A Measure of Tolerance: Public Attitudes on Sentencing Enhancements for Old and Juvenile Prior Records

References

• Applegate, B., Cullen, F. Turner, M., & Sundt, J. (1996). Assessing public support for 3-strikes and you’re out laws: Global versus specific attitudes. Crime and Delinquency, 42, 517–534.
   Google Scholar
• Arnett, J. (1992). Reckless behavior in adolescence: A developmental perspective. Developmental Review, 12(4), 339–373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(92)90013-R
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottoms, A., & Shapland, J. (2011). Steps towards desistance among male young adult recidivists. In S. Farrall, M. Hough, S. Maruna, & R. Sparks (Eds.), Escape Routes: Contemporary Perspectives on Life After Punishment (pp. 43–80).
   Google Scholar
• Casey, B. J., Jones, R. M., & Hare, T. A. (2008). The adolescent brain. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124(1), 111–126. doi:10.1196/annals.1440.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cauffman, E., & Steinberg, L. (2000). (Im)maturity of judgment in adolescence: Why adolescents may be less culpable than adults. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 18(6), 741–760. Doi:10.1002/bsl.416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doble, J. & Klein, J. (1989). Punishing criminals. The public’s view. An Alabama survey. New York, NY: Edna McConnell Clark Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, G. (1978). Rethinking criminal law. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Frase, R. S. (2009). What explains persistent racial disproportionality in Minnesota’s prison and jail populations? In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice. A review of research (pp. 201–280). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frase, R. S., Roberts, J. V., Hester, R., & Mitchell, K. (2015). Criminal history enhancements sourcebook. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Robina Institute of Criminal Law and Criminal Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Groenendyk, E. (2016). The anxious and ambivalent partisan: The effect of incidental anxiety on partisan motivated recall and ambivalence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(2) 460–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, L., Oswald, M., Stucki, I., & Gollwitzer, M. (2010). A Closer look at an eye for an eye: Laypersons’ punishment decisions are primarily driven by retributive motives. Social Justice Research, 23, 99–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurlychek, M., Brame, R., & Bushway, S. (2006). Scarlet letters and recidivism: Does an old criminal record predict future offending? Criminology and Public Policy, 5(3), 483–504. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2006.00397.x
   Google Scholar
• Kurlychek, M. C., Brame, R., & Bushway, S. D. (2007). Enduring risk? Old criminal records and predictions of future criminal involvement. Crime & Delinquency, 53(1), 64–83. doi:10.1177/0011128706294439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. (2010). Repeat offenders and the question of desert. In J. V. Roberts & A. von Hirsch (Eds.), Previous convictions at sentencing: Theoretical and applied perspectives (pp. 49–71). Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Levay, K., Freese, J., & Druckman, J. (2016, January–March). The demographic and political composition of Mechanical Turk samples. Sage Open, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mande, M., & English, K. (1989). The effect of public opinion on correctional policy: A comparison of opinions and practice. Boulder, CO: Colorado Department of Public Safety.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2012). Conducting behavioural research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 1–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattinson, J., & Mirrlees-Black, C. (2000) Attitudes to crime and criminal justice. London, UK: Home Office, RDS Directorate.
   Google Scholar
• Messing, S., Jabon, M., & Plaut, E. (2016). Bias in the flesh skin complexion and stereotype consistency in political campaigns. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(1), 44–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, M. E., Maxfield, L. D., & Harer, M. D. (2004). Past as prologue: Reconciling recidivism and culpability. Fordham Law Review, 73(1), 245–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer, D., Meyvis T., & Davidenko N. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 867–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickett, J., & Roche, S. (2016). Arrested development: Misguided directions in deterrence theory and policy. Criminology & Public Policy, 15(3), 727–751. doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piquero, A. R., Farrington, D. P., & Blumstein, A. (2007). Key issues in criminal career research: New analyses of the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. V. (1997). The role of criminal record in the sentencing process. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research, 22, 303–362. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/449265.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. V. (2008). Punishing persistent offenders: Exploring community and offender perspectives. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. V., Hough, M., Jackson, J., & Gerber, M. (2012). Public opinion towards the lay magistracy and the Sentencing Council guidelines. British Journal of Criminology, 52(6), 1072–1091. doi:10.1093/bjc/azs024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. V., & von Hirsch, A. (Eds.). (2010). Previous convictions at sentencing: Theoretical and applied perspectives. Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, P. (2013). Intuitions of justice and the utility of desert. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, J., & Hamilton, V. (1992). Legal cultures and punishment repertoires in Japan, Russia, and the United States. Law and Society Review, 26, 117–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scurich, N., & Monahan, J. (2016). Evidence-based sentencing: Public openness and opposition to using gender, age, and race as risk factors for recidivism. Law and Human Behavior, 40(1), 36–41. doi:10.1037/lhb0000161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soothill, K., & Francis, B. (2009). When do ex-offenders become like non-offenders? Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 48(4), 373–387. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2311.2009.00576.x
   Google Scholar
• Spear, L. P. (2000). The adolescent brain and age-related behavioral manifestations. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 24(4), 417–463. doi:10.1016/S0149-7634(00)00014-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg, L. (2008). A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Review, 28(1), 78–106. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2007.08.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonry, M. (1996). Sentencing matters. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tonry, M. (2015). Sentencing fragments. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tufts, J., & Roberts, J. V. (2002). Sentencing juvenile offenders: Public preferences and judicial practice. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 13, 46–64.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Sentencing Commission. (2010). Computation of ‘recency’ criminal history points under USSG S4A1.1(e). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• von Hirsch, A. (1976). Doing justice: The choice of punishments. New York, NY: Hill and Wang.
   Google Scholar
• von Hirsch, A. (2010). Proportionality and the progressive loss of mitigation: Some further reflections. In J. V. Roberts & A. von Hirsch (Eds.), Previous convictions at sentencing: Theoretical and applied perspectives (pp. 1–16). Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar