Cantos de las ranas y los sapos de Colombia: estado actual del conocimiento y perspectivas de investigación en ecoacústica

References

• Ryan MJ, editor. Anuran communication. Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Starnberger I, Poth D, Peram PS, et al. Take time to smell the frogs: vocal sac glands of reed frogs (Anura: Hyperoliidae) contain species-specific chemical cocktails. Biol J Linn Soc. 2013;110(4):828–838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas B. Behavioural, ecological, and evolutionary aspects of diversity in frog colour patterns. Biol Rev. 2016;92(2):1059–1080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerhardt HC, Huber F. Acoustic communication in insects and anurans: common problems and diverse solutions. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Wells KD. The ecology and behavior of amphibians. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Duellman WE, Trueb L. Biology of amphibians. Baltimore (MD): John Hopkins University Press; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler J, Jansen M, Rodríguez A, et al. The use of bioacoustics in anuran taxonomy: theory, terminology, methods and recommendations for best practice. Zootaxa. 2017;4251(1):1–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toledo LF, Tipp C, Márquez R. The value of audiovisual archives. Science. 2015;347(6221): 484–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goicoechea N, De La Riva I, Padial JM. Recovering phylogenetic signal from frog mating calls. Zool Scripta. 2010;39(2):141–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gingras B, Mohandesan E, Boko D, et al. Phylogenetic signal in the acoustic parameters of the advertisement calls of four clades of anurans. BMC Evol Biol. 2013;13(1):134.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dawson B, Ryan MJ. Early experience leads to changes in the advertisement calls of male Physalaemus pustulosus. Copeia. 2009;2009(2):221–226.
   Google Scholar
• Bee MA. Social recognition in anurans. En: Bee MA, Miller CT, editors. Psychological mechanisms in animal communication Vol. 5. Switzerland: Springer; 2014. p. 169–221.
   Google Scholar
• Pough FH, Andrews RM, Crump ML, et al. Herpetology. 4th ed. Sunderland MA: Sinauer Associates; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider H, Sinsch U. Contributions of bioacoustics to the taxonomy of the Anura. En: Heatwole H, Tyler M, editors. Amphibian biology. Vol. 7. Australia: Surrey Beatty & Sons; 2007. p. 2893–2933.
   Google Scholar
• Hepp F, Pombal JP Jr. Review of bioacoustical traits in the genus Physalaemus Fitzinger, 1826 (Anura: Leptodactylidae: Leiuperinae). Zootaxa. 2019;4766(4):599–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivera-Correa M, Vargas-Salinas F, Grant T. Statistical differences and biological implications: a comparative analysis of the advertisement calls of two Andean stream treefrogs (Hylidae: Hyloscirtus) and the evolution of acoustic characters. Salamandra. 2017;53(2):237–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escalona Sulbaran MD, Ivo Simões P, Gonzalez‐Voyer A, et al. Neotropical frogs and mating songs: the evolution of advertisement calls in glassfrogs. J Evol Biol. 2019;32(2):163–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hödl W. Call differences and calling site segregation in anuran species from Central Amazonian floating meadows. Oecologia. 1977;28(4):351–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duellman WE, Pyles RA. Acoustic resource partitioning in anuran communities. Copeia. 1983;1983(3):639–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amézquita A, Flechas SV, Lima AP, et al. Acoustic interference and recognition space within a complex assemblage of dendrobatid frogs. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(41):17058–17063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvajal-Castro JD, Vargas-Salinas F. Stream noise, habitat filtering, and the phenotypic and phylogenetic structure of Neotropical anuran assemblages. Evol Ecol. 2016;30(3):451–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulloa JS, Aubin T, Llusia D, et al. Explosive breeding in tropical anurans: environmental triggers, community composition and acoustic structure. BMC Ecol. 2019;19(1):28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fahrig L, Rytwinski T. Effects of roads on animal abundance: an empirical review and synthesis. Ecol Soc. 2009;14(1):21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargas-Salinas F, Amézquita A. Traffic noise correlates with calling time but not spatial distribution in the threatened poison frog Andinobates bombetes. Behaviour. 2013;150(6):569–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider-Maunoury L, Lefebvre V, Ewers RM, et al. Abundance signals of amphibians and reptiles indicate strong edge effects in Neotropical fragmented forest landscapes. Biol Conserv. 2016;200:207–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farina A, Gage SH. Ecoacoustics: a new science. En: Farina A, Gage SH, editors. Ecoacoustics: the ecological role of sounds. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2017. p. 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Feng AS, Narins PM, Xu C-H, et al. Ultrasonic communication in frogs. Nature. 2006;440(7082):333–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz JJ, Bee MA. Anuran acoustic signal production in noisy environments. En: Brumm H, editor. Animal communication and noise. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2013. p. 91–132.
   Google Scholar
• Vargas-Salinas F, Amézquita A. Abiotic noise, call frequency and stream-breeding anuran assemblages. Evol Ecol. 2014;28(2):341–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Megela-Simmons A, Narins PM. Effects of anthropogenic noise on amphibians and reptiles. En: Slabbekoorn H, Dooling RJ, Popper AN, editors. Effects of anthropogenic noise on animals. New York NY: Springer; 2018. p. 179–208.
   Google Scholar
• Herrera-Montes MI, Aide TM. Impacts of traffic noise on anuran and bird communities. Urban Ecosyst. 2011;14(3):415–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Giraldo C, Bedoya CL, Morán-Vásquez RA, et al. Ecoacoustics in the rain: understanding acoustic indices under the most common geophonic source in tropical rainforests. Remote Sens Ecol Conserv. 2020;6(3):248–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson CR, Dorcas ME. Automated data acquisition. En: Heyer RW, Donnelly MA, McDiarmid RW, editors. Measuring and monitoring biological diversity. Washington: Smithsonian Tropical Institute; 1994. p. 47–57.
   Google Scholar
• Dorcas ME, Price SJ, Walls SC, et al. Auditory monitoring of anuran populations. En: Dodd CK Jr editors. Amphibian ecology and conservation: a handbook of techniques. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009. p. 281–298.
   Google Scholar
• Sueur J, Pavoine S, Hamerlynck O, et al. Rapid acoustic survey for biodiversity appraisal. PLoS ONE. 2008;3(12):e4065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumstein DT, Mennill DJ, Clemins P, et al. Acoustic monitoring in terrestrial environments using microphone arrays: applications, technological considerations and prospectus. J Appl Ecol. 2011;48(3):758–767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Depraetere M, Pavoine S, Jiguet F, et al. Monitoring animal diversity using acoustic indices: implementation in a temperate woodland. Ecol Ind. 2012;13(1):46–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasc A, Sueur J, Pavoine S, et al. Biodiversity sampling using a global acoustic approach: contrasting sites with microendemics in New Caledonia. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(5):e65311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• brist MK, Pavan G, Sueur J, et al. Bioacoustics approaches in biodiversity inventories. En: Eymann J, Degreef J, Häuser C, et al, editors. ABC Taxa. Manual on field recording techniques and protocols for all taxa biodiversity inventories. Brussels: Belgian National Focal Point to the Global Taxonomy Initiative. 2020. p. 68–99.
   Google Scholar
• Potamitis I. Automatic classification of a taxon-rich community recorded in the wild. PloS ONE. 2014;9(5):e96936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towsey M, Wimmer J, Williamson I, et al. The use of acoustic indices to determine avian species richness in audio-recordings of the environment. Ecol Inform. 2014;21:110–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madalozzo B, Santos TG, Santos MB, et al. Biodiversity assessment: selecting sampling techniques to access anuran diversity in grassland ecosystems. Wildl Res. 2017;44(1):78–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sueur J, Farina A. Ecoacoustics: the ecological investigation and interpretation of environmental sound. Biosemiotics. 2015;8(3):493–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acevedo‐Charry O, Aide TM. Recovery of amphibian, reptile, bird and mammal diversity during secondary forest succession in the tropics. Oikos. 2019;128(8):1065–1078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farina A. Ecoacoustics: a quantitative approach to investigate the ecological role of environmental sounds. Mathematics. 2019;7(1):21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerra V, Llusia D, Gambale PG, et al. The advertisement calls of Brazilian anurans: historical review, current knowledge and future directions. PloS ONE. 2018;13(1):e0191691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Baucells A, Torrent L, Rocha R, et al. Stronger together: combining automated classifiers with manual post-validation optimizes the workload vs reliability trade-off of species identification in bat acoustic surveys. Ecol Inform. 2019;49:45–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ducrettet M, Forget PM, Ulloa JS, et al. Monitoring canopy bird activity in disturbed landscapes with automatic recorders: a case study in the tropics. Biol Conserv. 2020;245:108574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernal MH, Lynch JD. Review and analysis of altitudinal distribution of the Andean anurans in Colombia. Zootaxa 2008;1826:1–25.
   Google Scholar
• AmphibiaWeb [Internet]. Berkeley, USA: University of California; 2021 [citada 2021 mayo 30]. Available from: http://amphibiaweb.org. Archivada por WebCite® en https://www.webcitation.org/5EnTRVZZ4
   Google Scholar
• Frost DR. Amphibian species of the world: an online reference [Internet]. Version 6.1. New York, USA: American Museum of Natural History; 2021 [ citada 2021 mayo 30]. Available from: https://amphibiansoftheworld.amnh.org/index.php
   Google Scholar
• Endler JA. Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. Am Nat. 1992;139(Supplement):S125–S153.
   Google Scholar
• Wilczynski W, Ryan MJ. Geographic variation in animal communication systems. En: Foster SA, Endler JA, editors. Geographic variation in behavior. New York, USA: Oxford University Press; 1999. p. 234–261.
   Google Scholar
• Bernal XE, Guarnizo C, Lüddecke H. Geographic variation in advertisement call and genetic structure of Colostethus palmatus (Anura, Dendrobatidae) from the Colombian Andes. Herpetologica. 2005;61(4):395–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargas-Salinas F, Cunnington GM, Amézquita A, et al. Does traffic noise alter calling time in frogs and toads? A case study of anurans in Eastern Ontario, Canada. Urban Ecosyst. 2014;17(4):945–953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röhr DL, Camurugi F, Paterno GB, et al. Variability in anuran advertisement call: a multi-level study with 15 species of monkey tree frogs (Anura: Phyllomedusidae). Can J Zool. 2020;98:495–504.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart SN, Chanson JS, Cox NA, et al. Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science. 2004;306(5702):1783–1786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheele BC, Pasmans F, Skerratt LF, et al. Amphibian fungal panzootic causes catastrophic and ongoing loss of biodiversity. Science. 2019;363(6434):1459–1463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutilleux G, Curé C. Automated acoustic monitoring of endangered common spadefoot toad populations reveals patterns of vocal activity. Freshw Biol. 2020;65(1):20–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acosta-Galvis AR. Lista de los Anfibios de Colombia [Internet]. Referencia en línea V.11.2021. Villa de Leyva, Boyacá, Colombia: Batrachia; 2021 [ citada 2021 mayo 30]. Available from: http://www.batrachia.com
   Google Scholar
• Lynch JD, Ruiz-Carranza PM, Ardila-Robayo MC. Biogeographic patterns of Colombian frogs and toads. Rev Acad Colomb Cienc Ex Fís Nat. 1997;21(80):237–248.
   Google Scholar
• IUCN The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species [Internet]. Versión 2020–1. IUCN. 2020 [ citada 2021 mayo 30]. Available from: https://www.iucnredlist.org
   Google Scholar
• MADS (Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible). 2018. Lista de especies silvestres amenazadas de la diversidad biológica continental y marino-costera de Colombia - Resolución 1912 de 2017 expedida por el Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible MADS. v2.3. Bogotá: Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible. Dataset/Checklist. doi: https://doi.org/10.15472/5an5tz.
   Google Scholar
• SPSS Inc. IBM SPSS statistics for windows. Version 21. Armonk NY: IBM Corp; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Whitlock MC, Schluter D. The analysis of biological data. 2nd ed. Greenwood CO: W. H. Roberts and Company Publishers; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Fouquette MJ Jr. A new tree frog, genus Hyla, from the Canal Zone. Herpetologica. 1958;14(2):125–128.
   Google Scholar
• Fouquette MJ Jr, Pyburn WF. A new Colombian treefrog of the Hyla rubra complex. Herpetologica. 1972;28(2):176–181.
