Paid Your Debt to Society? Court-related Financial Obligations and Community Supervision during the First Year after Release from Prison

References

• Acock, A. C. (2013). Discovering structural equation modeling using stata. Stata Press.
   Google Scholar
• Albin-Lackey, C. (2014). Profiting from probation: America’s “offender-funded” probation industry. Human Rights Watch. https://www.hrw.org/report/2014/02/05/profiting-probation/americas-offender-funded-probation-industry
   Google Scholar
• Bannon, A., Nagrecha, M., & Diller, R. (2010). Criminal justice debt: A barrier to reentry. Brennan Center for Justice, New York University Law School. https://www.brennancenter.org/publication/criminal-justice-debt-barrier-reentry
   Google Scholar
• Beckett, K., & Harris, A. (2011). On cash and conviction. Criminology & Public Policy, 10(3), 509–537. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00726.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucklen, K., & Zajac, G. (2009). But some of them don’t come back (to prison!): Resource deprivation and thinking errors as determinants of parole success and failure. The Prison Journal, 89(3), 239–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885509339504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colgan, B. A. (2017). Graduating economic sanctions according to ability to pay. University of Iowa Law Review, 103(1), 53–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colgan, B. A. (2019). Beyond graduation: economic sanctions and structural reform. Duke Law Journal, 1529, 1583–112.
   Google Scholar
• Doherty, F. (2016). Obey all laws and be good: Probation and the meaning of recidivism. The Georgetown Law Journal, 104(291), 291–354. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2007.54.1.23
   Google Scholar
• Feeley, M. M., & Simon, J. (1992). The new penology: Notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications. Criminology, 30(4), 449–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01112.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feierman, J., Goldstein, N., Haney-Caron, E., & Columbo, J. F. (2016). Debtors’ prisons for kids? The high cost of fines and fees in the juvenile justice system. Juvenile Law Center. http://debtorsprison.jlc.org/documents/JLC-Debtors-Prison-executive-summary.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J. (1991). Regression diagnostics. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fritz, M. S., & Mackinnon, D. P. (2015). Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological Science, 18(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01882.x
   Google Scholar
• Glaze, L. E., & Bonczar, T. P. (2009, December 2). Probation and parole in the United States, 2008. Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin, (October 2014), 1–61. https://doi.org/10.1037/e529812006-001
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, M. A., & Glaser, D. (1991). The use and effects of financial penalties in municipal courts. Criminology, 29(4), 651–676. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1991.tb01083.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grattet, R., & Lin, J. (2016). Supervision intensity and parole outcomes: A competing risks approach to criminal and technical parole violations. Justice Quarterly, 33(4), 565–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2014.932001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grattet, R., Petersilia, J., Lin, J., & Beckman, M. (2009). Parole violations and revocations in California: Analysis and suggestions for action. Federal Probation, 73(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2007.54.1.23
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. (2016). A pound of flesh: Monetary sanctions as a permanent punishment for poor people. Russell Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A., Evans, H., & Beckett, K. (2010). Drawing blood from stones: Legal debt and social inequality in the contemporary United States. American Journal of Sociology, 115(6), 1753–1799. https://doi.org/10.1086/651940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartman, J., Travis, L., & Latessa, E. (1996). Thirty-nine years of parole rules. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Las Vegas, NV.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., & Scharkow, M. (2013). The relative trustworthiness of inferential tests of the indirect effect in statistical mediation analysis: Does method really matter? Psychological Science, 24(10), 1918–1927. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613480187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillsman, S. T. (1990). Fines and day fines. Crime and Justice, 12, 49–98. https://doi.org/10.1086/449164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyatt, J. M., & Barnes, G. C. (2017). An experimental evaluation of the impact of intensive supervision on the recidivism of high-risk probationers. Crime & Delinquency, 63(1), 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128714555757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyatt, J. M., Powell, K., & Link, N. W. (2020). Agency-level perceptions of monetary sanctions: Current landscape and impediments to reform. Sociological Perspectives, 63(6), 939–961. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121420968123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iratzoqui, A., & Metcalfe, C. (2017). Set up for failure? Examining the influence of monetary sanctions on probation success. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 28(4), 370–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403415586595
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, M. (2005). Downsizing prisons: How to reduce crime and end mass incarceration. New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Link, N., Hyatt, J. M., & Ruhland, E. (2020a). Monetary sanctions, legal and collateral consequences, and probation & parole: Where do we go from here? UCLA Criminal Justice Law Review, 4(1), 199–212. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4w8022j5
   Google Scholar
• Link, N. W. (2020). Criminal justice debt during the reintegration process: Who has it and how much? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(1), 154–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854818790291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Link, N. W., Powell, K., Hyatt, J. M., & Ruhland, E. L. (2020b). Considering the process of debt collection in community corrections: The case of the monetary compliance unit. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 37(1), 128–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986220971394
   Google Scholar
• Link, N. W., & Roman, C. G. (2017). Longitudinal associations among child support debt, employment, and recidivism after prison. The Sociological Quarterly, 58(1), 140–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2016.1246892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Link, N. W., Ward, J. T., & Stansfield, R. (2019). Consequences of mental and physical health for reentry and recidivism: Toward a health‐based model of desistance. Criminology, 57(3), 544–573. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, W. A., & Wright, R. F. (2014). Mercenary criminal justice. The University of Illinois Law Review, 2014(4), 1175–1228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, K. D. (2018). Monetary myopia: An examination of institutional response to revenue from monetary sanctions for misdemeanors. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 29(6-7). https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403418761099.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, K. D., Sykes, B. L., Shannon, S., Edwards, F., & Harris, A. (2018). Monetary sanctions: Legal financial obligations in U.S. systems of justice. Annual Review of Criminology, 1(1), 471–495. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-032317-091915
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mauer, M., & Chesney-Lind, M. (2003). Invisible punishment: The collateral consequences of mass incarceration. The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, N., & Tonry, M. H. (1991). Between prison and probation: Intermediate punishments in a rational sentencing system. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mowen, T. J., & Visher, C. A. (2013). Drug use and crime after incarceration: The role of family support and family conflict. Justice Quarterly, 32(2), 337–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2013.771207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Muthen & Muthen.
   Google Scholar
• Nagrecha, M., Katzenstein, M. F., & Davis, E. (2015). When all else fails, fining the family. Center for Community Alternatves. http://www.communityalternatives.org/pdf/Criminal-Justice-Debt.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Olson, D. E., & Ramker, G. F. (2001). Crime does not pay, but criminals may: Factors influencing the imposition and collection of probation fees. Justice System Journal, 22(1), 29–46.
   Google Scholar
• Ostermann, M., & Hyatt, J. M. (2016). Is something better than nothing? The effect of short terms of mandatory parole supervision. Justice Quarterly, 33(5), 785–810. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2014.980300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersilia, J. (2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petersilia, J., & Cullen, F. T. (2014). Liberal but not stupid: Meeting the promise of downsizing prisons. Stanford Journal of Criminal Law and Policy, 2(1), 1–43.
   Google Scholar
• Pfaff, J. (2017). Locked in: The true causes of mass incarceration–And how to achieve real reform. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Phelps, M. S. (2013). The paradox of probation: Community supervision in the age of mass incarceration. Law and Policy, 35(1–2), 51–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piquero, A. R., & Jennings, W. G. (2017). Justice system-imposed financial penalties increase the likelihood of recidivism in a sample of adolescent offenders. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 15(3), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204016669213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pleggenkuhle, B. (2018). The financial cost of a criminal conviction: Context and consequences. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(1), 121–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854817734278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roman, C. G., & Link, N. W. (2017). Community reintegration among prisoners with child support obligations: An examination of debt, needs, and service receipt. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 28(9), 896–917. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403415611460
   Google Scholar
• Ruback, B. R. (2015). The benefits and costs of economic sanctions: Considering the victim, the offender, and society. Minnesota Law Review, 99, 1779–1836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruback, R. B., & Bergstrom, M. (2006). Economic sanctions in criminal justice purposes, effects, and implications. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33(2), 242–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854805284414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruhland, E. L. (2019). It’s all about the money: An exploration of probation fees. Corrections: Policy, Practice, and Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/23774657.2018.1564635
   Google Scholar
• Ruhland, E. L., Petkus, A. A., Link, N. W., Hyatt, J. M., Holmes, B., & Pate, S. (2020). Monetary sanctions in community corrections: Law, policy, and their alignment with correctional goals. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 37(1), 108–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986220971393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruhland, E. L., Robey, J. P., Corbett, R. P., & Reitz, K. R. (2017). Exploring supervision fees in four probation jurisdictions in Texas. The Robina Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Schiraldi, V., & Jacobson, M. (2014, June 12). Could less be more when it comes to probation supervision? American City & County.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, J. (2014, May 19). As court fees rise, the poor are paying the price. National Public Radio. https://www.npr.org/2014/05/19/312158516/increasing-court-fees-punish-the-poor
   Google Scholar
• Sobel, M. E. (1986). Some new results on indirect effects and their standard errors in covariance structure models. In N. Tuma (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 159–186). American Sociological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Travis, J. C. (2005). But they all come back: Facing the challenges of prisoner reentry. Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Travis, L. F., & Stacey, J. (2010). A half century of parole rules: Conditions of parole in the United States, 2008. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(4), 604–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.04.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, S., & Petersilia, J. (1996). Day fines in four U.S. institutions. RAND. https://csgjusticecenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/1996-RAND-day-fines-4-BJA-pilot-sites.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Justice. (2015). Investigation of the Ferguson police department. http://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/opa/press-releases/attachments/2015/03/04/ferguson_police_department_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Uggen, C., Wakefield, S., & Western, B. (2005). Work and family perspectives on reentry. In J. Travis & C. A. Visher (Eds.), Prisoner reentry and crime in America (pp. 209–243). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Visher, C., Debus, S., & Yahner, J. (2008). Employment after prison: A longitudinal study of releasees in three states. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Visher, C., Debus-Sherrill, S., & Yahner, J. (2011). Employment after prison: A longitudinal study of former prisoners. Justice Quarterly, 28(5), 698–718. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2010.535553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visher, C. A., Baer, D., & Naser, R. (2006). Ohio prisoners’ reflections on returning home. The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, D. (2011). A test of the routine activities and neighborhood attachment explanations for bias in disorder perceptions. Crime & Delinquency, 61(4), 587–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128711426538
   Google Scholar
• Western, B., Braga, A., Hureau, D., & Sirois, C. (2016). Study retention as bias reduction in a hard-to-reach population. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(20), 5477–5485. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1604138113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. (2007). Inverse probability weighted estimation for general missing data problems. Journal of Econometrics, 141(2), 1281–1301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar