A study protocol to understand urban rewilding behaviour in relation to adaptations to private gardens

References

• Aveyard, H., 2010. Doing a literature review in health and social care: a practical guide. Berkshire: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bamberg, S. and Rees, J., 2015. Environmental attitudes and behavior: measurement. In: J.D. Wright, ed. International encyclopaedia of the social & behavioral sciences, Vol. 7, Oxford: Elsevier, 699–705.
   Google Scholar
• Byerly, H., et al., 2018. Nudging pro-environmental behavior: evidence and opportunities. Frontiers in ecology and the environment, 16 (3), 159–168. doi:10.1002/fee.1777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanza, R., et al., 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387 (6630), 253–260. doi:10.1038/387253a0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, 2019. Biodiversity net gain and local nature recovery strategies: impact assessment. London: Crown copyright.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2012. Future brief: green behaviour – issue 4. Bristol: Science Communication Unit, the University of the West of England.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, R.A., et al., 2007. Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biology letters, 3 (4), 390–394. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2007.0149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford, R. and Nilsson, A. 2014. Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review. International Journal of Psychology, 49(3), 141–157. doi:10.1002/ijop.12034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, S.E., et al., 2007. Adapting cities for climate change: the role of the green infrastructure. Built environment, 33 (1), 115–133. doi:10.2148/benv.33.1.115
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, P.A., et al., 2014. Linkages between biodiversity attributes and ecosystem services: a systematic review. Ecosystem services, 9, 191–203. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haydow, D.B., et al., 2016. State of nature 2016. The State of Nature Partnership. Available at: https://www.rspb.org.uk/globalassets/downloads/documents/conservation-projects/state-of-nature/state-of-nature-uk-report-2016.pdf (Accessed 15 January 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Hill, M.J., et al., 2017. Urban ponds as an aquatic biodiversity resource in modified landscapes. Global change biology, 23 (3), 986–999. doi:10.1111/gcb.13401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, K.L., Randall, N.P., and Haddaway, N.R., 2016. A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environmental evidence, 5 (1), 7. doi:10.1186/s13750-016-0059-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janhäll, S., 2015. Review on urban vegetation and particle air pollution – deposition and dispersion. Atmospheric environment, 105, 130–137. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.01.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns, D., 2019. History of rewilding: ideas and practice. In: J.T. Du Toit, N. Pettorelli, and S.M. Durant, eds. Rewilding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Ecological Reviews), 12–33. doi:10.1017/9781108560962.002
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, D., 2015. Rethinking rewilding. Geoforum, 65, 482–488. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.11.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettel, E.F., et al., 2019. Breeding performance of an apex predator, the peregrine falcon, across urban and rural landscapes. Urban ecosystems, 22 (1), 117–125. doi:10.1007/s11252-018-0799-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kok, G., 2018. A practical guide to effective behavior change. The european health psychologist, 16 (5), 156–170. doi:10.31234/osf.io/r78wh
   Google Scholar
• Maller, C., et al., 2006. Healthy nature healthy people: ‘contact with nature’ as an upstream health promotion intervention for populations. Health promotion international, 21 (1), 45–54. doi:10.1093/heapro/dai032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayor of London, 2019. London national park city. Available at: https://www.london.gov.uk/what-we-do/environment/parks-green-spaces-and-biodiversity/london-national-park-city (Accessed 5 March 2020)
   Google Scholar
• Medical Research Council, 2017. MRC regulatory support centre: retention framework for research data and records. London: MRC.
   Google Scholar
• Mesmer-Magnus, J., Viswesvaran, C., and Wiernik, B.M., 2012. The role of commitment in bridging the gap between organizational sustainability and environmental sustainability. In: S.E. Jackson, D.S. Ones, and S. Dilchert, eds. Managing HR for environmental sustainability. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Wiley, 155–186.
   Google Scholar
• Michie, S., et al., 2013. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Annals of behavioral medicine, 46 (1), 81–95. doi:10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michie, S., Atkins, L., and West, R., 2014. The behaviour change wheel. A guide to designing interventions. London: Silverback Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Michie, S., Van Stralen, M.M., and West, R., 2011. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation science, 6 (1), 42. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mill, J.G., et al., 2017. Urban habitat restoration provides a human health benefit through microbiome rewilding: the microbiome rewilding hypothesis. Restoration Ecology, 25 (6), 866–872. doi:10.1111/rec.12610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D., et al., 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS medicine, 6 (7), e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moxon, S., 2019. Drawing on nature: a vision of an urban residential street adapted for biodiversity in architectural drawings. City, territory and architecture, 6 (6), 1–13. doi:10.1186/s40410-019-0105-0
   Google Scholar
• Office of National Statistics, 2020. Data set: access to gardens and public green space in Great Britain. Available at: https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/environmentalaccounts/datasets/accesstogardensandpublicgreenspaceingreatbritain (Accessed 21 January 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Osbaldson, R. and Schott, J.P., 2012. Environmental sustainability and behavioural science: meta-analysis of pro environmental behaviour experiments. Environment and behavior, 44 (2), 257–299. doi:10.1177/0013916511402673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, G.Y., 2018. A practical guide to effective behavior change: how to identify what to change in the first place. The European health psychologist, 16 (5), 156–170. doi:10.31234/osf.io/hy7mj
   Google Scholar
• Rewilding Britain, n. d. Rewilding Britain. Available at: https://rewildingbritain.org.uk/ (Accessed 19 November 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Rewilding Earth, n. d. Rewilding. Available at: https://rewilding.org/ (Accessed 19 November 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Rewilding Europe, n. d. Making Europe a wilder place. Available at: https://rewildingeurope.com/ (Accessed 19 November 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Rewind My Street, 2019. Transforming London’s streets for wildlife. Available at: https://www.rewildmystreet.org/ (Accessed 5 March 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson, A.E., et al., 2018. Lower bumblebee colony reproductive success in agricultural compared with urban environments. Proceedings of the royal society B: biological sciences, 285. h ttp://1 0.1 098/rspb.2018.0807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soulé, M. and Noss, R., 1998. Rewilding and biodiversity: complementary goals for continental conservation. Wild earth, 8, 19–28.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, H., 2019. What is Rewilding? (extended version), Rewilding News, 24 January. Available at: https://rewildingnews.com/2019/01/24/what-is-rewilding-extended-version/ (Accessed 14 February 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, W.J., Dicks, L.V., and Smith, R.K., 2020. What works in conservation 2020. Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers. 1 0.11 647/OBP.0191
   Google Scholar
• UK Parliament, 2018. Data protection act 2018. London: Crown copyright.
   Google Scholar
• UK Parliament, 2020. Environment bill 2019-21 (Bill 220). London: Crown copyright.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations, 2018. 68% of the world population projected to live in urban areas by 2050, says UN. Available at: https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/population/2018-revision-of-world-urbanization-prospects.html (Accessed 5 March 2020).
   Google Scholar
• United Nations General Assembly, 2015. Resolution adopted by the general assembly on 25 September 2015 (A/RES/70/1). New York, NY: United Nations. Available at http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E
   Google Scholar
• Verheij, M.J., et al., 2006. Green space, urbanity, and health: how strong is the relation? Journal of epidemiology & community health, 60 (7), 587–592. doi:10.1136/jech.2005.043125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, J., et al., 2016b. Increasing the frequency of physical activity very brief advice by nurses to cancer patients. A mixed methods feasibility study of a training intervention. Public health, 139, 121–131. h ttp://d oi:1 0.1 016/j.puhe.2016.05.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, J., Foster, J., and Poulter, E., 2016a. Increasing the frequency of physical activity very brief advice for cancer patients. Development of an intervention using the behaviour change wheel. Public health, 133, 45–56. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2015.12.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, J., Stockwell, J., and Chavez-Ulgade, Y., 2017. The reach, adoption, and effectiveness of online training for healthcare professionals. Public Health, 53, 107–110. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2017.08.016
   Google Scholar
• Wildlife Trust, 2010. London: Garden City? London: Wildlife Trust.
   Google Scholar
• World Population Review, 2020. London population 2020. Available at: http://worldpopulationreview.com/world-cities/london-population/ (Accessed 5 March 2020).
   Google Scholar