Can we use online technology to rejig the traditional laboratory experience to improve student engagement?

References

• Abdulwahed, M., & Nagy, Z.K. (2009). Applying Kolb’s experiential learning cycle for laboratory education. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(3), 283–294. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01025.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alam, F., Tang, H., & Tu, J. (2004). The development of an integrated experimental and computational virtual learning tool for thermal fluid science. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 3(2), 249–252.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: McGraw-hill education.
   Google Scholar
• Bjælde, O.E., Jørgensen, T.H., & Lindberg, A.B. (2017). Continuous assessment in higher education in Denmark: Early experiences from two science courses. Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift, 12(23), 1–19. doi:10.7146/dut.v12i23.25634
   Google Scholar
• Bonfield, C.A., Salter, M., Longmuir, A., Benson, M., & Adachi, C. (2020). Transformation or evolution?: Education 4.0, teaching and learning in the digital age. Higher Education Pedagogies, 5(1), 223–246. doi:10.1080/23752696.2020.1816847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2007). Developing assessment for informing judgement. In Rethinking assessment in higher education (pp. 181–197). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Y., Lu, S., Du, Y., & Lim, G. (2017). Introducing online quizzes into lab-based teaching in university. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 7(8), 571. doi:10.18178/ijiet.2017.7.8.933
   Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, H., Alam, F., & Mustary, I. (2019). Development of an innovative technique for teaching and learning of laboratory experiments for engineering courses. Energy Procedia, 160, 806–811. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2019.02.154
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D., & Sasson, I. (2016). Online quizzes in a virtual learning environment as a tool for formative assessment. Journal of Technology and Science Education (JoTSE), 6(3), 21. doi:10.3926/jotse.217
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, S.K., & Smith, C.L. (2019). Evaluating the benefits of virtual training for bioscience students. Higher Education Pedagogies, 4(1), 287–299. doi:10.1080/23752696.2019.1599689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale, E. (1969). Audiovisual methods in teaching (3rd ed.). Orlando, FL: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Dawes, L., Murray, M., & Rasmussen, G. (2005). Student experiential learning. In D. Radcliffe & J. Humphries (Eds.), Proceedings 4th ASEE/AaeE Global Colloquium on Engineering Education (pp. 1–11). Australia: The University of Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• Feisel, L., & Rosa, A.J. (2005). The role of the laboratory in undergraduate engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 121–130. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00833.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felder, R.M., & Brent, R. (2003). Designing and teaching courses to satisfy the ABET engineering criteria. Journal of Engineering Education, 92(1), 7–25. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2003.tb00734.x
   Google Scholar
• Forster, A.M., Pilcher, N., Tennant, S., Murray, M., Craig, N., & Copping, A. (2017). The fall and rise of experiential construction and engineering education: Decoupling and recoupling practice and theory. Higher Education Pedagogies, 2(1), 79–100. doi:10.1080/23752696.2017.1338530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamage, S.H.P.W., Ayres, J.R., Behrend, M.B., & Smith, E.J. (2019). Optimising moodle quizzes for online assessments. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 27. doi:10.1186/s40594-019-0181-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamez-Montero, P.J., Raush, G., Domenech, L., Castilla, R., Garcia-Vilchez, M., Moreno, H., & Carbo, A. (2015). Methodology for developing teaching activities and materials for use in fluid mechanics courses in undergraduate engineering programs. Journal of Technology and Science Education (JoTSE), 5(1), 16. doi:10.3926/jotse.135
   Google Scholar
• Gurses, A., Açıkyıldız, M., Doğar, Ç., & Sozbilir, M. (2007). An investigation into the effectiveness of problem-based learning in a physical chemistry laboratory course. Research in Science & Technological Education, 25(1), 99–113. doi:10.1080/02635140601053641
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Planning, 46(1–2), 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2013.08.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., & Sinkovics, R.R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In R.R. Sinkovics & P.N. Ghauri (Eds.), New Challenges to International Marketing (Advances in International Marketing) (Vol. 20, pp. 277–319). doi:10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014
   Google Scholar
• Huilier, D. (2019). Forty years’ experience in teaching fluid mechanics at Strasbourg university. Fluids, 4(4), 199. doi:10.3390/fluids4040199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, M., & Adair, D. (2014). The influence of students’ interest, ability and personal situation on students’ perception of a problem-based learning environment. European Journal of Engineering Education, 39(1), 84–96. doi:10.1080/03043797.2013.833172
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kuh, G.D. (2008). Excerpt from high-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Association of American Colleges and Universities, 14(3), 28–29.
   Google Scholar
• Kuh, G., O’Donnell, K., & Schneider, C.G. (2017). HIPs at ten. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 49(5), 8–16. doi:10.1080/00091383.2017.1366805
   Google Scholar
• Lal, S., Lucey, A.D., Lindsay, E.D., Sarukkalige, P.R., Mocerino, M., Treagust, D.F., & Zadnik, M.G. (2017). An alternative approach to student assessment for engineering–laboratory learning. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 22(2), 81–94. doi:10.1080/22054952.2018.1435202
   Google Scholar
• Landrum, B. (2020). Examining students’ confidence to learn online, self-regulation skills and perceptions of satisfaction and usefulness of online classes. Online Learning, 24. doi:10.24059/olj.v24i3.2066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• León, J., Núñez, J.L., & Liew, J. (2015). Self-determination and STEM education: Effects of autonomy, motivation, and self-regulated learning on high school math achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 43, 156–163. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.08.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, E., Liu, D., Murray, S., & Lowe, D. (2007). Remote laboratories in engineering education: Trends in students’ perceptions. In Proceedings of the 18th Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education, Melbourne, Australia. Australasian Association for Engineering Education.
   Google Scholar
• McClelland, C.J. (2013, June). Flipping a large-enrollment fluid mechanics course–is it effective? In 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia, US (pp. 23–607).
   Google Scholar
• Meltzer, D.E., & Manivannan, K. (2002). Transforming the lecture-hall environment: The fully interactive physics lecture. American Journal of Physics, 70(6), 639–654. doi:10.1119/1.1463739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooi, E., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A concise guide to market research. The process, data and methods using IBM SPSS statistics. Springer Texts in Business and Economics. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-53965-7
   Google Scholar
• Peña-Fernández, A., Acosta, L., Fenoy, S., Magnet, A., Izquierdo, F., Bornay, F.J., … Del Aguila, C. (2020). Evaluation of a novel digital environment for learning medical parasitology. Higher Education Pedagogies, 5(1), 1–18. doi:10.1080/23752696.2019.1710549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, A. (2016). A blended learning approach to teach fluid mechanics in engineering. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42, 1–8. doi:10.1080/03043797.2016.1153044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salas-Morera, L., Arauzo-Azofra, A., & García-Hernández, L. (2012). Analysis of online quizzes as a teaching and assessment tool. Journal of Technology and Science Education (JoTSE), 2(1), 7. doi:10.3926/jotse.30
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, R., & Renaud-Assemat, I. (2020). Developing technical report writing skills in first and second year engineering students: A case study using self-reflection. Higher Education Pedagogies, 5(1), 19–29. doi:10.1080/23752696.2019.1710550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokoloff, D.R. (editor). (2006). “Introduction”, active learning in optics and photonics training manual (pp. 1–13). Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Sokoloff, D.R., & Thornton, R.K. (1997). Using interactive lecture demonstrations to create an active learning environment. The Physics Teacher, 35(6), 340–347. doi:10.1119/1.2344715
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, R.K., & Sokoloff, D.R. (1998). Assessing student learning of newton’s laws: The force and motion conceptual evaluation and the evaluation of active learning laboratory and lecture curricula. American Journal of Physics, 66(4), 338–352. doi:10.1119/1.18863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vial, P.J., Nikolic, S., Ros, M., Stirling, D., & Doulai, P. (2015). Using online and multimedia resources to enhance the student learning experience in a telecommunications laboratory within an Australian university. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 20(1), 71–80. doi:10.7158/D13-006.2015.20.1
   Google Scholar
• Wallihan, R., Smith, K.G., Hormann, M.D., Donthi, R.R., Boland, K., & Mahan, J.D. (2018). Utility of intermittent online quizzes as an early warning for residents at risk of failing the pediatric board certification examination. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 287. doi:10.1186/s12909-018-1366-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Webster, D.R., Majerich, D.M., & Luo, J. (2014). Flippin’ Fluid Mechanics - Quasi-experimental Pre-test and Post-test Comparison Using Two Groups. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014APS.DFDM33005W
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B.J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). City University of New York, New York: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar