195
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The Value of Participatory Action Research in Corrections: Introduction to the Special Issue

ORCID Icon, , &

References

  • Allred, S. L, Boyd, C, Cotton, T, & Perry, P. (2020). Participatory evaluation in a prison education program: meaning & community building within inside-out think tanks. Corrections: Policy, Practice and Research, 5(1), 6-27. doi: 10.1080/23774657.2019.1604193
  • Brydon-Miller, M., Greenwood, D., & Maguire, P. (2003). Why action research? Action Research, 1(1), 9–28. doi:10.1177/14767503030011002
  • Cahill, C. (2007). Including excluded perspectives in participatory action research. Design Studies, 28(3), 325–340. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2007.02.006
  • Chevalier, J. M., & Buckles, D. J. (2019). Participatory action research: Theory and methods for engaged inquiry. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Fine, M., & Torre, M. E. (2006). Intimate details: Participatory action research in prison. Action Research, 4(3), 253–269. doi:10.1177/1476750306066801
  • Goldstein, A. P. (1990). Delinquents on delinquency. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
  • Haverkate, D. L, Meyers, T. J, Telep, C. W, & Wright, K. A. (2020). On par with the yard: participatory action research to advance knowledge in corrections. corrections: policy. Practice and Research, 5(1), 28-43.
  • Johnson, M. E., Brems, C., Mills, M. E., & Eldridge, G. D. (2018). Involving incarcerated individuals in the research process: Perspectives of key stakeholders. Action Research, 16(1), 43–64. doi:10.1177/1476750316661397
  • Kidd, S, Davidson, L, Frederick, T, & Kral, M. J. (2018). Reflecting on participatory, action-oriented research methods in community psychology: progress, problems, and paths forward. American Journal Of Community Psychology, 61(1–2), 76–87. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.2018.61.issue-1pt2
  • Kleck, G., Tark, J., & Bellows, J. J. (2006). What methods are most frequently used in research in criminology and criminal justice? Journal of Criminal Justice, 34(2), 147–152. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2006.01.007
  • Lane, J., Turner, S., & Flores, C. (2004). Researcher-practitioner collaboration in community corrections: Overcoming hurdles for successful partnerships. Criminal Justice Review, 29(1), 97–114. doi:10.1177/073401680402900107
  • Lindblom, C. E., & Cohen, D. K. (1979). Usable knowledge: Social science and social problem solving. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Magnuson, S, Kras, K. R, Aleandro, H, Rudes, D. S, & Taxman, F. S. (2020). Using plan-do-study-act and participatory action research to improve use of risk needs assessments. corrections: policy. Practice and Research, 5(1), 44-63.
  • Payne, Y. A., & Bryant, A. (2018). Street participatory action research in prison: A methodology to challenge privilege and power in correctional facilities. The Prison Journal, 98(4), 449–469. doi:10.1177/0032885518776378
  • Persons, R. W., & Marks, P. A. (1970). Self-disclosure with recidivists: Optimum interviewer-interviewee matching. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 76(3), 387–391. doi:10.1037/h0030274
  • Rudes, D. S., Viglione, J., Lerch, J., Porter, C., & Taxman, F. S. (2014). Build to sustain: Collaborative partnerships between university researchers and criminal justice practitioners. Criminal Justice Studies, 27(3), 249–263. doi:10.1080/1478601X.2014.947808
  • Sandwick, T., Fine, M., Greene, A. C., Stoudt, B. G., Torre, M. E., & Patel, L. (2018). Promise and provocation: Humble reflections on critical participatory action research for social policy. Urban Education, 53(4), 473–502. doi:10.1177/0042085918763513
  • Stevens, D. J. (1994). Predatory rapists and victim selection techniques. The Social Science Journal, 31(4), 421–433. doi:10.1016/0362-3319(94)90033-7
  • Thrasher, J., Maloney, E., Mills, S., House, J., Wroe, T., & White, V. (2019). Reimagining prison research from the inside-out. Journal of Prisoners on Prisons, 28(1), 12–28.
  • Watson, T. M., & van der Meulen, E. (2019). Research in carceral contexts: Confronting access barriers and engaging former prisoners. Qualitative Research, 19(2), 182–198. doi:10.1177/1468794117753353
  • Woodward, V. H., Webb, M. E., Griffin, O. H., III, & Copes, H. (2016). The current state of criminological research in the United States: An examination of research methodologies in criminology and criminal justice journals. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 27(3), 340–361. doi:10.1080/10511253.2015.1131312

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.