Measuring learning gains and examining implications for student success in STEM

References

• American Association for the Advancement of Science . (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy . New York, NY : Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, D.A. , & Matsui, J. (2007). The “turning point” for minority pre-meds: The effect of early undergraduate experience in the sciences on aspirations to enter medical school of minority students at UC Berkeley and Stanford University . Research & Occasional Paper Series: CSHE.20.08. Berkeley: Center for Studies in Higher Education, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P. , Harrison, C. , Lee, C. , Marshall, B. , & Wiliam, D. (2002). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom . London: King’s College.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P. , Harrison, C. , Lee, C. , Marshall, B. , & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice . Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P. , & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan , 80 (2), 139–148.
   Google Scholar
• Bodner, G. , & Klobuchar, M. (2001). The many forms of constructivism. Journal of Chemical Education , 78 (8), 1107–1134.
   Google Scholar
• Claesgens, J. , Scalise, K. , Draney, K. , Wilson, M. , & Stacy, A. (2002). Perspectives of Chemists: A framework to promote conceptual understanding in chemistry . Paper presented at the Validity and Value in Educational Research American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Claesgens, J. , Scalise, K. , Wilson, M. , & Stacy, A. (2008). Assessing student understanding in and between courses for higher education: An example of an approach. Assessment Update , 20 (5), 6–8.
   Google Scholar
• Claesgens, J. , Scalise, K. , Wilson, M. , & Stacy, A. (2009). Mapping student understanding in chemistry: The Perspectives of Chemists. Science Education , 93 (1), 56–85.
   Google Scholar
• Corcoran, T. , Mosher, F.A. , & Rogat, A. (2009). Learning progressions in science: An evidence-based approach to reform . New York, NY : Center on Continuous Instructional Improvement, Teachers College – Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2004). Standards, accountability, and school reform. Teachers College Record , 106 (6), 1047–1085.
   Google Scholar
• De Boeck, P. , & Wilson, M. (2004). Explanatory item response models: A generalized linear and nonlinear approach . New York, NY : Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Driver, R. , Asoko, H. , Leach, J. , Mortimer, E. , & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher , 23 (7), 5–12.
   Google Scholar
• Embretson, S. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists . Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hambleton, R.K. , Swaminathan, H. , & Rogers, H.J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse, J. , & Anderson, C.W. (1992). Students’ conceptions of chemical change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 29 (3), 277–299.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J ., Arumi, A. M ., & Ott, A . (2006). Reality check 2006, issue no. 3: Is support for standards and testing fading? Public Agenda, Retrieved from http://www.publicagenda.org/research/pdfs/rc0603.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, C. , Wilson, M.R. , Draney, K. , Tutunciyan, S. , & Vorp, R. (2006). GradeMap v4.2 user guide home page . Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Evaluation and Assessment Research Center, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council . (1996). National science education standards . Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council . (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment . Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scalise, K. , Claesgens, J. , Krystyniak, R. , Mebane, S. , Wilson, M. , & Stacy, A. (2004). Perspectives of Chemists: Tracking conceptual understanding of student learning in chemistry at the secondary and university levels . Paper presented at the Enhancing the Visibility and Credibility of Educational Research, American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Scalise, K. , Claesgens, J. , Wilson, M. , & Stacy, A. (2006). Contrasting the expectations for student understanding of chemistry with levels achieved: A brief case-study of student nurses. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, The Royal Society of Chemistry , 7 (3), 170–184.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C.L. , Wiser, M. , Anderson, C.W. , & Krajcik, J. (2006). Implications of research on children’s learning for standards and assessment: A proposed learning progression for matter and the atomic molecular theory. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives , 4 (1 & 2), 1–98.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education . (2006). A test of leadership, charting the future of U.S. higher education . A report of the commission appointed by Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/hiedfuture/index.html
   Google Scholar
• van Barneveld, A. , Arnold, K.E. , & Campbell, J.P. (2012). Analytics in higher education: Establishing a common language. EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative . Retrieved from https://qa.itap.purdue.edu/learning/docs/research/ELI3026.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. (2005). Constructing measures: An item response modeling approach . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. (2009). Measuring progressions: Assessment structures underlying a learning progression. Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 46 , 716–730.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. , & Scalise, K. (2006). Assessment to improve learning in higher education: The BEAR Assessment System. Higher Education , 52 , 635–663.
   Google Scholar