References
- Ahmed, K. (2018). Bank warns on AI jobs threat. BBC News. 20 August. Accessed 8 November 2019. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-45240758
- Aoun, J. (2017). Robot-proof: Higher education in the age of artificial intelligence. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
- Ashwin, P. (2020). Transforming University education: A manifesto (1st ed.). New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
- Avis, J. (2018). Socio-technical imaginary of the fourth industrial revolution and its implications for vocational education and training: A literature review. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 1–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2018.1498907
- Barnett, R. (2012). Learning for an unknown future. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(1), 65–77. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.642841
- Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge, UK: Malden, MA: Polity Press; Blackwell.
- Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London; Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications. ( Theory, culture & society).
- Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research. Michigan: Free Press.
- Boyer, E.L. (1997). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
- Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA, USA: Polity Press.
- Brew, A. (2003). Teaching and Research: New relationships and their implications for inquiry-based teaching and learning in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 22(1), 3–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436032000056571
- Brew, A. (2006). Research and teaching: Beyond the divide. Palgrave Macmillan: New York
- Brezina, V., Timperley, M., & McEnery, T. (2018). #LancsBox v. 4.x [software]. Available at: http://corpora.lancs.ac.uk/lancsbox.
- Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
- Cross, N. (1982). Designerly ways of knowing. Design Studies, 3(82), 221–227. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(82)90040-0
- Dafoe, A. (2015). On technological determinism: A typology, scope conditions, and a mechanism. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 40(6), 1047–1076. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915579283
- DiSalvo, C. (2019). Diagrams for Another Bauhaus. In L. Forlano, M.W. Steenson, & M. Ananny (Eds.), Bauhaus futures. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
- Edwards, C., & McLinden, M. (2017). Cultivating student expectations of a research-informed curriculum: Developing and promoting pedagogic resonance in the undergraduate student learning pathway. In C. Brent & D. Fung (Eds.), Developing the higher education curriculum: Research based education in practice. London: UCL Press.
- Ehn, P. (1998). Manifesto for a digital bauhaus. Digital Creativity, 9(4), 207–217. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14626269808567128
- Evans, T. L. (2015). Transdisciplinary collaborations for sustainability education: Institutional and intragroup challenges and opportunities. Policy Futures in Education, 13(1), 70–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210314566731.
- Evans, T.L. (2019). Chapter 5 transdisciplinary engagement with enforced dependency: A platform for higher education to address crises in employment, sustainability, and democracy in technological society. In M. Peters, P. Jandrić, & A.J. Means (Eds.), Education and technological unemployment.
- Feenberg, A. (2017). Technosystem: The social life of reason. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
- Forlano, L., Steenson, M.W., & Ananny, M. (2019). Introduction. In L. Forlano, M.W. Steenson, & M. Ananny (Eds.), Bauhaus futures. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
- Foster, J., & Yaoyuneyong, G. (2016). Teaching innovation: Equipping students to overcome real-world challenges. Higher Education Pedagogies, 1(1), 42–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2015.1134195
- Hamilton, E., & Feenberg, A. (2012). Alternative Rationalisations and Ambivalent Futures: A Critical History of Online Education. In (Re)Inventing the internet: Critical case studies. Sense Publishers. http://site.ebrary.com/id/10546411
- Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2009). Developing undergraduate research and inquiry. The Higher Education Academy.
- HEFCE. (2016). Teaching excellence framework year two additional guidance. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/HEFCE,2014/Content/Pubs/2016/201632/HEFCE2016_32.pdf
- Holsti, O.R. (1969). Content anaylis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.
- Jackson, A.J.H. (2018). REF, TEF, and KEF; and the “Research-Informed” Teaching and co-production traditions in local history: Analysing provincial newspapers. International Journal of Regional and Local History, 13(1), 68–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/20514530.2018.1451447
- Jandrić, P., Jaldemark, J., Hurley, Z., Bartram, B., Matthews, A., Jopling, M., … Tesar, M. (2020). Philosophy of education in a new key: Who remembers Greta Thunberg? Education and environment after the coronavirus. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1811678
- Jandrić, P., Knox, J., Besley, T., Ryberg, T., Suoranta, J., & Hayes, S. (2018). Postdigital science and education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(10), 893–899. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1454000
- Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S.-H. (2015). Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226276663.001.0001
- Josephson, P., Karlsohn, T., & Östling, J. (2014). Introduction: The humboldtian tradition and its transformations. In P. Josephson, T. Karlsohn, & J. Östling (Eds.), The humboldtian tradition. BRILL. doi:https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004271944_002
- Koops, W., van den Kerkhof, M., Ostermeier, C., & Van de Schoot, R. (2016). A Bildung-psychological investigation into student motives: McKinsey- or von Humboldt-oriented? European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13(6), 756–774. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2016.1230056
- Law, D. (2019). International comparisons. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 23(1), 1–4. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2019.1534710
- Loudon, G. (2019). Integrating ideas from design disciplines into the STEM curricula. Higher Education Pedagogies, 4(1), 284–286. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2019.1599688
- Marr, B. (2018). The 4th industrial revolution is here - are you ready? Forbes. Accessed 8 November 2019. https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2018/08/13/the-4th-industrial-revolution-is-here-are-you-ready/
- Mason, P. (2016). PostCapitalism: A guide to our future. UK: Penguin Books.
- Matthews, A. (2020). Blurring boundaries between humans and technology: Postdigital, postphenomenology and actor-network theory in qualitative research. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 1–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2020.1836508
- Matthews, A., & Kotzee, B. (2019). The rhetoric of the UK higher education Teaching Excellence Framework: A corpus-assisted discourse analysis of TEF2 provider statements. Educational Review, 1–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1666796
- May Lee, R., & Yuan, Y. (2018). Innovation education in China: preparing attitudes, approaches, and intellectual environments for life in the automation economy. In N.W. Gleason (Ed.), Higher education in the era of the fourth industrial revolution Singapore: Springer Singapore. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0194-0.
- McCowan, T. (2017). Higher education, unbundling, and the end of the university as we know it. Oxford Review of Education, 43(6), 733–748. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2017.1343712
- Mulcahy, C.M. (2016). Pedagogy, praxis and purpose in education. Taylor & Francis. Place of publication not identified.
- Newman, J.H. (1852). The Idea of a University. London: Longmans, Green, & Co.
- Nixon, E., Scullion, R., & Hearn, R. (2018). Her majesty the student: Marketised higher education and the narcissistic (dis)satisfactions of the student-consumer. Studies in Higher Education, 43(6), 927–943. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1196353
- Office for Students. (2018). Get the data - Office for students. TEF data. Accessed 11 August 2018. https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/advice-and-guidance/teaching/tef-data/get-the-data/
- Orr, D., Weller, M., & Farrow, R. (2019). How is digitalisation affecting the flexibility and openness of higher education provision? Results of a global survey using a new conceptual model. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, (2019)(1), 5. doi:https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.523
- Pepperell, R. (2009). The posthuman condition consciousness beyond the brain. Bristol: Intellect.
- Peters, M.A. (2017). Technological unemployment: Educating for the fourth industrial revolution. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(1), 1–6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2016.1177412
- Peters, M.A. (2020). Digital socialism or knowledge capitalism? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 52(1), 1–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2019.1593033
- Peters, M.A., Jandrić, P., & Means, A.J. (eds.). (2019). Education and technological unemployment. Singapore: Springer Singapore. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6225-5.
- Pinch, T.J., & Bijker, W.E. (1984). The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science, 14(3), 399–441. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/030631284014003004
- Potter, W.J., & Levine‐Donnerstein, D. (1999). Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 27(3), 258–284. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00909889909365539
- Robertson, J. (2007). Beyond the “research/teaching nexus”: Exploring the complexity of academic experience. Studies in Higher Education, 32(5), 541–556. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070701476043
- Roudaut, A. (2019). Bridging the gap between teaching and research: A case study for engineering & applied science. Higher Education Pedagogies, 4(1), 209–225. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2019.1605836
- Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution (First U.S. ed.). New York: Crown Business.
- Scott, M., & Unsworth, J. (2018). Matching final assessment to employability: Developing a digital viva as an end of programme assessment. Higher Education Pedagogies, 3(1), 373–384. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2018.1510294
- Seale, C. (2004). Researching Society and Culture (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
- Seldon, A., & Abidoye, O. (2018). The fourth education revolution: Will artificial intelligence liberate or infantilise humanity. Buckingham: The University of Buckingham Press.
- Spronken‐Smith, R., & Walker, R. (2010). Can inquiry-based learning strengthen the links between teaching and disciplinary research? Studies in Higher Education, 35(6), 723–740. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903315502
- Stember, M. (1991). Advancing the social sciences through the interdisciplinary enterprise. The Social Science Journal, 28(1), 1–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0362-3319(91)90040-B
- Tegmark, M. (2018). Life 3.0: Being human in the age of artificial intelligence. UK: Penguin Books.
- Tight, M. (2016). Examining the research/teaching nexus. European Journal of Higher Education, 6(4), 293–311. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2016.1224674
- Webb, L., & Wang, Y. (2014). Techniques for sampling online text-based data sets. In W.-C. Hu & N. Kaabouch (Eds.), Big data management, technologies, and applications. IGI Global. doi:https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4699-5
- Xing, B., & Marwala, T. (2017) Implications of the fourth industrial age for higher education. The_Thinker__Issue_73__Third_Quarter_2017. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3225331
- Xu, L.D., Xu, E.L., & Li, L. (2018). Industry 4.0: State of the art and future trends. International Journal of Production Research, 56(8), 2941–2962. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1444806