Saving the rules from the exceptions? John Millar, the Scottish Enlightenment and the history of the family

Bibliography

• Berry, Christopher. The Social Theory of the Scottish Enlightenment. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Binoche, Bertrand. Les trois sources des philosophies de l’histoire (1764–1798). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Bowles, Paul. “John Millar, the Four-Stage Theory, and Women’s Position in Society.” History of Political Economy 16 (1984): 619–638. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-16-4-619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran, Andrew. “Rethinking Race History: The Role of the Albino in the French Enlightenment Life Sciences.” History and Theory 48, no. 3 (2009): 151–179. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2303.2009.00502.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daston, Lorraine. “Enlightenment Fears, Fears of Enlightenment.” In What’s Left of the Enlightenment? A Postmodern Question, edited by Keith Michael Baker and Peter Hans Reill. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes, Duncan. “Scientific Whiggism: Adam Smith and John Millar.” Cambridge Journal 7 (1954): 643–670.
   Google Scholar
• Haakonssen, Knud. “John Millar and the Science of a Legislator.” In Natural Law and Moral Philosophy, edited by Knud Haakonsse, 154–181. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Ignatieff, Michael. “John Millar and Individualism.” In Wealth and Virtue: The Shaping of Political Economy in the Scottish Enlightenment, edited by Istvan Hont, and Michael Ignatieff, 317–344. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann, William C. John Millar of Glasgow, 1735–1801: His Life and Thought and His Contributions to Sociological Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960.
   Google Scholar
• Meek, Ronald L. “The Scottish Contribution to Marxist Sociology.” In Democracy and the Labour Movement, edited by J. Saville, 84–102. London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1954.
   Google Scholar
• Meek, Ronald L. Social Science and the Ignoble Savage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, John. An Historical View of the English Government (1787). Edited by Mark Salber Philips and Dale R. Smith. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, John. The Origin of the Distinction of Ranks (1771/1806). Editedby Aaron Garrett. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Nicholas B. John Millar and the Scottish Enlightenment: Family Life and World History. Oxford: Voltaire Foundtion, Oxford University Studies in the Enlightenment, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, James, and Michael. Silverthorne. “Gershom Carmichael and the Natural Jurisprudence Tradition in Eighteenth-Century Scotland.” In Wealth and Virtue: The Shaping of Political Economy in the Scottish Enlightenment, edited by Istvan Hont, and Michael Ignatieff, 73–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, Karen. Women and Enlightenment in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, Richard. “Sex and Status in Scottish Enlightenment Social Science: John Millar and the Sociology of Gender Roles.” History of the Human Sciences 11, no. 1 (1998): 73–100. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/095269519801100104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascal, Roy. “Property and Society. The Scottish Historical School of the Eighteenth Century.” Modern Quarterly I (1938): 167–179.
   Google Scholar
• Pocock, J. G. A. The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Republican Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Pocock, J. G. A. “The Varieties of Whiggism from Exclusion to Reform: A History of Ideology and Discourse.” In Virtue, Commerce and History. Essays on Political Thought and History, Chiefly in the Eighteenth Century, 215–310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Sebastiani, Silvia. The Scottish Enlightenment: Race, Gender and the Limits of Progress. Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Justin E. Nature, Human Nature, and Human Difference: Race in Early Modern Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Paul B. “The Materialist Interpretation of John Millar’s Philosophic History: Towards a Critical Appraisal”. Glasgow: University of Glasgow, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Tomaselli, Sylvana. “The Enlightenment Debate on Women.” History Workshop Journal 20 (1985): 101–124. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/hwj/20.1.101
   Google Scholar