Proposed Principles for Procedurally Just Probation and Parole Practices

References

• Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). LexisNexis.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., & Kiessling, J. J. (1980). Program structure and effective correctional practices: A summary of the CaVic research. In R. R. Ross & P. Gendreau (Eds.), Effective correctional treatment (pp. 441–463). Butterworths.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, T., Gordon, J. A., & Taxman, F. S. (2015). A hierarchical analysis of correctional officers’ procedural justice judgments of correctional institutions: Examining the influence of transformational leadership. Justice Quarterly, 32(6), 1037–1063. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2013.877517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkworth, J., & Murphy, K. (2016). System contact and procedural justice policing: Improving quality of life outcomes for victims. International Review of Victimology, 22(2), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269758015627044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkworth, J. M., & Murphy, K. (2019). Procedural justice, posturing and defiant action: Exploring prisoner reactions to prison authority. Justice Quarterly, 38(3), 537–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2019.1666905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beijersbergen, K. A., Dirkzwager, A. J. E., Eichelsheim, V. I., Van der Laan, P. H., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2014). Procedural justice and prisoners’ mental health problems: A longitudinal study. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 24(2), 100–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.1881
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beijersbergen, K. A., Dirkzwager, A. J. E., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2016). Reoffending after release: Does procedural justice during imprisonment matter? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815609643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blasko, B. L., Friedmann, P. D., Rhodes, A. G., & Taxman, F. S. (2015). The parole officer-client relationship as a mediator of criminal justice outcomes. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(7), 722–740. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854814562642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blasko, B. L., & Taxman, F. S. (2018). Are supervision practices procedurally fair? Development and predictive utility of a procedural justice measure for use in community corrections settings. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(3), 402–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854817749255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonta, J., Rugge, T., Bourgon, G., & Wanamaker, K. A. (2019). A conceptual replication of the strategic training initiative in community supervision (STICS). Journal of Experimental Criminology, 15(3), 397–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-019-09371-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottoms, A., & Tankebe, J. (2012). Beyond procedural justice: A dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 102(1), 119–170. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23145787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Brunton-Smith, I., & McCarthy, D. J. (2016). Prison legitimacy and procedural fairness: A multilevel examination of prisoners in England and Wales. Justice Quarterly, 33(6), 1029–1054. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2015.1023215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, C. M., Labrecque, R. M., Schaefer, R. L., Harvis, M., Zavita, K. R., Reddy, L., & Labranche, K. (2020). Do perceptions of legitimacy and fairness matter in prison? Examining how procedural and distributive justice relate to misconduct. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(12), 1630–1653. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820916901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canada, K. E., & Watson, A. C. (2012). “’Cause everybody likes to be treated good”: Perceptions of procedural justice among mental health court participants. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(2), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212465415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, M. D., Walters, S., Gingerich, R., & Meltzer, M. (2006). Motivational interviewing for probation officers: Tipping the balance toward change. Federal Probation, 70(1), 38–44. https://www.uscourts.gov/federal-probation-journal/2006/06/motivational-interviewing-probation-officers-tipping-balance
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, F. T., Eck, J. E., & Lowenkamp, C. T. (2002). Environmental corrections: A new paradigm for effective probation and parole supervision. Federal Probation, 66(2), 28–37. https://www.uscourts.gov/federal-probation-journal/2002/09/environmental-corrections-new-paradigm-effective-probation-and
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, F. T., & Gendreau, P. (2000). Assessing correctional rehabilitation: Policy, practice, and prospects. In J. Horney (Ed.), Criminal justice 2000: Volume 3. Policies, processes, and decisions of the criminal justice system (pp. 109–175). U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Day, A., Hardcastle, L., & Birgden, A. (2012). Case management in community corrections: Current status and future directions. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 51(7), 484–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2012.706245
   Google Scholar
• Dowden, C., & Andrews, D. A. (2004). The importance of staff practice in delivering effective correctional treatment: A meta-analytic review of core correctional practice. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X03257765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendreau, P., Cullen, F. T., & Bonta, J. (1994). Intensive rehabilitation supervision: The next generation in community corrections? Federal Probation, 58(1), 72–78. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/intensive-rehabilitation-supervision-next-generation-community
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, A., & Allen, K. R. (2015). Communicating qualitative research: Some practical guideposts for scholars. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacin, R., & Meško, G. (2018). Prisoners’ perception of legitimacy of the prison staff: A qualitative study in Slovene prisons. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(13), 4332–4350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X18758896
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmqvist, R., Hill, T., & Lang, A. (2007). Treatment alliance in residential treatment of criminal adolescents. Child & Youth Care Forum, 36(4), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-007-9037-z
