Sci Rep. 2015;13708.
   Google Scholar
• DeCicco RePass MA, Chen Y, Lin Y, et al. Novel Bioengineered Three-Dimensional Human Intestinal Model for Long-Term Infection of Cryptosporidium parvum. Infect Immun. 2017;85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen Hoang AT, Chen P, Juarez J, et al. Dendritic cell functional properties in a three-dimensional tissue model of human lung mucosa. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2012;302:L226–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mairpady Shambat S, Chen P, Nguyen Hoang AT, et al. Modelling staphylococcal pneumonia in a human 3D lung tissue model system delineates toxin-mediated pathology. Dis Model Mech. 2015;8:1413–1425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy SV, Atala A. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nature Biotechnology. 2014;32:773–785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfister A, Landers R, Laib A, et al. Biofunctional rapid prototyping for tissue-engineering applications: 3D bioplotting versus 3D printing. J Polym Sci Part a-Polym Chem. 2004;42:624–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozbolat IT, Hospodiuk M. Current advances and future perspectives in extrusion-based bioprinting. Biomaterials. 2016;76:321–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klebe RJ. Cytoscribing - a method for micropositioning cells and the construction of two-dimensional and 3-dimensional synthetic tissues. Exp Cell Res. 1988;179:362–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudapati H, Dey M, Ozbolat I. A comprehensive review on droplet-based bioprinting: past, present and future. Biomaterials. 2016;102:20–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillotin B, Souquet A, Catros S, et al. Laser assisted bioprinting of engineered tissue with high cell density and microscale organization. Biomaterials. 2010;31:7250–7256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu Y, Mapili G, Suhali G, et al. A digital micro-mirror device-based system for the microfabrication of complex, spatially patterned tissue engineering scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2006;77:396–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng WL, Qi JTZ, Yeong WY, et al. Proof-of-concept: 3D bioprinting of pigmented human skin constructs. Biofabrication. 2018;10:025005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma X, Qu X, Zhu W, et al. Deterministically patterned biomimetic human iPSC-derived hepatic model via rapid 3D bioprinting. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:2206–2211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmeliet P, Jain RK. Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases. Nature. 2000;407:249–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouwkema J, Khademhosseini A. Vascularization and angiogenesis in tissue engineering: beyond creating static networks. Trends Biotechnol. 2016;34:733–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butt OI, Carruth R, Kutala VK, et al. Stimulation of peri-implant vascularization with bone marrow-derived progenitor cells: monitoring by in VivoEPR oximetry. Tissue Eng. 2007;13:2053–2061.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang Y, Yu Y, Chen H, et al. Characterization of printable cellular micro-fluidic channels for tissue engineering. Biofabrication. 2013;5:025004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attalla R, Ling C, Selvaganapathy P. Fabrication and characterization of gels with integrated channels using 3D printing with microfluidic nozzle for tissue engineering applications. Biomed Microdevices. 2016;18:1241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta P, Ayan B, Ozbolat IT. Bioprinting for vascular and vascularized tissue biofabrication. Acta Biomater. 2017;51:1–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolesky DB, Homan KA, Skylar-Scott MA, et al. Three-dimensional bioprinting of thick vascularized tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:3179–3184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller JS, Stevens KR, Yang MT, et al. Rapid casting of patterned vascular networks for perfusable engineered three-dimensional tissues. Nat Mater. 2012;11:768–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miri AK, Khalilpour A, Cecen B, et al. Multiscale bioprinting of vascularized models. Biomaterials. 2019;198:204–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parak A, Pradeep P, Du Toit LC, et al. Functionalizing bioinks for 3D bioprinting applications. Drug Discov Today. 2019;24:198–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma X, Liu J, Zhu W, et al. 3D bioprinting of functional tissue models for personalized drug screening and in vitro disease modeling. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;132:235–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Combellack E, Jessop ZM, Whitaker IS. The commercial 3D bioprinting industry. New York: Elsevier Ltd; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Datta P, Barui A, Wu Y, et al. Essential steps in bioprinting from pre- to post-bioprinting. Biotechnol Adv. 2018;36:1481–1504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blundell C, Tess ER, Schanzer ASR, et al. A microphysiological model of the human placental barrier. Lab Chip. 2016;16:3065–3073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson EL, Lu H. Three-dimensional models for studying development and disease: moving on from organisms to organs-on-a-chip and organoids. Integr Biol. 2016;8:672–683.
   Google Scholar
• Ahadian S, Civitarese R, Bannerman D, et al. Organ-on-a-chip platforms: a convergence of advanced materials, cells, and microscale technologies. Adv Healthcare Mater. 2017;7:1700506–1700553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittal R, Woo FW, Castro CS, et al. Organ-on-chip models: implications in drug discovery and clinical applications. J Cell Physiol. 2018;105:e48–29.
