Practicing human rights across scale: indigenous peoples’ affectedness and recognition in REDD+ governance

Bibliography

• Aguilar-Støen, M. “Better Safe than Sorry? Indigenous Peoples, Carbon Cowboys and the Governance of REDD in the Amazon. .” Forum for Development Studies 44, no. 1 (2017): 91–108. doi:10.1080/08039410.2016.1276098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AIDESEP. “Se conformó la Mesa Nacional de REDD Indígena de Perú.” Blog, 2013. http://www.aidesep.org.pe/se-conformo-la-mesa-nacional-de-redd-indigena-de-peru/
   Google Scholar
• Alonso, J. “Colombia, Ecuador y Perú apuestan por incluir un enfoque indígena en la gestión de los bosques.” 2016. http://p.dw.com/p/1IsR5
   Google Scholar
• Anaya, S. J. Indigenous Peoples in International Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Angelsen, A., M. Brockhaus, W. Sunderlin, and L. Verchot, eds. Analysing REDD+: Challenges and Choices. Bogor: Center for International Forestry Research, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Arhin, A. A. “Safeguards and Dangerguards: A Framework for Unpacking the Black Box of Safeguards for REDD+.” Forest Policy and Economics 45,(2014): 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benford, R., and D. Snow. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology 26 (2000): 611–639. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benvenisti, E., and G. W. Downs. “The Empire’s New Clothes: Political Economy and the Fragmentation of International Law.” Stanford Law Review 60, no. 2 (2007): 595–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, J., and P. Drahos. Global Business Regulation. Cambridge: University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Buckel, S., F. Georgi, J. Kannankulam, and J. Wissel. “Staat, Europa und Migrationskontrollen Theoretische Grundlagen einer materialistischen Perspektive.” Transcript. Verlag, Bielefeld.
   Google Scholar
• Cáceres, B. “Rechazo de COPINH al R-PP y a la implementación de REDD+ en Honduras.” Letter sent to Benoit Bosquet, 2013. https://www.forestcarbonpartnership.org/sites/fcp/files/2013/carta%20SOBRE%20PROYECTOS%20REDD%20HONDURAS%20final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Campese, J., T. Sunderland, T. Greiber, and G. Oviedo, eds. Rights-Based Approaches. Exploring Issues and Opportunities for Conservation. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR and IUCN, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Charlesworth, H., C. Chinkin, and S. Wright. “Feminist Approaches to International Law.” The American Journal of International Law 85, no. 4 (1991): 613–645. doi:10.2307/2203269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chimni, B. S. “Third World Approaches to International Law: A Manifesto.” International Community Law Review 8, no. 1 (2006): 3–27. doi:10.1163/187197306779173220.
   Google Scholar
• Chimni, B. S. “The Limits of the All Affected Principle: Attending to Deep Structures.” Third World Thematics . doi:10.1080/23802014.2018.1600954.
   Google Scholar
• COICA. “REDD+ Indigena Amazonico-RIA.” 2014. http://www.coica.org.ec/images/pdf/REDD+RIA.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• COICA. Declaration of Iquitos. “There Is No REDD+ without Territories, Rights and Autonomy for Indigenous People.” Adopted in Iquitos, 27 April 2011. http://www.friendsoftheamazon.org/Declaration-of-Iquitos.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cortell, A. P., and J. W. Davis Jr. Jr. “Understanding the Domestic Impact of International Norms: A Research Agenda.” International Studies Review 2, no. 1 (2000): 65–87. doi:10.1111/misr.2000.2.issue-1.
   Google Scholar
• Costa Rica and Papua New Guinea. 2005. “Reducing Emissions from Deforestation in Developing Countries: Approaches to Stimulate Action.” Document Code FCCC/CP/2005/MISC.1, November 11.
   Google Scholar
• Daase, C., and N. Deitelhoff. 2014. “Zur Rekonstruktion globaler Herrschaft aus dem Widerstand.” Internationale Dissidenz Working Paper 1, Frankfurt am Main.
   Google Scholar
• Drezner, D. W. “The Power and Peril of International Regime Complexity.” Perspectives on Politics 7, no. 1 (2009): 65–70. doi:10.1017/S1537592709090100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duyck, S., S. Jodoin, and A. Johl, eds. The Routledge Handbook of Human Rights and Climate Governance. London: Routledge, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Ecuador. “Confederación de Nacionalidades Indígenas del Ecuador.” Oficio Nº 52, 2011. http://no-redd.com/espanol/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/CONAIE-rechaza-REDD.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• El Salvador. 2012. “Salvadoran National Indigenous Coordinating Council (CCNIS).” Letter of Demand for withdrawal of second version of R-PP sent to FCPF. https://forestcarbonpartnership.org.
   Google Scholar
• FCPF. 2015. Charter Establishing the FCPF.
   Google Scholar
• FCPF and UN-REDD Programme. 2012. Guidelines on Stakeholder Engagement in REDD+ Readiness.
   Google Scholar
• Focarelli, C. International Law as Social Construct. The Struggle for Global Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Fontana, L. B., and J. Grugel. “The Politics of Indigenous Participation through ‘Free Prior Informed Consent’: Reflections from the Bolivian Case.” World Development 77 (2016): 249–261. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.08.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO). “Latin America Doubled Its Agricultural Emissions of Greenhouse Gases in the past 50 Years.” 2014. http://www.fao.org/americas/noticias/ver/en/c/240449/
   Google Scholar
• Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF). 2008. FCPF Information Memorandum.
   Google Scholar
• Geist, H., and E. Lambin. “Proximate Causes and Underlying Driving Forces of Tropical Deforestation.” BioScience 52, no. 2 (2002): 143–150. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0143:PCAUDF]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaab, K., A. Graf, and S. Engelkamp. “Kritische Normenforschung in den Internationalen Beziehungen. Eine Einleitung.” In Kritische Normenforschung in Den Internationalen Beziehungen, edited by K. Glaab, A. Graf, and S. Engelkamp, 1–18. Frankfurt/Main: Nomos Verlag, forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Gover, K. “REDD+, Tenure and Indigenous Property Claims.” In The Impact of Climate Change Mitigation on Indigenous and Forest Communities: International, National and Local Law Perspectives on REDD+, edited by M. Tehan, L. C. Godden, M. A. Young, and K. A. Gover, 87–129, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, J., A. Hildering, and D. Misiedjan. “Indigenous People’s Right to Water under International Law: A Legal Pluralism Perspective.” Environmental Sustainability 11 (2014): 26–33.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. Faktizität und Geltung - Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, A. “Getting REDD-y: Conservation and Climate Change in Latin America.” Latin American Research Review 46 (2011): 184–210. doi:10.1353/lar.2011.0039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasenclever, A., and H. Narr “The Dark Side of the Affectedness-Paradigm: Lessons from the Indigenous Peoples’ Movement at the United Nations”, Third World Thematics . doi:10.1080/23802014.2018.1553505.
   Google Scholar
• ILO. “Indigenous Peoples and Climate Change: From Victims to Change Agents through Decent Work.” 2017. http://www.ilo.org/global/topics/indigenous-tribal/WCMS_551189/lang–en/index.htm.
   Google Scholar
• International Labor Organization (ILO). Convention Nº169, 1989. http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ILO_CODE:C169.
   Google Scholar
• Jodoin, S. Forest Preservation in a Changing Climate. REDD+ and Indigenous and Community Rights in Indonesia and Tanzania. UK: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Jupille, J., and D. Snidal. 2005. The choice of international institutions: cooperation, alternatives and strategies.
