Heterodyne Near Field Speckles: from laser light to X-rays

References

• Dainty JC. Laser speckle and related phenomena. New York: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman JW. Speckle Phenomena in Optics. Englewood: Ben Roberts & Company; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Newton I. Optiks. New York: reprinted by Dover Press; 1952.
   Google Scholar
• Exner K, Sitzungsber. Kaiserl. Akad. Wiss. 1877;76:522.
   Google Scholar
• Exner K, Wiedemanns. Ann. Physik. 1880;9:239.
   Google Scholar
• Von Laue M, Sitzungsber. Akad. Wiss. 44 (1914), p. 1144.
   Google Scholar
• See, for example, La Mort de Casagemas by Picasso, Pablo (oil on wood, 1901, Musée Picasso, Paris), Il Sole by Pellizza da Volpedo, Giuseppe (oil on canvas, 1904, Galleria Nazionale d’Arte Moderna, Rome), Sole Nascente sul Fiume by Olivero, Matteo (oil on canvas, 1907-1910), Lampada ad Arco by Balla, Giacomo (oil on canvas, 1909-1911, Museum of Modern Art, New York).
   Google Scholar
• Interestingly, the eye of the observer itself provides the random medium in these cases. To support this statement, one can perform some convincing experiments. By looking at sunlight through a dense foliage, elongated white light speckles can be observed. Taking pictures of such speckles with a reflex camera is likely to fail, unless e.g. moisture is breathed on the front lens to make its surface irregular.
   Google Scholar
• Born M, Wolf E. Priciples of Optics. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Mandel L, Wolf E. Optical coherence and quantum optics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman JW. Statistical Optics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• De Haas WJ, Koninklighe. Acad. van Wetenschager. 1918;20:1278.
   Google Scholar
• Parry G, Some effects of surface roughness on the appearance of speckle in polychromatic light. Opt. Commun. 1974;12:75–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brogioli D, Vailati A, Giglio M. Heterodyne near-field scattering. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002;81:4109–4111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giglio M, Brogioli D, Potenza MAC, et al. Near field scattering. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2004;6:1547–1550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferri F, Magatti D, Pescini D, et al., Heterodyne near-field scattering: A technique for complex fluids. Phys. Rev. E. 2004;70:041404.
   Google Scholar
• Brogioli D, Vailati A, Giglio M. A schlieren method for ultra-low–angle light scattering measurements. Europhys. Lett. 2003;63:220–225.
   Google Scholar
• Potenza MAC, Magatti D, Pescini D, et al., Proc. of SPIE Bellingham, WA.2004;5249: 461–470.
   Google Scholar
• Potenza MAC, Pescini D, Magatti D, et al. A new particle sizing technique based on near field scattering. Nuclear Physics B (Proc. Suppl.). 2006;150: 334–338.
   Google Scholar
• Magatti D, Alaimo MD, Potenza MAC, et al. Dynamic heterodyne near field scattering. Appl Phys Lett. 2008;92:241101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzoni S, Potenza MAC, Alaimo MD, et al. SODI-COLLOID: a combination of static and dynamic light scattering on board the International Space Station. Rev Sci Instrum. 2013;84:043704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potenza MAC, Manca A, Veen SJ, et al., EPL. 2014;106:68005.
