‘Slippery turns’: Rhetoric and politics in Shakespeare’s Coriolanus

Bibliography

• Anon. Rhetorica ad Herennium. Edited by Harry Caplan. Cambridge, MA, 1954.
   Google Scholar
• Bodin, Jean. The Six Bookes of a Common-Weale. Translated by Richard Knolles. London, 1606.
   Google Scholar
• Calderwood, James L. “Coriolanus: Wordless Meanings and Meaningless Words.” Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900 6 (1966): 211–224. doi: 10.2307/449633
   Google Scholar
• Colclough, David. “Talking to the Animals: Persuasion, Counsel and Their Discontents in Julius Caesar.” In Shakespeare and Early Modern Political Thought, edited by David Armitage, Conal Condren, and Andrew Fitzmaurice, 217–233. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Fish, Stanley. Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Greenblatt, Stephen. Tyrant: Shakespeare on Politics. New York: Norton, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. Edited by Richard Tuck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, Victoria. Machiavellian Rhetoric: From the Counter-Reformation to Milton. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Machiavelli, Niccolò. The Prince. Edited by Quentin Skinner and Russell Price. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Muir, Kenneth. “The Background of Coriolanus.” Shakespeare Quarterly 10 (1959): 137–146. doi: 10.2307/2866918
   Google Scholar
• Norbrook, David. “Rehearsing the Plebeians: Coriolanus and the Reading of Roman History.” In Shakespeare and the Politics of Commoners: Digesting the New Social History, edited by Chris Fitter, 180–216. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Peltonen, Markku. “Political Rhetoric and Citizenship in Coriolanus.” In Shakespeare and Early Modern Political Thought, edited by David Armitage, Conal Condren, and Andrew Fitzmaurice, 234–252. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Plotz, John. “Coriolanus and the Failure of Performatives.” ELH 63, no. 4 (1996): 809–832. doi: 10.1353/elh.1996.0031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plutarch. The Lives of the Noble Grecians and Romans, Compared. Translated by Thomas North. London, 1579.
   Google Scholar
• Plutarch. “How a Man may Discern a Flatterer from a Friend.” In The Philosophie, Commonlie Called the Morals, translated by Philemon Holland. London, 1603.
   Google Scholar
• Pollack-Pelzner, Daniel. “Behold, Steve Bannon’s Hip-Hop Shakespeare Rewrite: ‘Coriolanus’”, in The New York Times online. Accessed 22 April 2019. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/17/opinion/sunday/steve-bannon-hip-hop-shakespeare-ewrite-coriolanus.html.
   Google Scholar
• Puttenham, George. The Arte of English Poesie. London, 1589.
   Google Scholar
• Rebhorn, Wayne A. The Emperor of Men’s Minds: Literature and the Renaissance Discourse of Rhetoric. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Rebhorn, Wayne A., ed. Renaissance Debates on Rhetoric. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, William. Coriolanus. Edited by Peter Holland. London: Bloomsbury, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Shrank, Cathy. “Civility and the City in Coriolanus.” Shakespeare Quarterly 54 (2003): 406–423. doi: 10.1353/shq.2004.0035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sicherman, Carol. “Coriolanus: The Failure of Words.” ELH 39 (1972): 189–207. doi: 10.2307/2872242
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, Quentin. “Moral Ambiguity and the Renaissance Art of Eloquence.” Essays in Criticism 44 (1994): 267–292. doi: 10.1093/eic/XLIV.4.267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, Quentin. Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, Quentin. “Republican Virtues in an Age of Princes.” In Visions of Politics, Volume II: Renaissance Virtues, edited by Quentin Skinner, 118–159. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, Quentin. “Paradiastole: Redescribing the Vices as Virtues.” In Renaissance Figures of Speech, edited by Sylvia Adamson, Gavin Alexander, and Katrin Ettenhuber, 147–163. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, Quentin. “Rhetorical Redescription and Its Uses in Shakespeare.” In From Humanism to Hobbes: Studies in Rhetoric and Politics, edited by Quentin Skinner, 89–117. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Weever, John. The Mirror of Martyrs. London, 1601.
   Google Scholar
• West, Michael, and Myron Silberstein. “The Controversial Eloquence of Shakespeare’s Coriolanus – an Anti-Ciceronian Orator?” Modern Philology 102 (2005): 307–331. doi: 10.1086/432691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeeveld, W. Gordon. “Coriolanus and Jacobean Politics.” Modern Language Review 57 (1962): 321–334. doi: 10.2307/3721822
   Google Scholar