   Google Scholar
• Klotz, A. Norms in International Relations. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Krasner, S. International Regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, T., W. Collen, and K. A. Nicholas. “Evaluating Safeguards in a Conservation Incentive Program: Participation, Consent, and Benefit Sharing in Indigenous Communities of the Ecuadorian Amazon.” Ecology and Society 18, no. 4 (2013): 1. doi:10.5751/ES-05733-180401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuntz, F. “Aporias: The International Relation, Interrelated Sovereigns, the Human Individual, and Power-Knowledge.” PhD diss., Bielefeld: Bielefeld University, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, M., and I. Scoones. “Political Ecologies of Carbon in Africa.” In Carbon Conflicts and Forest Landscapes in Africa, edited by M. Leach and I. Sconnes, 1–42. London: Routledge, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, D., and T. Pistorius. The Impacts of International REDD+ Finance. Climate and Land Use Alliance, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, K., C. McDermott, and B. Cashore. “The Climate Regime as Global Forest Governance: Can Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) Initiatives Pass a “Dual Effectiveness” Test?” International Forestry Review 10, no. 3 (2008): 538–549. doi:10.1505/ifor.10.3.538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mato, D. “Transnational Networking and the Social Production of Representations of Identities by Indigenous Peoples‘ Organizations of Latin America.” International Sociology 15, no. 2 (2000): 343–360. doi:10.1177/0268580900015002012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, A. “Reflections on Social Movement Theory: Criticisms and Proposals.” Contemporary Sociology 29, no. 3 (2000): 445–454. doi:10.2307/2653931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, M., and S. Nakhooda. 2014. “The State of REDD+ Finance.” CGD Working Paper 378, Washington, DC: Center for Global Development. Updated version, May 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Orsini, A. “Multi-Forum Non-State Actors: Navigating the Regime Complexes for Forestry and Genetic Resources.” Global Environmental Politics 13, no. 3 (2013): 34–55. doi:10.1162/GLEP_a_00182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Recio, E. 2014. “The Warsaw Framework and the Future of REDD”. Yearbook of International Environmental Law, 24(1), 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Recio, E., 2015. TGCC Assessment: Panama Resource Tenure and Sustainable Landscapes, USAID, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Recio, E., 2016. TGCC Assessment: Honduras Resource Tenure and Sustainable Landscapes, USAID, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Recio, E. 2018. “Transnational REDD+ Rule Making: The Regulatory Landscape for REDD+ Implementation in Latin America” Transnational Environmental Law, 7(2).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Recio, E. Forthcoming. “Dancing Like a Toddler: the Green Climate Fund and REDD+ International Rule-making”. Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law.
   Google Scholar
• Rogue, J.-M. “Indigenous Peoples’ Rights and Climate Change Policies.” Pace Diritti Umani 3 (2009): 59–90.
   Google Scholar
• Sändig, J., J. von Bernstorff, and A. Hasenclever. “Affectedness in International Institutions: Promises and Pitfalls of involving the Most Affected.” Third World Thematics . doi:10.1080/23802014.2018.1599692.
   Google Scholar
• Savaresi, A. “The Legal Status and Role of REDD-Plus Safeguards.” In Research Handbook on REDD+ and International Law, edited by C. Voigt, 126–156. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Schapper, A. “Climate Justice and Human Rights.” International Relations 32, no. 3 (2018): 275–295. doi:10.1177/0047117818782595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. “Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse.” Annual Review of Political Science 11 (2008): 303–326. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schramm, A., and J. Sändig. “Affectedness Alliances: Affected People at the Centre of Transnational Advocacy.” Third World Thematics . doi:10.1080/23802014.2018.1575767.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, A., and V. von Bremen. 2013. “Pueblos Indígenas y Protección de Bosques a Través de REDD+ y Medidas Similares.” Brot für die Welt.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, H. “Agency in International Climate Negotiations: The Case of Indigenous Peoples and Avoided Deforestation.” International Environmental Agreements 10, no. 4 (2010): 317–332. doi:10.1007/s10784-010-9138-2.
   Google Scholar
• Sieder, R. “Indigenous Peoples’ Rights and the Law in Latin America.” In Routledge Handbook of Indigenous Peoples’ Rights, edited by C. Lennox and D. Short, 414–424. New Yok: Routledge, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Sikor, T., J. Stahl, T. Enters, J. C. Ribot, N. Singh, W. D. Sunderlin, and L. Wollenberg. “REDD-plus, Forest People‘S Rights and Nested Climate Governance.” Global Environmental Change 20, no. 3 (2010): 423–425. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, D., and R. Benford. “Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization.” International Social Movement Research 1 (1988): 197–217.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, C., R. Winterbottom, J. Springer, and K. Reytar. 2014. Securing Rights, Combating Climate Change. World Resources Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Tauli-Corpuz, V., and A. Lynge. “Impact of Climate Change Mitigation Measures on Indigenous Peoples and on Their Territories and Lands.” Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, New York, 2008. http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/E_C19_2008_10.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Toussaint, P. “Voices Unheard – Affected Communities and the Climate Negotiations on Loss and Damage.” Third World Thematics . doi:10.1080/23802014.2018.1597640.