   Google Scholar
• Escobedo-Sanchez MA, Rojas-Ochoa LF, Laurati M, et al. Investigation of moderately turbid suspensions by heterodyne near field scattering. Soft Matter. 2017;13:5961–5969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cremonesi L, Siano M, Paroli B, et al. Near field scattering for samples under forced flow. Rev Sci Instrum. 2020;91:075108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alaimo MD, Magatti D, Ferri F, et al. Heterodyne speckle velocimetry. Appl Phys Lett. 2006;88:191101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potenza MAC, Alaimo MD, Pescini D, et al. A new technique for fluid velocimetry based on near field scattering. Opt. Laser Eng. 2006;44:722–731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alaimo MD, Potenza MAC, Magatti D, et al. Heterodyne speckle velocimetry of Poiseuille flow. J Appl Phys. 2007;102:073113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siano M, Paroli B, Chiadroni E, et al. Measurement of power spectral density of broad-spectrum visible light with heterodyne near field scattering and its scalability to betatron radiation. Opt Express. 2015;23:32888–32896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siano M, Paroli B, Chiadroni E, et al., Note: Nanosecond LED-based source for optical modeling of scintillators illuminated by partially coherent X-ray radiation. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 87 (2016), p.126104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerbino R, Peverini L, Potenza MAC, et al. X-ray-scattering information obtained from near-field speckle. Nat. Phys. 2008;4:238–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu X, Mochrie SGJ, Narayanan S, et al. X-ray near-field speckle: implementation and critical analysis. J. Synchrotron Rad. 2011;18:823–834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alaimo MD, Potenza MAC, Manfredda M, et al. Probing the transverse coherence of an undulator X-ray beam using brownian particles. Phys Rev Lett. 2009;103:194805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alaimo MD, Anania MP, Artioli M, et al. Mapping the transverse coherence of the self amplified spontaneous emission of a free-electron laser with the heterodyne speckle method. Opt Express. 2014;22:30013–30023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manfredda M, Alaimo MD, Giglio M, et al. Probing transverse coherence with the heterodyne speckle approach: overview and perspectives. Phys Procedia. 2015;62:59–64.
   Google Scholar
• Kashyap Y, Wang H, Sawhney K, Phys. Rev. A. 2015;92:033842.
   Google Scholar
• Siano M, Paroli B, Manfredda M, et al., Proc. of SPIE. Prague, Czech Republic, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Siano M, Paroli B, Potenza MAC, et al., Proc. of IBIC. IBIC, Barcelona, Spain, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Siano M, Paroli B, Potenza MAC, et al. Characterizing temporal coherence of visible synchrotron radiation with heterodyne near field speckles. Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams. 2017;20: 110702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzoni S, Roncarolo F, Trad G, et al., Proc. of IBIC. Shanghai, China, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Siano M, Paroli B, Potenza MAC, et al., Proc. of IBIC. Malmo, Sweden, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Berujon S, Ziegler E, Cerbino R, et al. Two-dimensional X-ray beam phase sensing. Phys Rev Lett. 2012;108:158102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berujon S, Ziegler E, Cloetens P. X-ray pulse wavefront metrology using speckle tracking. J. Synchrotron Rad. 2015;22:886–894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Kashyap Y, Sawhney K. Speckle based X-ray wavefront sensing with nanoradian angular sensitivity. Opt Express. 2015;23:23310–23317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seaberg M, Cojocaru R, Berujon S, et al. Wavefront sensing at X-ray free-electron lasers. J. Synchrotron Rad. 2019;26:1115–1126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawhney K, Alcock S, Sutter J, et al. Characterisation of a novel super-polished bimorph mirror. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2013;425:052026.
   Google Scholar
• Berujon S, Wang H, Sawhney KJS. At-wavelength metrology using the X-ray speckle tracking technique: case study of a X-ray compound refractive lens. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2013;425:052020.
   Google Scholar
• Berujon S, Wang H, Alcock S, et al. At-wavelength metrology of hard X-ray mirror using near field speckle. Opt Express. 2014;22:6438–6446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Kashyap Y, Laundy D, et al. J. Synchrotron Rad. 2015;22:925–929.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Sutter J, Sawhney K. Advanced in situ metrology for x-ray beam shaping with super precision. Opt Express. 2015;23:1605–1614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashyap Y, Wang H, Sawhney K. J. Synchrotron Rad. 2016;23:1131–1136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashyap Y, Wang H, Sawhney K. Speckle-based at-wavelength metrology of X-ray mirrors with super accuracy. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2016;87:052001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Zhou T, Kashyap Y, et al., Speckle-based at-wavelength metrology of X-ray optics at Diamond Light Source. Proc. of SPIE. 2017;10388:103880I.
   Google Scholar
• Zdora M-C, Zanette I, Zhou T, et al. At-wavelength optics characterisation via X-ray speckle- and grating-based unified modulated pattern analysis. Opt Express. 2018;26:4989–5004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berujon S, Cojocaru R, Piault P, et al. X-ray optics and beam characterization using random modulation: theory. J. Synchrotron Rad. 2020;27:284–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berujon S, Cojocaru R, Piault P, et al. X-ray optics and beam characterization using random modulation: experiments. J. Synchrotron Rad. 2020;27:293–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan KS, Paganin DM, Siu KKW. X-ray phase imaging with a paper analyzer. Appl Phys Lett. 2012;100:124102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berujon S, Wang H, Sawhney K, Phys. Rev. A. 2012;86:063813.
   Google Scholar
• Berujon S, Wang H, Pape I, et al. X-ray phase microscopy using the speckle tracking technique. Appl Phys Lett. 2013;102:154105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Berujon S, Pape I, et al. X-ray microscopy using two phase contrast imaging techniques: two dimensional grating interferometry and speckle tracking. J Phys Conf Ser. 2013;463:012042.
   Google Scholar
• Zanette I, Zhou T, Burvall A, et al. Speckle-Based X-ray phase-contrast and dark-field imaging with a laboratory source. Phys Rev Lett. 2014;112:253903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aloision IA, Paganin DM, Wright CA, et al. Exploring experimental parameter choice for rapid speckle-tracking phase-contrast X-ray imaging with a paper analyzer. J. Synchrotron Rad. 2015;22:1279–1288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou T, Zanette I, Zdora M-C, et al. Speckle-based x-ray phase-contrast imaging with a laboratory source and the scanning technique. Opt. Lett. 2015;40:2822–2825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berujon S, Ziegler E, Phys. Rev A. 2015;92:013837.
   Google Scholar
• Wang H, Kashyap Y, Sawhney K. Hard-X-ray directional dark-field imaging using the speckle scanning technique. Phys Rev Lett. 2015;114:103901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Berujon S, Herzen J, et al. X-ray phase contrast tomography by tracking near field speckle. Sci Rep. 2015;5:8762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanette I, Zdora M-C, Zhou T, et al., PNAS 2015;112:12569–12573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zdora M-C, Thibault P, Pfeiffer F, et al. Simulations of x-ray speckle-based dark-field and phase-contrast imaging with a polychromatic beam. J Appl Phys. 2015;118:113105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashyap Y, Wang H, Sawhney K. Experimental comparison between speckle and grating-based imaging technique using synchrotron radiation X-rays. Opt Express. 2016;24:18664–18673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zdora M-C, Thibault P, Herzen J, et al., AIP Conf. Proc. 2016;1696:020016.
   Google Scholar
• Wang H, Kashyap Y, Sawhney K. Quantitative X-ray dark-field and phase tomography using single directional speckle scanning technique. Appl Phys Lett. 2016;108:124102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berujon S, Ziegler E. X-ray multimodal tomography using speckle-vector tracking. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2016;5: 044014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Kashyap Y, Sawhney K. From synchrotron radiation to lab source: advanced speckle-based X-ray imaging using abrasive paper. Sci Rep. 2016;6:20476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang F, Wang Y, Wei G, et al. Speckle-tracking X-ray phase-contrast imaging for samples with obvious edge-enhancement effect. Appl Phys Lett. 2017;111:174101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zdora M, Thibault P, Rau C, et al. Characterisation of speckle-based X-ray phase-contrast imaging. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2017;849:012024.
   Google Scholar
• Romell J, Zhou T, Zdora M, et al. Comparison of laboratory grating-based and speckle-tracking x-ray phase-contrast imaging. J Phys Conf Ser. 2017;849:012035.
   Google Scholar
• Berujon S, Ziegler E, Phys. Rev. A. 2017;95:063822.
   Google Scholar
• Vittoria FA, Endrizzi M, Olivo A. Retrieving the ultrasmall-angle X-ray scattering signal with polychromatic radiation in speckle-tracking and beam-tracking phase-contrast Imaging. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2017;7: 034024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zdora M-C, Thibault P, Zhou T, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017;118:203903.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zdora M-C. State of the Art of X-ray speckle-based phase-contrast and dark-field imaging. J Imaging. 2018;4:60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paganin DM, Labriet H, Brun E, et al., Phys. Rev. A. 2018;98:053813.
