2,823
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Scholarship - Empirical

Social determinants of older adults’ urban design preference: a cross-sectional study

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 360-374 | Received 13 Aug 2020, Accepted 21 Dec 2020, Published online: 02 Feb 2021

References

  • Abdi, H., 2007. The Bonferonni and Šidák corrections for multiple comparisons. In: N.J. Salkind, ed. Encyclopedia of measurement and statistics. Sage: Thousand Oaks, 103–107.
  • Barnett, D.W., et al., 2017. Built environmental correlates of older adults’ total physical activity and walking: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 14 (1), 103. doi:10.1186/s12966-017-0558-z
  • BBSR. 2017. Laufende Stadtbeobachtung - Raumabgrenzungen. Stadt- und Gemeindetypen in Deutschland [Ongoing city observation - spatial delimitations. Types of cities and municipalities in Germany}. Bundesinstitut für Bau-, Stadt- und Raumforschung (BBSR). Available from: https://www.bbsr.bund.de/BBSR/DE/forschung/raumbeobachtung/Raumabgrenzungen/deutschland/gemeinden/StadtGemeindetyp/StadtGemeindetyp.html [Accessed 11 November 2020].
  • Beyer, F.R. and Ker, K., 2009. Street lighting for preventing road traffic injuries. Cochrane database of systematic reviews. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004728.pub2
  • Bolte, G., et al., 2018. Environmental justice as an approach to tackle environmental health inequalities. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz, 61 (6), 674–683. doi:10.1007/s00103-018-2739-6
  • Brüchert, T., et al., 2016. Securing active aging in place. Access by Design, 146, 32–33.
  • Brüchert, T., et al., 2017. Intersectoral collaboration of public health and urban planning for promotion of mobility and healthy ageing: protocol of the AFOOT project. Cities & health, 1 (1), 83–88. doi:10.1080/23748834.2017.1312086
  • Brüchert, T., et al., 2021a. Barriers, facilitators, and intersectoral collaboration for promoting active mobility for healthy aging – a qualitative study within local government in Germany. International journal of environmental research and public health (under review).
  • Brüchert, T., Quentin, P., and Bolte, G., 2021b. The relationship between perceived built environment and cycling or e-biking for transport among older adults – a cross-sectional study. BMC public health (under review).
  • Bundeskriminalamt, 2019. Der Deutsche Viktimisierungssurvey 2017 [The German Victimisation Survey 2017]. Wiesbaden: Bundeskriminalamt.
  • Burton, E.J., Mitchell, L., and Stride, C.B., 2011. Good places for ageing in place: development of objective built environment measures for investigating links with older people’s wellbeing. BMC public health, 11 (1), 839. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-839
  • Cairns, J., et al., 2014. Go slow: an umbrella review of the effects of 20 mph zones and limits on health and health inequalities. Journal of public health, 37 (3), 515–520. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdu067
  • Cerin, E., et al., 2013. Sharing good NEWS across the world: developing comparable scores across 12 countries for the neighborhood environment walkability scale (NEWS). BMC public health, 13 (1), 309. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-309
  • Cerin, E., et al., 2014. Ageing in an ultra-dense metropolis: perceived neighbourhood characteristics and utilitarian walking in Hong Kong elders. Public health nutrition, 17 (1), 225–232. doi:10.1017/S1368980012003862
  • Cerin, E., et al., 2017. The neighbourhood physical environment and active travel in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 14 (1), 15. doi:10.1186/s12966-017-0471-5
  • Clarke, P., et al., 2008. Mobility disability and the urban built environment. American journal of epidemiology, 168 (5), 506–513. doi:10.1093/aje/kwn185
  • Ding, D., et al., 2014. Neighborhood environment and physical activity among older adults: do the relationships differ by driving status? Journal of aging and physical activity, 22 (3), 421–431. doi:10.1123/JAPA.2012-0332
  • DWD, 2018. Klimareport Niedersachsen [Climate report lower saxony]. Offenbach am Main: Deutscher Wetterdienst.
  • Eggs, J., et al., 2018. Mobilität in Deutschland – miD Methodenbericht. Anhang. Studie von infas, DLR, IVT und infas 360 im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Verkehr und digitale Infrastruktur [Mobility in Germany - MiD method report. Appendix. Study by infas, DLR, IVT and infas 360 on behalf of the Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure]. Bonn: Berlin.
  • EU, 2019. Ageing Europe — looking at the lives of older people in the EU. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  • Eurostat. 2020. People at risk of poverty or social exclusion by age and sex (online data code: ILC_PEPS01). Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/ilc_peps01/settings_1/table?lang=en.
  • Ewing, R. and Cervero, R., 2001. Travel and the built environment: a synthesis. Transportation research record, 1780 (1), 87–114. doi:10.3141/1780-10
  • Ewing, R. and Cervero, R., 2010. Travel and the built environment. Journal of the american planning association, 76 (3), 265–294. doi:10.1080/01944361003766766
  • Farias, I. and Widmer, S., 2017. Ordinary smart cities. How calculated users, professional citizens, technology companies and city administrations engage in a more-than-digital politics. TECNOSCIENZA: Italian journal of science & technology studies, 8 (2), 43–60.
  • Fecht, D., et al., 2015. Associations between air pollution and socioeconomic characteristics, ethnicity and age profile of neighbourhoods in England and the Netherlands. Environmental pollution, 198, 201–210. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2014.12.014
  • Flacke, J., et al., 2016. Mapping environmental inequalities relevant for health for informing urban planning interventions-a case study in the City of Dortmund, Germany. International journal of environmental research and public health, 13 (7), 711. doi:10.3390/ijerph13070711
  • Gardener, M.A. and de Oliveira, F.L., 2020. Urban environment cues for health and well-being in the elderly 2019. Cities & health, 4 (1), 117–134. doi:10.1080/23748834.2019.1636506
  • Golant, S.M., 2011. Chapter 15 - the changing residential environments of older people. In: R.H. Binstock and L.K. George, eds. Handbook of aging and the social sciences (7th). Academic Press: San Diego, 207–220.
  • Gray, D.B., Gould, M., and Bickenbach, J.E., 2003. Environmental barriers and disability. Journal of architectural and planning research, 20, 29–37.
  • Innes, J.E. and Booher, D.E., 2004. Reframing public participation: strategies for the 21st century. Planning theory & practice, 5 (4), 419–436. doi:10.1080/1464935042000293170
  • Kelly, P., et al., 2014. Systematic review and meta-analysis of reduction in all-cause mortality from walking and cycling and shape of dose response relationship. International journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 11 (1), 132. doi:10.1186/s12966-014-0132-x
  • Kemperman, A., et al., 2019. Loneliness of older adults: social network and the living environment. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16 (3), 406. doi:10.3390/ijerph16030406
  • Kerr, J., Rosenberg, D., and Frank, L., 2012. The role of the built environment in healthy aging. Journal of planning literature, 27 (1), 43–60. doi:10.1177/0885412211415283
  • Khayesi, M., 2020. Vulnerable road users or vulnerable transport planning? Frontiers in sustainable cities, 2.
  • Köckler, H., 2014. Nur die Einladung reicht nicht. Teilhabe als Schlüssel umweltbezogener Gerechtigkeit [Just the invitation’s not enough. Participation as the key to environmental justice]. politische ökologie, 32, 43–48.
  • Löfqvist, C., et al., 2013. Voices on relocation and aging in place in very old age—a complex and ambivalent matter. The gerontologist, 53 (6), 919–927. doi:10.1093/geront/gnt034
  • Marquardt, G., 2011. Wayfinding for people with dementia: a review of the role of architectural design. Herd, 4 (2), 75–90. doi:10.1177/193758671100400207
  • Marquez, D.X., et al., 2015. Older adult strategies for community wayfinding. Journal of applied gerontology, 36 (2), 213–233. doi:10.1177/0733464815581481
  • Mathers, J., Parry, J., and Jones, S., 2008. Exploring resident (non-)participation in the UK new deal for communities regeneration programme. Urban Studies, 45 (3), 591–606. doi:10.1177/0042098007087336
  • Meunier, C., 2006. Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung in der Bauleitplanung. Bedeutung der Aarhus-Konvention und der ihrer Umsetzung dienenden EU-Richtlinien – Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung in Berlin-Brandenburg im Praxistest – arbeitshilfe für die Praxis (UVP spezial, Bd. 20) [Public participation in urban land use planning. Significance of the Aarhus Convention and the EU Directives serving its implementation - public participation in Berlin-Brandenburg in practical test - Guidelines for practice (UVP spezial, Vol. 20)]. Dortmund: Dortmunder Vertrieb – Verl. für Architektur, Bau- und Planungsliteratur.
  • MiD 2017a. Mobilität in Tabellen (MiT 2017): PKW Verfügbarkeit nach Bildungsabschluss und Alter (Eigene Berechnungen). [Mobility in tables (MiT 2017): car availability by educational level and age (own calculations)]. Mobilität in Deutschland. Available from: https://mobilitaet-in-tabellen.dlr.de/mit/login.html?brd [Accessed 11 November 2020].
  • MiD. 2017b. Mobilität in Tabellen (MiT 2017): wege ausschließlich zu Fuß nach Geschlecht und Alter (Eigene Berechnungen). [Mobility in tables (MiT 2017): travelling exclusively on foot by sex and age (own calculations)]. Available from: https://mobilitaet-in-tabellen.dlr.de/mit/login.html?brd.
  • Min, L.I., et al., 2012. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. The Lancet, 380 (9838), 219–229. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61031-9
  • Mishler, A.D. and Neider, M.B., 2017. Improving wayfinding for older users with selective attention deficits. Ergonomics in design: the magazine of human factors applications, 25 (1), 11–16. doi:10.1177/1064804616659992
  • Moran, M., et al., 2014. Understanding the relationships between the physical environment and physical activity in older adults: a systematic review of qualitative studies. International journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 11 (1), 79. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-11-79
  • Musselwhite, C., 2015. Environment–person interactions enabling walking in later life. Transportation Planning and Technology, 38 (1), 44–61. doi:10.1080/03081060.2014.976983
  • Musselwhite, C., Holland, C., and Walker, I., 2015. The role of transport and mobility in the health of older people. Journal of Transport & Health, 2 (1), 1–4. doi:10.1016/j.jth.2015.02.001
  • Nobis, C., 2019. Mobilität in Deutschland - MiD Analysen zum Radverkehr und Fußverkehr. Studie von infas, DLR, IVT und infas 360 im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Verkehr und digitale Infrastruktur [Mobility in Germany - MiD analyses of bicycle traffic and foot traffic. Study by infas, DLR, IVT and infas 360 on behalf of the Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure]. Bonn: Berlin.
  • Nobis, C. and Kuhnimhof, T., 2018. Mobilität in Deutschland - MiD Ergebnisbericht Studie von infas, DLR, IVT und infas 360 im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Verkehr- und digitale Infrastruktur [Mobility in Germany - MiG Results Report. Study by infas, DLR, IVT and infas 360 on behalf of the federal ministry of transport and digital infrastructure]. Bonn: Berlin.
  • OECD, 2013. OECD guidelines for micro statistics on household wealth. OECD Publishing: Paris.
  • OECD, 2019. Health at a glance 2019: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Rachele, J.N., et al., 2019. Neighbourhood built environment and physical function among mid-to-older aged adults: A systematic review. Health place, 58, 102137. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.05.015
  • Schuilenburg, M. and Peeters, R., 2018. Smart cities and the architecture of security: pastoral power and the scripted design of public space. City, Territory and Architecture, 5 (1), 13. doi:10.1186/s40410-018-0090-8
  • Shergold, I., Parkhurst, G., and Musselwhite, C., 2012. Rural car dependence: an emerging barrier to community activity for older people. Transportation Planning and Technology, 35 (1), 69–85. doi:10.1080/03081060.2012.635417
  • Shigematsu, R., et al., 2009. Age differences in the relation of perceived neighborhood environment to walking. Medicine & science in sports & exercise, 41.
  • Stapelkamp, T., 2012. Informationsvisualisierung. Web - Print - Signaletik. Erfolgreiches Informationsdesign: leitsysteme, Wissensvermittlung und Informationsarchitektur [Information visualization. Web - Print - Signaling. Successful information design: guidance systems, knowledge transfer and information architecture]. Springer: Heidelberg.
  • Statistische Ämter des Bundes und der Länder. 2014a. Bevölkerung nach Alter (5er-Jahresgruppen) und höchstem Schulabschluss. Ergebnis des Zensus 2011 zum Berichtszeitpunkt 9. Mai 2011 [Population by age (5-year groups) and highest school-leaving qualification. Result of the 2011 census as of the reporting date 9 May 2011]. Available from: https://ergebnisse.zensus2011.de/#StaticContent:03,BEG_1_6_6,m,table [Accessed 11 November 2020].
  • Statistische Ämter des Bundes und der Länder. 2014b. Bevölkerung nach Geschlecht und Alter (5er-Jahresgruppen). Ergebnis des Zensus 2011 zum Berichtszeitpunkt 9. Mai 2011. [Population by gender and age (5-year groups). Result of the 2011 census as of the reporting date 9 May 2011]. Available from: https://ergebnisse.zensus2011.de/#StaticContent:03,BEG_1_1_1,GESCHLECHT-1,table [Accessed 11 November 2020].
  • Statistische Ämter des Bundes und der Länder. 2018. Armutsgefährdungsschwelle nach Bundesländern für einen Einpersonenhaushalt im Zeitvergleich [At-risk-of-poverty threshold by german Länder for a single-person household in time comparison]. Available from: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Soziales/Sozialberichterstattung/Tabellen/liste-armutsgefaehrungs-schwelle.html [Accessed 11 November 2020].
  • UN, 2019. World population prospects 2019: volume i: comprehensive tables. United Nations: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division.
  • UNESCO-UIS, 2006. International standard classification of education. Unesco 1997. Montreal: UIS.
  • Van Cauwenberg, J., et al., 2012. Physical environmental factors related to walking and cycling in older adults: the Belgian aging studies. BMC public health, 12 (1), 142. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-142
  • Van Cauwenberg, J., et al., 2016. Street characteristics preferred for transportation walking among older adults: a choice-based conjoint analysis with manipulated photographs. International journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 13 (1), 6. doi:10.1186/s12966-016-0331-8
  • Wang, X. and Rodiek, S., 2019. Older adults’ preference for landscape features along urban park walkways in Nanjing, China. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16 (20), 3808. doi:10.3390/ijerph16203808
  • WHO, 2007a. Global age-friendly cities: a guide. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  • WHO, 2007b. WHO global report on falls prevention in older age. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  • WHO, 2015. World report on ageing and health. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  • York, T.W. and Don, M., 2015. Chapter 17 - security design considerations for healthcare. In: T.W. York and D. MacAlister, eds. Hospital and healthcare security (sixth edition). Butterworth-Heinemann: Boston, 409–436.
  • Zamora, F.M., et al., 2020. Use of community support and health services in an age-friendly city: the lived experiences of the oldest-old. Cities & health, 4 (1), 1–10.