   Google Scholar
• Rothbauer M, Rosser JM, Zirath H, et al. ScienceDirect tomorrow today: organ-on-a-chip advances towards clinically relevant pharmaceutical and medical in vitro models. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2018;55:81–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huh D, Matthews BD, Mammoto A, et al. Reconstituting organ-level lung functions on a chip. Science. 2010;328:1658–1662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nawroth JC, Barrile R, Conegliano D, et al. Stem cell-based lung-on-chips: the best of both worlds? Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronaldson-Bouchard K, Vunjak-Novakovic G. Organs-on-a-chip: a fast track for Engineered human tissues in drug development. Stem Cell. 2018;22:310–324.
   Google Scholar
• Esch EW, Bahinski A, Huh D. Organs-on-chips at the frontiers of drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2015;14:248–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi Y, Inoue H, Wu JC, et al. Induced pluripotent stem cell technology: a decade of progress. Nat Publishing Group. 2016;16:115–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Den Berg A, Mummery CL, Passier R, et al. Personalised organs-on-chips: functional testing for precision medicine. Lab Chip. 2019;19:198–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosa-Hernández JE, Villalba-Rodríguez AM, Romero-Castillo KD, et al. Organs-on-a-chip module: a review from the development and applications perspective. Micromachines. 2018;9:536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang B, Korolj A, Lai BFL, et al. Advances in organ-on-a-chip engineering. Nat Rev Mater. 2018;3:1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun W, Luo Z, Lee J, et al. Organ-on-a-chip for cancer and immune organs modeling. Adv Healthcare Mater. 2019;177:1801363.
   Google Scholar
• Nawroth J, Rogal J, Weiss M, et al. Organ-on-a-chip systems for women’s health applications. Adv Healthcare Mater. 2017;7:1700550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Low LA, Tagle DA. Tissue chips – innovative tools for drug development and disease modeling. Lab Chip. 2017;17:3026–3036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortega-Prieto AM, Skelton JK, Wai SN, et al. 3D microfluidic liver cultures as a physiological preclinical tool for hepatitis B virus infection. Nat Commun. 2018;9:1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn J, Ko J, Lee S, et al. Microfluidics in nanoparticle drug delivery; From synthesis to pre-clinical screening. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;128:29–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aziz A, Geng C, Fu M, et al. The role of microfluidics for organ on chip simulations. Bioengineering. 2017;4:39.
   Google Scholar
• Viswanathan P, Guvendiren M, Chua W, et al. Mimicking the topography of the epidermal-dermal interface with elastomer substrates. Integr Biol. 2016;8:21–29.
   Google Scholar
• Kageyama T, Yoshimura C, Myasnikova D, et al. Spontaneous hair follicle germ (HFG) formation in vitro, enabling the large-scale production of HFGs for regenerative medicine. Biomaterials. 2018;154:291–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortega I, Ryan AJ, Deshpande P, et al. Combined microfabrication and electrospinning to produce 3-D architectures for corneal repair. Acta Biomater. 2013;9:5511–5520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levis HJ, Massie I, Dziasko MA, et al. Rapid tissue engineering of biomimetic human corneal limbal crypts with 3D niche architecture. Biomaterials. 2013;34:8860–8868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramanian B, Kaya O, Pollak MR, et al. Guided tissue organization and disease modeling in a kidney tubule array. Biomaterials. 2018;183:295–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YI, Carmona C, Hickman JJ, et al. Multiorgan microphysiological systems for drug development: strategies, advances, and challenges. Adv Healthcare Mater. 2018;7:1701000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castaño AG, García-Díaz M, Torras N, et al. Dynamic photopolymerization produces complex microstructures on hydrogels in a moldless approach to generate a 3D intestinal tissue model. Biofabrication. 2019;11:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang YS, Aleman J, Shin SR, et al. Multisensor-integrated organs-on-chips platform for automated and continual in situ monitoring of organoid behaviors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114:E2293–E2302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zervantonakis IK, Hughes-Alford SK, Charest JL, et al. Three-dimensional microfluidic model for tumor cell intravasation and endothelial barrier function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:13515–13520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das M, Wilson K, Molnar P, et al. Differentiation of skeletal muscle and integration of myotubes with silicon microstructures using serum-free medium and a synthetic silane substrate. Nat Protoc. 2007;2:1795–1801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varghese K, Molnar P, Das M, et al. A new target for amyloid beta toxicity validated by standard and high-throughput electrophysiology. Plos One. 2010;5:e8643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter FR, Valkai S, Kincses A, et al. A versatile lab-on-a-chip tool for modeling biological barriers. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2016;222:1209–1219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takebe T, Zhang B, Radisic M. Synergistic engineering: organoids meet organs-on-a-chip. Cell Stem Cell. 2017;21:297–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao H, Chen Y, Shao L, et al. Airflow‐assisted 3D bioprinting of human heterogeneous microspheroidal organoids with microfluidic nozzle. Small. 2018;14:1802630–1802637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng W, Datta P, Wu Y, et al. Challenges in bio-fabrication of organoid cultures. Cell Biol Transl Med. 2018;3:53–71. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 1107. Springer, Cham.
   Google Scholar