   Google Scholar
• Tramontana, E. “Civil Society Participation in International Decision Making: Recent Developments and Future Perspectives in the Indigenous Rights Arena.” The International Journal of Human Rights 16, no. 1 (2012): 173–192. doi:10.1080/13642987.2012.622459.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. 2013. “Work Programme on Results-Based Finance to Progress the Full Implementation of the Activities Referred to in Decision 1/CP.16.” Paragraph 70, Decision 9/CP.19.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. “Parties and Observers.” http://unfccc.int/parties_and_observers/items/2704.php
   Google Scholar
• United Nations (UN). 1992. “United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.”
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). “En el marco del proceso REDD Gobierno y CONPAH firman acta sobre derechos indígenas y afrohondureños sobre su territorio.” 2013. http://www.hn.undp.org/content/honduras/es/home/presscenter/articles/2013/01/21/en-el-marco-del-proceso-redd-gobierno-y-conpah-firman-acta-sobre-derechos-ind-genas-y-afrohondure-os-sobre-su-territorio-.html
   Google Scholar
• United Nations General Assembly (UNGA). 2007. “Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.” UNGA Resolution 61/295, September 13. http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/DRIPS_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UN-REDD. 2015. Terms of Reference. UN-REDD Programme Multi-Partner Trust Fund.
   Google Scholar
• UN-REDD Programme. Accessed November 7, 2017. http://www.unredd.net/about/what-is-redd-plus.html
   Google Scholar
• UN-REDD Programme. Accessed February 18, 2018. http://www.unredd.net/index.php?view=download&alias=6207-un-redd-faqs-and-answers-june-2010-1-6207&category_slug=additional-resources-1312&option=com_docman&Itemid=134
   Google Scholar
• Van Asselt, H., and C. McDermott. “The Institutional Complex for REDD: A ‘Benevolent Jigsaw?’.” In Research Handbook on REDD+ and International Law, edited by C. Voigt, 63–88. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Vergara-Asenjo, G., and C. J. Potvin. “Forest Protection and Tenure Status: The Key Role of Indigenous Peoples and Protected Areas in Panama.” Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions 28 (2014): 205–215. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallbott, L. “Indigenous Peoples in UN REDD+ Negotiations: “Importing Power” and Lobbying for Rights through Discursive Interplay Management.” Ecology & Society 19, no. 1 (2014): 166–180. doi:10.5751/ES-06111-190121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallbott, L. “Rights, Representation and Recognition: Practicing Advocacy for Women and Indigenous Peoples in UN Climate Negotiations.” In The Routledge Handbook of Human Rights and Climate Governance, edited by S. Duyck, S. Jodoin, and A. Johl, 58–71. London: Routledge, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Wallbott, L., and G. K. Rosendal. “Safeguards, Standards and the Science-Policy Interfaces of REDD +: Greening Land Use through Forest-Based Mitigation in Costa Rica ?” Journal of Environment and Development 27, no. 1 (2018): 99–125. doi:10.1177/1070496517751716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener, A. The Invisible Constitution of Politics. Contested Norms and International Encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, A., and U. Puetter. “The Quality of Norms Is What Actors Make of It. Critical Constructivist Research of Norms.” Journal of International Law and International Relations 15, no. 1 (2009): 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Women Organizing for Change in Agriculture and Natural Resource Management. 2017. Gender Integration in REDD+ and the ERPD in Nepal. FCPF.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2013. “Letter to Berta Cáceres (COPINH).” https://www.forestcarbonpartnership.org/sites/fcp/files/2013/Honduras.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yashar, D. Contesting Citizenship in Latin America: The Rise of Indigenous Movements and the Postliberal Challenge. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Zelli, F., D. Erler, S. Frank, J.-I. Hein, H. Hotz, and A.-M. S. C. Melgarejo. REDD in Peru, A Challenge to Social Inclusion and Multi-Level Governance. Bonn: Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik, 2014.
   Google Scholar