239
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Scholarship – Conceptual

Collective and creative consortia: combining knowledge, ways of knowing and praxis

Pages 237-249 | Received 10 Jul 2019, Accepted 15 Dec 2019, Published online: 20 Jan 2020

References

  • Baltazar, A. and Kapp, S., 2010. Against determination, beyond meditation. In: F. Kossak, et al., eds. Agency: working with uncertain architectures. London and New York: Routledge, 131–140.
  • Brandt, P., et al., 2013. A review of transdisciplinary research in sustainability science. Ecological economics, 92, 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.008
  • Bromham, L., Dinnage, R., and Hua, X., 2016. Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success. Nature, June 30 534 (7609), 684–687. doi:10.1038/nature18315
  • Brown, J. and Isaacs, D., 2005. The World Café: shaping our futures through conversations that matter. San Francisco CA: Berrett-Koehler.
  • Brown, V., 2010. Multiple knowledges, multiple languages: are the limits of my language the limits of my world? Knowledge management for development journal, 6 (2), 120–131. doi:10.1080/19474199.2010.532148
  • Brown, V., 2015. Utopian thinking and the collective mind: beyond transdisciplinarity. Futures, 65 (1), 209–216. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2014.11.004
  • Brown, V., Harris, J., and Russell, J., 2010. Tackling wicked problems through the transdisciplinary imagination. London UK: Earthscan.
  • Buchanan, R., 1992. Wicked problems in design thinking. Design issues, 8 (2), 5–21. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1511637
  • Doucet, I. and Janssens, N., 2011. Transdisciplinary knowledge production in architecture and urbanism: towards hybrid modes of inquiry. Dordrecht NL: Springer.
  • Femenías, P. and Thuvander, L., 2018. Transdisciplinary research in the built environment: A question of time. Technology innovation management review, 8 (8), 27–40. doi:10.22215/timreview/1176
  • Gibbons, M., et al., 1994. The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London UK: Sage Publications.
  • Haas, P., 2016. Epistemic communities, constructivism, and international environmental politics. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Habermas, J., 1981. The theory of communicative action. Volume 2. Lifeworld and system: a critique of functional reason. Boston MA: Beacon Press.
  • Harrison, O., 2008. Open space technology: a user’s guide. 3rd. San Francisco CA: Berrett-Koehler.
  • Hugentobler, M., 2017. Switzerland. In: M. Pareja-Eastaway and N. Winston, eds. Sustainable communities and urban housing. a comparative European perspective. London Uand New York: Routledge, 203–224.
  • Hugentobler, M., Hofer, A., and Simmendinger, P., eds., 2016. More than housing: cooperative planning- a case study in Zurich. Basel: Birkhauser.
  • Jacobs, J.A., 2013. In defense of disciplines. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Jordan, T., 2014. Deliberative methods for complex issues: A typology of functions that may need scaffolding. Group facilitation: a research and applications journal, 13, 50–71.
  • Lang, D., et al., 2012. Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Science, 7(s1, 25–43. doi:10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x
  • Latour, B., 2014. Agency at the time of the Anthropocene. New literary history, 45, 1–18. http://www.bruno-latour.fr/node/501
  • Lawrence, R., 2010. Beyond disciplinary confinement to transdisciplinarity. In: V. Brown, J. Harris, and J. Russell, eds.. Tackling wicked problems through the transdisciplinary imagination. London UK: Earthscan, 16–30.
  • Lawrence, R., 2015a. Advances in transdisciplinarity: epistemologies, methodologies and processes. Futures, 65 (1), 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2014.11.007
  • Lawrence, R., 2015b. Mind the gap: bridging the divide between knowledge, policy and practice. In: H. Barton, et al., eds. The routledge handbook of planning for health and well-being. New York: Routledge, 74–84.
  • Lawrence, R., in press. Creating built environments: bridging knowledge and practice divides. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Lawrence, R. and Després, C., eds., 2004. Futures of transdisciplinarity. Futures, 36 (4), 397–405. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.005.
  • Lawrence, R. and Gatzweiler, F., 2017. Wanted: a transdisciplinary knowledge domain for urban health. Journal of urban health, 94, 592–596. doi:10.1007/s11524-017-0182-x
  • McDowell, C., et al., 2005. Building knowledge from the practice of local communities. Knowledge management for development journal, 1 (3), 30–40. www.km4dev.org/journal
  • Meadowcroft, J., 2009. What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions. Policy science, 42, 323–340. doi:10.1007/s11077-009-9097-z
  • Mehr als Wohnen Housing Cooperative, Zurich https://www.mehralswohnen.ch/
  • Mistra Urban Futures, https://www.mistraurbanfutures.org/en
  • Mumford, L., 1922. The story of utopias. New York: Bari and Liveright.
  • Nadasdy, 1999. The politics of TEK: power and the “Integration” of knowledge. Artic anthropology, 36 (1–2), 1–18.
  • Nieuwenhuijsen, M. and Khreis, H., eds., 2019. Integrating human health into urban and transport planning: a framework. Cham CH: Springer.
  • Nowotny, H., Scott, P., and Gibbons, M., 2001. Re-thinking science: knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
  • Olshoorn, X. and Wiecorek, A., eds., 2006. Understanding industrial transformation: views from different disciplines. Dordrecht NL: Springer.
  • Oreskes, N. and Conway, E., 2010. Merchants of doubt. London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Palmer, H. and Walasek, H., eds., 2016. Co-production in action: towards realising just cities. Gothenburg SE: Mistra Urban Futures.
  • Persson, S., 2009. Research circles: a guidebook. City of Malmö SE: Centre for Diversity in Education.
  • Pohl, C., 2011. What is progress in transdisciplinary research? Futures, 43 (6), 618–626. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2011.03.001
  • Polanyi, M., 1969. Knowing and being: essays by Michael Polanyi. London UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Polk, M., ed., 2015. Co-producing knowledge for sustainable cities: joining forces for change. Abingdon UK and New York: Routledge.
  • Ringland Project, Antwerp, Belgium https://ringland.be/about/the-project/
  • Rittel, H. and Weber, M., 1973. Dilemmas in general theory of planning. Policy sciences, 4, 55–169. doi:10.1007/BF01405730
  • Routledge, P., 2003. Convergences space: process geographies of grassroots globalization networks. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 28 (3), 333–349. doi:10.1111/1475-5661.00096
  • Rydin, Y., 2007. Re-examining the role of knowledge within planning theory. Planning Theory, 6, 52–68. doi:10.1177/1473095207075161
  • Schön, D., 1983. The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
  • Stilgoe, J., 2009. Citizen scientists – reconnecting science with civil society. London UK: Demos.
  • Tsoukas, H. and Vladimirou, E., 2001. What is organizational knowledge? Journal of management studies, 38 (7), 973–993. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00268
  • UN Habitat, 2016. World cities report 2016: urbanization and development. Emerging futures. Nairobi K: United Nations.
  • Van Brusselen, D., et al., 2016. Health impact assessment of a predicted air quality change by moving traffic from an urban ring road into a tunnel. The case of Antwerp, Belgium. PloS one, 11 (5), e0154052. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0154052
  • Vigar, G., 2012. Planning and professionalism: knowledge, judgement and expertise in English planning. Planning Theory, 11 (4), 361–378. doi:10.1177/1473095212439993
  • Wenger, E., McDermott, R., and Snyder, W., 2002. Cultivating communities of practice: a guide to managing knowledge. Boston MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Wernli, D. and Darbellay, F., 2016. Interdisciplinarity and the 21st century research-intensive university. Leuven B: League of European Research Universities (LERU).
  • Wheatley, P., 1971. The pivot of the four quarters: a preliminary enquiry into the origins and character of the Ancient Chinese City. Edinburgh UK: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Wolf, E. and Van Dooren, W., 2017. How policies become contested: A spiral of imagination and evidence in a large infrastructure project. Policy sciences, 50 (3), 449–468. doi:10.1007/s11077-017-9275-3
  • Woodhouse, E. and Patton, J., 2004. Design by society: science and technology studies and the social shaping of design. Design issues, 20 (3), 1–12. doi:10.1162/0747936041423262

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.