Cycling policy futures: diversifying governance, expertise and the culture of everyday mobilities

References

• Aldred, R. 2012. “Governing Transport from Welfare State to Hollow State: The Case of Cycling in the UK.” Transport Policy 23: 5–102. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.05.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäckstrand, K. 2006. “Civic Science for Sustainability: Reframing the Role of Experts, Policy-Makers and Citizens in Environmental Governance.” Global Environmental Politics 3 (4): 24–41. doi:10.1162/152638003322757916.
   Google Scholar
• Banister, D. 2005. Unsustainble Transport: City Transport in the New Century. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Banister, D. 2008. “The Sustainable Mobility Paradigm.” Transport Policy 15 (2): 73–80. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumann, C. 2012. “Making Better Choices–An Investigation of Collaborative Stakeholder Dialogue as Catalyst for Consensus Building and Learning in the Transport Policy Process.” Dissertation, University of Technology, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Baureferat. 2005. “Realisierungsnetz Radfahrverbindungen in München: Fortschreibung.” Sitzungsvorlage Nr. 02-08/V06223. Accessed 11 November 2013. http://www.ris-muenchen.de/
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, K., and J. Urry. 2009. After the Car. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Docherty, I., and J. Shaw. 2012. “The Governance of Transport Policy.“ In Automobility in Transition?: A socio-technical analysis of sustainable transport, edited by F. Geels, R. Kemp, G. Dudley, and G. Lyons, 104–122. London: Routlede
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. 2003. Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices. Oxford: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. “Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 12 (2): 219–245. doi:10.1177/1077800405284363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F., R. Kemp, G. Dudley, and G. Lyons, eds. 2012. Automobility in Transition? A Socio-technical Analysis of Sustainable Transport. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of a Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. 1995. The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, D. 1995. “Discourse Theory.” In Theory and Methods in Political Science, edited by D. Marsh and G. Stoker, 115–133. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, M. W., and L. J. Phillips. 2002. Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, R. 2013. Doing Discourse Research: An Introduction for Social Scientists. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kesselring, S. 2001. Mobile Politik. Ein soziologischer Blick auf Verkehrspolitik in München. Berlin: Edition Sigma.
   Google Scholar
• Klühspies, K. 2015. München – nicht wie geplant: Stadtpolitik, Bürgerwille und die Macht der Medien. München: Franz Schiermeier Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Landeshauptstadt München. 1963. “Stadtentwicklungsplan mit Gesamtverkehrsplan, 1963, gekürzte Fassung.” Accessed 1 February 2016. http://www.muenchen.de/
   Google Scholar
• Landeshauptstadt München. 1983. “Materialien zum Stadtentwicklungsplan.” Referat für Stadtplanung und Bauordnung, 88. Stadtarchiv München.
   Google Scholar
• Landeshauptstadt München. 2009. “Radverkehr in München – Grundsatzbeschluss zur Förderung des Radverkehrs in München, 2009.” Sitzungsvorlagen Nr. 08-14/V 01793. Accessed 23 January 2014. http://www.ris-muenchen.de/, 2–4.
   Google Scholar
• Lindenau, M., and S. Böhler-Baedeker. 2014. “Citizen and Stakeholder Involvement: A Precondition for Sustainable Urban Mobility.” Transportation Research Procedia 4: 347–360. doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2014.11.026.
   Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J. 2007. “Who Is in Charge Here? Governance for Sustainable Development in a Complex World.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 9: 299–314. doi:10.1080/15239080701631544.
   Google Scholar
• Schmucki, B. 2001. Der Traum vom Verkehrsfluss: städtische Verkehrsplanung seit 1945 im deutsch-deutschen Vergleich. Frankfurt/Main: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Schwedes, O. 2011. “The Field Of Transport Policy: an Initial Approach.” German Policy Studies 7: 7-41.
   Google Scholar
• Sheller, M. 2012. “The Emergence of New Cultures of Mobility: Stability, Openings and Prospects.” In Automobility in Transition? A Socio-technical Analysis of Sustainable Transport, edited by F. Geels, R. Kemp, G. Dudley, and G. Lyons, 180–202. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shore, C., and S. Wright. 2011. “Conceptualising Policy: Technologies of Governance and the Politics of Visibility.” In Policy Worlds: Anthropology and the Analysis of Contemporary Power, edited by C. Shore, S. Wright, and P. David. 1-25. New York: Berghan Books.
   Google Scholar
• Tschoerner-Budde, C. 2019. Sustainable Mobility in Munich: Exploring the Role of Discourse in Policy Change. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. 2000. Sociology beyond Societies: Mobilities for the Twenty-first Century. International Library of Sociology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. 2004. “The ‘System’ of Automobility.” Theory, Culture & Society 21 (4/5): 25–39. doi:10.1177/0263276404046059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H. 2011. Meaning in Action: Interpretation and Dialogue in Policy Analysis. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Yanow, D. 1999. Conducting Interpretive Policy Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar