Modeling the resilience of critical infrastructure: the role of network dependencies

References

• Adachi, T., & Ellingwood, B. R. (2008). Serviceability of earthquake-damaged water systems: Effects of electrical power availability and power backup systems on system vulnerability. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 93, 78–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ALA. (2001). Seismic fragility formulations for water Systems: Part 1 – guideline, American lifelines alliance, April, ASCE. Retrieved from http://www.americanlifelinesalliance.org/
   Google Scholar
• Alfonso, L., Jonoski, A., & Solomatine, D. (2010). Multiobjective optimization of operational responses for contaminant flushing in water distribution networks. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 136, 48–58. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2010)136:1(48)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Applied Technology Council. (2016). Critical assessment of lifeline system performance: Understanding societal needs in disaster recovery. Gaithersburg, MD: Prepared for US Department of Commerce National Institute of Standards and Technology, Engineering Laboratory. NIST GCR 16-917–39.
   Google Scholar
• Ayyub, B. M. (2014). Systems resilience for multihazard environments: Definition, metrics, and valuation for decision making. Risk Analysis, 34, 340–355.10.1111/risa.2014.34.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bocchini, P., Decò, A., & Frangopol, D. M. (2012). Probabilistic functionality recovery model for resilience analysis. In F. Biondini & D. M. Frangopol (Eds.), Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management, Resilience and Sustainability (pp. 1920–1927). UK: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Bonneau, A. L., & O’Rourke, T. D. (2009). Water supply performance during earthquakes and extreme events. Mceer, 234. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books/about/Water_supply_performance_during_earthqua.html?id=ifVDAQAAIAAJ&pgis=1
   Google Scholar
• Bruneau, M., Chang, S. E., Eguchi, R. T., Lee, G. C., O’Rourke, T. D., Reinhorn, A. M., … von Winterfeldt, D. (2003). A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthquake Spectra, 19, 733–752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buldyrev, S. V., Parshani, R., Paul, G., Stanley, H. E., & Havlin, S. (2010). Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks. Nature, 464, 1025–1028.10.1038/nature08932
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavalieri, F., Franchin, P., Gehl, P., & Khazai, B. (2012). Quantitative assessment of social losses based on physical damage and interaction with infrastructural systems. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 41, 1569–1589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavalieri, F., Franchin, P., Buriticá Cortés, J. A. M., & Tesfamariam, S. (2014). Models for seismic vulnerability analysis of power networks: Comparative assessment. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 29, 590–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, S. E. (2014). Infrastructure resilience to disasters. The Bridge, 44, 36–41.
   Google Scholar
• Cimellaro, G. P., Reinhorn, A. M., & Bruneau, M. (2010). Seismic resilience of a hospital system. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 6, 127–144.10.1080/15732470802663847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornell, C. (1968). Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bulletin of Seismological Society of America, 58, 1583–1606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C. A., O’Rourke, T. D., Adams, M. L., & Rho, M. A. (2012). Case study: Los angeles water services restoration following the 1994 northridge earthquake. In Proceedings of 15th world conference earthquake engineering (15WCEE), Lisbon, Portugal. Paper No 364.
   Google Scholar
• Didier, M., Sun, L., Ghosh, S., & Stojadinovic, B. (2015). Post-earthquake recovery of a community and its electrical power supply system. In M. Papadrakakis, V. Papadopoulos, & V. Plevris (Eds.), COMPDYN 2015, 5th ECCOMAS thematic conference on computational methods in structural dynamics and earthquake engineering. Crete Island.
   Google Scholar
• Didier, M., Grauvogl, B., Steentoft, A., Ghosh, S., & Stojadinovic, B. (2017). Seismic resilience of the Nepalese power supply system during the 2015 Gorkha earthquake. In Proceedings of 16th world conference on earthquake engineering (16WCEE), Santiago, Chile. Paper N° 927.
   Google Scholar
• Ditlevsen, O., & Madsen, H. O. (1996). Structural reliability methods. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, J. (2011, April). Ground motion prediction equations 1964–2010, Rpt PEER 2011/102. UC Berkeley: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Dudenhoeffer, D. D., Permann, M. R., & Manic, M. (2006). CIMS: A framework for infrastructure interdependency modeling and analysis. In L. F. Perrone, F. P. Wieland, J. Liu, B. G. Lawson, D. M. Nicol, & R. M. Fujimoto (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2006 winter simulation conference (pp. 478–485). doi:10.1109/WSC.2006.323119
   Google Scholar
• Ellingwood, B. R. (2016). The centerville virtual community: A fully integrated decision model of interacting physical and social infrastructure systems. Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure. Under review.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eusgeld, I., Kröger, W., Sansavini, G., Schläpfer, M., & Zio, E. (2009). The role of network theory and object-oriented modeling within a framework for the vulnerability analysis of critical infrastructures. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 94, 954–963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FEMA. (2003). Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology, earthquake model, HAZUS-MH 2.1 Technical Manual, 1–699. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez, J. A., & Rix, G. J. (2006, April). Soil attenuation relationships and seismic hazard analyses in the Upper Mississippi Embayment. Proceedings of the 8th US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, San Francisco, California, 18–22. Paper No. 521.
   Google Scholar
• Franchin, P. (2014). A computational framework for systemic seismic risk analysis of civil infrastructural systems. In K. Pitilakis, P. Franchin, B. Khazai, & H. Wenzel (Eds.), SYNER-G: Systemic seismic vulnerability and risk assessment of complex urban, utility, lifeline systems and critical facilities (pp. 23–56). Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-8835-9_2
   Google Scholar
• Franchin, P., & Cavalieri, F. (2015). Probabilistic assessment of civil infrastructure resilience to earthquakes. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 30, 583–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engineering Systems (G&E). (1994). NIBS earthquake loss estimation methods. Technical Manual (Electric Power Systems), R23, 1–68.
   Google Scholar
• Gardoni, P., Der Kiureghian, A., & Mosalam, K. M. (2002). Probabilistic capacity models and fragility estimates for reinforced concrete columns based on experimental observations. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 128, 1024–1038. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:10(1024)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardoni, P., Mosalam, K. M., & Der Kiureghian, A. (2003). Probabilistic seismic demand models and fragility estimates for RC bridges. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 7, 79–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardoni, P., & LaFave, J. M. (2016). Multi-hazard approaches to civil infrastructure engineering: Mitigating risks and promoting resilience. In P. Gardoni, & J. M. LaFave (Eds.), Multi-hazard Approaches to Civil Infrastructure Engineering (pp. 3–12). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-29713-2
   Google Scholar
• Grigg, N. S. (2002). Surviving disasters: Learning from experience. American Water Works Association, 95, 64–75.
   Google Scholar
• Grigg, N. S. (2003). Water utility security: Multiple hazards and multiple barriers. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 9, 81–88. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2003)9:2(81)
   Google Scholar
• Guidorzi, M., Franchini, M., & Alvisi, S. (2009). A multi-objective approach for detecting and responding to accidental and intentional contamination events in water distribution systems. Urban Water Journal, 6, 115–135. doi:10.1080/15730620802566836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guidotti, R., Gardoni, P., & Chen, Y. (2016). Network reliability analysis with link and nodal weights, and auxiliary nodes. Structural Safety. doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2016.12.001.
   Google Scholar
• Guikema, S., & Gardoni, P. (2009). Reliability estimation for networks of reinforced concrete bridges. ASCE Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 15, 61–69.10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2009)15:2(61)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javanbarg, M. B., & Takada, S. (2010). Seismic reliability assessment of water supply systems. In H. Furuta, D. M. Frangopol, & M. Shinozuka (Eds.), Safety, reliability and risk of structures infrastructures and engineering systems (pp. 3455–3462). London: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Jia, G., Tabandeh, A., & Gardoni, P. (2016). Life-cycle analysis of engineering systems: Modeling deterioration, instantaneous reliability, and resilience. In P. Gardoni (Ed.), Risk and Reliability Analysis: Theory and Applications. Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, W.-H., Song, J., & Gardoni, P. (2008). Matrix-based system reliability method and applications to bridge networks. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 93, 1584–1593.10.1016/j.ress.2008.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. S., Spencer, B. F., Jr, Song, J., Elnashai, A. S., & Stokes, T. (2007). Seismic performance assessment of interdependent lifeline systems. MAE Center CD Release 0716. Retrieved from http://mae.cee.illinois.edu/publications/reports/Report07-16.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, J., Brill, E. D., Mahinthakumar, G., & Ranjithan, R. (2010). Identification of reactive contaminant sources in a water distribution system under the conditions of data uncertainties. Proceedings of the world environmental & water resources congress, challenges of change, Tucson, AZ, USA (pp. 4347–4356).
   Google Scholar
• Kurtz, N., Song, J., & Gardoni, P. (2015). Seismic reliability analysis of deteriorating representative US West Coast bridge transportation networks. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 142, C4015010 (1–11). doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E. E., Mitchell, J. E., & Wallace, W. A. (2007). Restoration of services in interdependent infrastructure systems: A network flows approach. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics Part C: Applications and Reviews, 37, 1303–1317. doi:10.1109/TSMCC.2007.905859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.-J., Song, J., Gardoni, P., & Lim, H.-W. (2011). Post-hazard flow capacity of bridge transportation networks considering structural deterioration of bridges. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 7, 509–521.10.1080/15732479.2010.493338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loggins, R. A., Wallace, W. A., & Cavdaroglu, B. (2013). MUNICIPAL: A decision technology for the restoration of critical infrastructures. Industrial and systems engineering research conference, Norcross, GA, USA (pp. 1767–1776).
   Google Scholar
• Modaressi, H., Desramaut, N., & Gehl, P. (2014). Specification of the vulnerability of physical systems. In K. Pitilakis, P. Franchin, B. Khazai, & H. Wenzel (Eds.), SYNER-G: Systemic seismic vulnerability and risk assessment of complex Urban, utility, lifeline systems and critical facilities (pp. 131–184). Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nan, C., & Sansavini, G. (2015). Multilayer hybrid modeling framework for the performance assessment of interdependent critical infrastructures. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 10, 18–33.10.1016/j.ijcip.2015.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NJDEP. (2016). Water main break guidance manual. Trenton: New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Water Supply & Geoscience Mail Code 401-04Q P.O. Box 420 Trenton NJ. Retrieved from http://www.nj.gov/dep/watersupply/pdf/wmb-guidance.pdf
   Google Scholar
• O’Rourke, M. J., & Ayala, G. (1993). Pipeline damage due to wave propagation. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 119, 1490–1498.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1993)119:9(1490)
   Google Scholar
• O’Rourke, M. J., & Deyoe, E. (2004). Seismic damage to segmented buried pipe. Earthquake Spectra, 20, 1167–1183. doi:10.1193/1.1808143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouyang, M. (2014). Review on modeling and simulation of interdependent critical infrastructure systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 121, 43–60.10.1016/j.ress.2013.06.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouyang, M., Pan, Z., Hong, L., & He, Y. (2015). Vulnerability analysis of complementary transportation systems with applications to railway and airline systems in China. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 142, 248–257.10.1016/j.ress.2015.05.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pathirana, A. (2010). EPANET2 desktop application for pressure driven demand modeling. Water Distribution Systems Analysis, 2005, 65–74. doi:10.1061/41203(425)8
   Google Scholar
• PCCIP. (1997, October). Critical foundations: Protecting America’s infrastructures, the report of the president’s commission on critical infrastructure protection. Retrieved from https://www.fas.org/sgp/library/pccip.pdf
   Google Scholar
• PPD-21. (2013, February 12). Presidential policy directive/PPD-21 – Critical infrastructure security and resilience. Washington, DC: The White House.
   Google Scholar
• Piller, O., & Van Zyl, J. E. (2009). Pressure-driven analysis of network sections supplied via high-lying nodes. In J. Boxall & C. Maksimovic (Eds.), Proceedings of the computing and control in the water industry, integrating water systems (pp. 257–262). London: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Pires, J. A., Ang, A. H.-S., & Villaverde, R. (1996). Seismic reliability of electrical power transmission systems. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 160, 427–439. doi:10.1016/0029-5493(95)01119-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinaldi, S. M., Peerenboom, J. P., & Kelly, T. K. (2001). Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 21, 11–25. doi:10.1109/37.969131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossman, L. A. (2000). EPANET 2: Users manual. Cincinnati US Environmental Protection Agency National Risk Management Research Laboratory, 38, 1–200. doi:10.1177/0306312708089715
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, N., Tabandeh, A., & Gardoni, P. (2016). Resilience analysis: A mathematical formulation to model resilience of engineering systems. Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure (submitted).
   Google Scholar
• Shi, P. & O’Rourke, T. D. (2008). Seismic response modeling of water supply systems. Mceer-08-0016, 352. Retrieved from https://mceer.buffalo.edu/publications/catalog/reports/Seismic-Response-Modeling-of-Water-Supply-Systems-MCEER-08-0016.html
   Google Scholar
• Sun, L., Didier, M., Delé, E., & Stojadinovic, B. (2015). Probabilistic demand and supply resilience model for electric power supply system under seismic hazard. 12th international conference on applications of statistics and probability in civil engineering, ICASP12, Vancouver, Canada (pp. 1–8).
   Google Scholar
• Tabucchi, T., Davidson, R., & Brink, S. (2010). Simulation of post-earthquake water supply system restoration. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, 27, 263–279. doi:10.1080/10286600902862615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titi, A., Biondini, F., & Frangopol, D. M. (2015). Seismic resilience of deteriorating concrete structures. In N. Ingraffea & N. Libby (Eds.), Structures Congress 2015 (pp. 1649–1660). Reston, VA: ASCE.
   Google Scholar
• Todini, E. (2003). A more realistic approach to the “extended period simulation” of water distribution networks. In C. Maksimovic, D. Butler, & F. A. Memon (Eds.), Advances in Water Supply Management, (pp. 173–184). Lisse, The Netherlands: Balkema.
   Google Scholar
• Trifunovic, N. (2012). Pattern recognition for reliability assessment of water distribution networks. CRC Press (PhD thesis). UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, Delft University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• USEPA. (2002). New or repaired water mains. US environmental protection agency, office of ground water and drinking water, standards and risk management division, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington DC 20004. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-09/documents/neworrepairedwatermains.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vanzi, I. (1996). Seismic reliability of electric power networks: Methodology and application. Structural Safety, 18, 311–327. doi:10.1016/S0167-4730(96)00024-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vespignani, A. (2010). Complex networks: The fragility of interdependency. Nature, 464, 984–985.10.1038/464984a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, R. Z., Sun, B. T., & Zhou, B. F. (2011). Field survey of Mw 8.8 Feb. 27, 2010 Chile earthquake and Tsunami. In Advanced Materials Research, 250–253, 2102–2106.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, W. A., Mendonca, D. M., Lee, E. E., Mitchell, J. E., & Chow Wallace, J. H. (2003). Managing disruptions to critical interdependent infrastructures in the context of the 2001 world trade center attack. In J. L. Monday (Ed.), Beyond September 11th: An account of post-disaster research, (pp. 165–198). #39. Boulder, CO: Natural Hazards Research and Applications Information Center, University of Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. (2006). Seismic performance evaluation of water supply systems (PhD dissertation). Cornell University, Ithaca.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks. Nature, 393, 440–442.10.1038/30918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, P., & Peeta, S. (2011). A generalized modeling framework to analyze interdependencies among infrastructure systems. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 45, 553–579. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2010.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, R. (2001). Social implications of infrastructure network interactions. Journal of Urban Technology, 8, 97–119. doi:10.1080/106307301753430764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar