Judicial review and social construction: the case of the Turkish Constitutional Court

References

• Ackermann, Bruce, and Neal Katyal. 1995. “Our Unconventional Founding.” University of Chicago Law Review 62 (2): 475–573.10.2307/1600145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsop, R., A. Fitzsimmons, and K. Lennon. 2002. Theorizing Gender: An Introduction. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Benedict. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London/New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Anthony, D. J. 2010. “A Spouse by Any Other Name.” W. & Mary J. of W. and the Law 17 (1): 187–222.
   Google Scholar
• Arato, Andrew. 2010. “The Constitutional Reform Proposal of the Turkish Government: The Return of Majority Imposition.” Constellations 17 (2): 345–350. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8675.2010.00599.x.
   Google Scholar
• Arato, Andrew. 2016. Post-Sovereign Constitution Making: Learning and Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford UP.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198755982.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Aslan, Senem. 2009. “Incoherent State: The Controversy over Kurdish Naming in Turkey.” European Journal of Turkish Studies 10: 1–20. http://ejts.revues.org/4142.
   Google Scholar
• Aslan, Senem. 2011. “Everyday Forms of State Power and The Kurds in the Early Turkish Republic.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 43 (1): 75–93. doi: 10.1017/S0020743810001200. 10.1017/S0020743810001200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ataç, İlker, Bülent Küçük, and Ulaş Şener, eds. 2008. Perspektiven auf die Türkei - Ökonomische und gesellschaftliche (Dis)Kontinuitäten im Kontext der Europäisierung. Münster: Dampfboot.
   Google Scholar
• Bayır, Derya. 2013. Minorities and Nationalism in Turkish Law. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Belçim Galip, Özlem. 2015. Imagining Kurdistan: Identity, Culture and Society. London: I.B.Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Belge, Ceren. 2006. “Friends of the Court: The Republican Alliance and Selective Activism of the Constitutional Court of Turkey.” Law & Society Review 40 (3): 653–692. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5893.2006.00276.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, Peter, and Thomas Luckmann. 1967. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1987. “The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field.” Hastings Law Journal 38 (5): 805–853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1998. Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action. Stanford: Stanford UP.
   Google Scholar
• Çalı, Başak. 2014. “Third Time Lucky? The Dynamics of the Internationalisation of Domestic Courts, the Turkish Constitutional Court and Women’s Right to Identity in International Law.” EJIL:Talk! The blog of the European Journal of International Law.http://tinyurl.com/gnmmaox
   Google Scholar
• Can, Osman. 2012. “The Turkish Constitutional Court as a Defender of the Raison dʼEtat?” In Constitutionalism in Islamic Countries: Between Upheaval and Continuity, edited by Rainer Grote and Tilman Röder, 259–278. Oxford: Oxford UP.
   Google Scholar
• Celeb, Ödel. 2014. “The Political Causes of Party Closures in Turkey.” Parliamentary Affairs 67 (2): 371–390. doi: 10.1093/pa/gss041.10.1093/pa/gss041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Checkel, J. 1999. “Social Construction and Integration.” Journal of European Public Policy 6 (4): 545–560. doi:10.1080/135017699343469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chemerinsky, Erwin. 2004. “In Defense of Judicial Review: The Perils of Popular Constitutionalism.” University of Illinois Law Review 3 (1): 673–690.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Robert A. 1957. “Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker.” Journal of Public Law 6 (1): 279–295.
   Google Scholar
• Dickson, Del. 2001. The Supreme Court in Conference (1940–1985): The Private Discussions Behind Nearly 300 Supreme Court Decisions. Oxford: Oxford UP.
   Google Scholar
• Elver, Hilal. 2006. “Gender Equality from a Constitutional Perspective: The Case of Turkey.” In The Gender of Constitutional Jurisprudence, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marín and Beverley Baines, 278–305. New York: Cambridge UP.
   Google Scholar
• Fearon, James D., and David D. Laitin. 2000. “Violence and the Social Construction of Ethnic Identity.” International Organization 54 (4): 845–877. doi:10.1162/002081800551398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foner, Eric. 1990. “Blacks and the US Constitution.” New Left Review I (183): 63–74.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 1994. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of Human Sciences. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, Samuel. 1990. “Constitutional Democracy and The Legitimacy of Judicial Review.” Law and Philosophy 9 (4): 327–370. doi:10.1007/BF00212703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldin, Claudia, and Maria Shim. 2004. “Making a Name: Women’s Surnames at Marriage and Beyond.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 18 (2): 143–160. doi:10.1257/0895330041371268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graber, Mark. 2005. “Constructing Judicial Review.” Annual Review of Political Science 8 (1): 425–451. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, William, and Ergun Özbudun. 2010. Islamism, Democracy and Liberalism in Turkey: The Case of the AKP. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haney Lopez, Ian. 1994. “The Social Construction of Race: Some Observation on Illusion, Fabrication, and Choice.” Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 29 (1): 1–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelsen, Hans. 1945. General Theory of Law and State. Cambridge/Mass: Harvard UP.
   Google Scholar
• Klare, Karl E. 2011. “Social Construction and System in Legal Theory: A Response to Professor Preuss.” German Law Journal 12 (1): 516–524.
