Estimating geographic patterns of ophidism risk in Ecuador

References

• ChippauxJP. Snake-bites: appraisal of the global situation. Bull World Health Organ. 1998;76:515–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-AndradeF, ChippauxJP. Snake bite envenomation in Ecuador. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2010;104:588–591.10.1016/j.trstmh.2010.05.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KasturiratneA, WickremasingheAR, de SilvaN, et al.The global burden of snakebite: a literature analysis and modelling based on regional estimates of envenoming and deaths. PLoS Med. 2008;5:e218.10.1371/journal.pmed.0050218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ValenciaJ, Garzón-TelloK, Barragán-PaladinesM. Serpientes venenosas del Ecuador: sistemática, taxonomía, historia natural, conservación, envenenamiento y aspectos antropológicos [Poisonous snakes of Ecuador: systematic, taxonomy, natural history, conservation, poisoning and anthropological aspects]. Quito (Ecuador): Fundación Herpetológica Gustavo Orcés, Universidad de Texas, Fondo Ambiental Nacional; 2016. Spanish.
   Google Scholar
• Yañez-ArenasC, PetersonAT, Rodríguez-MedinaK, et al.Mapping current and future potential snakebite risk in the new world. Climat Change. 2015;134:697–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChippauxJP. Epidemiology of snakebites in Europe: a systematic review of the literature. Toxicon. 2012;59:86–99.10.1016/j.toxicon.2011.10.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yañez-ArenasC, PetersonAT, MokondokoP, et al.The use of ecological niche modeling to infer potential risk areas of snakebite in the Mexican state of Veracruz. PLoS One. 2014;9:e100957.10.1371/journal.pone.0100957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrownJL. SDMtoolbox: a python-based GIS toolkit for landscape genetic, biogeographic and species distribution model analyses. Methods Ecol Evol. 2014;5:694–700.10.1111/mee3.2014.5.issue-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BoriaRA, OlsonLE, GoodmanSM, et al.Spatial filtering to reduce sampling bias can improve the performance of ecological niche models. Ecol Model. 2014;275:73–77.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StockwellD, PetersonAT. Effects of sample size on accuracy of species distribution models. Ecol Model. 2002;148:1–13.10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00388-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HijmansRJ, CameronSE, ParraJL, et al.Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol. 2005;25:1965–1978.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SoberónJ, PetersonAT. Interpretation of models of fundamental ecological niches and species’ distributional areas. Biodiv Inform. 2005;2:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• WWF. Conservation Science Ecoregions. 2006 [cited June 2016]. Available from: http://www.worldwildlife.org/science/ecoregions
   Google Scholar
• Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• BarveN, BarveV. ENMGadgets: tools for pre and post processing in ENM workflows. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• PhillipsSJ, AndersonRP, SchapireRE. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model. 2006;190:231–259.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ElithJ, PhillipsSJ, HastieT, et al.A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Divers Distrib. 2011;17:43–57.10.1111/ddi.2010.17.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FieldingAH, BellJF. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ Conserv. 1997;24:38–49.10.1017/S0376892997000088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PetersonAT, PapeşM, SoberónJ. Rethinking receiver operating characteristic analysis applications in ecological niche modeling. Ecol Model. 2008;213:63–72.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BarveN. Tool for partial-ROC. Lawrence (KS): Biodiversity Institute, ver.1. 2008;1.
   Google Scholar
• WarrellDA. Snake bite. Lancet. 2010;375:77–88.10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61754-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SmalliganR. Antivenin comparison: which is best for snake bites in Ecuador?Inpharma. 2004;1464:20.
   Google Scholar
• TheakstonR, LaingG, FieldingC, et al.Treatment of snake bites by Bothrops species and Lachesis muta in Ecuador: laboratory screening of candidate antivenoms. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1995;89:550–554.10.1016/0035-9203(95)90105-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SalvatoreM, PozziF, AtamanE, et al.Mapping global urban and rural population distributions. Rome: FAO; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Praba-EggeAD, ConeSW, AraimO, et al.Snakebites in the rainforests of Ecuador. World J Surg. 2003;27:234–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NoriJ, CarrascoPA, LeynaudGC. Venomous snakes and climate change: ophidism as a dynamic problem. Climat Change. 2014;122:67–80.10.1007/s10584-013-1019-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChippauxJP. Estimating the global burden of snakebite can help to improve management. PLoS Med. 2008;5:e221.10.1371/journal.pmed.0050221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar