Mobile crowd-sensing as a resource for contextualized urban public policies: a study using three use cases on noise and soundscape monitoring

References

• Agostinelli, S., 2009. Comment penser la médiation inscrite dans les outils et leurs dispositifs? Une approche par le système artefactuel. Distances et savoirs, 7 (3), 355–376. doi:10.3166/ds.7.355-376
   Google Scholar
• AppAnnie, 2018. The average smartphone user accessed close to 40 apps per month in 2017. Available from: https://www.appannie.com/en/insights/market-data/apps-used-2017/ Accessed 10 March 2019
   Google Scholar
• Ash, H., et al., 2018. Measuring physiological stress in the common marmoset (callithrix jacchus): validation of a salivary cortisol collection and assay technique. Physiology & behavior, 185, 14–22. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.12.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aumond, P., et al., 2017. Acoustic mapping based on measurements: space and time interpolation. INTER- NOISE and NOISE-CON congress and conference proceedings, 255 (5), 2287–2298.
   Google Scholar
• Aumond, P., et al., 2018. Kriging-based spatial interpolation from measurements for sound level mapping in urban areas. The journal of the acoustical society of America, 143 (5), 2847–2857. doi:10.1121/1.5034799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baranzini, A., et al., 2010. Feel it or measure it - perceived vs. measured noise in hedonic models. Transportation research part D: transport and environment, 15D (8), 473–482. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2010.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basner, M., et al., 2015. ICBEN review of research on the biological effects of noise 2011-2014. Noise and Health, 17 (75), 57–82. doi:10.4103/1463-1741.153373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanes, N., et al., 2017. Noise in Europe 2017: updated assessment (Tech. Rep.). Bilthoven, Netherlands: European Topic Centre on Air Pollution and Climate Change Mitigation (ETC/ACM).
   Google Scholar
• Bonfils, P., 2015. Immersion et environnements numériques: une approche mthodologique par léxpérience vcue. Questions de communication, 27 (1), 261–277. doi:10.4000/questionsdecommunication.9838
   Google Scholar
• Brill, L.C., 2017. Exploring the correlation between occupied and unoccupied noise levels in K-12 classrooms. Unpublished master’s thesis. Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, J., 2015. Roles of smartphone app use in improving social capital and reducing social isolation. Cyberpsychology, behavior, and social networking, 18 (6), 350–355. doi:10.1089/cyber.2014.0657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, A.W.L., et al., 2014. Characterizing noise sensitivity of inhabitants of cities. In: 11th International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem (ICBEN), Nara, Japan, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Concha-Barrientos, M., et al., 2004. Selected occupational risk factors. In Comparative quantification of health risks, 2, 1651–1801.
   Google Scholar
• Deloite, C., 2017. Global mobile consumer trends. Second. Available from: https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/us/Documents/technology-media -telecommunications/us-global-mobile-consumer-survey-second-edition.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dorst, K., 2015. Frame creation and design in the expanded field. She Ji: The journal of design, economics, and innovation, 1 (1), 22–33.
   Google Scholar
• Fecht, D., et al., 2016. Spatial and temporal associations of road traffic noise and air pollution in London: implications for epidemiological studies. Environment international, 88, 235–242. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2015.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, W., et al., 2017. Association between exposure to noise and risk of hypertension: a meta-analysis of observational epidemiological studies. Journal of hypertension, 35 (12), 2358–2366. doi:10.1097/HJH.0000000000001504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genuit, K. and Fiebig, A., November 2006. Psychoacoustics and its benefit for the soundscape approach. Acta acustica united with acustica, 92, 952–958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gille, L.-A., Marquis-Favre, C., and Weber, R., 2017. Aircraft noise annoyance modeling: consideration of noise sensitivity and of different annoying acoustical characteristics. Applied acoustics, 115, 139–149. doi:10.1016/j.apacoust.2016.08.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goncalves, J., et al., 2015. Motivating participation and improving quality of contribution in ubiquitous crowdsourcing. Computer networks, 90, 34–48. doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2015.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goswami, B., Hassan, Y., and Sarma, A., 2018. The effects of noise on students at school: A review. International journal of latest engineering and management research (IJLEMR), 3 (1), 43–45.
   Google Scholar
• Hachem, S., et al., 2015. Monitoring noise pollution using the urban civics middleware. In: Proceedings of IEEE First International Conference on Big Data Computing Service and Applications, Redwood City, CA, 52–61.
   Google Scholar
• Halim, H., et al., 2017. Comparison between measured traffic noise in Klang Valley, Malaysia and existing prediction models. Engineering Heritage Journal (GWK), 1, 10–14. doi:10.26480/gwk.02.2017.10.14
   Google Scholar
• Issarny, V., et al., 2016, December. Do’s and Don’ts in Mobile Phone Sensing Middleware: learning from a Large-Scale Experiment. In Proceedings of the 17th international middleware conference (pp. 17:1–17:13). Trento, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Jambroŝić, K., December 2017. Introduction to psychoacoustics and psychoacoustic tests. In: DENORMS Training School 3: Experimental techniques for acoustic porous materials and metamaterials. Le Mans, France: Le Mans University.
   Google Scholar
• Jarosinska, D., et al., 2018. Development of the who environmental noise guidelines for the European region: an introduction. International journal of environmental research and public health, 15 (4), 813: 1–813:7. doi:10.3390/ijerph15040813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimeno, B., Hau, M., and Verhulst, S. (2018). Corticosterone levels reflect variation in metabolic rate, independent of ‘stress’. Scientific reports, 8 (1), 13020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jourdan, C., 2013. Subjective geography. Available from: http://www.geographiesubjective.org Accessed 10 March 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Kardous, C.A. and Shaw, P.B., 2015. Do sound meter apps measure noise levels accurately? Sound and vibrations, July 2015, 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Kardous, C.A. and Shaw, P.B., 2016. Evaluation of smartphone sound measurement applications (apps) using external microphones - A follow-up study. The Journal of the acoustical society of America, 140 (4), 10–13. doi:10.1121/1.4962556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleist, N.J., et al., 2018. Chronic anthropogenic noise disrupts glucocorticoid signaling and has multiple effects on fitness in an avian community. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 115 (4), E648–E657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornprobst, H.-J., et al., 2014. Acoustics – soundscape – part 1: definition and conceptual framework. International organization for standardization, 1 (1), 4.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., et al., 2017. The brain basis for misophonia. Current Biology, 27 (4), 527–533. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2016.12.048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, N.D., et al., 2010. Asurvey of mobile phone sensing. IEEE communications magazine, 48 (9), 140–150.
   Google Scholar
• Lefevre, B. and Issarny, V., 2018. Matching technological & societal innovations: the social design of a mobile collaborative app for urban noise monitoring. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing (SMARTCOMP) (pp. 33–40). Taormina, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Longo, A., et al., 2017. Crowd-sourced data collection for urban monitoring via mobile sensors. ACM transactions on internet technology, 18 (1), 5:1–5:21. doi:10.1145/3093895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maisonneuve, N., Stevens, M., and Ochab, B., 2016. Participatory noise pollution monitoring using mobile phones. Information polity, 15, 51–71. doi:10.3233/IP-2010-0200
   Google Scholar
• Manwar, V.D., Mandal, B.B., and Pal, A.K., 2016. Environmental propagation of noise in mines and nearby villages: A study through noise mapping. Noise and health, 18 (83), 185–193. doi:10.4103/1463-1741.189246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marry, S., 2011. Modèle expérimental d’évaluation d’espaces publics par les citadins à travers la perception spatiale et sonore. In: RIDAD (Rencontres Interdisciplinaires Doctorales sur l’Aménagement Durable) Vaulx-en-Velin, 2011. Grenoble, France: Institut de géographie alpine, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Meng, Q. and Kang, J., 2016. Effect of sound-related activities on human behaviours and acoustic comfort in urban open spaces. Science of the total environment, 573, 481–493. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miège, B., 2007. Les Tic entre innovation technique et ancrage social. Grenoble, France: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble, p. 235.
   Google Scholar
• Munzel, T., et al., 2014. Cardiovascular effects of environ- mental noise exposure. European heart journal, 35 (13), 829–836. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabi, G., et al., 2018. The possible effects of anthropogenic acoustic pollution on marine mammals’ reproduction: an emerging threat to animal extinction. Environmental science and pollution research, 25 (20), 19338–19345. doi:10.1007/s11356-018-2208-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noureen, J. and Asif, M., 2017. Crowdsensing: socio-technical challenges and opportunities. (IJACSA) International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 8 (3), 363–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Official Journal of the European Communities, 2002. Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32002L0049&from=EN Accessed 10 March 2019
   Google Scholar
• Olmedo, E., 2015. Représenter l’espace vécu. les enjeux d’une cartographie émotionnelle en géographie. In: Seminar Géographie des E´motions, ENS-Ulm. Marseille, France: Centre N. Elias.
   Google Scholar
• Picaut, J., et al., 2017. Characterization of urban sound environments using a comprehensive approach combining open data, measurements, and modeling. The journal of the acoustical society of America, 141 (5), 3808.
   Google Scholar
• Raap, T., et al., 2017. Ambient anthropogenic noise but not light is associated with the ecophysiology of free-living songbird nestlings. Scientific reports, 7, 2754:1–2754: 8. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-02940-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa, P. and Koper, N., 2018. Integrating multiple disciplines to understand effects of anthro- pogenic noise on animal communication. Ecosphere, 9 (2), e02127. doi:10.1002/ecs2.2127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, G.M.E., Alves, S., and Botteldooren, D., 2018. Urban sound planning: an essential component in urbanism and landscape architecture. In: Handbook of research on perception- driven approaches to urban assessment and design. IGI Global, 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Seixas, N., et al., 2008. Comparison of perceived and quantitative measures of occupational noise exposure. The Annals of occupational hygiene, 53 (1), 41–54. doi:10.1093/annhyg/men071
   Google Scholar
• Shannon, G., et al., 2015. A synthesis of two decades of research documenting the effects of noise on wildlife. Biological Reviews, 91 (4), 982–1005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shield, B. and Dockrell, J., 2008. The effects of environmental and classroom noise on the academic attainments of primary school children. The journal of the acoustical society of America, 123 (1), 133–144. doi:10.1121/1.2812596
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shield, B.M. and Dockrell, J.E., 2003. The effects of noise on children at school: A review. Journal of building acoustics, 10 (2), 97–106. doi:10.1260/135101003768965960
   Google Scholar
• Stansfeld, S.A. and Shipley, M., 2015. Noise sensitivity and future risk of illness and mortality. Science of the total environment, 520, 114–119. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics, G., 2018. Number of mobile app downloads worldwide in 2017, 2018 and 2022 (in billions). Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/271644/worldwide-free-and-paid-mobile-app-store-downloads/ Accessed 10 March 2019
   Google Scholar
• The Centre for Strategy & Evaluation Services and ACCON, 2016. Evaluation of Directive 2002/49/EC relating to the assessment and management of Environmental Noise. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/noise/pdf/ summary study evaluation directive environmental noise en.pdf [Accessed 10 March 2019]
   Google Scholar
• Troïanowski, M., et al., 2017. Effects of traffic noise on tree frog stress levels, immunity, and color signaling. Conservation biology, 31 (5), 1132–1140. doi:10.1111/cobi.12893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unit, T.S.C., 2016. Links between noise and air pollution and socioeconomicstatus. Bristol: University of the West of England, Bristol: Science for Environment Policy, European Commission, DG Environment, Brussels, in- depth report 13 (Vol. 13, Technical Report).
   Google Scholar
• Unit, T.S.C., 2017. Noise abatement approaches. Future brief 17 (Vol. 17; Tech. Rep.). University of the West of England, Bristol: Science for Environment Policy, European Commission, DG Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Ventura, R., et al., 2017. Evaluation and calibration of mobile phones for noise monitoring application. Journal of the acoustical society of America, 142 (5), 3084–3093. doi:10.1121/1.5009448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventura, R., Mallet, V., and Issarny, V., 2018. Assimilation of mobile phone measurements for noise mapping of a neighborhood. The journal of the acoustical society of America, 144 (3), 1279–1292. doi:10.1121/1.5052173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO, 2018. Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region (Tech. Rep.). World Health Organization. Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/environment-and-health/noise/publications/2018/environmental -noise-guidelines-for-the-european-region-2018
   Google Scholar
• Willen, R.M., et al., 2017. Factors determining the effects of human interaction on the cortisol levels of shelter dogs. Applied animal behaviour science, 186, 41–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zannin, P.H.T., et al., 2003. A survey of urban noise annoyance in a large Brazilian city: the importance of a subjective analysis in conjunction with an objective analysis. Environmental impact assessment review, 23 (2), 245–255. doi:10.1016/S0195-9255(02)00092-6
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., et al., 2018. Effect of soundscape dimensions on acoustic comfort in urban open public spaces. Applied acoustics, 133, 73–81. doi:10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.11.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwicker, E. and Fastl, H., 2007. Psychoacoustics: facts and models. Chasseneuil, France: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar