References
- Baltazar, A. and Kapp, S., 2010. Against determination, beyond meditation. In: F. Kossak, et al., eds. Agency: working with uncertain architectures. London and New York: Routledge, 131–140.
- Brandt, P., et al., 2013. A review of transdisciplinary research in sustainability science. Ecological economics, 92, 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.008
- Bromham, L., Dinnage, R., and Hua, X., 2016. Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success. Nature, June 30 534 (7609), 684–687. doi:10.1038/nature18315
- Brown, J. and Isaacs, D., 2005. The World Café: shaping our futures through conversations that matter. San Francisco CA: Berrett-Koehler.
- Brown, V., 2010. Multiple knowledges, multiple languages: are the limits of my language the limits of my world? Knowledge management for development journal, 6 (2), 120–131. doi:10.1080/19474199.2010.532148
- Brown, V., 2015. Utopian thinking and the collective mind: beyond transdisciplinarity. Futures, 65 (1), 209–216. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2014.11.004
- Brown, V., Harris, J., and Russell, J., 2010. Tackling wicked problems through the transdisciplinary imagination. London UK: Earthscan.
- Buchanan, R., 1992. Wicked problems in design thinking. Design issues, 8 (2), 5–21. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1511637
- Doucet, I. and Janssens, N., 2011. Transdisciplinary knowledge production in architecture and urbanism: towards hybrid modes of inquiry. Dordrecht NL: Springer.
- Femenías, P. and Thuvander, L., 2018. Transdisciplinary research in the built environment: A question of time. Technology innovation management review, 8 (8), 27–40. doi:10.22215/timreview/1176
- Gibbons, M., et al., 1994. The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London UK: Sage Publications.
- Haas, P., 2016. Epistemic communities, constructivism, and international environmental politics. London and New York: Routledge.
- Habermas, J., 1981. The theory of communicative action. Volume 2. Lifeworld and system: a critique of functional reason. Boston MA: Beacon Press.
- Harrison, O., 2008. Open space technology: a user’s guide. 3rd. San Francisco CA: Berrett-Koehler.
- Hugentobler, M., 2017. Switzerland. In: M. Pareja-Eastaway and N. Winston, eds. Sustainable communities and urban housing. a comparative European perspective. London Uand New York: Routledge, 203–224.
- Hugentobler, M., Hofer, A., and Simmendinger, P., eds., 2016. More than housing: cooperative planning- a case study in Zurich. Basel: Birkhauser.
- Jacobs, J.A., 2013. In defense of disciplines. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Jordan, T., 2014. Deliberative methods for complex issues: A typology of functions that may need scaffolding. Group facilitation: a research and applications journal, 13, 50–71.
- Lang, D., et al., 2012. Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Science, 7(s1, 25–43. doi:10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x
- Latour, B., 2014. Agency at the time of the Anthropocene. New literary history, 45, 1–18. http://www.bruno-latour.fr/node/501
- Lawrence, R., 2010. Beyond disciplinary confinement to transdisciplinarity. In: V. Brown, J. Harris, and J. Russell, eds.. Tackling wicked problems through the transdisciplinary imagination. London UK: Earthscan, 16–30.
- Lawrence, R., 2015a. Advances in transdisciplinarity: epistemologies, methodologies and processes. Futures, 65 (1), 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2014.11.007
- Lawrence, R., 2015b. Mind the gap: bridging the divide between knowledge, policy and practice. In: H. Barton, et al., eds. The routledge handbook of planning for health and well-being. New York: Routledge, 74–84.
- Lawrence, R., in press. Creating built environments: bridging knowledge and practice divides. London and New York: Routledge.
- Lawrence, R. and Després, C., eds., 2004. Futures of transdisciplinarity. Futures, 36 (4), 397–405. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.005.
- Lawrence, R. and Gatzweiler, F., 2017. Wanted: a transdisciplinary knowledge domain for urban health. Journal of urban health, 94, 592–596. doi:10.1007/s11524-017-0182-x
- McDowell, C., et al., 2005. Building knowledge from the practice of local communities. Knowledge management for development journal, 1 (3), 30–40. www.km4dev.org/journal
- Meadowcroft, J., 2009. What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions. Policy science, 42, 323–340. doi:10.1007/s11077-009-9097-z
- Mehr als Wohnen Housing Cooperative, Zurich https://www.mehralswohnen.ch/
- Mistra Urban Futures, https://www.mistraurbanfutures.org/en
- Mumford, L., 1922. The story of utopias. New York: Bari and Liveright.
- Nadasdy, 1999. The politics of TEK: power and the “Integration” of knowledge. Artic anthropology, 36 (1–2), 1–18.
- Nieuwenhuijsen, M. and Khreis, H., eds., 2019. Integrating human health into urban and transport planning: a framework. Cham CH: Springer.
- Nowotny, H., Scott, P., and Gibbons, M., 2001. Re-thinking science: knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
- Olshoorn, X. and Wiecorek, A., eds., 2006. Understanding industrial transformation: views from different disciplines. Dordrecht NL: Springer.
- Oreskes, N. and Conway, E., 2010. Merchants of doubt. London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing.
- Palmer, H. and Walasek, H., eds., 2016. Co-production in action: towards realising just cities. Gothenburg SE: Mistra Urban Futures.
- Persson, S., 2009. Research circles: a guidebook. City of Malmö SE: Centre for Diversity in Education.
- Pohl, C., 2011. What is progress in transdisciplinary research? Futures, 43 (6), 618–626. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2011.03.001
- Polanyi, M., 1969. Knowing and being: essays by Michael Polanyi. London UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
- Polk, M., ed., 2015. Co-producing knowledge for sustainable cities: joining forces for change. Abingdon UK and New York: Routledge.
- Ringland Project, Antwerp, Belgium https://ringland.be/about/the-project/
- Rittel, H. and Weber, M., 1973. Dilemmas in general theory of planning. Policy sciences, 4, 55–169. doi:10.1007/BF01405730
- Routledge, P., 2003. Convergences space: process geographies of grassroots globalization networks. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 28 (3), 333–349. doi:10.1111/1475-5661.00096
- Rydin, Y., 2007. Re-examining the role of knowledge within planning theory. Planning Theory, 6, 52–68. doi:10.1177/1473095207075161
- Schön, D., 1983. The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
- Stilgoe, J., 2009. Citizen scientists – reconnecting science with civil society. London UK: Demos.
- Tsoukas, H. and Vladimirou, E., 2001. What is organizational knowledge? Journal of management studies, 38 (7), 973–993. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00268
- UN Habitat, 2016. World cities report 2016: urbanization and development. Emerging futures. Nairobi K: United Nations.
- Van Brusselen, D., et al., 2016. Health impact assessment of a predicted air quality change by moving traffic from an urban ring road into a tunnel. The case of Antwerp, Belgium. PloS one, 11 (5), e0154052. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0154052
- Vigar, G., 2012. Planning and professionalism: knowledge, judgement and expertise in English planning. Planning Theory, 11 (4), 361–378. doi:10.1177/1473095212439993
- Wenger, E., McDermott, R., and Snyder, W., 2002. Cultivating communities of practice: a guide to managing knowledge. Boston MA: Harvard Business School Press.
- Wernli, D. and Darbellay, F., 2016. Interdisciplinarity and the 21st century research-intensive university. Leuven B: League of European Research Universities (LERU).
- Wheatley, P., 1971. The pivot of the four quarters: a preliminary enquiry into the origins and character of the Ancient Chinese City. Edinburgh UK: Edinburgh University Press.
- Wolf, E. and Van Dooren, W., 2017. How policies become contested: A spiral of imagination and evidence in a large infrastructure project. Policy sciences, 50 (3), 449–468. doi:10.1007/s11077-017-9275-3
- Woodhouse, E. and Patton, J., 2004. Design by society: science and technology studies and the social shaping of design. Design issues, 20 (3), 1–12. doi:10.1162/0747936041423262