   Google Scholar
• Zdora M-C, Zanette I, Walker T, et al. X-ray phase imaging with the unified modulated pattern analysis of near-field speckles at a laboratory source. Appl. Opt. 2020;59:2270–2275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlov KM, Paganin DM, Rouge-Labriet H, et al.. Single-shot X-Ray speckle-based imaging of a single-material object. Phys. Rev. Appl. 13:2020; 054023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian N, Jiang H, Li A, et al. Influence of diffuser grain size on the speckle tracking technique. J. Synchrotron Rad. 2020;27:146–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman JW. Introduction to Fourier Optics. Englewood: Ben Roberts & Company; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Paganin DM. Coherent X-ray Optics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• By virtue of the Huygens-Fresnel principle, et(x, z)= ∫e0(x’) h(x – x’, z) dx’, where h(x,z) = exp(ikz) exp[ik|x|2/(2z)] in paraxial conditions. The convolution kernel h becomes highly oscillatory for |x|>(λz)1/2, thus making the convolution integral vanish. If D≫(λz)1/2, h acts as a Dirac δ-distribution and et(x, z) = e0(x)exp(ikz).
   Google Scholar
• Saleh BEA, Teich MC. Fundamentals of Photonics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• At variance, the superposition of two laterally-displaced spherical waves as in the Young double-pinhole experiment generates parallel fringes with a fixed spacing. It is equivalent to the interference between two tilted plane waves.
   Google Scholar
• Gabor D. A new microscopic principle. Nature. 1948;161:777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabor D, Proc. Roy. Soc. London. 1949;197:454.
   Google Scholar
• Gabor D, Microscopy by Reconstructed Wave Fronts: II. Proc. Phys. Soc. 1951;64:449.
   Google Scholar
• Williams DB, Carter CB. Transmission electron microscopy. New York: Plenum Press; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Kim MK. Principles and techniques of digital holographic microscopy. SPIE Review. 2010;1:018005.
   Google Scholar
• Vu X, Hong J, Liu C, et al. Review of digital holographic microscopy for three-dimensional profiling and tracking. Opt Eng. 2014;53:112306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahara T, Quan X, Otami R, et al. Digital holography and its multidimensional imaging applications: a review. Microscopy. 2018;67:55–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao Y, Lu X, Konijnenberg S, et al. Spatial coherence measurement and partially coherent diffractive imaging using self-referencing holography. Opt Express. 2018;26:4479–4490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNulty I, Nucl. Instrum. Methods. Phys. Res. A. 347 (1994), p.170.
   Google Scholar
• Eisebitt S, Luning J, Schlotter WF, et al. Lensless imaging of magnetic nanostructures by X-ray spectro-holography. Nature. 2004;432:885–888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momose A. Recent Advances in X-ray Phase Imaging. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2005;44:6355–6367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchesini S, Boutet S, Sakdinawat AE, et al. Massively parallel X-ray holography. Nat Photonics. 2008;2:560–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman HN, Nugent KA. Coherent lensless X-ray imaging. Nat Photonics. 2010;4:833–839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorniak T, Heine R, Mancuso AP, et al. X-ray holographic microscopy with zone plates applied to biological samples in the water window using 3rd harmonic radiation from the free-electron laser FLASH. Opt Express. 2011;19:11059–11070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin AV, D’Alfonso AJ, Wang F, et al. X-ray holography with a customizable reference. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorkhover T, Ulmer A, Ferguson K, et al. Femtosecond X-ray Fourier holography imaging of free-flying nanoparticles. Nat Photonics. 2018;12:150–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medecki H, Tejnil E, Goldberg KA, et al. Phase-shifting point diffraction interferometer. Opt. Lett. 1996;21:1526–1528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momose A. Phase-sensitive imaging and phase tomography using X-ray interferometers. Opt Express. 2003;11:2303–2314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitenberger W, Wendrock H, Bischoff L, et al. Pinhole interferometry with coherent hard X-rays. J. Synchrotron Rad. 2004;11:190–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homer P, Rus B, Polan J, Measurements of x-ray laser wavefront profile using PDI technique. Proc. of SPIE. 2007;6702:670211.
   Google Scholar
• Malyshev IV, Chkhalo NI, Akhsahalian AD, et al. Surface shape measurement of mirrors in the form of rotation figures by using point diffraction interferometer. J. Mod. Opt. 2017;64:413–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeuchi S, Kakuchi O, Yamazoe K, et al., Visible light point-diffraction interferometer for testing of EUVL optics. Proc. of SPIE 2006;6151:61510E.
   Google Scholar
• Wang D, Wang F, Zou H, et al. Analysis of diffraction wavefront in visible-light point-diffraction interferometer. Appl. Opt. 2013;52:7602–7608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao F, O’Donoghue T, Wang W. Full-field analysis of wavefront errors in point diffraction interferometer with misaligned Gaussian incidence. Appl. Opt. 2020;59:210–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giglio M, Carpineti M, Vailati A. pace Intensity Correlations in the Near Field of the Scattered Light: A Direct Measurement of the Density Correlation Function g(r). Phys Rev Lett. 2000;85:1416–1419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giglio M, Carpineti M, Vailati A, et al. Near-field intensity correlations of scattered light. Appl. Opt. 2001;40:4036–4040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trainoff SP, Cannell DS. Physical optics treatment of the shadowgraph. Phys. Fluids. 2002;14: 1340–1363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloetens P, Ludwig W, Baruchel J, et al. Holotomography: quantitative phase tomography with micrometer resolution using hard synchrotron radiation x rays. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1999;75:2912–2914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabler S, Cloetens P, Guigay J-P, et al. Optimization of phase contrast imaging using hard x rays. Rev Sci Instrum. 2005;76:073705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salditt T, Giewekemeyer K, Fuhse C, et al. Projection phase contrast microscopy with a hard x-ray nanofocused beam: defocus and contrast transfer. Phys Rev B. 2009;79:184112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van De Hulst HC. Light scattering by small particles. New York: Dover Publications, Inc; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Potenza MAC, Sabareesh KPV, Carpineti M, et al. How to measure the optical thickness of scattering particles from the phase delay of scattered waves: application to turbid samples. Phys Rev Lett. 2010;105:193901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li WB, Segrè PN, Gammon RW, et al., Physica A 204 (1994), p.399.
   Google Scholar
• Berne BJ, Pecora R. Dynamic light scattering. New York: Dover Publications, Inc; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Guo H, Narayanan T, Sztuchi M, et al. Reversible phase transition of colloids in a binary liquid solvent. Phys Rev Lett. 2008;100:188303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonn D, Otwinowski J, Sacanna S, et al., Direct Observation of Colloidal Aggregation by Critical Casimir Forces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009;103:156101.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Veen SJ, Antoniuk O, Weber B, et al. Colloidal aggregation in microgravity by critical casimir forces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012;109:248302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerbino R, Vailati A. Near-field scattering techniques: novel instrumentation and results from time and spatially resolved investigations of soft matter systems. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2009;14:416–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• In the far zone, the speckles do not move upon particle motions, but simply fluctuate stochastically in time. This is due to the fact that each speckle in the far field is the result of contributions from the entire illuminated sample, and therefore no correspondence between speckles and particles is possible.
   Google Scholar
• Buzzaccaro S, Secchi E, Piazza R. Ghost particle velocimetry: accurate 3D flow visualization using standard lab equipment. Phys Rev Lett. 2013;111:048101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Secchi E, Rusconi R, Buzzaccaro S, et al., Intermittent turbulence in flowing bacterial suspensions. J. R. Soc. Interface. 2016;13:20160175.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eberhard U, Seybold HJ, Secchi E, et al. Mapping the local viscosity of non-Newtonian fluids flowing through disordered porous structures. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:11733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuiper GP, Middlehurst BM. Telescopes. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1960.
   Google Scholar
• Keller G, Protheroe WM, Barnhart PE, et al., Reprint No. 39. Perkins Observatory, Delaware, 1956.
   Google Scholar
• Mikesell AH, Hoag AA, Hall JS. The scintillation of starlight*. J. Opt. Soc. America. 1951;41: 689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Protheroe WM, Contr. Perkins Obs. No. II-4, Delaware, 1955.
   Google Scholar
• Gifford F, Mikesell AH, Weather. 19538:195.