   Google Scholar
• Koğacıoğlu, Dicle. 2004. “Progress, Unity, and Democracy: Dissolving Political Parties in Turkey.” Law & Society Review 38 (3): 433–462. doi:10.1111/j.0023-9216.2004.00053.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kranenpohl, Uwe. 2010. Hinter dem Schleier des Beratungsgeheimnisses: Der Willensbildungs- und Entscheidungsprozess des Bundesverfassungsgerichts. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.10.1007/978-3-531-92242-3
   Google Scholar
• Lafont, Cristina. 2016. “Philosophical Foundations of Judicial Review.” In Philosophical Foundations of Constitutional Law, edited by David Dyzenhaus and Malcolm Thorburn, 266–280. Oxford: Oxford UP.
   Google Scholar
• Lessig, Lawrence. 1995. “The Regulation of Social Meaning.” University of Chicago Law Review 62 (3): 943–1045. http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclrev/vol62/iss3/1 10.2307/1600054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litowitz, Douglas. 2000. “Gramsci, Hegemony, and the Law.” Brigham Young University Law Review 2 (2): 515–551.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, Niklas. (1987) 2004. Law as a Social System. Oxford: Oxford UP.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, Chantal, and Ernesto Laclau. (1984) 2001. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Örücü, Esin. 2008. “The Constitutional Court of Turkey: The Anayasa Mahkemesi as the Protector of the System.” Journal of Comparative Law 3 (2): 254–268.
   Google Scholar
• Özbudun, Ergun, and Ömer F. Gençkaya. 2009. Democratization and the Politics of Constitution-Making in Turkey. Budapest: CEUP.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, Felix, and Zeynep Yanaşmayan. 2017. “The Final Trick? Separation of Powers, Checks and Balances, and the Recomposition of the Turkish State.“ Verfassungsblog/On Matters Constitutional. Accessed 17 March 2018. https://tinyurl.com/yaduuenv
   Google Scholar
• Posner, Richard A. 1982. “Economics, Politics, and the Reading of Statutes and the Constitution.” University of Chicago Law Review 49 (2): 263–291.10.2307/1599424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prakash, Saikrishna B., and John C. Yoo. 2003. “Questions for the Critics of Judicial Review.” The George Washington Law Review 72 (1–2): 354–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogowski, Ralf. 2013. “Constitutional Courts as Autopoietic Organisations.” In Die Politik des Verfassungsrechts. Interdisziplinäre und vergleichende Perspektiven auf die Rolle und Funktion von Verfassungsgerichten, edited by Michael Wrase and Christian Boulanger, 117–133. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Rubio-Marín, Ruth. 2015. “The Constitutional Status of Women in Turkey at a Crossroads: Reflections from Comparison.” Verfassungsblog/On Matters Constitutional. Accessed January 17, 2015. http://tinyurl.com/j94ozud
   Google Scholar
• Schnapper, Dominique. 2010. Une sociologue au Conseil Constitutionnel. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Shambayati, Hootan. 2008. “The Guardian of the Regime: the Turkish Constitutional Court in Comparative Perspective.” In Constitutional Politics in the Middle East: With special reference to Turkey, Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan, edited by Saïd Amir Arjomand, 99–122. Portland, ME: Hart Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Shambayati, Hootan, and Esen Kirdiş. 2009. “In Pursuit of Contemporary Civilization: Judicial Empowerment in Turkey.” Political Research Quarterly 62 (4): 767–780. doi:10.1177/1065912909346741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonyel, Salahi R. 2001. The Assyrians of Turkey: Victims of Major Power Policy. Ankara: THS Printing House.
   Google Scholar
• Steinsdorff, Silvia von, Ece Göztepe, Felix Petersen, and Maria Haimerl. Forthcoming. Constitutional Jurisdiction in Turkey. Documentation, Analysis and Evaluation of Judgments of the Turkish Constitutional Court (1961-2012). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Stone Sweet, Alec. 1999. “Judicialization and the Construction of Governance.” Comparative Political Studies 32 (2): 147–184. doi:10.1177/0010414099032002001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone Sweet, Alec. 2007. “The Politics of Constitutional Review in France and Europe.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 5 (1): 69–92. doi: 10.1093/icon/mol041. 10.1093/icon/mol041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tas, Latif. 2014. Legal Pluralism in Action: Dispute Resolution and the Kurdish Peace Committee. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tirosh, Yofi. 2010. “A Name of One’s Own: Gender and Symbolic Legal Personhood in the European Court of Human Rights.” Harvard Journal of Law & Gender 33 (1): 247–307.
   Google Scholar
• Trimberger, Kay Ellen. 1978. Revolution from Above: Military Bureaucrats and Development in Japan, Turkey, Egypt, and Peru. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.
   Google Scholar
• Türköz, Meltem. 2007. “Surname Narratives and The State–Society Boundary: Memories of Turkey's Family Name Law of 1934.” Middle Eastern Studies 43 (6): 893–908. doi:10.1080/00263200701568253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Türköz, Meltem. 2014. “Fathering the Nation: From Mustafa Kemal to Atatürk.” Traditiones 43 (1): 53–64. doi:10.3986/Traditio2014430105.
   Google Scholar
• Tushnet, Mark. 2000. Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts. Princeton UP: Princeton.10.1515/9781400822973
   Google Scholar
• Uğur Çınar, Meral. 2015. Collective Memory and National Membership: Identity and Citizenship Models in Turkey and Austria. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137473660
   Google Scholar
• Waldron, Jeremy. 1999. The Dignity of Legislation. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.10.1017/CBO9780511621987
   Google Scholar