Advanced search
Publication Cover
Journal of Evidence-Informed Social Work Volume 14, 2017 - Issue 6
Submit an article Journal homepage
765
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Practice Evaluation Strategies Among Social Workers: Why an Evidence-Informed Dual-Process Theory Still Matters

Thomas D. DavisSchool of Social Work, California State University, San Bernardino, California, USACorrespondence[email protected]
Pages 389-408 | Published online: 12 Sep 2017

References

  • Adams, F. (2010). Embodied cognition. Phenomenology and Cognition, 9, 619–628.
  • Auerbach, C., & Schudrich, W. Z. (2013). SSD for R: A comprehensive statistical package to analyze single-system data. Research on Social Work Practice, 23, 346–353. doi:10.1177/1049731513477213
  • Auerbach, C., & Zeitlin, W. (2014). SSD for R: An R package for analyzing single-subject data. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Bellamy, J. L., Bledsoe, S. E., & Traube, D. E. (2005). The current state of evidence-informed practice in social work: A review of the literature and qualitative analysis of expert interviews. Journal of Evidence-Informed Social Work, 3, 23–48. doi:10.1300/J394v03n01_02
  • Benner, P. (Ed.). (1995). Interpretive phenomenology: Embodiment, caring, and ethics in health and illness. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Bickerton, D. (1995). Language and human behavior. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
  • Bloom, M., Fisher, J., & Orme, J. G. (2009). Evaluating practice: Guidelines for the accountable professional (6th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.
  • Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (2001). Fuzzy-trace theory: Dual processes in memory, reasoning, and cognitive neuroscience. In H. W. Reese & R. Kail (Eds.), Advances in child development and behavior (vol. 28, pp. 41–100). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Briggs, H. E., Feyerherm, W., & Gingerich, W. (2004). Evaluating science-based pratice with single systems. In H. E. Briggs & T. L. Rzepnicki (Eds.), Using evidence in social work practice: Behavioral perspectives (pp. 323–342). Chicago, IL: Lyceum.
  • Brooks, R. A. (1991). Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence, 47, 139–159. doi:10.1016/0004-3702(91)90053-M
  • Bruno, F. J. (1936). The theory of social work. Boston, MA: D. C. Health and Co.
  • Bruno, F. J. (1948). Trends in social work as reflected in the proceedings of the National conference of social work (pp. 1874–1946). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Brunswik, E. (1943). Organismic achievement and envrionmental probability. The Psychological Review, 50, 255–272. doi:10.1037/h0060889
  • Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (Eds.). (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York, NY: Guilford.
  • Charleswort, S. J. (2000). A phenomenology of working class experience. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Coe, J. A. R., & Mennon, G. M. (Eds.). (2000). Computers and information technology in social work education, training, and practice. New York, NY: TRC.
  • Corcoran, K., & Fisher, J. (Eds.). (2013a). Measures for clinical practice and research, Volume 1: Couples, families, and children. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Corcoran, K., & Fisher, J. (Eds.). (2013b). Measures for clinical practice and research, Volume 2: Adults. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Council on Social Work Education. (2015). Educational policy and accreditation standards. Washington, DC: Author.
  • Cournoyer, B. R., & Powers, G. T. (2002). Evidence-informed social work: The quiet revolution. In A. R. Roberts & G. J. Greene (Eds.), Social workers’ desk reference (pp. 798–807). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Crick, F., & Koch, C. (2003). A framework for consciousness. National Neuroscience, 6, 119–126. doi:10.1038/nn0203-119
  • Davis, D. A., & Taylor-Vaisey, A. (1997). Translating guidelines into practice: A systematic review of theoretic concepts, practical experience and research evidence in the adoption of clinical practice guidelines. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 157, 408–416.
  • Davis, T. D. (2005). Beliefs about confrontation among substance abuse counselors: Are they consistent with the evidence? Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 2, 1–17. doi:10.1300/J394v02n01_01
  • Davis, T. D. (2006). Practice evaluation in social work: Theorizing pracitioner preference. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 76, 67–92. doi:10.1300/J497v76n03_06
  • Davis, T. D. (2007). Why do MSW students evaluate practice the way they do? An evidence-informed theory for clinical supervisors. The Clinical Supervisor, 26, 159–175. doi:10.1300/J001v26n01_11
  • Davis, T. D., Dennis, C. B., & Culbertson, S. E. (2015). Practice evaluation strategies among licensed clinical social workers: New directions in practice research. Research on Social Work Practice, 25, 654–669.
  • Dehaene, S., & Changeux, J. P. (2011). Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing. Neuron, 70, 200–227. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.03.018
  • Di Paolo, E., & Thompson, E. (2014). The enactive approach. In L. Shapiro (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of embodied cognition. London, England: Routledge.
  • Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M. W., Nordgren, L. F., & Van Barren, R. B. (2006). On making the right choice: The deliberation-without-attention effect. Science, 311, 1005–1007. doi:10.1126/science.1121629
  • Dreyfus, H. L. (2016). Skillful coping: Essays on the phenomenology of everyday perception and action (M. A. Wrathall, Ed.). Oxford, England: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press.
  • Drisko, J. (2001). How clinical social workers evaluate practice. Smith College Studes in Social Work, 71, 419–439. doi:10.1080/00377310109517638
  • Drisko, J. W., & Grady, M. D. (2012). Evidence-based practice in clinical social work. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Elks, M., & Kirkhart, K. (1993). Evaluating effectiveness from the practitioner perspective. Social Work, 38, 555–563. doi:10.1093/sw/38.5.554
  • Epstein, I. (2010). Clinical data-mining: Integrating practice and research. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Epstein, I., Fisher, M., Julkunen, I., Uggerhoj, L., Austin, M. J., & Sim, T. (2015). The New York statement on the evolving definition of practice research designed for continuing dialogue: A bulletin from the 3rd International conference on practice research (2014). Research on Social Work Practice, 25, 1–4. doi:10.1177/1049731515582250
  • Epstein, S., & Pacini, R. (1999). Some basic issues regarding dual-process theories from the persepctive of cogntive-experiential self-theory. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 462–482). New York, NY: Guilford.
  • Feldman, R. A. (2010). Critical infrastructures for social work practice research: Pondering the past, framing the future. In A. E. Fortune, P. McCallion, & K. Briar-Lawson (Eds.), Social work practice research for the twenty-first century (pp. 3–22). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Ferguson, M. J., Mann, T. C., & Wonjnowicz, M. T. (2014). Rethinking duality: Criticisms and ways forward. In J. W. Sherman, B. Gawronski, & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories of the social mind (pp. 578–594). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Fischer, J. (1993). Empirically-based practice: The end of ideology? Social Service Review, 18, 19–64. doi:10.1300/J079v18n01_03
  • Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Fortune, A. E., McCallion, P., & Briar-Lawson, K. (2010). Building evidence-informed intervention theories. In A. E. Fortune, P. McCallion, & K. Briar-Lawson (Eds.), Social work practice research for the twenty-first century (pp. 279–295). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Fraser, M. W., Richman, J. M., Galinsky, M. J., & Day, S. H. (2009). Intervention research: Developing social programs. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Gambrill, E. (1997). Social work practice: A critical thinker’s guide. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Gambrill, E. (1999). Evidence-informed practice: An alternative to authority-based practice. Families in Society, 80, 341–350. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.1214
  • Gambrill, E. (2012). Propoganda in the helping professions. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Garb, H. N. (1998). Studying the clinician: Judgment research and psychological assessment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 692–731. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692
  • Gawronski, B., Sherman, J. W., & Trope, Y. (2014). Two of what? A conceptual analysis of dual-process theories. In B. Gawronski, J. W. Sherman, & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories of the social mind (pp. 3–19). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Gerdes, K., Edmonds, R., Haslam, D., & McCartney, T. (1996). A statewide survey of licensed clinical social workers’ use of practice evaluation procedures. Research on Social Work Practice, 6, 27–39. doi:10.1177/104973159600600102
  • Gibbs, L. E. (2003). Evidence-informed practice for the helping professions. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  • Gigerenzer, G., & Todd, P. M. (Eds.). (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Gilbert, D. T. (1999). What the mind’s not. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 3–11). New York, NY: Guilford.
  • Giles, S. (2003). Transformations: A phenomenological investigation into the life-world of home haemodialysis. Social Work in Health Care, 38, 29–50. doi:10.1300/J010v38n02_02
  • Gingerich, W. J. (1982, March). Teaching students to use single-case evaluation methods: Enhancing generalization from classroom to practice settings. Paper presented at the Annual Program Meeting of the Council of Social Work Education, New York, NY.
  • Grobman, L. (Ed.). (2011). Days in the lives of social workers: 58 professionals tell real-life stories from social work practice (4th ed.). Harrisburg, PA: White House Communications.
  • Grobman, L., & Bourassa, D. (Eds.). (2007). Days in the lives of gerotological social workers: 44 professionals tell stories from real-life social work practice with older adults. Harrisburg, PA: White Hat Communications.
  • Healy, L. (2008). International social work: Professional action in an interdependent world (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Hepworth, D., Rooney, R., Rooney, G., & Strom-Gottfriend, K. (2012). Direct social work practice: Theory and skills (9th ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  • Higgs, J., & Jones, M. (2000). Clinical reasoning in the health professions. Clinical reasoning in the health professions (2nd ed., pp. 3–14). Oxford, England: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  • Hogarth, R. M. (2001). Educating intuition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Howard, M. O., & Garland, E. L. (2015). Social work research: 2044. Journal of Society for Social Work and Research, 61, 173–200. doi:10.1086/681099
  • Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, slow and fast. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  • Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kazi, M. (2000). Contemporary perspectives in the evaluation of practice. British Journal of Social Work, 30, 755–768. doi:10.1093/bjsw/30.6.755
  • Kazi, M. (2003). Realist evaluation for practice. British Journal of Social Work, 33, 803–818. doi:10.1093/bjsw/33.6.803
  • Keller, C., & Keller, J. D. (1996). Thinking and acting with iron. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 125–143). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kirk, S. A., & Reid, W. J. (2002). Science and social work: A critical appraisal. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Klein, G. (1998). Sources of power: How people make decisions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Klein, W. C. (1995). Practice wisdom. Social Work, 40, 799–807. doi:10.1093/sw/40.6.799
  • Knight, C. (2015). Social work students’ use of the peer-review literature and engagment in evidence-informed practice. Journal of Social Work Education, 51, 250–269. doi:10.1080/10437797.2015.1012924
  • Lave, J. (1996). The practice of learning. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 3–32). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lave, J., Murtaugh, M., & Rocha, O. D. L. (1984). The dialectic of arithmetic in grocery shopping. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 67–94). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Levinson, S. C. (1995). Interactional biases in human thinking. In E. Goody (Ed.), Social intelligence and interaction (pp. 221–260). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lieberman, M. (2000). Intuition: A social cognitive neuroscience approach. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 109–137. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.1.109
  • Lieberman, M. D. (2003). Reflexive and reflective judgment processes: A social cognitive neuroscience approach. In J. P. Forgas, K. R. Williams, & W. V. Hippel (Eds.), Social judgments in implicit and explicit processes (pp. 44–67). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lindblom, C. E., & Cohen, D. K. (1979). Usable knowledge. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Luhrmann, T. M. (2000). Of two minds: The growing disorder in American psychiatry. New York, NY: Knopf.
  • Lynch, M. (1993). Scientific practice and ordinary action. Cambridge, Engalnd: Cambridge University Press.
  • Madjar, I., & Walton, J. A. (1999). Phenomenology and nursing. In I. Madjar & J. A. Walton (Eds.), Nursing and the experience of illness (pp. 1–16). London, England: Routledge.
  • Manen, M. V. (2001). Professional practice and ‘doing phenomenology’. In S. K. Toombs (Ed.), Handbook of phenomenology and medicine (pp. 457–474). Boston, MA: Kluwer.
  • Marino, R., Green, R. G., & Young, E. (1998). Beyond the scientist-practitioner model’s failure to thrive: Social workers’ participation in agency-based research activities. Social Work Research, 22, 188–192. doi:10.1093/swr/22.3.188
  • Marthinsen, E., & Julkunen, I. (Eds.). (2012). Practice research in Nordic social work: Knowledge production in transition. Forest Hill, England: Whiting and Birch.
  • Martinez-Brawley, E. E. (1995). Knowledge diffusion and transfer technology: Conceptual premises and concrete steps for human services innovators. Social Work, 40, 670–682. doi:10.1093/sw/40.5.670
  • Maynard, D. W. (2003). Bad news, good news: Conversational order in everyday talk and clinical settings. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception ( C. Smith, Trans.). London, England: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Metcalfe, J., & Mischel, W. (1999). A hot/cool system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of will power. Psychological Review, 106, 3–19. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.106.1.3
  • Mullen, E. J., & Bacon, W. (2004). Implementation of practice guidelines and evidence-informed treatment: A survey of psychiatrists, psychologists, and social workers. In A. R. Roberts & K. R. Yeager (Eds.), Evidence-informed pratice manual: Research and outcome measures in health and human services (pp. 210–218). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • National Association of Social Workers. (2008). Code of ethics of the National Association of Social Workers. Washington, DC: NASW Press.
  • Nurius, P. S., Kemp, S. P., & Gibson, J. W. (1999). Practitioners’ perspectives on sound reasoning: Adding a worker-in-context component. Administration in Social Work, 23, 1–27. doi:10.1300/J147v23n01_01
  • O’Sullivan, T. O. (2005). Some theoretical propositions on the nature of practice wisdom. Journal of Social Work, 5, 221–242. doi:10.1177/1468017305054977
  • Okpych, N. J., & Yu, J. L.-H. (2014). A historical analysis of evidence-informed practice in social work: The unfinished journey toward an empirically grounded profession. Social Service Review, 88, 3–58. doi:10.1086/674969
  • Orme, J. G., Combs-Orme, T., & Orme, J. G. (2011). Outcome-informed evidence-informed practice. New York, NY: Pearson.
  • Orr, J. (1996). Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Parrish, D. E., & Oxhandler, H. K. (2015). Social work field instructors’ views and implementation of evidence-informed practice. Journal of Social Work Education, 51, 270–286. doi:10.1080/10437797.2015.1012943
  • Penka, C. E., & Kirk, S. A. (1991). Practitioner involvment in clinical evaluation. Social Work, 36, 513–518. doi:10.1093/sw/36.6.513
  • Pignotti, M., & Thyer, B. A. (2009). Use of novel unsupported and empirically supported therapies by licensed clinical social workers. Social Work Research, 33, 5–17. doi:10.1093/swr/33.1.5
  • Pollio, H. R., Henley, T. B., & Thompson, C. J. (1997). The phenomenology of everyday life: Empirical investigations of human experience. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Pollock, J. L. (1991). OSCAR: A general theory of rationality. In J. Cummings & J. L. Pollock (Eds.), Philosophy and AI: Essays at the interface (pp. 189–213). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Reamer, F. G. (1995). Malpractice claims against social workers: First facts. Social Work, 40, 595–601. doi:10.1093/sw/40.5.595
  • Reid, W. J., & Zettergren, P. (1999). A perspective on empirical practice. In I. Shaw & J. Lishman (Eds.), Evaluation and social work practice (pp. 41–62). London, England: Sage Publications.
  • Richey, C. A., Blythe, B. J., & Berlin, S. B. (1987). Do social workers evaluate their practice? Social Work Research and Abstracts, 23, 14–20. doi:10.1093/swra/23.2.14
  • Rubin, A. (2008). Practitioner’s guide to using research for evidence-informed practice. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley and Sons.
  • Rubin, A., & Babbie, E. R. (2017). Research methods for social work (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Brooks Cole.
  • Schatzki, T. R. (2001). Introduction: Practice theory. In T. R. Schatzki, K. K. Cetina, & E. V. Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 1–14). London, England: Routledge.
  • Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Scribner, S. (1984). Studying working intelligence. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 9–40). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Shapiro, L. (2011). Embodied cognition. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Shaw, I. (1998). Practicing evaluation. In J. Cheetham & M. A. F. Kazi (Eds.), The working of social work (pp. 201–223). London, England: Jessica Kingsley.
  • Shaw, I. (2012a). Logics, qualties and quality of social work research. In I. Shaw, K. Briar-Lawson, J. Orme, & R. Ruckdeschel (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social work research (pp. 246–263). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Shaw, I. (2012b). Places in time: Contextualizing social work research. In I. Shaw, K. Briar-Lawson, J. Orme, & R. Ruckdeschel (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social work research (pp. 210–227). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Shaw, I., & Shaw, A. (1997a). Game plans, buzzes and sheer luck: Doing well in social work. Social Work Research, 21, 69–79. doi:10.1093/swr/21.2.69
  • Shaw, I., & Shaw, A. (1997b). Keeping social work honest: Evaluating as profession and practice. British Journal of Social Work, 27, 847–869.
  • Sheldon, B., & Chilvers, R. (2000). Evidence-informed social care: A study of prospects and problems. Dorset, England: Russell House.
  • Sherman, J. W., Gawronski, B., & Trope, Y. (Eds.). (2014). Dual-process theories of the social mind. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Sloman, A. S. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3–22. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.3
  • Smith, E. R. (2000). Dual-process theories in social and cogntive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 108–131. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_01
  • Stanovich, K. E. (1999). Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Stanovich, K. E. (2003). The fundamental computational biases of human cognition: Heuristics that (sometimes) impair decision making and problem solving. In J. E. Davidson & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of problem solving (pp. 291–342). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645–726.
  • Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Toplak, M. E. (2014). Rationality, intelligience, and the defining features of type 1 and type 2 processing. In J. W. Sherman, B. Gawronski, & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories of the social mind (pp. 80–91). New York, NY: Guilford.
  • Stein, E. (1996). Without good reason: The rationality debate in philosophy and cognitive science. Oxford, England: Clarendon.
  • Suchman, L. A. (1996). Plans and situated action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Taylor, C., & White, S. (2000). Practicing reflexivity in health and welfare: Making knowledge. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
  • Taylor, C., & White, S. (2001). Knowledge, truth, and reflexivity: The problem of judgement in social work. Journal of Social Work, 1, 37–59. doi:10.1177/146801730100100104
  • Taylor, S. E. (2002). Tending instinct: How nurturing is essential for who we are and how we live. New York, NY: Henry Holt.
  • Thyer, B. A. (2008). The potentially harmful effects of theory in social work. In B. A. Thyer, K. Sowers, & C. Dulmus (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of social work and social welfare (Vol. 2, pp. 519–538). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley and Sons.
  • Thyer, B. A., & Myers, L. L. (2007). A social worker’s guide to evaluating practice outcomes. Alexandria, VA: CSWE Press.
  • Thyer, B. A., & Pignotti, M. G. (2015). Science and pseudoscience in social work practice. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Toombs, S. K. (2001). Introduction: Phenomenology and medicine. In S. K. Toombs (Ed.), Handbook of phenomenology and medicine (pp. 1–26). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Tsui, M. S. (2005). Social work supervision: Contexts and concepts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Vahabzadeh, P. (2003). Articulated experiences: Toward a radical phenomenology of contemporary social movements. New York, NY: State University of New York Press.
  • Ventimiglia, J. A., Marschke, J., Carmichael, P., & Loew, R. (2000). How do clinicians evaluate their practice effectiveness? A survey of clinical social workers. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 70, 287–306. doi:10.1080/00377310009517593
  • Vinzant, J. C., & Crothers, L. (1998). Street-level leadership: Discretion and legitimacy in front-line public service. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  • Weinstein, J., Whittington, C., & Leiba, T. (2007). Collaboration in social work practice. London, England: Jessica Kingsley.
  • Welch, G. (1983). Will graduates use single-subject designs to evaluate their casework practice? Journal of Education in Social Work, 19, 42–47.
  • Wilson, T. D. (2002). Strangers to ourselves. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Zeira, A., & Rosen, A. (2000). Unraveling “tacit knowledge”: What social workers do and why they do it. Social Service Review, 74, 103–123. doi:10.1086/514459

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.