Using Plan-Do-Study-Act and Participatory Action Research to Improve Use of Risk Needs Assessments

References

• Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. A. (1998). A psychology of criminal conduct (4th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge NY.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J. A., & Wormith, J. S. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime & Delinquency, 52(1), 7–27. doi:10.1177/0011128705281756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, M., & Neuhauser, D. (2005). W. Edwards Deming: Father of quality management, patient and composer. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 14(4), 310–312. doi:10.1136/qshc.2005.015289
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonta, J., & Andrews, D. A. (2007). Risk-need-responsivity model for offender assessment and rehabilitation. Rehabilitation, 6(1), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Bonta, J. A., Bourgon, G., Rugge, T., Scott, T., Yessine, A. K., Gutierrez, L., & Li, J. (2011). An experimental demonstration of training probation officers in evidence-based community supervision. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(11), 1127–1148. doi:10.1177/0093854811420678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourgon, G., Gutierrez, L., & Ashton, J. (2012). The evolution of community supervision practice: The transformation from case manager to change agent. Federal Probation, 76, 27.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative research. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Cleary, B. A. (1995). Supporting empowerment with Deming’s PDSA cycle. Empowerment in Organizations, 3(2), 34–39. doi:10.1108/09684899510089310
   Google Scholar
• Cox, S., Wilcock, P., & Young, J. (1999). Improving the repeat prescribing process in a busy general practice: A study using continuous quality improvement methodology. Quality in Health Care, 8, 119–125.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Desmarais, S. L., & Singh, P. P. (2013). Risk assessment instruments validated and implemented in correctional settings in the United States: An empirical guide. New York, NY: Council of State Governments Justice Center.
   Google Scholar
• Fass, T. L., Heilburn, K., Dematteo, D., & Fretz, R. (2008). The LSI-R and the COMPAS validation data on two risk-needs tools. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 35(9), 1095–1108. doi:10.1177/0093854808320497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guy, L. S., Nelson, R. J., Fusco-Morin, S. L., & Vincent, G. M. (2014). What do Juvenile probation officers think of using the SAVRY and YLS/CMI for case management, and do they use the instruments properly? International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13(2), 227–241. doi:10.1080/14999013.2014.939789
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, H. C., Brady, P. W., Dritz, M. C., Hooper, D. K., Linam, W. M., Froehle, C. M., & Margolis, P. (2010). The Influence of context on quality improvement success in health care: A systematic review of the literature. The Milkbank Quarterly, 88(4), 500–559. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00611.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley, G. J., Nolan, K. M., Nolan, T. W., Norman, C. L., & Provost, L. P. (1996). The improvement guide: A practical approach to enhancing organizational performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenkamp, C. T., Latessa, E. J., & Holsinger, A. M. (2006). The risk principle in action: What have we learned from 13,676 offenders and 97 correctional programs. Crime & Delinquency, 52(1), 77–93. doi:10.1177/0011128705281747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntyre, A. (2007). Participatory action research (Vol. 52). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• McMurran, M. (2009). Motivational interviewing with offenders: A systematic review. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 14, 83–100. doi:10.1348/135532508X278326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J., & Maloney, C. (2013). Practitioner compliance with risk/needs assessment tools: A theoretical and empirical assessment. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 7(40), 716–736. doi:10.1177/0093854812468883
   Google Scholar
• Powell, T. C. (1995). Total quality management as competitive advantage: A review and empirical study. Strategic Management Journal, 16(1), 15–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, T. C., Rushmer, R. K., & Davies, H. T. O. (2008.) A systematic narrative review of quality improvement models in health care. Social Dimensions of Health Institute. at The Universities of Dundee and St Andrews.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rudes, D. S., & Meyer, K. S. (2017). Drift, risk, and misalignment: Evidence-based and evidence-informed practice use in juvenile justice. Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology November annual meeting, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Rudes, D. S., Taxman, F. S., Portillo, S., Murphy, A., Rhodes, A., Stitzer, M., Luongo, P. F., & Friedmann, P. D. (2012). Adding positive reinforcement in justice settings: Acceptability and feasibility. Journal of Substance Abuse and Treatment, 42(3), 260–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudes, D. S., Viglione, J., & Meyer, K. S. (2016). Risk entangled needs in probation supervision. Handbook on Risk and Need Assessment. Theory and Practice, 1, 406.
   Google Scholar
• Rudes, D. S., Viglione, J., & Porter, C. M. (2013). Using quality improvement models in correctional organizations. Federal Probation, 77(2), 69–75.
   Google Scholar
• Senge, R. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York, NY: Currency Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Taxman, F. S. (2002). Supervision–exploring the dimensions of effectiveness. Federal Probation, 66(2), 14–27.
   Google Scholar
• Taxman, F. S. (2006). Assessment with a flair. Federal Probation, 70(2), 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Taxman, F. S., & Belenko, S. (2011). Implementing evidence-based practices in community corrections and addiction treatment. Boulder, CO: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Taxman, F. S., & Caudy, M. (2015). Risk tells us who, but not what or how: Empirical assessment of the complexity of criminogenic needs to inform correctional programming. Criminology and Public Policy, 14(1), 1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taxman, F. S., Shepardson, E. S., & Byrne, J. M. (2004). Tools of the trade: A guide to incorporating science into practice. Townson, MD: Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services.
   Google Scholar
• Toronjo, H., & Taxman, F. S. (2017). Supervision face-to-face contacts: The emergence of an intervention. In Evidence-based skills in criminal justice: International research on supporting rehabilitation and desistance (pp. 217).
   Google Scholar
• Trotman, A. J., & Taxman, F. S. (2011). Implementation of a contingency management based intervention in a community supervision setting: Clinical issues and recommendations. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 50(5), 235–251.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Viglione, J., Rudes, D. S., & Taxman, F. S. (2015). Misalignment in supervision: Implementing risk/needs assessment instruments in probation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(3), 263–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimpenny, K. (2010). Chapter 10: Participatory action research, An integrated approach towards practice development. In M. Savin-Baden & C. H. Major (Eds.), New approaches to qualitative research: Wisdom and uncertainty(pp. 89–99). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar