Built environment stakeholders’ experiences of implementing healthy urban development: an exploratory study

References

• Allen, J.G., et al., 2015. Green buildings and health. Current environmental health reports, 2 (3), 250–258. doi:10.1007/s40572-015-0063-y.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Allen, J.G. and Macomber, J.D., 2020. Healthy buildings: how indoor spaces can drive performance and productivity. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C. and Schön, D.A., 1974. Theory in practice: increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, L., Michell, K., and Viruly, F., 2018. A critique of the application of neighborhood sustainability assessment tools in urban regeneration. Sustainability; basel, 10 (4), 1005. doi:10.3390/su10041005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V. and Clarke, V., 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3 (2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Callway, R., Pineo, H., and Moore, G., 2020. Understanding the role of standards in the negotiation of a healthy built environment. Sustainability, 12 (23), 9884. doi:10.3390/su12239884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmichael, L., et al., 2012. Integration of health into urban spatial planning through impact assessment: identifying governance and policy barriers and facilitators. Environmental Impact assessment review, 32 (1), 187–194. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2011.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmichael, L., et al., 2019. Urban planning as an enabler of urban health: challenges and good practice in England Following the 2012 planning and public health reforms. Land use policy, 84 (May), 154–162. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.02.043.
   Google Scholar
• Carmichael, L., et al., 2020. Healthy buildings for a healthy city: is the public health evidence base informing current building policies? Science of the total environment, 719 (June), 137146. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137146.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carmona, M., 2019. Place value: place quality and its impact on health, social, economic and environmental outcomes. Journal of urban design, 24 (1), 1–48. doi:10.1080/13574809.2018.1472523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cedeño-Laurent, J.G., et al., 2018. Building evidence for health: green buildings, current science, and future challenges. Annual review of public health, 39 (1), 291–308. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044420.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Center for Active Design, n.d. About Fannie Mae’s healthy housing rewards™. Center for Active Design. Available from: https://centerforactivedesign.org/healthyhousingrewards (accessed 29 December 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Central Committee of Chinese Communist Party, and State Council, 2016. The plan for healthy China 2030. Beijing: Government of the People’s Republic of China.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, M. 2018. Securing Constructive Collaboration and Consensus for Planning Healthy Developments: A Report from the Developers and Wellbeing Project. London, UK: Town and Country Planning Association.
   Google Scholar
• Clements-Croome, D., Turner, B., and Pallaris, K., 2019. Flourishing workplaces: a multisensory approach to design and POE. Intelligent buildings international, 1–14. doi:10.1080/17508975.2019.1569491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colton, M.D., et al., 2014. Indoor air quality in green vs conventional multifamily low-income housing. Environmental science & technology, 48 (14), 7833–7841. doi:10.1021/es501489u.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colton, M.D., et al., 2015. Health benefits of green public housing: associations with asthma morbidity and building-related symptoms. American journal of public health; Washington, 105 (12), 2482–2489. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2015.302793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creutzig, F., Mühlhoff, R., and Julia, R., 2012. Decarbonizing urban transport in european cities: four cases show possibly high co-benefits. Environmental research letters, 7 (4), 044042. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dannenberg, A.L., Frumkin, H., and Jackson, R., 2011. Making healthy places: designing and building for health, well-being, and sustainability. Washington, D.C.; London: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Leeuw, E., et al., 2014. Healthy cities, promoting health and equity, evidence for local policy and practice: summary evaluation of Phase V of the WHO European healthy cities network. Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Design Council, 2018. Healthy placemaking: why do built environment practitioners create places that contribute to preventable disease and early death, despite evidence on healthy placemaking? London: Design Council.
   Google Scholar
• Diduck, A., 2010. The learning dimension of adaptive capacity: untangling the multi-level connections. In: D.R. Armitage and R. Plummer, eds. Adaptive capacity and environmental governance. Heidelberg; London: Springer: Springer Series on Environmental Management, 199–221.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, G.K.C., 2008. Sustainable construction—the role of environmental assessment tools. Journal of environmental management, 86 (3), 451–464. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.12.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Droomers, M., et al., 2014. Area-based interventions to ameliorate deprived dutch neighborhoods in practice: does the Dutch District approach address the social determinants of health to such an extent that future health impacts may be expected? Preventive medicine, 61 (April), 122–127. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.01.009.
   Google Scholar
• Droomers, M., et al., 2016. Is it better to invest in place or people to maximize population health? Evaluation of the general health impact of urban regeneration in Dutch deprived neighbourhoods. Health & Place, 41 (September), 50–57. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.07.003.