   Google Scholar
• Mikesell AH, Pub. U. S. Naval Obs. 195517:139.
   Google Scholar
• Barnhart PE, Keller G, Mitchell WE, Report TR59-291, Air Force Cambridge Research Center: Bedford, Mass, 1959.
   Google Scholar
• Spence JCH. Experimental high-resolution electron microscopy. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Scherzer O. The theoretical resolution limit of the electron microscope. J. Appl. Phys. 1949;20:20–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashimoto H, Endoh H. Electron Diffraction 1927-1977. Bristol and London: The Institute of Physics; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Krivanek OL. A method for determining the coefficient of spherical aberration from a single electron micrograph. Optik. 1976;45:97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerbino R, Peverini L, Potenza MAC, et al. X-ray-scattering information obtained from near-field speckle. Nat. Phys. 2008;4:238–243. [Suppl. Mat].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois F, Joannes L, Legros J-C. Improved three-dimensional imaging with a digital holography microscope with a source of partial spatial coherence. Appl. Opt. 1999;38:7085–7094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois F, Minetti C, Monnom O, et al. Pattern recognition with a digital holographic microscope working in partially coherent illumination. Appl. Opt. 2002;41:4108–4119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois F, Novella Requena M-L, Minetti C, et al. Partial spatial coherence effects in digital holographic microscopy with a laser source. Appl. Opt. 2004;43:1131–1139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois F, Callens N, Yourassowsky C, et al. Digital holographic microscopy with reduced spatial coherence for three-dimensional particle flow analysis. Appl. Opt. 2006;45:864–871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minetti C, Callens N, Coupier G, et al. Fast measurements of concentration profiles inside deformable objects in microflows with reduced spatial coherence digital holography. Appl. Opt. 2008;47:5305–5314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois F, Yourassowsky C, Callens N, et al. Applications of digital holographic microscopes with partially spatial coherence sources. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2008;139:012027.
   Google Scholar
• Dubois F, Yourassowsky C, Off-axis multispectral digital holographic microscope with partially coherent illumination. Proc. of SPIE. 20128429:84291E.
   Google Scholar
• Minetti C, Podgorski T, Coupuier G, et al., Dynamics of vesicle suspension in shear flow between walls by digital holographic microscopy with a spatially reduced coherent source. Proc. of SPIE. 20128429 :84291I.
   Google Scholar
• Dohet-Eraly J, Yourassowsky C, El Mallahi A, et al. Quantitative assessment of noise reduction with partial spatial coherence illumination in digital holographic microscopy. Opt. Lett. 2016;41:111–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dohet-Eraly J, Yourassowsky C, El Mallahi A, et al., Partial spatial coherence illumination in digital holographic microscopy: quantitative analysis of the resulting noise reduction. Proc. of SPIE. 2016;9890:989004.
   Google Scholar
• Manfredda M, Siano M, Paroli B, et al., in preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer F, Bunk O, Schulze-Briese C, et al. Shearing interferometer for quantifying the coherence of hard X-ray beams. Phys Rev Lett. 2005;94:164801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitkamp T, Diaz A, David C, et al. X-ray phase imaging with a grating interferometer. Opt Express. 2005;12:6296–6304.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer F, Bech M, Bunk O, et al. Hard-X-ray dark-field imaging using a grating interferometer. Nat Mater. 2008;7:134–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloetens P, Guigay JP, De Martino C, et al. Fractional Talbot imaging of phase gratings with hard x rays. Opt. Lett. 1997;22:1059–1061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momose A, Kawamoto S, Koyama I, et al. Demonstration of X-Ray Talbot Interferometry. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2003;42:L866–L868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guigay J-P, Zabler S, Cloetens P, et al. The partial Talbot effect and its use in measuring the coherence of synchrotron X-rays. J. Synchrotron Rad. 2004;11:476–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelhardt M, Kottler C, Bunk O, et al. The fractional Talbot effect in differential x-ray phase-contrast imaging for extended and polychromatic x-ray sources. J. Microsc. 2008;232:145–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momose A, Yashiro W, Maikusa H, et al. High-speed X-ray phase imaging and X-ray phase tomography with Talbot interferometer and white synchrotron radiation. Opt Express. 