Assessing the accessibility of urban nodes: the case of TEN-T railway stations in Europe

References

• Apostol, I. 2013. “Railway Stations as Interface between the Local and the Global.” Paper Presented at Joint AESOP/ACSP Congress, Planning for Resilient Cities and Regions. Proceedings held on 15–19 July 2013 in Dublin. Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Arcadis. 2015. “Our Mobile Future: Developing City Value & Prosperity Through Mobility Oriented Developments.” Accessed April 2 2018. https://www.arcadis.com/media/2/4/0/%7B240EF743-54E0-405F-8F54-50791BB50519%7DArcadis-Our-Mobile-Future-MODe-FINAL%20REPORT.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Banister, D., and P. Hall. 1993. “The Second Railway Age.” Built Environment 19 (3–4): 157–162.
   Google Scholar
• Bertolini, L. 1996. “Nodes and Places: Complexities of Railway Station Redevelopment.” European Planning Studies 4 (3): 331–345. doi:10.1080/09654319608720349.
   Google Scholar
• Bertolini, L., C. Curtis, and J. Renne. 2012. “Station Area Projects in Europe and Beyond: Towards Transit Oriented Development.” Built Environment 38 (1): 31–50. doi:10.2148/benv.38.1.31.
   Google Scholar
• Bros, M., M. Givoni, and P. Rietveld. 2009. “Access to Railway Stations and Its Potential in Increasing Rail Use.” Transport Research Part A 43: 136–149.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, P., and J. Andersen. 2013. Deliverable 2.3: Lessons from Descriptive Case Studies – Recommendations for City-HUB Model. EU project: City-HUB. Accessed April 3 2018. http://www.cityhub.imet.gr/Default.aspx?tabid=96
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. 2010. “Towards a Politics of Mobility.” Environment and Planning D 28: 17–31. doi:10.1068/d11407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawkins, C., and R. Moeckel. 2016. “Transit-Induced Gentrification: Who Will Stay, and Who Will Go?” Housing Policy Debate 26 (4–5): 801–818. doi:10.1080/10511482.2016.1138986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debrezion, G., E. Pels, and P. Rietveld. 2009. “Modeling the Joint Access Mode and Railway Station Choice.” Transportation Research Part E 45: 270–283. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2008.07.001.
   Google Scholar
• Denscomb, M. 2017. The Good Research Guide: For Small-Scale Social Research Projects. 6th ed. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Transport. 2015. Transport Connectivity Travel Time Indicators: Guidance Notes. Accessed April 2 2018. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/journey-time-statistics-guidance
   Google Scholar
• Edensor, T. 2016. “Introduction: Thinking about Rhythm and Space.” In Geographies of Ryhthem: Nature Place, Mobilities and Bodies, edited by T. Edensor, 13–30. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2013. Annex, A Concept for Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans to the‘Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions - Together towards competitive and resource-efficient urban mobility’ (COM(2013) 913 final). Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. 2013. “TEN-T Regulation.” Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, L. D., J. F. Sallis, T. L. Conway, J. E. Chapman, B. E. Saelens, and W. Bachman. 2006. “Many Pathways from Land Use to Health: Associations between Neighborhood Walkability and Active Transportation, Body Mass Index, and Air Quality.” Journal of the American Planning Association 72 (1): 75–87. doi:10.1080/01944360608976725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, L. D., T. L. Schmid, J. F. Sallis, C. James, and B. E. Saelens. 2005. “Linking Objectively Measured Physical Activity with Objectively Measured Urban Form. Findings from SMARTRAQ.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 28: 117–125. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2004.11.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galiza, R., and P. Charles. 2013. Improving Rail Station Access in Australia, Brisbane: CRC for Rail Innovation. Project No.: R1.133. Brisbane: CRC for Rail Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Palomares, J. C., and J. Guiéterrez. 2013. “Walking Accessibility to Public Transport. An Analysis Based on Microdata and GIS.” Environment and Planning B 40: 1087–1102. doi:10.1068/b39008.
   Google Scholar
• Garmendia, M., C. Ribalaygua, and J. M. Urena. 2012. “High Speed Rail: Implication for Cities.” Cities 29: S26–S31. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2012.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geurs, K. T., and B. Van Wee. 2004. “Accessibility Evaluation of Land-Use and Transport Strategies: Review and Research Directions.” Journal of Transport Geography 12: 127–140. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005.
   Google Scholar
• Givoni, M., and P. Rietveld. 2007. “The Access Journey to the Railway Station and Its Role in Passengers’ Satisfaction with Rail Travel.” Transport Policy 14: 357–365. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannam, K., M. Sheller, and J. Urry. 2006. “Editotial: Mobilities, Immobilities and Moorings.” Mobilities 1 (1): 1–22. doi:10.1080/17450100500489189.
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez, S., and A. Monzon. 2016. “Key Factors for Defining an Efficient Urban Transport Interchange: User’s Perceptions.” Cities 50: 158–167. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2015.09.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ITDP (Institute for Transportation and Development Policy). 2018. Pedestrians Frist, Tool for Walkability City. 1st ed. New York: ITDP.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, O. B. 2018. “Urban Design for Mobilities – Towards Material Pragmatism.” Urban Development Issues 55: 5–11. doi:10.2478/udi-2018-0012.
   Google Scholar
• Kesselring, S. 2006. “Pioneering Mobilities: New Patterns of Movement and Motility in a Mobile World.” Environment and Planning A 38: 269–279. doi:10.1068/a37279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesselring, S. 2015. “Corporate Mobilities Regimes. Mobility, Power and the Socio-Geographical Structurations of Mobile Work.” Mobilities 10 (4): 571–591. doi:10.1080/17450101.2014.887249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhnimhof, T., C. Schlosser, M. Wirtz, and J. Last. 2007. “Central Issues in Passenger Intermodality (Deliverable 1).” EU project: KITE - A Knowledge Base for Intermodal Passenger Travel in Europe. Karlsruhe: Institute for Transport Studies, University of Karlsruhe.
   Google Scholar
• La Paix, L., and K. T. Geurs. 2016. “Train Station Access and Train Use: A Joint Stated and Revealed Preference Choice Modeling Study.” In Accessibility, Equity and Efficiency: Challenges for Transport and Public Services, edited by K. T. Geurs, R. Patuelli, and T. Ponce Dentinho, 144–166. Cheltenham: Edwar Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Landeshaupstadt Düsseldorf. 2017. Demographie-Monitoring Düsseldorf 2012–2017. Accessed March 5 2018. https://www.duesseldorf.de/fileadmin/Amt12/statistik/stadtforschung/download/Demografie-Monitoring2012bis2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. 2004. Rhythmanalysis – Space, Time and Everyday Life. Translated by Elden, S. and Moore, G. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Malicet, M., P. van Egmond, L. Lucietti, C. Hoogendoorn, and P. Skoniezki 2013. Intermodality and ICT, a Benchmark Tool (Deliverable 3.4.2 - Final). EU project: NODES. Brussels: UITP.
   Google Scholar
• Middleton, J. 2018. “The Socialities of Everyday Urban Walking and the ‘Right to the City’.” Urban Studies 55 (2): 296–315. doi:10.1177/0042098016649325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monzon, A., E. Ortega, and E. Lopez. 2016. “Influence of the First and Last Mile on HSR Accessibility Levels.” In Accessibility, Equity and Efficiency: Challenges for Transport and Public Services, edited by K. T. Geurs, R. Patuelli, and T. Ponce Dentinho, 125–143. Cheltenham: Edwar Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, N., A Goode, B. Fjeldsoe, T. Sugiyama, and E. Eakin. 2012. “Designing for the Dissemination of Environmental and Policy Initiatives and Programs for High-Risk Groups.“ In Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health Translating Science to Practice, edited by R. C. Brownson, G. A. Colditz, and E. K. Proctor, 114–127. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199751877.003.0006
   Google Scholar
• Papa, E., and L. Bertolini. 2015. “Accessibility and Transit-Oriented Development in European Metropolitan Areas.” Journal of Transport Geography 47: 70–83. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, D., and J. Novy. 2012. “Rail Station Mega-Projects: Overlooked Centrepieces in the Complex Puzzle of Urban Restructuring in Europe.” Built Environment 38 (1): 5–12. doi:10.2148/benv.38.1.5.
   Google Scholar
• Rietveld, P. 2000. “The Accessibility of Railway Stations: The Role of the Bicycle in the Netherlands.” Transportation Research Part D 5: 71–75. doi:10.1016/S1361-9209(99)00019-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rode, P., and G. Floater. 2014. “Accessibility in Cities: Transport and Urban Form.” NCE Cities Paper 03. LSE Cities. London: London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE).
   Google Scholar
• Saelens, B. E., J. F. Sallis, J. B. Black, and D. Chen. 2003. “Neighborhood-Based Differences in Physical Activity. An Environment Scale Evaluation. American.” Journal of Public Health 93 (9): 1552–1558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semler, C., and C. Hale. 2010. “Rail Station Access – An Assessment of Options.” CRC for Rail Innovation. Project No. R1.123. Brisbane: CRC for Rail Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Sheller, M., and J. Urry. 2006. “The New Mobilities Paradigm.” Environment and Planning A 38: 207–226. doi:10.1068/a37268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, Y. J., P. Fard, M. Zuidgeest, M. Brussel, and M. van Maarseveen. 2014. “Measuring Transit Oriented Development: A Spatial Multi Criteria Assessment Approach for the City Region Arnhem and Nijmegen.” Journal of Transport Geography 35: 130–143. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.01.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton, N. A., R. C. McIlroy, C. Harvey, S. Blainey, A. Hickford, J. M. Preston, and B. Ryan. 2012. “Following the Cognitive Work Analysis Train of Thought: Exploring the Constraints of Modal Shift to Rail Transport.” Ergonomics 56 (3): 522–540. doi:10.1080/00140139.2012.718366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TU Dresden. 2015. Mobilität der Düsseldorfer Bevölkerung 2013 (SrV 2013), Ergebnisse. Accessed March 5 2018. https://www.duesseldorf.de/fileadmin/Amt66/verkehrsmanagement/pdf/schlussbericht_srv13.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. 2007. Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vale, D. S. 2015. “Transit-Oriented Development, Integration of Land Use and Transport, and Pedestrian Accessibility: Combining Node-Place Model with Pedestrian Shed Ratio to Evaluate and Classify Station Areas in Lisbon.” Journal of Transport Geography 45: 70–80. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.04.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Hoeven, F., A. van Nes, S. van der Spek, J. Albecoa, P. Skoniezki, H. Berends, A. Venema, M. van Hagen, and I. Cré. 2013. State of the Art (Deliverable 2.1 - Final). EU project: NODES. Accessed February 25 2017. http://www.nodes-interchanges.eu/documents/2014/05/nodes_wp2_d2-3_final-3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Van Egmond, P., and M. Van Hagen. 2016. CIVITAS E-Course ‘Quality of Public Transport Interchanges, the Customer Point of View’. CIVITAS Learning Centre. Accessed February 25 2017. http://civitaslearningcenter.talentlms.com/catalog/info/id:158
   Google Scholar
• Venter, C. 2016. Developing a Common Narrative on Urban Accessibility: A Transport Perspective. Brookings Institution. Accessed February 25 2017. https://www.brookings.edu/research/developing-common-narrative-urban-accessibility-transportation/
   Google Scholar
• Vickerman, R. 2015. “High-Speed Rail and Regional Development: The Case of Intermediate Stations.” Journal of Transport Geography 42: 157–165. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.06.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zemp, Z., M. Stauffacher, D. J. Lang, and R. W. Scholz. 2011. “Classifying Railway Stations for Strategic Transport and Land Use Planning: Context Matters!” Journal of Transport Geography 19: 670–679. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar