Spatial Development in the European Alps: Topographic Potential Area as a Basic Indicator for Policy Debates

References

• Bender, O., and A. Haller. 2017. The cultural embeddedness of population mobility in the Alps: Consequences for sustainable development. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift – Norwegian Journal of Geography 71 (3):132–45. doi:10.1080/00291951.2017.1317661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertram, D., and T. Chilla. 2022. Polycentricity and accessibility in mountain areas: The Alpine case. European Planning Studies 1–21. doi:10.1080/09654313.2022.2145874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertram, D., T. Chilla, and S. Hippe. 2023. Cross-border mobility: Rail or road? Space-time-lines as an evidence base for policy debates. Journal of Borderlands Studies 1–18. doi:10.1080/08865655.2023.2249917.
   Google Scholar
• Bertram, D., T. Chilla, and M. Lambracht. 2023. The Alpine settlement system: Capturing relevance beyond size. Journal of Maps 19 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1080/17445647.2022.2164229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavallaro, F., and A. Dianin. 2020. Cross-border public transport as a driver for tourism in the Alps. Transportation Research Procedia 48 (2):2446–61. doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2020.08.262.
   Google Scholar
• Chilla, T., D. Bertram, and M. Lambracht. 2022. Alpine towns – Key to sustainable development in the Alpine region. Part 1: Facts, maps and scientific debates. 9th Report on the State of the Alps. 1-56 doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.36022.98880/1.
   Google Scholar
• Chilla, T., and M. Lambracht. 2022. Land take in the Alpine region: The data perspective. Contribution to IP_S2, Step 1 of the Alpine climate target system. https://www.alpconv.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Organisation/TWB/SPSD/CDR_ACTS_IP_S3_1a_Land_Take_Data.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chilla, T., and A. Heugel. 2022. Cross-border commuting dynamics: Patterns and driving forces in the Alpine macro-region. Journal of Borderlands Studies 37 (1):17–35. doi:10.1080/08865655.2019.1700822.
   Google Scholar
• Dax, T., and P. Hellegers. 2000. Policies for less-favoured areas. In CAP regimes and the European countryside, prospects for integration between agricultural, regional and environmental policies, ed. Brouwer, F. and P. Lowe, 179–97. Wallingford: CAB International.
   Google Scholar
• Debarbieux, B., and M. Price. 2008. Representing mountains: From local and national to global common good. Geopolitics 13 (1):148–68. doi:10.1080/14650040701783375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dematteis, G. 2018. The alpine metropolitan-mountain faced with global challenges. Reflections on the case of turin. Journal of Alpine Research|Revue De Géographie Alpine 106 (2):1-13. doi:10.4000/rga.4402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESTAT (Eurostat – European Statistical Office). 2023. Conversion of DN in ‘SLOP’ files into degrees off horizontal of the surface tangent. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/7116161/7172326/SPEC011-b140109-SLOP.pdf
   Google Scholar
• FLF (Forschungszentrum für landwirtschaftliche Fernerkundung und Julius Kühn-Institut). 2017. Geodatenprodukte: Hangneigung. https://flf.julius-kuehn.de/webdienste/webdienste-des-flf/hangneigung.html.
   Google Scholar
• Funnell, D., and M. Price. 2003. Mountain geography: A review. Geographical Journal 169 (3):183–90. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3451445. doi:10.1111/1475-4959.00083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gastner, M., and M. Newman. 2004. Diffusion-based method for producing density-equalizing maps. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101 (20):7499–504. doi:10.1073/pnas.0400280101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M. 2018. Reimagining the history of GIS. Annals of GIS 24 (1):1–8. doi:10.1080/19475683.2018.1424737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorsevski, P., P. Gessler, and P. Jankowski. 2003. Integrating a fuzzy k-means classification and a Bayesian approach for spatial prediction of landslide hazard. Journal of Geographical Systems 5 (3):223–51. doi:10.1007/s10109-003-0113-0.
   Google Scholar
• Greenlee, D. 1987. Raster and vector processing for scanned linework. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 53 (10):1383–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarasiunas, G. 2016. Assessment of the agricultural land under steep slope in Lithuania. Journal of Central European Agriculture 17 (1):176–87. doi:10.5513/JCEA01/17.1.1688.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, T., and J. Sandström. 2020. Organizing rocks. Actor-network theory and space. Organization 27 (5):701–16. doi:10.1177/1350508419842715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Job, H., C. Meyer, O. Coronado, S. Koblar, P. Laner, A. Omizzolo, G. Plassmann, W. Riedler, P. Vesely, and A. Schindelegger. 2022. Open spaces in the European Alps – GIS-based analysis and implications for spatial planning from a transnational perspective. Land 11 (9):1605. doi:10.3390/land11091605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohler, T., J. Balsiger, G. Rudaz, B. Debarbieux, D. Pratt, and D. Maselli. 2015. Green Economy and Institutions for Sustainable Mountain Development: From Rio 1992 to Rio 2012 and beyond. Bern, Switzerland, Centre for Development and Environment (CDE), Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC), University of Geneva and Geographica Bernensia: 1-144. doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.4376.9440.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1999. On recalling ANT. In Actor network theory and after, ed. Law J. and J. Hassard, 15–25. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Peuquet, D. 1981. An examination of techniques for reformatting digital cartographic data, part 1: The raster-ta-vector process. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization 18 (1):34–48. doi:10.3138/VL12-8581-0733-0Q11.
   Google Scholar
• Pirasteh, S., and J. Li. 2017. Landslides investigations from geoinformatics perspective: Quality, challenges, and recommendations. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk 8 (2):448–65. doi:10.1080/19475705.2016.1238850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, M., T. Arnesen, E. Gløersen, and M. Metzger. 2019. Mapping mountain areas: Learning from Global, European and Norwegian perspectives. Journal of Mountain Science 16 (1):1–15. doi:10.1007/s11629-018-4916-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, M., W. Gurgiser, I. Juen, C. Adler, S. Wymann von Dach, G. Kaser, and S. Mayr. 2022. The International Mountain Conference, Innsbruck, Austria, September 2019 (IMC2019): A Synthesis with Recommendations for Research. Mountain Research and Development 42 (1):A1–A16. doi:10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-21-00027.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu, H., Y. Zhu, W. Zhou, H. Sun, J. He, and Z. Liu. 2022. Influence of DEM resolution on landslide simulation performance based on the Scoops3D model. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk 13 (1):1663–81. doi:10.1080/19475705.2022.2097451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleem, N., M. Huq, N. Twumasi, A. Javed, and A. Sajjad. 2019. Parameters derived from and/or used with digital elevation models (DEMs) for landslide susceptibility mapping and landslide risk assessment: a review. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 8 (12):1–25. doi:10.3390/ijgi8120545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanap, R., and V. Sapate. 2020. Analysis of building on sloping ground. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology 8 (6):513–9. doi:10.22214/ijraset.2020.6079.
   Google Scholar
• Sofia, G. 2020. Combining geomorphometry, feature extraction techniques and earthsurface processes research: The way forward. Geomorphology 355:107055. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gelder, P., F. Nadim, and C. G. Soares. 2010. Risk assessment of natural hazards with applications to landslides and abnormal waves. In Safety and Reliability of Industrial Products, Systems and Structures, ed. Guedes Soares, C. London: Taylor & Francis Group. doi:10.1201/b10572.
   Google Scholar
• Viles, H. 2016. Technology and geomorphology: Are improvements in data collection techniques transforming geomorphic science? Geomorphology 270:121–33. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.07.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar