2,281
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Scholarship - Conceptual

Planning for an ageing city: place, older people and urban restructuring

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 375-388 | Received 04 Jun 2020, Accepted 22 Mar 2021, Published online: 02 Jun 2021

References

  • Age-friendly Belfast (AfB), 2017. Age-friendly Belfast plan 2018-2021: a city where older people live life to the full. Belfast: AfB.
  • Age-friendly Belfast (AfB), 2018. Age-friendly Belfast progress report April 2018. Belfast: AfB.
  • Amin, A., 2013. Telescopic urbanism and the poor. City, 17 (4), 476–492. doi:10.1080/13604813.2013.812350.
  • Bache, I., 2020. Evidence, policy and wellbeing. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  • Béland, D., 2009. Ideas, institutions, and policy change. Journal of European public policy, 16 (5), 701–718. doi:10.1080/13501763.2015.1115533.
  • Béland, D., 2017. Identity, politics, and public policy. Critical policy studies, 11 (1), 1–18. doi:10.1080/19460171.2016.1159140
  • Béland, D. and Cox, R.H., 2016. Ideas as coalition magnets: coalition building, policy entrepreneurs, and power relations. Journal of European public policy, 23 (3), 428–445. doi:10.1080/13876988.2016.1174410.
  • Béland, D. and Howlett, M., 2016. The role and impact of the multiple streams approach in comparative policy analysis. Journal of comparative policy analysis: research and practice, 18 (3), 221–227. doi:10.1080/13876988.2016.1174410.
  • Belfast Healthy Cities (BHC), 2014. Walkability assessment for healthy ageing. Belfast: BHC.
  • Bollens, S., 2018. Trajectories of conflict and peace: Jerusalem and Belfast since 1994. London: Routledge.
  • Braun, V. and Clarke, V., 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3 (2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
  • Braun, V. and Clarke, V., 2020. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative research in psychology, 1–25. doi:10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238.
  • Brownlow, G. and Birnie, E., 2018. Rebalancing and regional economic performance: Northern Ireland in a Nordic mirror. Economic affairs, 38 (1), 58–73. doi:10.1111/ecaf.12267.
  • Buffel, T. and Handler, S., eds, 2018. Age-friendly cities and communities: a global perspective. Bristol: Policy Press.
  • Cairney, P. and Jones, M.D., 2016. Kingdon’s multiple streams approach: what is the empirical impact of this universal theory? Policy studies journal, 44 (1), 37–58. doi:10.1111/psj.12111.
  • Colombini, M., et al., 2016. Agenda setting and framing of gender-based violence in Nepal: how it became a health issue. Health policy and planning, 31 (4), 493–503. doi:10.1093/heapol/czv091.
  • Department for Communities (DfC), 2013. Belfast city centre public realm masterplan report and update. Belfast: DFC.
  • Department for Communities (DfC), 2016. Active ageing strategy 2016-21. Belfast: DFC.
  • Durand, M., et al., 2015. An evaluation of the public health responsibility deal: informants’ experiences and views of the development, implementation and achievements of a pledge-based, public–private partnership to improve population health in England. Health policy, 119 (11), 1506–1514. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.08.013.
  • Engler, F. and Herweg, N., 2019. Of barriers to entry for medium and large ‘n’ multiple streams applications: methodological and conceptual considerations. Policy studies journal, 47 (4), 905–926. doi:10.1111/psj.12235.
  • Fitch-Roy, O. and Fairbrass, J., 2018. Negotiating the EU’s 2030 climate and energy framework: agendas, ideas and European interest groups. New York: Springer.
  • Fox-Rogers, L. and Murphy, E., 2014. Informal strategies of power in the local planning system. Planning theory, 13 (3), 244–268. doi:10.1177/1473095213492512.
  • Healey, P., 2010. Making better places: the planning project in the 21st century. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  • Health and Social Care Board (HSCB), 2016. Health and wellbeing: delivering together 2026. Belfast: HSCB.
  • Herrault, H. and Murtagh, B., 2019. Shared space in post-conflict Belfast. Space and polity, 23 (3), 251–264. doi:10.1080/13562576.2019.1667763.
  • Herweg, N., 2017. European union policy-making: the regulatory shift in natural gas market policy. New York: Springer.
  • Herweg, N., Zahariadis, N., and Zohlnhöfer, R., 2019. The multiple streams framework: foundations, refinements, and empirical applications. In: P. Sabatier, ed. Theories of the policy process. 4th ed. London: Routledge, 17–53.
  • Howlett, M. and Ramesh, M., 2003. Studying public policy: policy cycles and policy subsystems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Jones, M.D., et al., 2016. A river runs through it: a multiple streams meta‐review. Policy studies journal, 44 (1), 13–36. doi:10.1111/psj.12115.
  • Kelley, J., Dannefer, D., and Masarweh, L.I., 2018. Addressing erasure, microfication and social change: age-friendly initiatives and environmental gerontology in the 21st century. In: T. Buffel, S. Handler, and C. Philipson, eds. Age-friendly cities and communities – a global perspective. Bristol: Policy Press, 51–71.
  • Kingdon, J., 1984. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. London: Harper Collins.
  • Kingdon, J., 2014. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. 2nd international ed. Pearson: Harlow.
  • Knaggård, Å., 2015. The multiple streams framework and the problem broker. European journal of political research, 54 (3), 450–465. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12097.
  • Lawrence, R.J., 2020. Collective and creative consortia: combining knowledge, ways of knowing and praxis. Cities and health, 1–13. doi:10.1080/23748834.2020.1711996.
  • Lencucha, R., et al., 2018. Opening windows and closing gaps: a case analysis of Canada’s 2009 tobacco additives ban and its policy lessons. BMC public health, 18 (1), 13–21. doi:10.1186/s12889-018-6157-3.
  • Löblová, O., 2018. When epistemic communities fail: exploring the mechanism of policy influence. Policy studies journal, 46 (1), 160–189. doi:10.1111/psj.12213.
  • Milton, K. and Grix, J., 2015. Public health policy and walking in England-analysis of the 2008 ‘policy window’. BMC public health, 15 (1), 614–623. doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1915-y.
  • Moos, M., et al., 2019. The knowledge economy city: gentrification, studentification and youthification, and their connections to universities. Urban studies, 56 (6), 1075–1092. doi:10.1177/0042098017745235.
  • Northern Ireland Assembly Research and Information Service (NIARIS), 2017. Is the continued provision of free travel for 60-64 year olds sustainable? Belfast: NIARIS. Available: https://www.assemblyresearchmatters.org/2017/12/08/is-the-continued-provision-of-free-travel-for-60-64-year-olds-sustainable/ [Accessed Jan 2020].
  • Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency (NISRA), 2020. 2019 mid-year population estimates for Northern Ireland. Belfast: NISRA.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2015. Ageing in cities. Paris: OECD Publications.
  • Pierce, J., et al., 2017. There and back again: a tale of the advocacy coalition framework. Policy studies journal, 45 (S1), S13–S46. doi:10.1111/psj.12197.
  • Rawat, P. and Morris, J.C., 2016. Kingdon’s ‘streams’ model at thirty: still relevant in the 21st century? Politics and policy, 44 (4), 608–638. doi:10.1111/polp.12168.
  • Reardon, L., 2018. Networks and problem recognition: advancing the multiple streams approach. Policy sciences, 51 (4), 457–476. doi:10.1007/s11077-018-9330-8.
  • Robinson, S.E. and Eller, W.S., 2010. Participation in policy streams: testing the separation of problems and solutions in subnational policy systems. Policy studies journal, 38 (2), 199–216. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00358.x.
  • Rozbicka, P. and Spohr, F., 2016. Interest groups in multiple streams: specifying their involvement in the framework. Policy sciences, 49 (1), 55–69. doi:10.1007/s11077-015-9227-8.
  • Sætren, H., 2016. From controversial policy idea to successful program implementation: the role of the policy entrepreneur, manipulation strategy, program design, institutions and open policy windows in relocating Norwegian central agencies. Policy sciences, 49 (1), 71–88. doi:10.1007/s11077-016-9242-4.
  • Unwin, N., et al., 2017. The development of public policies to address non-communicable diseases in the Caribbean country of Barbados: the importance of problem framing and policy entrepreneurs. International journal of health policy and management, 6 (2), 71. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2016.74.
  • Wellstead, A., 2017. Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose? A review of Paul Sabatier’s ‘An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein’. Policy sciences, 50 (4), 549–561. doi:10.1007/s11077-017-9307-z.
  • World Health Organization (WHO), 2007. Global age-friendly cities: a guide. Geneva: WHO.
  • World Health Organization (WHO), 2018. The global network for age-friendly cities and communities: looking back over the last decade, looking forward to the next. Geneva: WHO.
  • Zahariadis, N., 2014. Ambiguity and multiple streams. In: P. Sabatier, ed. Theories of the policy process. 3rd ed. Boulder, CO: Westfield Press, 25–58.
  • Zahariadis, N., 2016. Delphic oracles: ambiguity, institutions, and multiple streams. Policy science, 49 (3), 3–12. doi:10.1007/s11077-016-9243-3.
  • Zamora, F.M.V., et al., 2019. Use of community support and health services in an age-friendly city: the lived experiences of the oldest-old. Cities and health, 1–10. doi:10.1080/23748834.2019.1606873.
  • Zohlnhöfer, R., Herweg, N., and Huß, C., 2016. Bringing formal political institutions into the multiple streams framework: an analytical proposal for comparative policy analysis. Journal of comparative policy analysis: research and practice, 18 (3), 243–256. doi:10.1080/13876988.2015.1095428.