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, J., & Bradford, B. (2010). What is trust and confidence in the police? Policing, 4(3), 241–248. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paq020
   Google Scholar
• Jalbert, S. K., & Rhodes, W. (2012). Reduced caseloads improve probation outcomes. Journal of Crime and Justice, 35(2), 221–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2012.679875
   Google Scholar
• James, N. (2015). Offender reentry: Correctional statistics, reintegration into the community, and recidivism. Congressional Research Service.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M., & Kerbs, J. J. (2007). Probation and parole officers and discretionary decision-making: Responses to technical and criminal violations. Federal Probation, 71(1), 9–15. https://www.uscourts.gov/federal-probation-journal/2007/06/probation-and-parole-officers-and-discretionary-decision-making
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, K. A., & Holtfreter, K. (2016). An integrated theory of specialized court programs: Using procedural justice and therapeutic jurisprudence to promote offender compliance and rehabilitation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815609642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozar, C. J., & Day, A. (2012). The therapeutic alliance in offending behavior programs: A necessary and sufficient condition for change? Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(5), 482–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, E. G., Hogan, N. L., & Griffin, M. L. (2007). The impact of distributive and procedural justice on correctional staff job stress, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35(6), 644–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2007.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovins, B., Cullen, F. T., Latessa, E. J., & Jonson, C. L. (2018). Probation officer as coach: Building a new professional identity. Federal Probation, 82(1), 13–19. https://www.uscourts.gov/federal-probation-journal/2018/06/probation-officer-coach-building-new-professional-identity
   Google Scholar
• Maruna, S., & Roy, K. (2007). Amputation or reconstruction? Notes on the concept of “knifing off” and desistance from crime. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 23(1), 104–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986206298951
   Google Scholar
• Mazerolle, L., Antrobus, E., Bennett, S., & Tyler, T. R. (2013). Shaping citizen perceptions of police legitimacy: A randomized field trial of procedural justice. Criminology, 51(1), 33–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2012.00289.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazerolle, L., Bennett, S., Antrobus, E., & Eggins, E. (2012). Procedural justice, routine en-counters and citizen perceptions of police: Main findings from the Queensland Community Engagement Trial (QCET). Journal of Experimental Criminology, 8(4), 343–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-012-9160-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazerolle, L., Bennett, S., Davis, J., Sargeant, E., & Manning, M. (2013). Procedural justice and police legitimacy: A systematic review of the research evidence. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 9(3), 245–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-013-9175-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCluskey, J. (2003). Police requests for compliance: Coercive and procedurally just tactics. LFB Scholarly.
   Google Scholar
• McMurran, M. (2009). Motivational interviewing with offenders: A systematic review. Legal and Criminal Psychology, 14(1), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532508X278326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, F. (2019). Pervasive punishment: Making sense of mass supervision. Emerald Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. (2005). Regulating more effectively: The relationship between procedural justice, legitimacy, and tax non-compliance. Journal of Law and Society, 32(4), 562–589. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2005.00338.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, K., Bradford, B., & Jackson, J. (2016). Motivating compliance behavior among offenders: Procedural justice or deterrence? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(1), 102–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815611166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, K., Hinds, L., & Fleming, J. (2008). Encouraging public cooperation and support for police. Policing and Society, 18(2), 136–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439460802008660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, K., & Tyler, T. (2008). Procedural justice and compliance behaviour: The mediating role of emotions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(4), 652–668. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagin, D. S., & Telep, C. W. (2017). Procedural justice and legal compliance. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 13(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110316-113310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelps, M. S. (2013). The paradox of probation: Community supervision in the age of mass incarceration. Law & Policy, 35(1–2), 51–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rankin, L. E., & Tyler, T. R. (2009). Justice and cooperation. Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 65(4), 146–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03080137
   Google Scholar
• Reisig, M. D., & Mesko, G. (2009). Procedural justice, legitimacy and prisoner misconduct. Psychology, Crime & Law, 15(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160802089768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivas-Vazquez, R. A., Sarria, M., Rey, G., Rivas-Vazquez, A. A., Rodriguez, J., & Jardon, M. E. (2009). A relationship-based care model for jail diversion. Psychiatric Services, 60(6), 766–771. https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.2009.60.6.766
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, C. R., Lowenkamp, C. T., Holsinger, A., VanBenschoten, A., & Oleson, J. C. (2012). A random study of Staff Training Aimed at Reducing Re-arrest (STARR): using core correctional practices in probation interactions. Journal of Crime and Justice, 35(2), 167–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2012.674823
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, R., Eck, J. E., & Dunham, J. (2010). Super controllers and crime prevention: A routine activity explanation of crime prevention success and failure. Security Journal, 23(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2009.17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer, L., & Brewer, S. (2022). Probation and parole: From control to case management. In E. Jeglic & C. Calkins (Eds.), Handbook of Issues in Criminal Justice Reform (pp. 275–290). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schaefer, L., Cullen, F. T., & Eck, J. E. (2016). Environmental corrections: A new paradigm for supervising offenders in the community. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schaefer, L., & Little, S. (2020). A quasi-experimental evaluation of the “environmental correct-ions” model of probation and parole. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 16(4), 535–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-019-09373-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer, L., Moir, E., & Williams, G. C. (2019). When a loved one is on community supervision: The crime controller strategies used by “PoPPs” (parents/partners/peers of probationers and parolees). Criminal Justice Studies, 32(2), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478601X.2019.1600817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer, L., Townsley, M., & Hutchins, B. (in press). Does the involvement of family and friends improve probation and parole outcomes? A quantitative evaluation of Triple-S: Social supports in supervision. Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Schaefer, L., & Williams, G. C. (2021). The impact of probation and parole officers’ attitudes about offenders on professional practices. Corrections: Policy, Practice and Research, 5(4), 274–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/23774657.2018.1538710
   Google Scholar
• Schaefer, L., & Williamson, H. (2018). Probation and parole officers’ compliance with case management tools: Professional discretion and override. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(14), 4565–4584. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X18764851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, L. W. (1993). Defiance, deterrence, and irrelevance: A theory of the criminal sanction. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30(4), 445–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427893030004006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skeem, J. L., Eno Louden, E., Polaschek, D., & Camp, J. (2007). Assessing relationship quality in mandated community treatment: Blending care with control. Psychological Assessment, 19(4), 397–410. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.19.4.397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skeem, J. L., & Manchak, S. (2008). Back to the future: From Klockars’ model of effective supervision to evidence-based practice in probation. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 47(3), 220–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509670802134069
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P., Schweitzer, M., Labrecque, R. M., & Latessa, E. J. (2012). Improving probation officers‘ supervision skills: An evaluation of the EPICS model. Journal of Crime and Justice, 35(2), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2012.674826
   Google Scholar
• Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law & Society Review, 37(3), 513–548. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5893.3703002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tankebe, J. (2013). Viewing things differently: The dimensions of public perceptions of police legitimacy. Criminology, 51(1), 103–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2012.00291.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taxman, F. S. (2008). No illusions: Offender and organizational change in Maryland’s proactive community supervision efforts. Criminology & Public Policy, 7(2), 275–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2008.00508.x
   Google Scholar
• Taxman, F. S. (2011). Parole: Moving the field forward through a new model of behavioural management. In L. Gideon & H.-E. Sung (Eds.), Rethinking corrections: Rehabilitation, reentry, and reintegration (pp. 307–328). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Taxman, F. S., & Thanner, M. (2004). Probation from a therapeutic perspective: Results from the field. Contemporary Issues in Law, 7(1), 39–63.
   Google Scholar
• Trotter, C. (2016). Working with involuntary clients: A guide to practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven: Yale University Press. (ISBN:9780691126739).
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (1997). The psychology of legitimacy: A relational perspective on voluntary deference to authorities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1(4), 323–345. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0104_4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (2003). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and the effective rule of law. Crime and Justice, 30, 283–357. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1147701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (2010). Legitimacy in corrections: Policy implications. Criminology & Public Policy, 9(1), 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2010.00615.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (2017). Procedural justice and policing: A rush to judgment? Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 13(1), 29–53. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110316-113318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., & Degoey, P. (1996). Trust in organizational authorities: The influence of motive attributions on willingness to accept decisions. In R. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizational authorities (pp. 331–356). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., & Fagan, J. (2008). Legitimacy and cooperation: Why do people help the police fight crime in their communities. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6(1), 231–275. https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/414/
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. Russell-Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wales, H. W., Hiday, V. A., & Ray, B. (2010). Procedural justice and the mental health court judge’s role in reducing recidivism. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 33(4), 265–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2010.06.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, G. D. (2015). Working alliance between substance abusing offenders and their parole officers and counselors: Its impact on outcome and role as a mediator. Journal of Crime and Justice, 39(3), 421–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2015.1053967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, S. T., Vader, A. M., Nguyen, N., Harris, T. R., & Eells, J. (2010). Motivational interviewing as a supervision strategy in probation: A randomized effectiveness trial. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 49(5), 309–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2010.489455
   Google Scholar
• Weinrath, M. (2016). Behind the walls: Inmates and correctional officers on the state of Canadian prisons. UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, G. C., & Schaefer, L. (2021). Expanding desistance theory through the integration of offender strategies. Journal of Crime and Justice, 44(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2020.1782248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar