References
- Altbach, P.G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L.E. (2019). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. BRILL: Sense Publisher.
- Baker, R., Sj., D’Mello, S.K., Rodrigo, M.M.T., & Graesser, A.C. (2010). Better to be frustrated than bored: The incidence, persistence, and impact of learners’ cognitive–affective states during interactions with three different computer-based learning environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(4), 223–241. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.12.003
- Bakker, A., Cai, J., English, L., Kaiser, G., Mesa, V., & Van Dooren, W. (2019). Beyond small, medium, or large: Points of consideration when interpreting effect sizes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102(1), 1–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09908-4
- Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.
- Bloom, B.S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13(6), 4–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X013006004
- Braaksma, M.A., Rijlaarsdam, G., & Van den Bergh, H. (2002). Observational learning and the effects of model-observer similarity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 405–415. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.405
- Braaksma, M.A., Rijlaarsdam, G., Van den Bergh, H., & van Hout-wolters, B.H.M. (2004). Observational learning and its effects on the orchestration of writing processes. Cognition and Instruction, 22(1), 1–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690Xci2201_1
- Brown-Martin, G. (2017). Education and the fourth industrial revolution. Groupe Media TFO. Retrieved from https://www.groupemediatfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/FINAL-Education-and-the-Fourth-Industrial-Revolution-1-1-1.pdf
- Chan, C., Burtis, J., & Bereiter, C. (1997). Knowledge building as a mediator of conflict in conceptual change. Cognition and Instruction, 15(1), 1–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1501_1
- Chi, M.T. (2013). Learning from observing an expert’s demonstration, explanations, and dialogues. In J. J. Staszewski (ed), Expertise and skill acquisition: The impact of William G. Chase (pp. 1–27). UK: Taylor and Francis. doi:https://doi.org/10/4324/9780203074541
- Chi, M.T., Kang, S., & Yaghmourian, D.L. (2017). Why students learn more from dialogue-than monologue-videos: Analyses of peer interactions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(1), 10–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1204546
- Chi, M.T., Roy, M., & Hausmann, R.G. (2008). Observing tutorial dialogues collaboratively: Insights about human tutoring effectiveness from vicarious learning. Cognitive Science, 32(2), 301–341. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03640210701863396
- Collins, A., Brown, J.S., & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator, 15(3), 6–11.
- Cooper, K.M., Ding, L., Stephens, M.D., Chi, M.T., & Brownell, S.E. (2018). A course-embedded comparison of instructor-generated videos of either an instructor alone or an instructor and a student. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(2), ar31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-12-0288
- Craig, S.D., Gholson, B., Ventura, M., & Graesser, A.C. (2000). The Tutoring Research Group: Overhearing dialogues and monologues in virtual tutoring sessions. Intl Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11, 242–253.
- Craig, S.D., Graesser, A.C., Sullins, J., & Gholson, B. (2004). Affect and learning: An exploratory look into the role of affect in learning with AutoTutor. Journal of Educational Media, 29(3), 241–250. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1358165042000283101
- Craig, S.D., Sullins, J., Witherspoon, A., & Gholson, B. (2006). The deep-level-reasoning-question effect: The role of dialogue and deep-level-reasoning questions during vicarious learning. Cognition and Instruction, 24(4), 565–591. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2404_4
- Ding, L., Adams, J.A., Stephens, M.D., Brownell, S., & Chi, M.T. (2018). Failure to replicate using dialogue videos in learning: Lessons learned from an authentic course. In J. Kay & R. Luckin (Eds.), Rethinking Learning in the Digital Age: Making the Learning Sciences Count 13th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2018, Volume 2. London, UK: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
- Driscoll, D.M., Craig, S.D., Gholson, B., Ventura, M., Hu, X., & Graesser, A.C. (2003). Vicarious learning: Effects of overhearing dialog and monologue-like discourse in a virtual tutoring session. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29(4), 431–450. doi:https://doi.org/10.2190/Q8CM-FH7L-6HJU-DT9W
- Evans, C., Kandiko Howson, C., & Forsythe, A. (2018). Making sense of learning gain in higher education. Higher Education Pedagogies, 3(1), 1–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2018.1508360
- Fowler, C.J.H., & Mayes, J.T. (1999). Learning relationships from theory to design. ALT-J, 7(3), 6–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v7i3.11554
- Gholson, B., Witherspoon, A., Morgan, B., Brittingham, J.K., Coles, R., Graesser, A.C., … Craig, S.D. (2009). Exploring the deep-level reasoning questions effect during vicarious learning among eighth to eleventh graders in the domains of computer literacy and Newtonian physics. Instructional Science, 37(5), 487–493. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9069-2
- Graesser, A.C., D’Mello, S., & Cade, W. (2011). Instruction based on tutoring. In R. Mayers & P. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (pp. 408–426). New York: Routledge.
- Graesser, A.C., & McNamara, D. (2010). Self-regulated learning in learning environments with pedagogical agents that interact in natural language. Educational Psychologist, 45(4), 234–244. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2010.515933
- Graesser, A.C., Person, N.K., & Magliano, J.P. (1995). Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one-to-one tutoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9(6), 495–522. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350090604
- Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
- Isaacs, E.A., & Clark, H.H. (1987). References in conversation between experts and novices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116(1), 26–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.116.1.26
- Isen, A.M. (2008). Some ways in which positive affect influences decision making and problem solving. Handbook of Emotions, 3, 548–573.
- Ivanova, I., Horton, W.S., Swets, B., Kleinman, D., & Ferreira, V.S. (2020). Structural alignment in dialogue and monologue (and what attention may have to do with it). Journal of Memory and Language, 110, 104052. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2019.104052
- Laurillard, D. (2013). Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies. London: Routledge.
- Lotz-Sisitka, H., Wals, A.E., Kronlid, D., & McGarry, D. (2015). Transformative, transgressive social learning: Rethinking higher education pedagogy in times of systemic global dysfunction. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 16, 73–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.07.018
- Marton, F. (2018). Towards a pedagogical theory of learning. In K. Matsushita (Ed.), Deep active learning (pp. 59–77). Singapore: Springer.
- Marton, F., & Pang, M.F. (2006). On some necessary conditions of learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 193–220. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1502_2
- Mayes, J. (2015). Still to learn from vicarious learning. E-Learning and Digital Media, 12(3–4), 361–371. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753015571839
- Mezirow, J. (1981). A critical theory of adult learning and education. Adult Education, 32(1), 3–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/074171368103200101
- Monaghan, P., & Stenning, K. (1998). Effects of representational modality and thinking style on learning to solve reasoning problems. In M. A. Gernsbacher & S.J. Derry (eds.), Proceeding of the 20th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp.716-721) . Maweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Muldner, K., Lam, R., & Chi, M.T. (2014). Comparing learning from observing and from human tutoring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 69–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034448
- Muller, D.A., Bewes, J., Sharma, M.D., & Reimann, P. (2008). Saying the wrong thing: Improving learning with multimedia by including misconceptions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(2), 144–155. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00248.x
- Muller, D.A., Sharma, M.D., Eklund, J., & Reimann, P. (2007). Conceptual change through vicarious learning in an authentic physics setting. Instructional Science, 35(6), 519–533. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-007-9017-6
- Porter, S. R. (2013). Self-reported learning gains: A theory and test of college student survey response. Research in Higher Education, 54(2), 201–226
- Reynolds, C.F., Degenholtz, H., Parker, L.S., Schulberg, H.C., Mulsant, B.H., Post, E., & Rollman, B. (2001). Treatment as usual (TAU) control practices in the PROSPECT study: Managing the interaction and tension between research design and ethics. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 16(6), 602–608. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.466
- Salmon, G. (2019). May the fourth be with you: Creating education 4.0. Journal of Learning for Development-JL4D, 6(2), 95–115.
- Schunk, D.H., Hanson, A.R., & Cox, P.D. (1987). Peer-model attributes and children’s achievement behaviors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(1), 54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.79.1.54
- Stranc, S., & Muldner, K. (2019). Learning from videos showing a dialog fosters more positive affect than learning from a monolog. In S. Isotani, E. Millan, A. Ogan, P. Hastings, B. McLaren, R. Luckin (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education, AIED 2019.Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Vol. (pp.275–280). Springer, Cham.
- Tree, J.E.F., & Mayer, S.A. (2008). Overhearing single and multiple perspectives. Discourse Processes, 45(2), 160–179. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530701792867
- Wong, G., Greenhalgh, T., Westhorp, G., & Pawson, R. (2012). Realist methods in medical education research: What are they and what can they contribute? Medical Education, 46(1), 89–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04045.x
- Wrigley, T., & McCusker, S. (2019). Evidence-based teaching: A simple view of “science”. Educational Research and Evaluation, 25(1–2), 110–126. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2019.1617992
- Xing, B. (2019). Towards a Magic Cube framework in understanding higher education 4.0 imperative for the fourth industrial revolution. In M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Handbook of research on challenges and opportunities in launching a technology-driven international university (pp. 107–130). USA: IGI Global. doi:https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-6255-9
- Yeadon-Lee, A. (2018). Reflective vicarious learning (RVL) as an enhancement for action learning. Journal of Management Development, 37(4), 363–371. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-11-2017-0348
- Zilvinskis, J., Masseria, A.A., & Pike, G.R. (2017). Student engagement and student learning: Examining the convergent and discriminant validity of the revised national survey of student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 58(8), 880–903. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-017-9450-6