From constructivist to critical engagements with peacebuilding: implications for hybrid peace

Bibliography

• Adler, Emanuel. “Constructivism in International Relations: Sources, Contributions, and Debates.” In Handbook of International Relations, edited by Thomas Risse, Walter Carlsnaes, and Beth A. Simmons, 112–144. London: Sage, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Advisory Group of Experts on the Review of the Peacebuilding Architecture. Challenge of Sustaining Peace, UN Doc. A/69/968-S/2015/490, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Ashley, Richard. “The Geopolitics of Geopolitical Space: Towards a Critical Social Theory of International Politics.” Alternatives 12, no. 4 (1989): 403–434.
   Google Scholar
• Ayoob, Mohammed. “Inequality and Theorizing in International Relations: The Case for Subaltern Realism.” International Studies Review 4 (2002): 27–48.10.1111/misr.2002.4.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Barkawi, Tarak, and Mark Laffey. “The Postcolonial Moment in Security Studies.” Review of International Studies 32 (2006): 329–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, Michael. Dialogues in Arab Politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, Michael, and Martha Finnemore. “The Politics, Power and Pathologies of International Organizations.” International Organization 53, no. 4 (1999): 699–732.10.1162/002081899551048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlin, Isaiah. Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Björkdahl, Annika, and Kristine Hoglund. “Precarious Peacebuilding: Friction in Global–Local Encounters.” Peacebuilding 1, no. 3 (2013): 289–299.10.1080/21647259.2013.813170
   Google Scholar
• Boucher, David, and Paul Kelly. “Introduction”: Political Thinkers from Socrates to the Present, 10. Oxford: OUP, 2003.10.3138/9781442670983
   Google Scholar
• Boulding, Elise. Cultures of Peace: The Hidden Side of History. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. The Logic of Practice. Translated by R. Nice. Cambridge: Polity, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, David. Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Castañeda, Dorly. The European Approach to Peacebuilding: Civilian Tools for Peace in Colombia and Beyond. London: Palgrave, 2014.10.1057/9781137357311
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, David. “Reconceptualising International Intervention: Statebuilding, ‘Organic Processes’ and the Limits of Causal Knowledge.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 9, no. 1 (2015): 70–88.10.1080/17502977.2015.1015247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, David. “Resilience and the ‘Everyday’: Beyond the Paradox of ‘Liberal Peace’.” Review of International Studies 41, no. 01 (2015): 27-48.10.1017/S0260210513000533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Checkel, Jeffery. “Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change.” International Organization 55, no. 3 (2001): 553–588.10.1162/00208180152507551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopra, Tanja, Christian Ranheim, and Rod Nixon. “Local-level Justice under Transitional Administration.” In Customary Justice and the Rule of Law in War-Torn Societies, edited by Deborah Isser, 119–158. Washington, DC: US Institute of Peace Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Comaroff, Jean, and John L. Comaroff. Theory from the South: Or, How Euro-America is Evolving Toward Africa. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Constantinou, Costas M. “Aporias of Identity: Bicommunalism, Hybridity and the ‘Cyprus Problem’.” Cooperation and Conflict 42, no. 3 (2007): 247–270.10.1177/0010836707079931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, Bill, and Uma Kothari. “The Case for Participation as Tyranny.” In Participation: The New Tyranny? edited by Bill Cooke and Uma Kothari, 1–15. London: Zed Books, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, Bill, and Uma Kothari, eds. Participation: The New Tyranny? London: Zed Books, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, Robert. “Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory.” In Neorealism and its Critics, edited by Robert Keohane, 204–254. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Dessler, David. “What's at Stake in the Agent-structure Debate?” International Organization 43, no. 3 (1989): 441–473.10.1017/S0020818300032999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diez, Thomas. “Speaking ‘Europe’: The Politics of Integration Discourse.” Journal of European Public Policy 6, no. 4 (1999): 598–613.10.1080/135017699343496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, Michael. “Three Pillars of the Liberal Peace.” American Political Science Review 99, no. 3 (2005): 643–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnemore, Martha. National Interests in International Society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Finnemore, Martha. The Purpose of Intervention: Changing Beliefs about the Use of Force. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Finnemore, Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International Organization 52, no. 4 (1998): 887–917.10.1162/002081898550789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, Michael N. “Hermeneutics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Continental Philosophy, edited by Michael Rosen and Brian Leiter, 30–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Fraenkel, Jon. The Manipulation of Custom: From Uprising to Intervention in the Solomon Islands. Wellington: Victoria University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, Clifford. Local Knowledge. New York: Basic Books, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, Harry. “What is at Stake in the Agent-structure Debate.” In International Relations in a Constructed World, edited by Vendulka Kubalkova, Nicholas Onuf, and Paul Kowert, 79–98. New York: MA Sharpe, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, Antonio. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Translated and edited by Quinton Hoare and Geofffrey Smith. New York: International, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, John. Isaiah Berlin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Grenfell, Damien. “Rethinking Governance and Security in Timor-Leste.” In A New Era? Timor-Leste after the UN, edited by Sue Ingram, Lia Kent, and Andrew McWilliam, 169–186. Canberra: ANU Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Guzzini, Stefano. “A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 6, no. 2 (2000): 147–182.10.1177/1354066100006002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzzini, Stefano, and Anna Leander, eds. Constructivism and International Relations: Alexander Wendt and His Critics. London: Routledge, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, David. Spaces of Hope. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Hohe, Tanja, and Rod Nixon. Reconciling Justice: “Traditional” Law and State Judiciary in East Timor. Dili: U.S. Institute of Peace, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Honig, Bonnie. Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Hopf, Ted. Social Construction of International Politics: Identities and Foreign Policies, Moscow 1955 and 1999. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Horkheimer, Max. Critical Theory: Selected Essays. New York: The Continuum Publishing Company, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Howely, Pat. Breaking Spears and Mending Hearts: Peacemakers and Restorative Justice in Bougainville. London: Zed Books, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, Caroline, Joakim Ojendal, and Isabell Schierenbeck. “The Struggle versus the Song – The Local Turn in Peacebuilding: An Introduction.” Third World Quarterly 36, no. 5 (2015): 817–824.10.1080/01436597.2015.1029907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Human Security Study Group. “From Hybrid Peace to Human Security: Rethinking EU Strategy towards Conflict, the Berlin Report of the Human Security Study Group.” Presented to High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs & Security Policy, Federica Mogherini, Brussels, February 24, 2016. www.fes.de/cgi-bin/gbv.cgi?id=12373&ty=pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kalb, Don. “Uses of Local Knowledge.” In The Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis, edited by Robert E. Goodin and Charles Tilly, 579–595. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, Peter, ed. The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Klotz, Audie. Norms in International Relations: The Struggle against Apartheid. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Kornprobst, Markus. Irredentism in European Politics: Argumentation, Compromise and Norms. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Kratochwil, Freidrich. Rules, Norms, and Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.10.1017/CBO9780511559044
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, Ernesto. Emancipation(S). London: Verso, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. We Have Never Been Modern. Translated by C. Porter. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, Henri The Production of Space, Translated by D. Nicholson-Smith. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Legro, Jeffery. Rethinking the World – Great Power Strategies and International Order. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Linklater, Andrew. The Transformation of Political Community: Ethical Foundations of the Post-Westphalian Era. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, Roger. “Between Resistance and Compliance: Non-participation and the Liberal Peace.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 6 (2012): 167–187.10.1080/17502977.2012.655601
   Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, Roger. “Everyday Peace: Bottom-up and Local Agency in Conflict-affected Societies.” Security Dialogue 45, no. 6 (2014): 548–564.10.1177/0967010614550899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, Roger. “Hybrid Peace: The Interaction between Top-down and Bottom-up Peace.” Security Dialogue 41, no. 4 (2010): 391–412.10.1177/0967010610374312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, Roger, and Oliver P. Richmond. “The Local Turn in Peace Building: A Critical Agenda for Peace.” Third World Quarterly 34, no. 5 (2013): 763–783.10.1080/01436597.2013.800750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, James, and John Olsen. “The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders.” International Organization 52, no. 4 (1998): 943–969.10.1162/002081898550699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, Gearoid. “Disaggregating Hybridity: Why Hybrid Institutions Do Not Produce Predictable Experiences of Peace.” Journal of Peace Research 51, no. 4 (2014): 501–514.10.1177/0022343313519465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadarajah, Suthaharan, and David Rampton. “The Limits of Hybridity and the Crisis of Liberal Peace.” Review of International Studies 41, no. 1 (2015): 49–72.10.1017/S0260210514000060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, Iver, and Ole Sending. “‘The International’ as Governmentality.” Millennium 35, no. 3 (2007): 677–701.10.1177/03058298070350030201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. Supporting Statebuilding in Situations of Conflict and Fragility: Policy Guidance, DAC Guidelines and Reference Series. Paris: OECD, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Onuf, Nicholas. “Constructivism: A User’s Manual.” In International Relations in a Constructed World, edited by Vendulka Kubalkova, Nicholas Onuf, and Paul Kowert, 58–78. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Paffenholz, Thania. “Unpacking the Local Turn in Peacebuilding: A Critical Assessment towards an Agenda for Future Research.” Third World Quarterly 36, no. 5 (2015): 857–874.10.1080/01436597.2015.1029908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattie, Charles, Patrick Seyd, and Paul Whiteley. Citizenship in Britain: Values, Participation and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, Jenny. “A Conceptual Unpacking of Hybridity: Accounting for Notions of Power, Politics and Progress in Analyses of Aid-driven Interfaces.” Journal of Peacebuilding & Development 7, no. 2 (2012): 9–22.10.1080/15423166.2012.742802
   Google Scholar
• Popper, Karl. The Open Universe: An Argument for Indeterminism. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, Elisabeth. Peacebuilding: Women in International Perspective. London: Routledge, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Price, Richard. The Chemical Weapons Taboo. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Publius, (Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay). The Federalist Papers, 1787–1788.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, John A. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: The Bellnap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Reus-Smit, Christian. The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P. “Becoming Liberal, Unbecoming Liberalism: Liberal-Local Hybridity via the Everyday as a Response to the Paradoxes of Liberal Peacebuilding.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 3, no. 3 (2009): 324–344.10.1080/17502970903086719
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P. Failed Statebuilding. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2014.10.12987/yale/9780300175318.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P. “Resistance and the Post-liberal Peace.” Millennium 38, no. 3 (2010): 665–692.10.1177/0305829810365017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P. “The Dilemmas of a Hybrid Peace: Negative or Positive?” Cooperation and Conflict 50, no. 1 (2014): 50–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P., and Jason Franks. “Liberal Peacebuilding in Timor Leste: The Emperor’s New Clothes?” International Peacekeeping 15, no. 2 (2008): 185–200.10.1080/13533310802041436
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P., and Audra Mitchell. “Peacebuilding and Critical Forms of Agency: From Resistance to Subsistence.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 36, no. 4 (2011): 326–344.10.1177/0304375411432099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risse, Thomas. “‘Let’s Argue!’: Communicative Action in World Politics.” International Organization 54, no. 1 (2000): 1–39.10.1162/002081800551109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruggie, John. Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalization. London: Routledge, 1998.10.4324/9780203424261
   Google Scholar
• Scott, James C. Domination and the Art of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, John R. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Free Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Sikkink, Kathryn. “The Power of Principled Ideas: Human Rights Policies in the United States and Western Europe.” In Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change, edited by Judith Goldstein and Robert Keohane, 139–171. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Sillitoe, Paul. “The Development of Indigenous Knowledge: A New Applied Anthropology.” Current Anthropology 39 (1998): 223–252.10.1086/204722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Linda Tuhiwai. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London: Zed Books, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Starr, Paul. Freedom’s Power: The History and Promise of Liberalism. New York: Basic Books, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Tickner, Arlene. “Seeing IR Differently: Notes from the Third World.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 32 (2003): 295–324.10.1177/03058298030320020301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilly, Charles. Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990–1992. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Trindade, Josh. “Reconciling Conflicting Paradigms: An East Timorese Vision of the Ideal State.” In Democratic Governance in Timor-Leste: Reconciling the Local and the National, edited by David Mearns, 160–185. Darwin: Charles Darwin University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• UNDP. Governance for Peace. New York: UNDP, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations General Assembly. An Agenda for Peace: Preventice Diplomacy and Related Matters. UN Doc. A/RES/47/120, December 18, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• UN News Centre. “At UN Peace Operations Review, Ban Urges Change of Mindset in Response to New Challenges.” UN News Centre, April 12, 2016. http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=53653#.VwzbcHpdzyE
   Google Scholar
• Visoka, Gezim. “Three Levels of Hybridisation Practices in Post-Conflict Kosovo.” Journal of Peacebuilding and Development 7, no. 2 (2013): 23–36.
   Google Scholar
• Waever, Ole. “Securitization and Desecuritization.” In On Security, edited by Ronnie Lipschutz, 46–87. New York: Columbia University Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Wallis, Joanne. “Is ‘Good Enough’ Peacebuilding Good Enough? The Potential and Pitfalls of the Local Turn in Peacebuilding in Timor-Leste.” The Pacific Review 30, no. 2 (2017): 251–269.10.1080/09512748.2016.1220417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallis, Joanne, Renee Jeffery, and Lia Kent. “Political Reconciliation in Timor Leste, Solomon Islands and Bougainville: The Dark Side of Hybridity.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 70, no. 2 (2016): 159–178.10.1080/10357718.2015.1113231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, Max. “Science as a Vocation.” In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, edited by H. H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills, 129–157. New York: Oxford University Press, 1958.
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, Alexander. “Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization 46, no. 2 (1992): 391–425.10.1017/S0020818300027764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt, Alexander. “Constructing International Politics.” International Security 20, no. 1 (1995): 71–81.10.2307/2539217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt, Alexander. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.10.1017/CBO9780511612183
   Google Scholar
• Weldes, Jutta. Constructing National Interests: The United States and the Cuban Missile Crisis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Wight, Colin. Agents, Structures and International Relations – Politics as Ontology. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.10.1017/CBO9780511491764
   Google Scholar
• Wight, Colin. “The Shoot Dead Horses Don’t They? Locating Agency in the Agent-structure Problematique.” European Journal of International Relations 5, no. 1 (1999): 109–142.10.1177/1354066199005001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. World Development Report 2011: Conflict, Security, and Development. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Zabusky, Stacia. Launching Space: An Ethnography of European Cooperation in Space Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Zehfuss, Maja. Constructivism in International Relations – The Politics of Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.10.1017/CBO9780511491795
   Google Scholar