870
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Types of occupational relatedness and branching processes across Brazilian regions

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1-23 | Received 27 Jan 2021, Accepted 21 Aug 2022, Published online: 13 Oct 2022

References

  • Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., Braunerhjelm, P., & Carlsson, B. (2012). Growth and entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 39(2), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-010-9307-2
  • Almeida, R., & Carneiro, P. (2012). Enforcement of labor regulation and informality. American Economic Journal Applied Economics, 4(3), 64–89. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.4.3.64
  • Alonso, J. A., & Martín, V. (2019). Product relatedness and economic diversification at the regional level in two emerging economies: Mexico and Brazil. Regional Studies, 53(12), 1710–1722. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1605441
  • Araújo, I. F. D., Gonçalves, E., & Almeida, E. (2019). Effects of dynamic and spatial externalities on local growth: Evidence from Brazil. Papers in Regional Science, 98(2), 1239–1259. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12402
  • Azzoni, C. R., & Haddad, E. A. (2018). Regional disparities. In E. Amann, C. R. Azzoni, & W. Baer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the Brazilian economy. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190499983.001.0001
  • Barbour, E., & Markusen, A. (2007). Regional occupational and industrial structure: Does one imply the other? International Regional Science Review, 30(1), 72–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017606296727
  • Barufi, A. M. B., Haddad, E. A., & Nijkamp, P. (2016). Industrial scope of agglomeration economies in Brazil. The Annals of Regional Science, 56(3), 707–755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-016-0768-3
  • Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 31–56. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132504ph469oa
  • Beckouche, P. (1991). French high-tech and space: A double cleavage. In G. Benko & M. Dunford (Eds.), Industrial change and regional development (pp. 205–225). Belhaven Press.
  • Beckouche, P., Savy, M., & Veltz, P. (1988). Nouvelle économie, nouveaux territoires. CERTES, Supplémént à La Lettre de La DATAR, 3.
  • Borggren, J., Eriksson, R. H., & Lindgren, U. (2016). Knowledge flows in high-impact firms: How does relatedness influence survival, acquisition and exit? Journal of Economic Geography, 16(3), 637–665. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbv014
  • Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320887
  • Boschma, R. (2017). Relatedness as driver of regional diversification: A research agenda. Regional Studies, 51(3), 351–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1254767
  • Boschma, R. (2022). Global value chains from an evolutionary economic geography perspective: A research agenda. Area Development and Policy, 7(2), 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/23792949.2022.2040371
  • Boschma, R., Minondo, A., & Navarro, M. (2013). The emergence of new industries at the regional level in Spain: A proximity approach based on product relatedness. Economic Geography, 89(1), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2012.01170.x
  • Campolina Diniz, C., & Vieira, D. J. (2016). Brazil: Accelerated metropolization and urban crisis. Area Development and Policy, 1(2), 155–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/23792949.2016.1202085
  • Coslovsky, S. V. (2014). Flying under the radar? The state and the enforcement of labour laws in Brazil. Oxford Development Studies, 42(2), 190–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2013.875135
  • de Macedo, F. C., & Porto, L. R. (2021). Evolução regional do mercado de trabalho no Brasil (2000–2018): Apontamentos para a Política Nacional de Desenvolvimento Regional (PNDR). Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada, 90.
  • Eder, J., & Trippl, M. (2019). Innovation in the periphery: Compensation and exploitation strategies. Growth and Change, 50(4), 1511–1531. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12328
  • Ehrl, P., & Monasterio, L. (2019). Skill concentration and persistence in Brazil. Regional Studies, 53(11), 1544–1554. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1585798
  • Farinha, T., Balland, P.-A., Morrison, A., & Boschma, R. (2019). What drives the geography of jobs in the US? Unpacking relatedness. Industry and Innovation, 26(9), 988–1022. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2019.1591940
  • Feser, E. J. (2003). What regions do rather than make: A proposed set of knowledge-based occupation clusters. Urban Studies, 40(10), 1937–1958. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098032000116059
  • Firgo, M., & Mayerhofer, P. (2018). (Un)related variety and employment growth at the sub-regional level. Papers in Regional Science, 97(3), 519–547. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12276
  • Frenken, K., & Boschma, R. A. (2007). A theoretical framework for evolutionary economic geography: Industrial dynamics and urban growth as a branching process. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(5), 635–649. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbm018
  • Frenken, K., Oort, F. V., & Verburg, T. (2007). Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies, 41(5), 685–697. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400601120296
  • Galetti, J. R. B., Tessarin, M. S., & Morceiro, P. C. (2021). Skill relatedness, structural change and heterogeneous regions: Evidence from a developing country. Papers in Regional Science, 100(6), 1355–1376. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12629
  • Garcia, R., Araujo, V., Mascarini, S., Santos, E. G. D., & Costa, A. (2018). Is cognitive proximity a driver of geographical distance of university–industry collaboration? Area Development and Policy, 3(3), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/23792949.2018.1484669
  • Glaeser, E. L., Kallal, H. D., Scheinkman, J. A., & Shleifer, A. (1992). Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy, 100(6), 1126–1152. https://doi.org/10.1086/261856
  • Grillitsch, M., Asheim, B., & Trippl, M. (2018). Unrelated knowledge combinations: The unexplored potential for regional industrial path development. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(2), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsy012
  • Hane-Weijman, E., Eriksson, R. H., & Rigby, D. (2021). How do occupational relatedness and complexity condition employment dynamics in periods of growth and recession? Regional Studies, 56(7), 1176–1189. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1984420
  • Hanushek, E. A. (2013). Economic growth in developing countries: The role of human capital. Economics of Education Review, 37, 204–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.04.005
  • Hartmann, D., Guevara, M. R., Jara-Figueroa, C., Aristarán, M., & Hidalgo, C. A. (2017). Linking economic complexity, institutions, and income inequality. World Development, 93, 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.020
  • Hassink, R., Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2019). Towards a comprehensive understanding of new regional industrial path development. Regional Studies, 53(11), 1636–1645. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1566704
  • Henderson, V. (2002). Urbanization in developing countries. The World Bank Research Observer, 17(1), 89–112. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/17.1.89
  • Herrera, W. D. M., Strauch, J. C. M., & Bruno, M. A. P. (2021). Economic complexity of Brazilian states in the period 1997–2017. Area Development and Policy, 6(1), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/23792949.2020.1761846
  • Hidalgo, C. A., & Hausmann, R. (2009). The building blocks of economic complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10570–10575. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900943106
  • Hidalgo, C. A., Klinger, B., Barabási, A. -L., & Hausmann, R. (2007). The product space conditions the development of nations. Science, 317(5837), 482–487. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1144581
  • IBGE. (1990). Divisão regional do Brasil em mesorregiões e microrregiões geográficas, 1.
  • Imbs, J., & Wacziarg, R. (2003). Stages of diversification. American Economic Review, 93(1), 63–86. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803321455160
  • Isaksen, A., Trippl, M. (2016). Path development in different regional innovation systems: A conceptual analysis. In M. D. Parrilli, R. D. Fitjar, & A. Rodríguez-Pose (Eds.), Innovation drivers and regional innovation strategies (pp. 82–100). Routledge.
  • Jara-Figueroa, C., Jun, B., Glaeser, E. L., & Hidalgo, C. A. (2018). The role of industry-specific, occupation-specific, and location-specific knowledge in the growth and survival of new firms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(50), 12646–12653. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1800475115
  • Kogler, D. F., Rigby, D. L., & Tucker, I. (2013). Mapping knowledge space and technological relatedness in US cities. European Planning Studies, 21(9), 1374–1391. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.755832
  • Kuznets, S. (1973). Modern economic growth: Findings and reflections. The American Economic Review, 63(3), 247–258. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1914358
  • Maciente, A. N. (2013). The determinants of agglomeration in Brazil: Input–output, labor and knowledge externalities. Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
  • Maskell, P., & Malmberg, A. (1999). Localised learning and industrial competitiveness. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23(2), 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/23.2.167
  • Morceiro, P. C. (2018). Evolution and sectoral competitiveness of the Brazilian manufacturing industry. In E. Amann, C. R. Azzoni, & W. Baer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the Brazilian economy (pp. 243–265). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190499983.001.0001
  • Muneepeerakul, R., Lobo, J., Shutters, S. T., Goméz-Liévano, A., & Qubbaj, M. R. (2013). Urban economies and occupation space: Can they get ‘there’ from ‘here’? PLOS ONE, 8(9), e73676. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073676
  • Neffke, F. (2019). The value of complementary co-workers. Science Advances, 5(12), eaax3370. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax3370
  • Neffke, F., Henning, M., & Boschma, R. (2011). How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography, 87(3), 237–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.x
  • Nooteboom, B. (2000). Learning by interaction: Absorptive capacity, cognitive distance and governance. Journal of Management and Governance, 4(1), 69–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009941416749
  • Reis, E. (2014). Spatial income inequality in Brazil, 1872–2000. EconomiA, 15(2), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econ.2014.06.006
  • Resende, G. M., de Carvalho, A. X. Y., Sakowski, P. A. M., & Cravo, T. A. (2016). Evaluating multiple spatial dimensions of economic growth in Brazil using spatial panel data models. The Annals of Regional Science, 56(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-015-0706-9
  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism. Socialism and Democracy.
  • Shutters, S. T., Muneepeerakul, R., & Lobo, J. (2016). Constrained pathways to a creative urban economy. Urban Studies, 53(16), 3439–3454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015616892
  • Storper, M., & Venables, A. J. (2004). Buzz: Face-to-face contact and the urban economy. Journal of Economic Geography, 4(4), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlecg/lbh027
  • Thompson, W. R., & Thompson, P. R. (1985). From industries to occupations: Rethinking local economic development. Economic Development Commentary, 9(3), 12–18.
  • Torre, A., & Rallet, A. (2005). Proximity and localization. Regional Studies, 39(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320842
  • Ulyssea, G. (2018). Firms, informality, and development: Theory and evidence from Brazil. American Economic Review, 108(8), 2015–2047. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20141745
  • Weitzman, M. L. (1998). Recombinant growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(2), 331–360. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355398555595
  • Whittle, A., & Kogler, D. F. (2020). Related to what? Reviewing the literature on technological relatedness: Where we are now and where can we go? Papers in Regional Science, 99(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12481
  • Wixe, S., & Andersson, M. (2017). Which types of relatedness matter in regional growth? Industry, occupation and education. Regional Studies, 51(4), 523–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1112369
  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2003). Cluster-sample methods in applied econometrics. American Economic Review, 93(2), 133–138. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803321946930
  • Xiao, J., Boschma, R., & Andersson, M. (2018). Industrial diversification in Europe: The differentiated role of relatedness. Economic Geography, 94(5), 514–549. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2018.1444989