Seasonal turnover of avian community assembly in a highly fragmented Tumbesian dry forest of southwestern Ecuador

References

• Janzen DH. Management of habitat fragments in a tropical dry forest: Growth. Ann Missouri Bot Garden. 1988a;75(1):105–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mass JM. Conversion of tropical dry forest to pasture and agriculture. In: Mooney SH, Bullock H.a, Medina E, editors. Seasonally dry tropical forest. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press; 1995. p. 399–422.
   Google Scholar
• Portillo-Quintero CA, Sánchez-Azofeifa GA. Extent and conservation of tropical dry forests in the Americas. Biol Conserv. 2010;143(1):144–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy PG, Lugo AE. Ecology of tropical dry forest. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 1986;17(1):67–88.
   Google Scholar
• Janzen DH. Tropical dry forests: the most endangered major tropical ecosystem. In: Wilson EO, editor. Biodiversity. Washington, USA: National Academy Press; 1988b. p. 130–137.
   Google Scholar
• Miles L, Newton AC, DeFries RS, et al. A global overview of the conservation status of tropical dry forests. J Biogeograph. 2006;33(3):491–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cueva Ortiz J, Espinosa CI, Quiroz Dahik C, et al. Influence of anthropogenic factors on the diversity and structure of a dry forest in the central part of the Tumbesian region (Ecuador–perú). Forests. 2019;10(1):1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahrig L. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2003;34(1):487–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson MC, Chen XY, Corlett RT, et al. Habitat fragmentation and biodiversity conservation: key findings and future challenges. Landscape Ecol. 2016;31(2):219–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller-Rushing AJ. How does habitat fragmentation affect biodiversity? A controversial question at the core of conservation biology. Biol Conserv. 2019;232:271–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murcia C. Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol. 1995;10(2):58–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olden JD, Poff NLR, Douglas MR, et al. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of biotic homogenization. Trends Ecol Evol. 2004;19(1):18–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clavel J, Julliard R, Devictor V. Worldwide decline of specialist species: toward a global functional homogenization? Front Ecol Environ. 2011;9(4):222–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dar PA, Reshi ZA. Components, processes and consequences of biotic homogenization: a review. Contemp Probl of Ecol. 2014;7(2):123–136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gámez-Virués S, Perović D, Gossner M, et al. Landscape simplification filters species traits and drives biotic homogenization. Nat Commun. 2015;6(1):8568.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Graves GR, Rahbek C. Source pool geometry and the assembly of continental avifaunas. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2005;102(22):7871–7876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittelbach GG, Schemske DW. Ecological and evolutionary perspectives on community assembly. Trends Ecol Evol. 2015;30(5):241–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez JP, Bravo GA, Brumfield RT, et al. A phylogenetic approach to disentangling the role of competition and habitat filtering in community assembly of Neotropical forest birds. J Anim Ecol. 2010;79(6):1181–1192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson EO. Causes of ecological success: the case of the ants. J Anim Ecol. 1987;56(1):1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newbold T, Scharlemann JPW, Butchart SHM, et al. (2013). Ecological traits affect the response of tropical forest bird species to land-use intensity. , 280:20122131.
   Google Scholar
• Salgado-Negret B, Paz H. Escalando de los rasgos funcionales a procesos poblacionales, comunitarios y ecosistémicos. In: Salgado-Negret B, editor. La ecología funcional como aproximación al estudio, manejo y conservación de la biodiversidad. Bogotá Colombia: Protocolos y aplicaciones Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt; 2015. p. 12–35.
   Google Scholar
• Paz Silva C, Sepúlveda RD, Barbosa O. Nonrandom filtering effect on birds: species and guilds response to urbanization. Ecol Evol. 2016;6(11):3711–3720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olmos F, Silva WADG, Albano CG. Aves em oito áreas de Caatinga no sul do Ceará e oeste de Pernambuco, nordeste do Brasil: composição, riqueza e similaridade. Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia (São Paulo). 2005;45(14):179–199
   Google Scholar
• Albuquerque UP, de Lima Araújo E, El-Deir ACA, et al. Caatinga revisited: ecology and conservation of an important seasonal dry forest. Sci World J. 2012;2012:1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceballos G. Vertebrate diversity, ecology and conservation in neotropical dry forests. In: Bullock SH, Mooney HA, Medina E, editors. Seasonally dry tropical forests. 1st ed. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press; 1995. p. 195–220.
   Google Scholar
• Sierra R, Campos F, Chamberlin J. Assessing biodiversity conservation priorities: ecosystem risk and representativeness in continental Ecuador. Landscape Urban Plann. 2002;59:95–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BirdLife International. (2017a). Important Bird Areas factsheet: Bosque Protector Puyango. Accessed on: 2017-04-09. http://www.birdlife.org.
   Google Scholar
• Orihuela-Torres A, Tinoco B, Ordóñez-Delgado L, et al. Knowledge Gaps or Change of Distribution Ranges? Explaining New Records of Birds in the Ecuadorian Tumbesian Region of Endemism. Divers. 2020;12:66.
   Google Scholar
• Freile JF, Moreano M, Bonaccorso E, et al. Notas sobre la historia natural, distribución y conservación de algunas especies de aves amenazadas del suroccidente de Ecuador. Cotinga. 2004;21:18–24.
   Google Scholar
• Bonaccorso E, Santander T, Freile JF, et al. Avifauna and conservation of the Cerro Negro-cazaderos area, tumbesian Ecuador. Cotinga. 2007;27:61–66.
   Google Scholar
• Tinoco BA. Estacionalidad de la comunidad de aves en un bosque deciduo tumbesino en el sur occidente de Ecuador. Ornitología Neotropical. 2009;20:157–170.
   Google Scholar
• INAMHI: Instituto Nacional de Meteorología e Hidrología (2012). Anuario Meteorológico N° 52-2012. Accessed on: 2016-02-19. http://www.serviciometeorologico.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/anuarios/meteorologicos/Am%202012.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ralph CJ, Droege S, Sauer JR. Managing and monitoring birds using point counts: standards and applications. Albany (CA): Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station; 1995. p. 161–168.
   Google Scholar
• Moore JV, Krabbe N, Janh O. Bird sounds of Ecuador. MP3 DVD ed. San Jose CA, USA: Jhon V. Moore Nature Recordings; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Bioacoustics Research Program.Raven pro: interactive sound analysis software (version 1.5) computer software.Ithaca (NY):The Cornell Lab of Ornithology; 2014. Ithaca, NY, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Remsen JV Jr., Areta JI, Bonaccorso E, et al. Version 2021. A classification of the bird species of South America. American Ornithological Society.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman FM. Descriptions of proposed new birds from Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, and Chile. Am Mus Novit. 1923;96:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman FM. Descriptions of new birds from Ecuador, Colombia, Peru, and Bolivia. Am Mus Novit. 1924;138:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman FM. Descriptions of new birds from Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, and Argentina. Am Mus Novit. 1925;160:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmer JT. Studies of Peruvian birds. No. XLI. the genera hylophilus, smaragdolanius, and cyclarhis. Am Mus Novit. 1942;1160:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmer JT. Studies of Peruvian birds. No. 54, the families catamblyrhynchidae and parulidae. Am Mus Novit. 1949;1428:1–59.
   Google Scholar
• Bond J (1954). Notes on Peruvian Piciformes Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. 106:45–61.
   Google Scholar
• Wiedenfeld DA, Schulenberg TS, Robbins MB. Birds of a tropical deciduous forest in extreme northwestern Peru. Ornithol Monogr 1985; 36 305–315 doi: 10.2307/40168288
   Google Scholar
• Platt D. Conozca las aves de bosque petrificado de puyango. Quito Ecuador: FEPROTUR; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Parker TA III, Schulenberg TS, Kessler M, et al. Natural history and conservation of the endemic avifauna in north-west Peru. Bird Conserv Int. 1995;5(2–3):201–231.
   Google Scholar
• Cook AG. Avifauna of North-western Peru biosphere reserve and its environs. Bird Conserv Int. 1996;6(2):139–165.
   Google Scholar
• Weller AA. Biogeography, geographic variation and habitat preference in the Amazilia Hummingbird, Amazilia amazilia Lesson (Aves: trochilidae), with notes on the status of Amazilia alticola Gould. Journal Für Ornithologie. 2000;141(1):93–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez JC, Yánez-Muñoz M. Herpetofauna. Capítulo IV: manglares y Zona Marino Costera. En: una Guía para Ecosistemas Andino-Costeros Mena-Valenzuela, Patricio, Garzón-Santomaro, César . In: Publicación Miscelánea N°. Vol. 7. Quito Ecuador: Serie de Publicaciones MECNINB – GADPEO; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Chao A, Chazdon RL, Colwell RK, et al. A new statistical approach for assessing similarity of species composition with incidence and abundance data. Ecol Lett. 2005;8(2):148–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson RA, Cavanaugh JE. Ordered quantile normalization: a semiparametric transformation built for the cross-validation era. Journal of Applied Statistics. 2020. 47:13-15 ;2312–2327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson JB. Methods for fitting dominance/diversity curves. J Veg Sci. 1991;2(1):35–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R et al, et al. vegan: Community Ecology Package R package version 2.5-7. 0–2 ed. 2020. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan
   Google Scholar
• Chiarucci A, Bacaro G, Rocchini D, et al. Discovering and rediscovering the sample-based rarefaction formula in the ecological literature. Community Ecol. 2008;9(1):121–123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prieto-Torres DA, Rojas-Soto OR, Santiago-Alarcon D, et al. Diversity, endemism, species turnover and relationships among avifauna of neotropical seasonally dry forests. Ardeola. 2019;66(2):257–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garmendia A, Samo A. Prácticas de ecología. Valencia Spain: Universidad Politécnica de Valencia; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Almazán-Núñez RC, Alvarez-Alvarez EA, Pineda-López R, et al. Seasonal variation in bird assemblage composition in a dry forest of southwestern Mexico. Ornitología Neotropical. 2018;29:215–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latta SC, Brouwer NL, Mejía DA, et al. Avian community characteristics and demographics reveal how conservation value of regenerating tropical dry forest changes with forest age. PeerJ. 2018;6:e5217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Des Granges JL. Organization of a tropical nectar feeding bird guild in a variable environment. Living Bird. 1987;17:199–236.
   Google Scholar
• Levey DJ, Stiles FG. Evolutionary precursors of long distance migration: resource availability and movement patterns in Neotropical landbirds. Am Natur. 1992;140(3):447–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridgely RS, Greenfield PJ. Aves del Ecuador: guía de campo. Quito Ecuador: Fundación de conservación Jocotoco and Academia de Ciencias Naturales de Filadelfia; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Mischler T. Status, abundance, seasonality, breeding evidence and an updated list of the birds of Cerro Blanco, Guayaquil, Ecuador. Cotinga. 2012;34:60–72.
   Google Scholar
• Almazán-Núñez RC, Charre GM, Pineda-López R, et al. Relationship between bird diversity and habitat along a pine- oak successional forest in Southern Mexico. In: Dos Santos Viana HF, Morote FAG, editors. New Perspectives in Forest Science. London UK: IntechOpen; 2017. p. 185.
   Google Scholar
• Wikelski M, Hau M, Wingfield JC. Seasonality of reproduction in a neotropical rainforest bird. Ecology. 2000;81(9):2458–2472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araujo HFP, Vieira-Filho AH, Barbosa V, et al. Passerine phenology in the largest tropical dry forest of South America: effects of climate and resource availability. Emu - Austral Ornithology. 2017;117(1):78–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb C, Ackerly D, McPeek MA, et al. Phylogenies and community ecology. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 2002;33(1):475–505.
   Google Scholar
• Vázquez-Reyes LD, Arizmendi M, Godínez-Álvarez HO, et al. Directional effects of biotic homogenization of bird communities in Mexican seasonal forests. Condor. 2017;119(2):275–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrone JJ. Biogeographical regionalisation of the neotropical region. Zootaxa. 2014;3782(1):1–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentry AH. Diversity and floristic composition of neotropical dry forests. In: Bullock SH, Mooney HA, Medina E, editors. Seasonally dry tropical forests. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press; 1995. p. 146–194.
   Google Scholar
• Pennington RT, Prado DE, Pendry CA. Neotropical seasonally dry forests and Quaternary vegetation changes. J Biogeograph. 2000;27(2):261–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linares-Palomino R. Los bosques tropicales estacionalmente secos: i. El concepto de los bosques secos en el Perú. Arnoldia. 2004;11:85–102.
   Google Scholar
• Espinosa CI, De la Cruz M, Luzuriaga AL, et al. Bosques tropicales secos de la región Pacífico Ecuatorial: diversidad, estructura, funcionamiento e implicaciones para la conservación. Ecosistemas. 2012;21:167–179.
   Google Scholar
• Müller P. The dispersal centres of terrestrial vertebrates in the Neotropical realm. Netherlands:The Hague;1973. Junk.
   Google Scholar
• Cracraft J. Historical Biogeography and patterns of differentiation within the South American avifauna: areas of endemism. Ornithol Monogr. 1985;36(36):49–84
   Google Scholar
• Best BJ, Kessler M. Biodiversity and conservation in tumbesian Ecuador and Peru. Cambridge UK: BirdLife International; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Stattersfield AJ, Crosby MJ, Long AJ, et al. Endemic Bird Areas of the World. Priorities for biodiversity conservation Brooks, Duncan. In: BirdLife conservation series. Vol. 7. Cambridge UK: BirdLife International; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Balcázar CI, Díaz AP (2008). Alternativas de manejo para el bosque Suquinda, parroquia Yamana, cantón Paltas, provincia de Loja. Undergraduate thesis. Loja Ecuador: Universidad Nacional de Loja.
   Google Scholar
• Registro Oficial Nº 418 10 09. 2004. N° 74 - Ley forestal y de conservación de áreas naturales y vida silvestre. Edición Especial, Quito, Ecuador.
   Google Scholar
• Puente MC. Perdidos entre las leyes y los árboles: propiedad y posesión de un bosque protector ecuatoriano. Quito Ecuador: Abya-Yala; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Aguirre Z, Kvist L. Floristic composition and conservation status of the dry forests in Ecuador. Lyonia, a J of Ecol and Appl. 2005;8:41–67.
   Google Scholar
• Castillo B (2012). Identificación y dinamización del Corredor de Endemismo Tumbesino, sector Bosque Petrificado de Puyango. Undergraduate thesis. Loja, Ecuador: Universidad Nacional de Loja.
   Google Scholar