   Google Scholar
• Fazli, G.S., et al., 2017. Identifying mechanisms for facilitating knowledge to action strategies targeting the built environment. BMC public health, 17 (1), 1. doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3954-4.
   Google Scholar
• Fereday, J. and Muir-Cochrane, E., 2006. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International journal of qualitative methods, 5 (1), 80–92. doi:10.1177/160940690600500107.
   Google Scholar
• Fishman, E., Böcker, L., and Helbich, M., 2015. ‘Adult active transport in the Netherlands: an analysis of its contribution to physical activity requirements’. Edited by François Criscuolo. PLOS ONE, 10 (4), e0121871. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0121871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galea, S., Ettman, C.K., and Vlahov, D., 2019. Urban health. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gatzweiler, F.W., et al., 2018. Lessons from complexity science for urban health and well-being. Cities & health, 1 (2), 210–223. doi:10.1080/23748834.2018.1448551.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, M., 2015. European healthy city network phase V: patterns emerging for healthy urban planning. Health promotion international, 30 (suppl 1), i54–70. doi:10.1093/heapro/dav033.
   Google Scholar
• Greenway, K., Butt, G., and Walthall, H., 2019. What is a theory-practice gap? An exploration of the concept. Nurse education in practice, 34, 1–6. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2018.10.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammerschmidt, S., Cohen, A., and Hayes, G., 2016. Building healthy corridors: transforming urban and suburban arterials into thriving places. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, T. and Duhl, L.J. 1986. Healthy cities: promoting health in the urban context. WHO Healthy Cities Paper #1. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Henneberry, J., et al., 2011. Physical-financial modelling as an aid to developers’ decision-making. In: S. Tiesdell and D. Adams, eds. Urban design in the real estate development process. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 219–235. doi:10.1002/9781444341188.ch11.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, Y., 2020. Development status and development trend of healthy buildings in China. Green building materials, 4, 180–183.
   Google Scholar
• Ige-Elegbede, J., et al., 2020. Exploring the views of planners and public health practitioners on integrating health evidence into spatial planning in england: a mixed-methods study. Journal of public health. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdaa055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J.E. and Booher, D.E., 2010. Planning with complexity : an introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kent, J. and Thompson, S., 2019. Planning Australia’s healthy built environments. In: Routledge research in planning and urban design. New York: Routledge, 252.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, A., et al., 2014. Building for wellness: the business case. Washington DC: Urban Land Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Lo Iacono, V., Symonds, P., and Brown, D.H.K., 2016. Skype as a tool for qualitative research interviews. Sociological research online, 21 (2), 103–117. doi:10.5153/sro.3952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, M., et al., 2015. Planning healthy, liveable and sustainable cities: how can indicators inform policy? Urban policy and research, 33 (2), 131–144. doi:10.1080/08111146.2014.1002606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, M., Whitzman, C., and Giles-Corti, B., 2018. Health-promoting spatial planning: approaches for strengthening urban policy integration. Planning theory & practice, 19 (2), 180–197. doi:10.1080/14649357.2017.1407820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacNaughton, P., et al., 2017. The impact of working in a green certified building on cognitive function and health. Building and environment, 114 (March), 178–186. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.11.041.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, R., et al., 2020. Evaluating a workforce development programme: bringing public health into architecture education in England. Cities & health, 1–13. doi:10.1080/23748834.2020.1736738.
   Google Scholar
• Martiskainen, M. and Kivimaa, P., 2018. Creating Innovative Zero Carbon Homes in the United Kingdom — intermediaries and Champions in Building Projects. Environmental innovation and societal transitions, 26 (March), 15–31. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2017.08.002.
   Google Scholar
• McArthur, J.J. and Powell, C., 2020. Health and wellness in commercial buildings: systematic review of sustainable building rating systems and alignment with contemporary research. Building and environment, 171 (March), 106635. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106635.
   Google Scholar
• McGreevy, M., et al., 2019. Can health and health equity be advanced by urban planning strategies designed to advance global competitiveness? Lessons from two Australian case studies. Social science & medicine, 242 (December), 112594. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112594.
   Google Scholar
• McKinnon, G., et al., 2020. Strengthening the links between planning and health in England. BMJ, 369 (April). doi:10.1136/bmj.m795.
   Google Scholar
• Meadows, D.H., 2008. Thinking in systems: a primer edited by Diana Wright. White River Junction, Vt: Chelsea Green Pub, 218.
