Immotility as resilience? A key consideration for transport policy and research

References

• Abbott, Andrew. 2001. Chaos of disciplines. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adey, Peter. 2006. If mobility is everything then it is nothing: Towards a relational politics of (im)mobilities. Mobilities 1, no. 1: 75–94.10.1080/17450100500489080
   Google Scholar
• Alfonzo, Mariela A. 2005. To walk or not to walk? The hierarchy of walking needs. Environment and Behavior 37, no. 6: 808–836.10.1177/0013916504274016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anable, Jillian. 2005. ‘Complacent car addicts’ or ‘aspiring environmentalists’? Identifying travel behaviour segments using attitude theory. Transport Policy 12, no. 1: 65–78.10.1016/j.tranpol.2004.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreotti, Alberta, Patrick le Gales, and Francisco Fuentes. 2012. Transnational mobility and rootedness: The upper middle classes in European cities. Global Networks 13, no. 1: 41–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banister, David. 1999. Planning more to travel less: Land use and transport. Town Planning Review 70, no. 3: 313–338.10.3828/tpr.70.3.e7p3837505516833
   Google Scholar
• Banister, David. 2006. Unsustainable transport: City transport in the new century. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Banister, David. 2008. The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy 15: 73–80.10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banister, David, and Kenneth Button (eds.). 1993. Transport, the environment and sustainable development. London: Spon.
   Google Scholar
• Banister, D., J. Pucher, and M. Lee-Gosselin. 2007. Making sustainable transport politically and publicly acceptable. In Institutions and sustainable transport: Regulatory reform in advanced economies, eds. P. Rietveld and R. Stough, 17–50. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Banister, David, Karen Anderton, David Bonilla, Moshe Givoni, and Tim Schwanen. 2011. Transportation and the environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 36: 247–270.10.1146/annurev-environ-032310-112100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauman, Zygmunt. 1995. Postmodern ethics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Zygmunt. 2005. Work, consumerism and the new poor. Berkshire: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Zygmunt. 2007. Liquid life. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Begg, David, James Cherry, Ben DeCosta, Josef Felder, Malcolm Field, Jim Hunter, Mary Loney, et al. 2011. Report of the Heathrow winter resilience enquiry. Hounslow: British Airports Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Berdica, Katja. 2002. An introduction to road vulnerability: What has been done, is done and should be done. Transport Policy 9, no. 2: 117–127.10.1016/S0967-070X(02)00011-2
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann, Sigurd, and Tore Sager. 2008. In between standstill and hypermobility: Introductory remarks to a broader discourse. In The ethics of mobilities: Rethinking place, exclusion, freedom and environment, eds. Sigurd Bergmann and Tore Sager, 1–9. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Bertolini, Luca. 2006. Fostering urbanity in a mobile society: Linking concepts and practices. Journal of Urban Design 11, no. 3: 319–334.10.1080/13574800600888269
   Google Scholar
• Bertolini, Luca. 2012. Integrating mobility and urban development agendas: A manifesto. DISP 48, no. 1: 16–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertolini, Luca, and Frank le Clercq. 2003. Urban development without more mobility by car? Lessons from Amsterdam, a multimodal urban region. Environment and Planning A 35, no. 4: 575–589.10.1068/a3592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, Roy. 1998. The possibility of naturalism: A philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Birtchnell, Thomas, and Monika Büscher. 2011. Stranded: An eruption of disruption. Mobilities 6, no. 1: 1–9.10.1080/17450101.2011.532648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bissell, David. 2011. Thinking habits for uncertain subjects: Movement, stillness, susceptibility. Environment and Planning A 43, no. 11: 2649–2665.10.1068/a43589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bissell, David, and Gillian Fuller. 2013. Stillness in a mobile world. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bristow, A.L., and J. Nellthorp. 2000. Transport project appraisal in the European Union. Transport Policy 7, no. 1: 51–60.10.1016/S0967-070X(00)00010-X
   Google Scholar
• Choo, Kim-Kwang Raymond. 2011. The cyber threat landscape: Challenges and future research directions. Computers and Security 30, no. 8: 719–731.10.1016/j.cose.2011.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, Matthew. 2011. The case for working with your hands. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, Tim. 2008. Understanding mobility holistically: The case of Hurricane Katrina. In The ethics of mobilities: Rethinking place, exclusion, freedom and environment, eds. Sigurd Bergmann and Tore Sager, 129–140. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. 2012. Mobilities II: Still. Progress in human geography 36, no. 5: 645–653.10.1177/0309132511423349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalziell, Erica, and Alan Nicholson. 2001. Risk and impact of natural hazards on a road network. Journal of Transportation Engineering 127, no. 2: 159–166.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2001)127:2(159)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DfT. 2010. The resilience of England’s transport systems in Winter – An independent review (Final report). London: UK Department for Transport.
   Google Scholar
• Diken, Bülent. 2011. Fire as a metaphor of (im)mobility. Mobilities 6, no. 1: 95–102.10.1080/17450101.2011.532657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodson, J., and N. Sipe. 2008. Shocking the suburbs: Urban location, homeownership and oil vulnerability in the Australian city. Housing Studies 23: 377–401.10.1080/02673030802015619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dovers, Stephen, and John Handmer. 1992. Uncertainty, sustainability and change. Global Environmental Change 2, no. 4: 262–276.10.1016/0959-3780(92)90044-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, Zhen-Ping, and Alan Nicholson. 1997. Degradable transportation systems: Sensitivity and reliability analysis. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 31, no. 3: 225–237.10.1016/S0191-2615(96)00023-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehn, Billy, and Orvar Löfgren. 2010. The secret world of doing nothing. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. 2011. Resilience, ecology and adaptation in the experimental city. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 36, no. 2: 223–237.10.1111/tran.2011.36.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, António, and Peter Batey. 2007. Re-thinking accessibility planning: A multi-layer conceptual framework and its policy implications. Town Planning Review 78, no. 4: 429–458.10.3828/tpr.78.4.3
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, António, Els Beukers, and Marco te Brömmelstroet. 2012. Accessibility is gold, mobility is not: A proposal for the improvement of transport-related Dutch Cost-Benefit Analysis. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 39, no. 4: 683–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, António, Greg Marsden, and Marco Te Brömmelstroet. 2013. What curriculum for Mobility and transport studies? A critical exploration. Transport Reviews 33, no. 5: 501–525.10.1080/01441647.2013.827266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folke, Carl, Stephen Carpenter, Brian Walker, Marten Scheffer, Terry Chapin, and Johan Rockström. 2010. Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society 15, no. 4: 20–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forum Vies Mobiles, L’Obsoco. 2016. “Aspirations for mobility and lifestyles.” Forum Vies Mobiles. http://en.forumviesmobiles.org/project/2016/05/23/aspirations-mobility-and-lifestyles-3246.
   Google Scholar
• Freudendal-Pedersen, Malene, Kevin Hannam, and Sven Kesselring. 2016. Applied mobilities, transitions and opportunities. Applied Mobilities 1, no. 1: 1–9.10.1080/23800127.2016.1150562
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, Phil, and Kurt Van Dender. 2013. ‘Peak car’ – Themes and issues. Transport Reviews 33, no. 3: 243–254.10.1080/01441647.2013.804133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, David, and Michael Wegener. 1997. Sustainable transport. Journal of Transport Geography 5, no. 3: 177–190.10.1016/S0966-6923(97)00013-6
   Google Scholar
• Guiver, Jo, and Juliet Jain. 2011. Grounded: Impacts of and insights from the volcanic ash cloud disruption. Mobilities 6, no. 1: 41–55.10.1080/17450101.2011.532651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handy, Susan. 2002. Accessibility- vs. mobility-enhancing strategies for addressing automobile dependence in the U.S. Davis: Department of Environmental Science and Policy, Prepared for the European Conference of Ministers of Transport.
   Google Scholar
• Handy, Susan, and Kelly Clifton. 2001. Local shopping as a strategy for reducing automobile travel. Transportation 28: 317–346.10.1023/A:1011850618753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannam, Kevin, Mimi Sheller, and John Urry. 2006. Editorial: Mobilities, immobilities and moorings. Mobilities 1, no. 1: 1–22.10.1080/17450100500489189
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, Susan. 2006. Imagine. Journal of Transport Geography 14: 232–233.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hines, Colin. 2000. Localization: A global manifesto. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Holling, C. 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4: 1–23.10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Google Scholar
• Honoré, Carl. 2004. In praise of slowness: Challenging the cult of speed. New York: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, Phil, and Keith Lilley. 2004. Pacemaking the modern city: The urban politics of speed and slowness. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 22, no. 2: 273–294.10.1068/d338t
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull, Angela. 2008. Policy integration: What will it take to achieve more sustainable transport solutions in cities? Transport Policy 15, no. 2: 94–103.10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEA. 2012. “CO2 emissions from fuel combustion – Highlights.” In. Paris: International Energy Agency. http://www.iea.org/co2highlights/co2highlights.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2007. Climate change 2007. Synthesis report: Contribution of working groups I, II, and III to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, Ole. 2009. Flows of meaning, cultures of movements: Urban mobility as meaningful everyday life practice. Mobilities 4, no. 1: 139–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, Peter, and Karen Lucas. 2012. The social consequences of transport decision-making: Clarifying concepts, synthesising knowledge and assessing implications. Journal of Transport Geography 21: 4–16.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong, Martin, and Harry Geerlings. 2003. Exposing weaknesses in interactive planning: The remarkable return of comprehensive policy analysis in The Netherlands. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 21, no. 4: 281–291.10.3152/147154603781766149
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, Vincent. 2002. Re-thinking mobility. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, Vincent. 2011. Rethinking the city. London and Lausanne: Routledge and EPFL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, Vincent, Manfred Bergman, and Dominique Joye. 2004. Motility: Mobility as capital. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 28, no. 4: 745–756.10.1111/ijur.2004.28.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesselring, Sven. 2008. The mobile risk society. In Tracing mobilities: Towards a cosmopolitan perspective, eds. Weert Canzler, Vincent Kaufmann and Sven Kesselring, 77–102. London: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, Jonathan, Lorraine Whitmarsh, Björn Nykvist, Michel Schilperoord, Noam Bergman, and Alex Haxeltine. 2009. A transitions model for sustainable mobility. Ecological Economics 68, no. 12: 2985–2995.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.06.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, Glenn, and Kiron Chatterjee (eds.). 2002. Transport lessons from the fuel tax protests of 2000. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, Danny, and Kate Derickson. 2013. From resilience to resourcefulness. Progress in Human Geography 37, no. 2: 253–270.10.1177/0309132512454775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsden, Greg, and Iain Docherty. 2012. “‘Disruption’: A useful metaphor for transport policy change?” World Conference on Transport Research 13: Urban transport policies towards sustainability (Special Interest Group), Vienna, Austria, March 14–16.
   Google Scholar
• Marsden, G., and I. Docherty. 2013. Insights on disruptions as opportunities for transport policy change. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 51: 46–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moriarty, Patrick, and Damon Honnery. 2008. Low-mobility: The future of transport. Futures 40, no. 10: 865–872.10.1016/j.futures.2008.07.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morozov, Evgeny. 2014. To save everything, click here: Technology, solutionism, and the urge to fix problems that don’t exist. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Næss, Petter. 2005. Residential location affects travel behavior – but how and why? The case of Copenhagen metropolitan area. Progress in Planning 63, no. 2: 167–257.10.1016/j.progress.2004.07.004
   Google Scholar
• Næss, Petter. 2006a. Accessibility, activity participation and location of activities: Exploring the links between residential location and travel behaviour. Urban Studies 43, no. 3: 627–652.10.1080/00420980500534677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næss, Petter. 2006b. Cost-benefit analyses of transportation investments: Neither critical nor realistic. Journal of Critical Realism 5, no. 1: 32–60.
   Google Scholar
• Næss, P. 2015. Critical realism, urban planning and urban research. European Planning Studies 23, no. 6: 1228–1244.10.1080/09654313.2014.994091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næss, Petter. 2016. Built environment, causality and urban planning. Planning Theory and Practice 17, no. 1: 52–71.10.1080/14649357.2015.1127994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næss, P., and A. Strand. 2012. What kinds of traffic forecasts are possible? Journal of Critical Realism 11: 277–295.10.1558/jcr.v11i3.277
   Google Scholar
• Nijkamp, Peter. 1994. Roads toward environmentally sustainable transport. Transportation Research A 28, no. 4: 261–271.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, Sarah. 2008. Sense and sustainability: The case of the Slow City movement. Local Environment 13, no. 2: 95–106.10.1080/13549830701581895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rémy, Jean, and Liliane Voyé. 1992. La ville: Vers une nouvelle définition? [The city: Towards a new definition?]. Paris: Éditions L’Harmattan.
   Google Scholar
• Rosa, Hartmut. 2015. Social acceleration: A new theory of modernity. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sager, Tore. 2008. Mobility as stress regulation: A challenge to dialogue in planning? In The ethics of mobilities: Rethinking place, exclusion, freedom and environment, eds. Sigurd Bergmann and Tore Sager, 103–127. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Schwanen, Tim, Martin Dijst, and Mei-Po Kwan. 2008. ICTs and the decoupling of everyday activities, space and time: Introduction. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 99, no. 5: 519–527.10.1111/tesg.2008.99.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwanen, Tim, David Banister, and Jillian Anable. 2011. Scientific research about climate change mitigation in transport: A critical review. Transportation Research A 45: 993–1006.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. 1998. The corrosion of character: The personal consequences of work in the new capitalism. London: W. W Norton and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Sheller, Mimi, and John Urry. 2016. Mobilizing the new mobilities paradigm. Applied Mobilities 1, no. 1: 10–25.10.1080/23800127.2016.1151216
   Google Scholar
• Shove, Elizabeth, and Gordon Walker. 2007. CAUTION! Transitions ahead: Politics, practice, and sustainable transition management. Environment and Planning A 39, no. 4: 763–770.10.1068/a39310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, Elizabeth, Mika Pantzar, and Matt Watson. 2012. The dynamics of social practice: Everyday life and how it changes. London: Sage.10.4135/9781446250655
   Google Scholar
• Simmel, G. 1971. The metropolis and mental life. In Georg Simmel: On individuality and social forms, ed. Donald N. Lievine, 324–339. Glencoe: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tahmisoğlu, Mete, and Cinar Özen, eds. 2009. Transportation security against terrorism. Vol. 54, NATO Science for Peace and Security Series E: Human and Societal Dynamics. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tainter, Joseph. 1988. The collapse of complex societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Timms, Paul, Miles Tight, and David Watling. 2014. Imagineering mobility: Constructing utopias for future urban transport. Environment and Planning A 46, no. 1: 78–93.10.1068/a45669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vendemmia, Bruna. 2015. What spaces for highly mobile people? Analyzing emerging practices of mobility in Italy. PhD, Dipartimento di Architettura e Studi Urbani, Politecnico di Milano.
   Google Scholar
• Viry, Gil, and Vincent Kaufmann (eds.). 2015. High mobility in Europe: Work and personal life. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Viry, Gil, and Stephanie Vincent-Geslin. 2015. High mobility over the life course. In High Mobility in Europe, eds. Gil Viry and Vincent Kaufmann, 83–100. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137447388
   Google Scholar
• Viry, Gil, Emmanuel Ravalet, and Vincent Kaufmann. 2015. High mobility in Europe: An overview. In High Mobility in Europe, eds. Gil Viry and Vincent Kaufmann, 29–58. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137447388
   Google Scholar
• Walker, Brian, C. Holling, Stephen Carpenter, and Ann Kinzig. 2004. Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 9, no. 2: 5.10.5751/ES-00650-090205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, Cathy. 2012. Social-ecological resilience: Insights and issues for planning theory. Planning Theory 11, no. 2: 148–169.10.1177/1473095211426274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witter, Regina. 2012. Public urban transport, mobility patterns and social exclusion: The case of Santiago de Chile. PhD. Laboratoire de Sociologie Urbaine, École Plytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne.
   Google Scholar
• Xue, J., J. Walnum, C. Aall, and P. Næss. 2017. “Two contrasting scenarios for a zero-emission future in a high-consumption society.” Sustainability 9, no. 1: 20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar