Method for Observing pHysical Activity and Wellbeing (MOHAWk): validation of an observation tool to assess physical activity and other wellbeing behaviours in urban spaces

References

• Anderson, J., et al., 2017. Lively social space, well-being activity, and urban design: findings from a low-cost community-led public space intervention. Environment and behavior, 49 (6), 685–716. doi:10.1177/0013916516659108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauman, A.E., et al., 2012. Correlates of physical activity: why are some people physically active and others not? Lancet, 380 (9838), 258–271. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60735-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benton, J., et al., 2018a. The impact of new walking infrastructure and changes to green space along an urban canal on physical activity and wellbeing: protocol for a natural experimental study. Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/zcm7v/
   Google Scholar
• Benton, J.S., et al., 2018b. Evaluating the impact of improvements in urban green space on older adults’ physical activity and wellbeing: protocol for a natural experimental study. BMC public health, 18 (1), 923. doi:10.1186/s12889-018-5812-z
   Google Scholar
• Benton, J.S., et al., 2016a. The effect of changing the built environment on physical activity: a quantitative review of the risk of bias in natural experiments. The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 13 (1), 107. doi:10.1186/s12966-016-0433-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Benton, J.S., et al., 2016b. The effect of changing the built environment on physical activity: A quantitative review of the risk of bias in natural experiments. The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 13 (1).
   Google Scholar
• Broomhall, M., Giles-Corti, B., and Lange, A., 2004. Quality of public open space tool (POST). Perth: School of Population Health, The University of Western Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D.A., et al., 2011. How much observation is enough? Refining the administration of SOPARC. Journal of physical activity & health, 8 (8), 1117–1123. doi:10.1123/jpah.8.8.1117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and psychological measurement, 20 (1), 37–46. doi:10.1177/001316446002000104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., and White, M., 2008. Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of economic psychology, 29 (1), 94–122. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2007.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evenson, K.R., et al., 2016. Park characteristics, use, and physical activity: A review of studies using SOPARC (System for observing play and recreation in communities). Preventive medicine, 86, 153–166. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.02.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, D.P. and Sutton, S., 2010. Reactivity of measurement in health psychology: how much of a problem is it? What can be done about it? British journal of health psychology, 15 (3), 453–468. doi:10.1348/135910710X492341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehl Institute, 2017. The public life data protocol, version 1.0.
   Google Scholar
• Gehl, J. and Svarre, B., 2013. How to study public life. Island press. Washington, DC: How to Study Public Life, 1–179 p.
   Google Scholar
• Gidlow, C., et al., 2010. Promoting green space in stoke-on-trent (ProGreSS) final report for natural england august 2010. http://www.staffs.ac.uk/health_progress
   Google Scholar
• Gidlow, C.J., Ellis, N.J., and Bostock, S., 2012. Development of the neighbourhood green space tool (NGST). Landscape and urban planning, 106 (4), 347–358. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallgren, K.A., 2012. Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: an overview and tutorial. Tutorials in quantitative methods for psychology, 8 (1), 23–34. doi:10.20982/tqmp.08.1.p023
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Helliwell, J.F. and Putnam, R.D., 2005. The social context of well-being. In: F.A. Huppert, N. Baylis, and B. Keverne, eds. The science of well-being. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 435–459.
   Google Scholar
• Houlden, V., et al., 2018. The relationship between greenspace and the mental wellbeing of adults: A systematic review. PloS one, 13 (9), e0203000. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0203000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, R.F., et al., 2015. The impact of interventions to promote physical activity in urban green space: A systematic review and recommendations for future research. Social science & medicine (1982), 124, 246–256. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.11.051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, R.P. and Maddock, J.E., 2016. Observational park-based physical activity studies: A systematic reviewof the literature. Preventive medicine, 89, 257–277. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.06.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kärmeniemi, M., et al., 2018. The built environment as a determinant of physical activity: a systematic review of longitudinal studies and natural experiments. Annals of behavioral medicine: a publication of the society of behavioral medicine, 52 (3), 239–251. doi:10.1093/abm/kax043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo, T.K. and Li, M.Y.A., 2016. Guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of chiropractic medicine, 15 (2), 155–163. doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, I.-M., et al., 2012. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet, 380 (9838), 219–229. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61031-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacMillan, F., et al., 2018. Do natural experiments of changes in neighborhood built environment impact physical activity and diet? A systematic review. International journal of environmental research and public health, 15 (2), 217. doi:10.3390/ijerph15020217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEwan, K., et al., 2019. App for improving mental health through connecting with urban nature. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16 (18), 3373. doi:10.3390/ijerph16183373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie, T., Sallis, J., and Armstrong, C., 1994. Association between direct observation and accelerometer measures of children’s physical activity during physical education and recess. Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 26 (Supplement), 143. doi:10.1249/00005768-199405001-00805
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie, T.L., et al., 2006. System for observing play and recreation in communities (soparc): reliability and feasibility measures. Journal of physical activity & health, 3 (s1), S208–22. doi:10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s208
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie, T.L., et al., 2000. Leisure-time physical activity in school environments: an observational study using SOPLAY. Preventive medicine, 30 (1), 70–77. doi:10.1006/pmed.1999.0591
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie, T.L., Sallis, J.F., and Nader, P.R.S.O.F.I.T., 1992. System for observing fitness instruction time. Journal of teaching in physical education : JTPE, 11 (2), 195–205. doi:10.1123/jtpe.11.2.195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mckenzie, T.L., et al., 1991. BEACHES: an observational system for assessing children’s eating and physical activity behaviors and associated events. Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1 (24), 141–151.
   Google Scholar
• Millstein, R.A., et al., 2013. Development, scoring, and reliability of the microscale audit of pedestrian streetscapes (MAPS). BMC public health, 13 (1), 403. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-403
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore, T.H.M., et al., 2018. The effects of changes to the built environment on the mental health and well-being of adults: systematic review. Health & place, 53, 237–257. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.07.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New Economics Foundation. Five ways to wellbeing: the evidence. London; 2008. http://b.3cdn.net/nefoundation/8984c5089d5c2285ee_t4m6bhqq5.pdf
   Google Scholar
• New Economics Foundation, 2012. Well-being evidence for policy: A review. London. https://b.3cdn.net/nefoundation/10b8aabd90c5771ff9_a0m6bvv5a.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Patacchini, E., et al., 2009. Urban sprawl in Europe. Brookings-whart pap urban aff. Washington, DC, 125–149. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/25609561
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, H., et al., 2018. Identifying effective behavior change techniques in built environment interventions to increase use of green space: a systematic review. Environment and behavior, 50 (1), 28–55. doi:10.1177/0013916516681391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, P., et al., 2004. Measuring students’ physical activity levels: validating SOFIT for use with high-school students. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 23 (3), 235–251. doi:10.1123/jtpe.23.3.235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saelens, B.E., et al., 2016. Measuring physical environments of parks and playgrounds: EAPRS instrument development and inter-rater reliability. Journal of physical activity & health, 3 (s1), S190–207. doi:10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s190
   Google Scholar
• Sallis, J.F., et al., 2016. Physical activity in relation to urban environments in 14 cities worldwide: a cross-sectional study. Lancet, 387 (10034), 2207–2217. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01284-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suminski, R.R., Dominick, G.M., and Plautz, E., 2019. Validation of the block walk method for assessing physical activity occurring on sidewalks/streets. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16 (11), 1927. doi:10.3390/ijerph16111927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, P. and Gilliland, J., 2007. The effect of season and weather on physical activity: a systematic review. Public health, 121 (12), 909–922. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2007.04.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tully, M.A., et al., 2013. Physical activity and the rejuvenation of connswater (PARC study): protocol for a natural experiment investigating the impact of urban regeneration on public health. BMC public health, 13 (774).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UK Department of Health. Start active, stay active, 2011. A report on physical activity for health from our four home countries’ chief medical officer. London. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/216370/dh_128210.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations, 2015. World urbanization prospects: the 2014 revision, highlights. New York. https://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/publications/files/wup2014-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Veitch, J., et al., 2017. Challenges in conducting natural experiments in parks—lessons from the REVAMP study. The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 14 (1), 5. doi:10.1186/s12966-016-0460-0
   Google Scholar
• Whiting, J.W., Larson, L.R., and Green, G.T., 2012. Monitoring visitation in georgia state parks using the system for observing play and recreation in communities (SOPARC). Journal of outdoor recreation, education, and leadership, 30 (4), 21–37. https://lrl.people.clemson.edu/WebFiles/Whiting.etal.2012_JPRA-SOPARC.pdf
   Google Scholar
• The World Bank, 2019. Average precipitation in depth (mm per year) [Data file]. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/AG.LND.PRCP.MM?end=2014&start=2013&view=map
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization, 2010. Global recommendations on physical activity for health. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44399/1/9789241599979_eng.pdf
   Google Scholar