Potential impacts to dry forest species distribution under two climate change scenarios in southern Ecuador

References

• Pearson R, Dawson T. Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2003;12:361–371.10.1046/j.1466-822X.2003.00042.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarty J. Ecological consequences of recent climate change. Conserv Biol. 2001;15:320–331.10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015002320.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther G-R, Post E, Convey P, et al. Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature. 2002;416:389–395.10.1038/416389a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van-der-Putten W, Macel M, Visser M. Predicting species distribution and abundance responses to climate change: why it is essential to include biotic interactions across trophic levels. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010;365:2025–2034.10.1098/rstb.2010.0037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannah L, Betts A, Shugart H. Modeling future effects of climated change on tropical forest. In: Bush M, Flenley J, Gosling W, editors. Tropical rainforest responses to climatic change. 2nd ed. Berlin (Al); 2011. p. 411–429.10.1007/978-3-642-05383-2
   Google Scholar
• Parmesan C, Yohe G. A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature. 2003;421:37–42.10.1038/nature01286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez-Villegas J, Cuesta F, Devenish C, et al. Using species distributions models for designing conservation strategies of Tropical Andean biodiversity under climate change. J Nat Conserv. 2014;22:391–404.10.1016/j.jnc.2014.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues P, Silva J, Eisenlohr P, et al. Climate change effects on the geographic distribution of specialist tree species of the Brazilian tropical dry forests. Braz J Biol. 2015;75:679–684.10.1590/1519-6984.20913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enquist C. Predicted regional impacts of climate change on the geographical distribution and diversity of tropical forests in Costa Rica. J Biogeogr. 2002;29:519–534.10.1046/j.1365-2699.2002.00695.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guisan A, Thuiller W. Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol Lett. 2005;8:993–1009.10.1111/ele.2005.8.issue-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin M. Species distribution models and ecological theory: a critical assessment and some possible new approaches. Ecol Modell. 2007;200:1–19.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin J. Mapping species distributions: Spacial inference and prediction; Cambridge University Press; 2013. 320 p.
   Google Scholar
• Colwell R, Brehm G, Cardelús C, et al. Global warming, elevational range shifts, and lowland biotic attrition in the wet tropics. Science. 2009;322:258–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush M, Hooghiemstra H. Tropical biotic responses to climate change. In: Lovejoy T, Lee H, editors. Climate change and biodiversity. Michigan (MI): Yale University; 2005. p. 125–141.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson R. Climate change and the migration capacity of species. Trends Ecol Evol. 2006;21:111–113.10.1016/j.tree.2005.11.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parmesan C. Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2006;37:637–669.
   Google Scholar
• Pennington R, Prado D, Pendry C. Neotropical seasonally dry forests and Quaternary vegetation changes. J Biogeogr. 2000;27:261–273.10.1046/j.1365-2699.2000.00397.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguirre Z, Kvist L. Floristic composition and conservation status of the dry forests of south-western Ecuador. Lyonia. 2005;8:41–67.
   Google Scholar
• Albuja L. Biodiversity of the inter-Andean dry valleys of the Ecuador. In: Albuja L, editor. Escuela Politecnica Nacional. Quito; 2011. 56 p.
   Google Scholar
• Aguirre Z, Kvist L. Composición florística y estructura de bosques estacionalmente secos en el sur-occidental de Ecuador, provincia de Loja, municipios de Macara y Zapotillo. Arnaldoa. 2009;16:87–99.
   Google Scholar
• Aguirre Z, Kvist L, Sanchez O. Bosques Secos del Ecuador y su diversidad. Bot Econ los Andes Cent. 2006;162–87.