   Google Scholar
• Cuellar-Valencia OM, Arriaga-Jaramillo FG, García-Gómez I, et al. Two new species of Pristimantis (Anura: Strabomantidae) from the Serranía de los Paraguas: a priority site for conservation of amphibians in Colombia. Herpetologica. 2021;77(1):72–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fouquet A, Leblanc K, Framit M, et al. Species diversity and biogeography of an ancient frog clade from the Guiana Shield (Anura: Microhylidae: Adelastes, Otophryne, Synapturanus) exhibiting spectacular phenotypic diversification. Biol J Linn Soc. 2021;132(2):233–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison C, Hero JM. Geographic variation in life‐history characteristics of amphibians: a review. J Anim Ecol. 2003;72(2):270–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips BL. The evolution of growth rates on an expanding range edge. Biol Lett. 2009;5(6):802–804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narins PM, Smith SL. Clinal variation in anuran advertisement calls: basis for acoustic isolation? Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 1986;19(2):135–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duellman WE. Hylid frogs of middle America. Ithaca (NY): Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Bernal MH, Montealegre DP, Páez CA. Estudio de la vocalización de trece especies de anuros del municipio de Ibagué, Colombia. Rev Acad Colomb Cienc Ex Fís Nat. 2004;28(108):385–390.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz JJ, Wells KD. Interspecific acoustic interactions of the Neotropical treefrog Hyla ebraccata. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 1984;14(3):211–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duellman WE, Wiens JJ. Hylid frogs of the genus Scinax Wagler, 1830, in Amazonian Ecuador and Peru. Occ Pap Mus Nat Hist Univ Kansas. 1993;153:1–57.
   Google Scholar
• Tárano Z. Advertisement calls and calling habits of frogs from a flooded savanna of Venezuela. S Am J Herpetol. 2010;5(3):221–240.
   Google Scholar
• Amezquita A, Lima AP, Jehle R, et al. Calls, colours, shape, and genes: a multi-trait approach to the study of geographic variation in the Amazonian frog Allobates femoralis. Biol J Linn Soc. 2009;98(4):826–838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boul KE, Funk WC, Darst CR, et al. Sexual selection drives speciation in an Amazonian frog. Proc R Soc B. 2007;274(1608):399–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funk WC, Caminer M, Ron SR. High levels of cryptic species diversity uncovered in Amazonian frogs. Proc R Soc B. 2012;279(1734):1806–1814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arcila-Pérez LF, Rios-Soto JA, Montilla S, et al. Vocalization and natural history in populations of a glassfrog assigned to Nymphargus griffithsi in the Central Andes of Colombia. Herpetol Rev. 2017;48(2):275–280.
   Google Scholar
• Guayasamin JM, Rivera-Correa M, Arteaga A, et al. Molecular phylogeny of stream treefrogs (Hylidae: Hyloscirtus bogotensis group), with a new species from the Andes of Ecuador. Neotrop Biodiv. 2015;1(1):2–21.
   Google Scholar
• Hedges SB, Duellman WE, Heinicke MP. New world direct-developing frogs (Anura: Terrarana): molecular phylogeny, classification, biogeography, and conservation. Zootaxa. 2008;1737(1):1–182.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch JD, Duellman WE. Frogs of the genus Eleutherodactylus (Leptodactylidae) in western Ecuador: systematics, ecology, and biogeography. Univ Kansas Nat Hist Mus Special Pub. 1997;23:1–236.
   Google Scholar
• Duellman WE, Lehr E. Terrestrial breeding frogs (Strabomantidae) in Peru. Berlin: Natur und Tier-Verlag GmbH; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hutter CR, Liu V, Kell T, et al. The natural history, distribution, and conservation of lonely rainfrogs, Pristimantis eremitus. Herpetologica. 2016;72(1):13–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acosta-Galvis AR. Una nueva especie del género Pristimantis (Anura: craugastoridae) del complejo de páramos Merchán-Iguaque (Boyacá, Colombia). Biota Colomb. 2015;16(2):107–127.
   Google Scholar
• Rivera-Correa M, Daza J. Molecular phylogenetics of the Pristimantis lacrimosus species group (Anura: Craugastoridae) with the description of a new species from Colombia. Acta Herpetol. 2016;11(1):31–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivera-Correa M, Lamadrid-Feris F, Crawford AJ. A new small golden frog of the genus Pristimantis (Anura: Craugastoridae) from an Andean cloud forest of Colombia. Amphibia-Reptilia. 2016;37(2):153–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivera-Correa M, Jiménez-Rivillas C, Daza JM. Phylogenetic analysis of the Neotropical Pristimantis leptolophus species group (Anura: Craugastoridae): molecular approach and description of a new polymorphic species. Zootaxa. 2017;4242(2):313–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivera-Correa M, Daza JM. Out of the blue: a new rain frog species of the genus Pristimantis (Anura: Craugastoridae) from the northern Cordillera Central in Colombia. Zootaxa. 2020;4838(1):83–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Marca E, Lips KR, Lötters S, et al. Catastrophic population declines and extinctions in Neotropical harlequin frogs (Bufonidae: Atelopus). Biotropica. 2005;37(2):190–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lötters S, van der Meijden A, Coloma LA, et al. Assessing the molecular phylogeny of a near extinct group of vertebrates: the Neotropical harlequin frogs (Bufonidae; Atelopus). Syst Biodiv. 2011;9(1):45–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lötters S. The Neotropical toad genus Atelopus: checklist - biology - distribution. Köln: M. Vences & F. Glaw Verlags GbR; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Rueda-Solano LA, Pérez-González JL, Rivera-Correa M, et al. Acoustic signal diversity in the harlequin toad Atelopus laetissimus (Anura: Bufonidae). Copeia. 2020;108(3):503–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz-Gutiérrez N, Vargas-Salinas F, Rivera-Correa M, et al. Description of the previously unknown advertisement call and tadpole of the Colombian endemic glassfrog Centrolene savagei (Anura: Centrolenidae). Zootaxa. 2013;3686(2):289–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Rivillas C, Vargas LM, Fang JM, et al. Advertisement call of Diasporus anthrax (Lynch, 2001) (Anura: Eleutherodactylidae) with comparisons to calls from congeneric species. S Am J Herpetol. 2013;8(1):1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabanzo-Olarte LC, Ortega-Chinchilla JE. Advertisement call of the glass frog Espadarana andina (Anura: Centrolenidae). Herpetol Rev. 2017;48(3):514–516.
   Google Scholar
• Rios-Soto JA, Ospina-L AM, Vargas-Salinas F. The advertisement call and notes on the reproductive ecology of the glassfrog “Centrolene” quindianum (Anura: Centrolenidae). S Am J Herpetol. 2017;12(2):117–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rios-Soto JÁ, Ospina-L AM. The advertisement call of Pristimantis boulengeri (Lynch, 1981) from a population in the Central Andes of Colombia (Anura: Craugastoridae). Herpetol Notes. 2018;11:719–723.
   Google Scholar
• Ospina-L AM, Murillo-Bedoya D, García-Cobos D, et al. The advertisement call of Allobates niputidea (Anura: Aromobatidae). Zootaxa. 2019;4656(1):196–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angarita-Sierra T, Ospina-Sarria J, Anganoy-Criollo M, et al. Guía de campo de los anfibios y reptiles del departamento de Casanare (Colombia). Arauca, Colombia: Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Orinoquia; Bogotá: Yoluka ONG, Fundación de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Conservación; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Pedroza-Banda R, Ospina-Sarria JJ, Angarita-Sierra T, et al. Estado del conocimiento de la fauna de anfibios y reptiles del departamento de Casanare, Colombia. Rev Acad Colomb Cienc Ex Fís Nat. 2014;38(146):17–34.
   Google Scholar
• Arroyo S, Chaves-Portilla G, Rivera-Correa M, et al. Sistemática y taxonomía de anfibios. En: Vargas-Salinas F, Muñoz-Avila J, Morales-Puentes ME, editors. Biología de anfibios y reptiles en el bosque seco tropical del norte de Colombia. Tunja, Colombia: Editorial UPTC; 2019. p. 57–95.
   Google Scholar
• Vargas-Salinas F, Angarita T, Ospina-L AM, et al. Comunicación y ecología reproductiva. En: Vargas-Salinas F, Muñoz-Avila J, Morales-Puentes ME, editors. Biología de anfibios y reptiles en el bosque seco tropical del norte de Colombia. Tunja, Colombia: Editorial UPTC; 2019. p. 249–295.
   Google Scholar
• Pizano C, García H. El bosque seco tropical en Colombia. Bogotá: Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Vargas-Salinas F, Muñoz-Ávila J, Morales-Puentes ME editores. Biología de anfibios y reptiles en el bosque seco tropical del norte de Colombia. Tunja, Colombia: Editorial UPTC; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch JD, Ruiz-Carranza PM. A synopsis of the frogs of the genus Eleutherodactylus from the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, Colombia. Occ Pap Mus Zool Univ Mich. 1985;711:1–59.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch JD. New species of Eleutherodactylus from the Cordillera Occidental of western Colombia with a synopsis of the distributions of species in western Colombia. Rev Acad Colomb Cienc Ex Fís Nat. 1998;22(82):117–148.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch JD. Lista anotada y clave para las ranas (género Eleutherodactylus) chocoanas del Valle del Cauca, y apuntes sobre las especies de la Cordillera Occidental adyacente. Caldasia. 1999;21(2):184–202.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch JD. A small amphibian fauna from a previously unexplored páramo of the Cordillera Occidental in western Colombia. J Herpetol. 2001;35(2):226–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bravo-Valencia LB, Delia J. Maternal care in a glassfrog: care function and commitment to offspring in Ikakogi tayrona. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2016;70(1):41–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocha-Usuga AA, Vargas-Salinas F, Rueda-Solano LA. Not every drought is bad: quantifying reproductive effort in the harlequin frog Atelopus laetissimus (Anura: Bufonidae). J Nat Hist. 2017;51(31–32):1913–1928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rada M, Dias PHS, Pérez-Gonzalez JL, et al. The poverty of adult morphology: bioacoustics, genetics, and internal tadpole morphology reveal a new species of glassfrog (Anura: Centrolenidae: Ikakogi) from the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, Colombia. PloS ONE. 2019;14(5):e0215349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rueda-Solano LA, Warkentin KM. Foraging behavior with possible use of substrate-borne vibrational cues for prey localization in Atelopus laetissimus (Ruiz-Carranza, Ardila-Robayo, and Hernández-Camacho, 1994). Herpetol Notes. 2016;9:191–195.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann M, Hilton-Taylor C, Angulo A, et al. The impact of conservation on the status of the world’s vertebrates. Science. 2010;330(6010):1503–1509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morais AR, Batista VG, Gambale PG, et al. Acoustic communication in a Neotropical frog (Dendropsophus minutus): vocal repertoire, variability and individual discrimination. Herpetol J. 2012;22(4):249–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padial JM, De la Riva I. Integrative taxonomy reveals cryptic Amazonian species of Pristimantis (Anura: Strabomantidae). Zool J Linn Soc. 2009;155(1):97–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padial JM, Köhler J, Muñoz A, et al. Assessing the taxonomic status of tropical frogs through bioacoustics: geographical variation in the advertisement calls in the Eleutherodactylus discoidalis species group (Anura). Zool J Linn Soc. 2008;152(2):353–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaw F, Koehler J, De la Riva I, et al. Integrative taxonomy of Malagasy treefrogs: combination of molecular genetics, bioacoustics and comparative morphology reveals twelve additional species of Boophis. Zootaxa. 2010;2383(1):1–82.
   Google Scholar
• Dena S, Rebouças R, Augusto-Alves G, et al. How much are we losing in not depositing anuran sound recordings in scientific collections? Bioacoustics. 2020;29(5):590–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaves-Portilla GA, Rueda-Solano LA, Daza JM. First record of Colombian red-eyed tree frog Agalychnis terranova from the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, Colombia with a description of its advertisement call. Herpetol Bull. 2021;156:23–27.
   Google Scholar
• Arriaga-Jaramillo FG, Cuellar-Valencia OM, García-Gómez I, Ceballos-Castro I, Bolívar-García W, Velásquez-Trujillo DA, Ortiz-Baez AS, Ospina-Sarria JJ. Acoustic segregation of five sympatric and syntopic species of genus Pristimantis (Anura: Strabomantidae) from Western Colombia. Stud Neotrop Fauna Environ. In press.
   Google Scholar
• Cubillos-Abrahams MV, Montes-Correa AC, Vera-Pérez LE. 2021. First record of the greenhouse frog Eleutherodactylus planirostris (Anura, Eleutherodactylidae) from San Andrés, Colombian Caribbean islands. Caribb J Sci. 2021;51(1):136–145.
   Google Scholar
• Alonso R, Rodríguez A., Mena MC. Guía Sonora de los Anfibios de Cuba. Barcelona, España: Alosa, sonidos de la naturaleza. 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Díaz LM, Cádiz A. 2007. Guía descriptiva para la identificación de las llamadas de anuncio de las ranas cubanas del género Eleutherodactylus (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Herpetotropicos. 2007;3:100–122.
   Google Scholar