2009;17:12540–12545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yashiro W, Terui Y, Kawabata K, et al. On the origin of visibility contrast in x-ray Talbot interferometry. Opt Express. 2010;18:16890–16901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salditt T, Kalbfleisch S, Osterhoff M, et al. Partially coherent nano-focused x-ray radiation characterized by Talbot interferometry. Opt Express. 2011;19:9656–9675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nugent KA. Coherent methods in the X-ray sciences. Adv Phys. 2010;59:1–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cipelletti L, Carpineti M, Giglio M. Fractal morphology, spatial order, and pore structure in microporous membrane filters. Langmuir. 1996;12:6446–6451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manfredda M, Probing synchrotron radiation coherence: the heterodyne speckle approach, Ph.D. thesis, Milan, 2012, https://air.unimi.it/handle/2434/172631
   Google Scholar
• Gutt C, Wochner P, Fisher B, et al. Single shot spatial and temporal coherence properties of the SLAC linac coherent light source in the hard X-ray regime. Phys Rev Lett. 2012;108:024801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S, Roseker W, Gutt C, et al. Single shot speckle and coherence analysis of the hard X-ray free electron laser LCLS. Opt Express. 2013;21:24647–24664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmkuhler F, Gutt C, Fischer B, et al. Single shot coherence properties of the free-electron laser SACLA in the hard X-ray Regime. Sci Rep. 2014;4:5234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geloni G, Saldin E, Schneidmiller E, et al. Transverse coherence properties of X-ray beams in third-generation synchrotron radiation sources. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A. 2008;588:463–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paroli B, Potenza MAC, Advances in Physics. X 2(2017), p.978–1004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geloni G, Serkez S, Khubbutdinov R, et al. Effects of energy spread on brightness and coherence of undulator sources. J. Synchrotron Rad. 2018;25:1335–1345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas C, Dudin P, Hoesch M. Coherence of a near diffraction limited undulator synchrotron radiation source. Opt. Commun. 2016;359:171–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paroli B, Chiadroni E, Ferrario M, et al., Asymmetric lateral coherence of betatron radiation emitted in laser-driven light sources. EPL 2015;111::44003.
   Google Scholar
• Paroli B, Chiadroni E, Ferrario M, et al. A systematic study of the asymmetric lateral coherence of radiation emitted by ultra-relativistic particles in laser-driven accelerators. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A. 2016;839:1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paroli B, Bravin E, Mazzoni S, et al., A modified two-slit interferometer for characterizing the asymmetric lateral coherence of undulator radiation. EPL 2016;115:14004.
   Google Scholar
• Paroli B, Siano M, Potenza MAC. A symmetric lateral coherence allows precise wavefront characterization. EPL. 2018;122:44001.
   Google Scholar
• Paroli B, Cirella A, Debrot I, et al. Asymmetric lateral coherence of OAM radiation reveals topological charge and local curvature. J Opt. 2018;20:075605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paroli B, Siano M, Potenza MAC. The local intrinsic curvature of wavefronts allows to detect optical vortices. Opt Express. 2019;27:17550–17560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paroli B, Siano M, Teruzzi L, et al. Single-shot measurement of phase and topological properties of orbital angular momentum radiation through asymmetric lateral coherence. Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams. 2019;22: 032901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paroli B, Siano M, Potenza M. Measuring the topological charge of orbital angular momentum radiation in single-shot by means of the wavefront intrinsic curvature. Appl. Opt. 2020;59:5258–5264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paroli B, Siano M, Potenza MAC. A composite beam of radiation with orbital angular momentum allows effective local, single-shot measurement of topological charge. Opt Commun. 2020;459:125049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berto P, Rigneault H, Guillon M. Wavefront sensing with a thin diffuser. Opt. Lett. 2017;42:5117–5120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatti A, Magatti D, Ferri F .Three-dimensional coherence of light speckles: theory. Phys Rev. 2008;78:063806. doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.78.063806.
   Google Scholar
• Magatti D, Gatti A, Ferri F .Three-dimensional coherence of light speckles: experiment. Phys Rev.2009;79:053831. doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.79.053831.
   Google Scholar