   Google Scholar
• Linares-Palomino R, Kvist L, Aguirre-Mendoza Z, et al. Diversity and endemism of woody plant species in the Equatorial Pacific seasonally dry forests. Biodivers Conserv. 2010;19:169–185.10.1007/s10531-009-9713-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jara-Guerrero A, De la Cruz M, Méndez M. Seed dispersal spectrum of woody species in south Ecuadorian dry forests: environmental correlates and the effect of considering species abundance. Biotropica. 2011;43:722–730.10.1111/btp.2011.43.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thuiller W, Albert C, Araújo M, et al. Predicting global change impacts on plant species’ distributions: future challenges. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst. 2008;9:137–152.10.1016/j.ppees.2007.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbario-Loja. Zoning and determination of the types of dry forest in the southwest of the province of Loja. Universidad Nacional de Loja. 2001:144 p.
   Google Scholar
• Lozano P. Types of forest in the south of Ecuador. In: Aguirre Z, Madsen M, Cotton E, Balslev H, editors. Austroecuatoriana Botany: Studies on plant resources in the provinces of El Oro, Loja and Zamora- Chinchipe. Universidad Nacional de Loja. Loja; 2002. p. 29–49.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis J, McIntosh R. The interrelations of certain analytic and synthetic phytosociological characters. Ecol Soc Am. 1950;31:434–455.
   Google Scholar
• Mostacedo B, Fredericksen T. Manual de métodos básicos de muestreo y análisis en ecología vegetal. Proyecto de Manejo Forestal Sostenible (BOLFOR). Santa Cruz; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Magurran AE, McGill BJ. Biological diversity: frontiers in measurement and assessment [Internet]. OUP Oxford; 2011. Available from: http://books.google.co.cr/books?id=Q5oURmsTv4wC
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. Climate Change and Biodiversity. Gineva, Switzerland; 2002. 89 p.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips SJ, Robert A, Robert S. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Modell. 2006;190:231–259.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riahi K, Rao S, Krey V, et al. RCP 8.5 – a scenario of comparatively high greenhouse gas emissions. Clim Change. 2011;109:33–57.10.1007/s10584-011-0149-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Vuuren D, Edmonds J, Kainuma M, et al. The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Clim Change [Internet]; 2011 Aug 5 [cited 2014 Jul 10];109:5–31. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10584-011-0148-z
   Google Scholar
• Wayne GP. The beginners’s guide to representative concentration pathways. Skeptical Science; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. Climate change 2013. The physical science basis. Working group I contribution to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; 2013. 1535 p.
   Google Scholar
• Sillmann J, Kharin K, Zwiers F, et al. Climate extremes indices in the CMIP5 multimodel ensemble: Part 2. Future climate projections. J Geophys Res Atmos. 2013;118:2473–2493.10.1002/jgrd.50188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armenta G, Dorado J, Rodriguez A, et al. Escenarios de Cambio Climático para Precipitación y Temperaturas en Colombia. Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales de Colombia Bogota, Colombia. IDEAM:274; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Kharin V, Zwiers F. Climate predictions with multimodel ensembles. J Clim. 2002;15:793–799.10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<0793:CPWME>2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knutti R, Furrer R, Tebaldi C, et al. Challenges in combining projections from multiple climate models. J Clim. 2010;23:2739–2758.10.1175/2009JCLI3361.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knutti R, Sedláček J. Robustness and uncertainties in the new CMIP5 climate model projections. Nat Clim Change. 2012;3:1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eguiguren P, Maita J, Aguirre N, et al. Tropical ecosystems vulnerability to climate change in southern Ecuador. Tripical Conserv Sci. 2016:1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert S, Boer G. CMIP1 evaluation and intercomparison of coupled climate models. Clim Dyn. 2001;17:83–106.10.1007/PL00013736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham C, Loiselle B, Velásquez-Tibatá J, et al. Models of Species Distribution and the Challenge of Forecasting Future Distributions. In: Herzog S, Martinez R, Jorgensen P, Tiessen H, editors. Climate Change and Biodiversity in the Tropical Andes, Instituto Interamericano para la investigación del Cambio global (IAI), São José dos Campos, y Comité Científico sobre Problemas del Medio Ambiente (SCOPE). Paris; 2009. p. 349–368.
   Google Scholar
• Rissler L, Apodaca J. Adding more ecology into species delimitation: ecological niche models and phylogeography help define cryptic species in the black salamander (Aneides flavipunctatus). Syst Biol. 2007;56:924–942.10.1080/10635150701703063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC. IPCC 5th assessment report “climate change 2013: the physical science basis.”. Stockholm; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. Climate change 2001. Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Parte de la contribución del Grupo de trabajo II al Tercer Informe de Evaluación Grupo Intergubernamental de Expertos sobre el Cambio Climático. Ginebra: Grupo Intergubernamental de Expertos sobre el Cambio Climático; 2001. 93 p.
   Google Scholar
• Adger N, Arnella N, Tompkins E. Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Glob Environ Change. 2005;15:77–86.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Wang Y, Peng J, et al. Assessing vulnerability to drought based on exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity: a case study in middle Inner Mongolia of China. Chin Geogr Sci. 2013;23:13–25.10.1007/s11769-012-0583-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer C, Pickle L. Evaluation of methods for classifying epidemiological data on choropleth maps in series. Ann Assoc Am Geogr. 2002;92:662–681.10.1111/1467-8306.00310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty T. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process Thomas L. Saaty. Int J Serv Sci. 2008;1:83–98.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty T. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res. 1990;48:9–26.10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguirre Z, Betancourt-Figueras Y, Greada L. Natural regeneration in the dry forests of the province of Loja and useful for local management. Rev CEDAMAZ. 2013;3:54–65.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson ST, Betancourt JL, Booth RK, et al. Ecology and the ratchet of events: climate variability, niche dimensions, and species distributions. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2009;106:19685–19692.10.1073/pnas.0901644106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguirre N, Eguiguren P, Maita J, et al. Vulnerability to climate change in the Southern Region of Ecuador: Potential impacts on ecosystems, biomass production and water production. Universidad Nacional de Loja. Loja; 2015. 184 p.
   Google Scholar
• Araújo MB, Guilhaumon F, Neto DR, et al. Impacts, vulnerability and adaptation to climate change of Spanish biodiversity 2. vertebrate fauna; Madrid, Spain; 2011. p. 640.
   Google Scholar
• Pimm S, Jenkins C, Abell R, et al. The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection. Science. 2014;344:987–999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pliscoff P, Fuentes-Castillo T. Modelación de la distribución de especies y ecosistemas en el tiempo y en el espacio: una revisión de las nuevas herramientas y enfoques disponibles. Rev Geogr Norte Gd. 2011;79:61–79.10.4067/S0718-34022011000100005
   Google Scholar
• Vos CC, Berry P, Opdam P, et al. Adapting landscapes to climate change: examples of climate-proof ecosystem networks and priority adaptation zones. J Appl Ecol. 2008;45:1722–1731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coetzee BWT, Robertson MP, Erasmus BFN, et al. Ensemble models predict Important Bird Areas in southern Africa will become less effective for conserving endemic birds under climate change. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2009;18:701–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther G-R. Plants in a warmer world. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst Urban Fischer Verlag. 2003;6:169–185.10.1078/1433-8319-00076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberto F, Aitken S, Alía R, et al. Potential for evolutionary responses to climate change – evidence from tree populations. Glob Chang Biol. 2013;19:1645–1661.10.1111/gcb.12181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuesta-Camacho F, Peralvo M, Ganzenmuller A, et al. Identification of gaps and conservation priorities for terrestrial biodiversity in the Continental Ecuador. EcoCiencia, The Nature Conservancy, Conservación Internacional, Ministerio del Ambiente del Ecuador; 2006. Quito, Ecuador. p. 58.
   Google Scholar
• Jorgensen P, León Yánez S. Catalogue of the vascular plants of Ecuador. Monographs in systematic botany from the Missouri botanical garden; 1999. p. 1181.
   Google Scholar