   Google Scholar
• Meng, C., 2017. Evaluation and certification of domestic healthy buildings. Construction technology, 2, 60–62.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, F.T. and Glass, J., 2009. The construction design manager’s role in delivering sustainable buildings. Architectural engineering and design management, 5 (1–2), 75–90. doi:10.3763/aedm.2009.0908.
   Google Scholar
• Moyer, J., L’Hôte, E., and Levay, K., 2019. Public health reaching across sectors: strategies for communicating effectively about public health and cross-sector collaboration with professionals from other sectors. Washington, DC: FrameWorks Institute.
   Google Scholar
• NHS England, 2019. Putting health into place: design, deliver and manage. London: NHS England. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/ourwork/innovation/healthy-new-towns/.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsen, P., 2015. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implementation science, 10, 53. doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowell, L.S., et al., 2017. Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International journal of qualitative methods, 16 (1), 1–11. doi:10.1177/1609406917733847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paine, G. and Thompson, S., 2017. What is a healthy sustainable built environment? Developing evidence-based healthy built environment indicators for policy-makers and practitioners. Planning practice & research, 32 (5), 537–555. doi:10.1080/02697459.2017.1378972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilkington, P., et al., 2013. Engaging a wider public health workforce for the future: a public health practitioner in residence approach. Public health, 127 (5), 427–434. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2012.12.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pineo, H., 2020. Towards healthy urbanism: inclusive, equitable and sustainable (THRIVES) – an urban design and planning framework from theory to praxis. Cities & health, 1–19. doi:10.1080/23748834.2020.1769527.
   Google Scholar
• Pineo, H. and Rydin, Y., 2018. Cities, health and well-being. London: Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors. Available from: http://www.rics.org/uk/knowledge/research/insights/cities-health-and-well-being/.
   Google Scholar
• Pineo, H., Zimmermann, N., and Davies, M., 2020. Integrating health into the complex urban planning policy and decision-making context: a systems thinking analysis. Palgrave communications, 6 (1), 1–14. doi:10.1057/s41599-020-0398-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Retzlaff, R.C., 2009. The use of LEED in planning and development regulation: an exploratory analysis. Journal of planning education and research, 29 (1), 67–77. doi:10.1177/0739456X09340578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruijsbroek, A., et al., 2017. The impact of urban regeneration programmes on health and health-related behaviour: evaluation of the Dutch district approach 6.5 years from the start. PLOS ONE, 12 (5), e0177262. Edited by Stephen E Gilman. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0177262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y., 2010. Governing for sustainable urban development. 1st. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y., et al. 2012. Shaping cities for health: complexity and the planning of urban environments in the 21st Century. The lancet, 379 (9831), 2079–2108. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60435-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y., 2013. The future of planning: Beyond growth dependence. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schnake-Mahl, A.S., et al., January 2020. Gentrification, neighborhood change, and population health: a systematic review. Journal of urban health, 97, 1–25. doi:10.1007/s11524-019-00400-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwandt, T.A., 1994. Constructivist, interpretive approaches to human inquiry. In: N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln, eds. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 118–137.
   Google Scholar
• UN-Habitat, and World Health Organization, 2020. Integrating health in urban and territorial planning: a sourcebook. Geneva, Switzerland: UN-Habitat and World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations General Assembly, 2015. Resolution adopted by the general assembly on 25 September 2015: transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Urban Land Institute, 2015. Building healthy places toolkit: strategies for enhancing health in the built environment. Washington DC: Urban Land Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Q., et al., 2020. The current situation and trends of healthy building development in China. Chinese science bulletin, 65 (4), 246–255. doi:10.1360/TB-2019-0629.
   Google Scholar
• Washington American Planning Association Game Changing Initiative Health and Planning Working Group, 2016. Resource guide for healthy community planning: framing questions and links to data. Washington American Planning Association.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, C.H., 1998. Evaluation: methods for studying programs and policies. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• World Green Building Council, 2013. The business case for green building: a review of the costs and benefits for developers, investors and occupants. WGBC.
   Google Scholar
• World Green Building Council, 2014. Health, wellbeing and productivity in offices - the next chapter for green building. World Green Building Council. Available from: https://www.worldgbc.org/news-media/health-wellbeing-and-productivity-offices-next-chapter-green-building.
   Google Scholar
• World Green Building Council, 2016. Building the business case: health, wellbeing and productivity in green offices. Toronto: World Green Building Council. Available from: http://www.worldgbc.org/files/1114/7735/3801/WGBC_BtBC_Oct2016_Digital_Low.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization, 2018. WHO housing and health guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar