Situated (im)mobilities research in the mobile risk society: the dispersed management of risk of contagion in public transport

References

• Ayaß, R. 2014. “Using Media as Involvement Shields.” Journal of Pragmatics 72: 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, U. 1986/1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. 1996. “World Risk Society as Cosmopolitan Society? Ecological Questions in a Framework of Manufactured Uncertainties.” Theory, Culture & Society 13 (4): 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276496013004001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, U., W. Bonss, and C. Lau. 2003. “The Theory of Reflexive Modernization: Problematic, Hypotheses and Research Programme.” Theory, Culture & Society 20 (2): 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276403020002001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bissell, D. 2010. “Passenger Mobilities: Affective Atmospheres and the Sociality of Public Transport.” Environment and Planning: D, Society & Space 28 (2): 270–289. https://doi.org/10.1068/d3909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bissell, D. 2016. “Micropolitics of Mobility: Public Transport Commuting and Everyday Encounters with Forces of Enablement and Constraint.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 106 (2): 394–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2015.1100057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjørner, T. 2016. “Time Use on Trains: Media Use/non-Use and Complex Shifts in Activities.” Mobilities 11 (5): 681–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2015.1076619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. 2006. On the Move: Mobility in the Modern Western World. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203446713.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. 2021. “Valuing Mobility in a Post COVID-19 World.” Mobilities 16 (1): 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2020.1863550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drury, J., and E. Stokoe. 2021. “The Interactional Production and Breach of New Norms in the Time of COVID‐19: Achieving Physical Distancing in Public Spaces.” British Journal of Social Psychology 61 (3): 971–990. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrester, M. A., D. Reason, and E. Stokoe. 2006. “Competency and Participation in Acquiring a Mastery of Language: A Reconsideration of the Idea of Membership.” The Sociological Review 54 (3): 446–466. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2006.00625.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1983. “The Subject and Power.” In Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, edited by H. Dreyfus and P. Rabinow, 208–226. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1997. The Politics of Truth, edited by Sylvère Lotringer. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
   Google Scholar
• Freudendal-Pedersen, M. 2009. Mobility in Daily Life: Between Freedom and Unfreedom. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Freudendal-Pedersen, M. 2015. “Cyclists as Part of the City’s Organism: Structural Stories on Cycling in Copenhagen.” City & Society 27 (1): 30–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/ciso.12051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freudendal-Pedersen, M., and S. Kesselring. 2016. “Mobilities, Futures & the City: Repositioning Discourses - Changing Perspectives - Rethinking Policies.” Mobilities 11 (4): 575–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2016.1211825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freudendal-Pedersen, M., and S. Kesselring. 2021. “What is the Urban without Physical Mobilities? COVID-19-Induced Immobility in the Mobile Risk Society.” Mobilities 16 (1): 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2020.1846436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freudendal-Pedersen, M., K. Sven, and Z. Dennis. 2020. “Sharing Mobilities and the Mobile Risk Society. An Introduction.” In Sharing Mobilities: New Perspectives for the Mobile Risk Society, edited by S. Kesselring, M. Freudendal-Pedersen, and D. Zuev, 1–15. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429489242-1.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. 2002. Ethnomethodology’s Program: Working Out Durkeim’s Aphorism. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gerlinde, V. 2013. “The New Mobilities Regimes.” In New Mobilities Regimes. The Analytical Power of the Social Sciences and Arts, edited by S. Witzgall, G. Vogl, and S. Kesselring, 17–36. Burlington: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin books ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1983. “The Interaction Order.” American Sociological Review 48 (1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. 1984. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez, D. 2018. “Uneven Mobilities, Uneven Opportunities: Social Distribution of Public Transport Accessibility to Jobs and Education in Montevideo.” Journal of Transport Geography 67:119–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.08.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, A., K. Mee, and A. Tyndall. 2017. “‘Super Simple Stuff?’: Crafting Quiet in Trains Between Newcastle and Sydney.” Mobilities 12 (5): 740–757. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2016.1191797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchby, I., and R. Wooffitt. 1998. Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices, and Applications. Malden, Mass: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jayyusi, L. 1984. Categorization and the Moral Order. Boston: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, O. B. 2021. “Pandemic Disruption, Extended Bodies, and Elastic Situations - Reflections on COVID-19 and Mobilities.” Mobilities 16 (1): 66–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2021.1867296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesselring, S. 2008. “The Mobile Risk Society.” In Tracing Mobilities: Towards a Cosmopolitan Perspective, edited by W. Canzler, V. Kaufmann, and S. Kesselring, 77–102. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Koefoed, L., M. Dissing Christensen, and K. Simonsen. 2017. “Mobile Encounters: Bus 5A as a Cross-Cultural Meeting Place.” Mobilities 12 (5): 726–739. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2016.1181487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1990. “Drawing Things Together.” In Representation in Scientific Practice, edited by M. Lynch and S. Woolgar, 19–68. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laurier, E. 2014. “The Graphic Transcript: Poaching Comic Book Grammar for Inscribing the Visual, Spatial and Temporal Aspects of Action.” Geography Compass 8 (4): 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12123.
   Google Scholar
• Laurier, E. 2019. “The Panel Show: Further Experiments with Graphic Transcripts and Vignettes.” Social Interaction: Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality 2 (1). https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v2i1.113968.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. 2004. Rhythmanalysis: Space, Time, and Everyday Life. London: Continuum. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472547385.
   Google Scholar
• Lippert, R. 2010. “Mundane and Mutant Devices of Power: Business Improvement Districts and Sanctuaries.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 13 (4): 477–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549410377155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. 2013. Risk. 2nd ed. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203070161.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, L., and K. Doughty. 2016. “Interdependent, Imagined, and Embodied Mobilities in Mobile Social Space: Disruptions in ‘Normality’, ‘Habit’ and ‘Routine’.” Journal of Transport Geography 55:72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolaeva, A., P. Adey, T. Cresswell, J. Yeonjae Lee, A. Novoa, and C. Temenos. 2019. “Commoning Mobility: Towards a New Politics of Mobility Transitions.” Transactions - Institute of British Geographers (1965) 44 (2): 346–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterle, G. 2021. Comics as a Research Practice. Drawing Narrative Geographies Beyond the Frame. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ravalet, E., S. Vincent-Geslin, V. Kaufmann, and J. Leveugle. 2014. Slices of (Mobile) Life. A Sociological Survey and Manifesto on Work-Related High Mobility. Paris: Loco Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. 1999. Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. 1st ed. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488856.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. 1984. “On Doing “Being Ordinary.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, edited by J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage, 413–429. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511665868.024.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. 1988. “On members’ Measurement Systems.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 22:45–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351818809389297.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. 1992. Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., E. A. Schegloff, and G. Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language (Baltimore) 50 (4): 696–735. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. J. 2017. “The Practical Organisation of Space, Interaction, and Communication in and as the Work of Crossing a Shared Space Intersection.” Sociologica 2:1–32. https://doi.org/10.2383/88200.
   Google Scholar
• Stevanovic, M., and A. Peräkylä. 2012. “Deontic Authority in Interaction: The Right to Announce, Propose, and Decide.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (3): 297–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.699260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., L. Mondada, J. Steensig, T. Stivers, L. Mondada, and J. Steensig. 2011. The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921674.
   Google Scholar
• Stokoe, E. 2012. “Moving Forward with Membership Categorization Analysis: Methods for Systematic Analysis.” Discourse Studies 14 (3): 277–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612441534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Melik, R., and D. van de Schraaf. 2020. “Mobile Devices and Their Effect on the Sociality on Dutch Intercity Trains.” Mobilities 15 (3): 380–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2020.1733784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, R. 1978. “Categorization, Authorization and Blame-Negotiation in Conversation.” Sociology 12 (1): 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/003803857801200106.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, R. 1997. “Some General Reflections on ‘Categorization’ and ‘Sequence’ in the Analysis of Conversation Culture in Action.” In Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis, edited by S. Hester and P. Eglin, 49–76. London: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, L., and J. Urry. 2008. “Moving Methods, Travelling Times.” Environment and Planning: D, Society & Space 26 (5): 860–874. https://doi.org/10.1068/d6707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, I. 2001. “Social Theories of Risk Perception: At Once Indispensable and Insufficient.” Current Sociology 49 (1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392101049001002.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S., and C. Kitzinger. 2006. “Surprise as an Interactional Achievement: Reaction Tokens in Conversation.” Social Psychology Quarterly 69 (2): 150–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250606900203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar