Emerging powers and new global politics? An Indian perspective on the BRICS paradox

Bibliography

• Acharya, A. “Dialogue and Discovery: In Search of International Relations Theories beyond the West.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 39, no. 3 (2011): 619–637. doi:10.1177/0305829811406574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acharya, A., and B. Buzan. Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia. London: Routledge, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Alpers, E. The Indian Ocean in World History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Ayres, A. Our Time Has Come: How India Is Making Its Place in the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Babb, S. “The Washington Consensus as Transnational Policy Paradigm: Its Origins, Trajectory and Likely Successor.” Review of International Political Economy 20, no. 2 (2013): 268–297. doi:10.1080/09692290.2011.640435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilgin, P. “Thinking Past “Western” IR?” Third World Quarterly 29, no. 1 (2008): 5–23. doi:10.1080/01436590701726392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boesche, R. The First Great Realist: Kautilya and His Arthasastra. Oxford: Lexington Books, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, P. “BRICS Banking and the Debate over Subimperialism.” Third World Quarterly 37, no. 4 (2016): 611–629. doi:10.1080/01436597.2015.1128816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, P., and A. Garcia. Brics: An Anticapitalist Critique. London: Pluto, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• BRIC Joint Statement. 2nd BRIC Summit, Brazil, April 15, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• BRICS Fortaleza Declaration and Action Plan. 6th BRICS Summit, Fortaleza, Brazil, July 15, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• BRICS Goa Declaration and Action Plan. 8th BRICS Summit, Goa, India, October 16, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• BRICS Johannesburg Declaration. 10th BRICS Summit, Johannesburg, South Africa, July 26, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• BRICS Ufa Declaration and Action Plan. 7th BRICS Summit, Ufa, Russia, July 9, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• BRICS Xiamen Declaration and Action Plan. 9th BRICS Summit, Xiamen, China, September 4, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Brzezinski, Z. The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives. New York: Basic Books, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, G. T. “Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: Governance Innovation and Prospects.” Global Governance 22, no. 1 (2016): 11–26. doi:10.1163/19426720-02201002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drezner, D. W. “The System Worked: Global Economic Governance during the Great Recession.” World Politics 66, no. 1 (2014): 123–164. doi:10.1017/S0043887113000348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duggan, N. “BRICS and the Evolution of a New Agenda within Global Governance.” In The European Union and the BRICS: Complex Relations in the Era of Global Governance, edited by M. Rewizorski, 11–25. Heidelberg: Springer, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Farrelly, C. An Introduction to Contemporary Political Theory: A Reader. London: Sage, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• G20. Declaration of the Summit on Financial Markets and the World Economy. G20 Special Leaders Summit on the Financial Situation,Washington, DC, United States of America, November 15, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Gallarotti, G. M. “A Pragmatic Paradox: The BRICS Countries as Vehicles for Soft Power Diplomacy.” [ Le Paradoxe Pragmatique: Les BRICS Comme Vecteur De La Diplomatie D’influence.] Hermès, La Revue 79, no. 3 (2017): 183–191.
   Google Scholar
• Gautam, P. K. One Hundred Years of Kautilya’s Arthasastra. IDSA Monog. New Delhi: Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Gautam, P. K. “Understanding Kautilya’s Arthasastra: Origination, Migration and Diffusion.” In The Arthasastra in a Transcultural Perspective: Comparing Kautilya with Sun-Zi, Nizam Al-Mulk, Barani and Machiavelli, edited by M. Liebig and S. Mishra, 68–112. New Delhi: Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Graaff, N. D., and B. van Apeldoorn. “US-China Relations and the Liberal World Order: Contending Elites, Colliding Visions?” International Affairs 94, no. 1 (2018): 113–131. doi:10.1093/ia/iix232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudynas, E. “Beyond Varieties of Development: Disputes and Alternatives.” Third World Quarterly 37, no. 4 (2016): 721–732. doi:10.1080/01436597.2015.1126504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobson, J. Eastern Origins of Western Civilization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, J. The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Hopewell, K. Breaking the WTO: How Emerging Powers Disrupted the Neoliberal Project. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G. J. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G. J. “Why the Liberal World Order Will Survive.” Ethics and International Affairs 32 (2018): 17–29. doi:10.1017/S0892679418000072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juutinen, M. “Kautilyan Foreign Policy Analysis: Sino-Indian Dynamics in South Asia and the Indian Ocean Region.” Journal of the Indian Ocean Region 14, no. 2 (2018): 206–226. doi:10.1080/19480881.2018.1472859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juutinen, M. “Leadership for a Pluralistic Order? Assessing BRICS and Development Finance.” In Leading Change in a Complex World, edited by A. Kangas, J. Kujala, A. Heikkinen, A. Lönnqvist, H. Laihonen, and J. Bethwaite, 301–320. Tampere: Tampere University Press, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Juutinen, M., and J. Käkönen. “Battle for Globalisations? BRICS and US Mega-Regional Trade Agreements in a Changing World Order.” ORF-Monogr. New Delhi: Observer Research Foundation, 2016. http://www.orfonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Book_Battle-For-Globalisation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Käkönen, J., and M. Juutinen. “BRICS as Paradox.” In BRICS Framing a New Global Communication Order, edited by D. K. Thussu and K. Nordenstreng. London: Routledge, forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Khanna, P. The Future Is Asian. New Delhi: Simon & Schuster, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Krishna, S. Globalization and Postcolonialism: Hegemony and Resistance in the Twenty-First Century. London: Rowman & Littlefield, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Liebig, M. “Kauṭilya’s Arthaśāstra: A Classic Text of Statecraft and an Untapped Political Science Resource.” Heidelberg Papers in South Asian and Comparative Politics, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Mastanduno, M. “A Realist View: Three Images of the Coming International Order.” In International Order and the Future of World Politics, edited by J. Hall and T. V. Paul, 19–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, J. J. “The Gathering Storm: China’s Challenge to US Power in Asia.” Chinese Journal of International Politics 3, no. 4 (2010): 381–396. doi:10.1093/cjip/poq016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mielniczuk, F. “BRICS in the Contemporary World: Changing Identities, Converging Interests.” Third World Quarterly 34, no. 6 (2013): 1075–1090. doi:10.1080/01436597.2013.802506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra, S., and M. Liebig. Kautilya’s Arthasastra: An Intellectual Portrait. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Modelski, G. “Foreign Policy and International System in the Ancient Hindu World.” The American Political Science Review 58, no. 3 (1964): 549–560. doi:10.2307/1953131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nau, H. “Introduction: Domestic Voices of Aspiring Powers.” In Worldviews of Aspiring Powers: Domestic Foreign Policy Debates in China, India, Iran, Japan, and Russia, edited by H. Nau and D. Ollapally, 3–35. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• NDB. NDB’s General Strategy 2017–2021. New Development Bank, 2017. https://www.ndb.int/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/NDB-Strategy-Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nölke, A., and T. Ten Brink. “Simone Claar and Christian May. ‘domestic Structures, Foreign Economic Policies and Global Economic Order: Implications from the Rise of Large Emerging Economies’.” European Journal of International Relations 21, no. 3 (2015): 538–567. doi:10.1177/1354066114553682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivelle, P. “Manu and the Arthasastra: A Study in Sastric Intertextuality.” Journal of Indian Philosophy 32, no. 2–3 (2004): 281–291. doi:10.1023/B:INDI.0000021078.31452.8a.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pande, A. From Chanakya to Modi: The Evolution of India’s Foreign Policy. Kindle ed. India: HarperCollins Publishers, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Philp, M. “Political Theory and History.” In Political Theory: Methods and Approaches, edited by D. Leopold and M. Stears, 128–149. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Pijl, K. V. D. The Discipline of Western Supremacy: Modes of Foreign Relations and Political Economy. Vol. 3. London: Pluto Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Ramachandran, K. N. “Sun Zi and Kautilya: Towards a Comparative Analysis.” Strategic Analysis 38, no. 3 (2014): 390–408. doi:10.1080/09700161.2014.895247.
   Google Scholar
• Rangarajan, L. N. Kautilya: The Arthasastra. London: Penguin Books, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Rich, B. To Uphold the World: A Call for A New Global Ethic from Ancient India. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Saran, S. “Globalisation and the Celebration of Unique Cultures Work Together within BRICS.” Raisina Debates, Observer Research Foundation, May 29, 2018. Accessed April 15, 2019. https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/41198-globalisation-celebration-unique-cultures-work-together-brics/
   Google Scholar
• Saran, S. How India Sees the World: Kautilya to the 21st Century. New Delhi: Juggernaut, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar, B. K. “Hindu Theory of International Relations.” The American Political Science Review 13, no. 3 (1919): 400–411. doi:10.2307/1945958.
   Google Scholar
• Shahi, D. Kautilya and Non-Western IR Theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Shamasastry, R. Kautilya’s Arthasastra. Bangalore: Government Press, 1915.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, Q. Visions of Politics, Vol. 1: Regarding Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Stephen, M. D. “Rising Powers, Global Capitalism and Liberal Global Governance: A Historical Materialist Account of the BRICs Challenge.” European Journal of International Relations 20, no. 4 (2014): 912–938. doi:10.1177/1354066114523655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephen, M. D. “Emerging Powers and Emerging Trends in Global Governance.” Global Governance 23, no. 3 (2017): 483–502. doi:10.1163/19426720-02303009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tammen, R., J. Kugler, D. Lemke, A. C. Stam III, M. Abdollahian, C. Alsharabati, B. Efird, and A. F. K. Organski. Power Transition Strategies for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Thakur, R. “How Representative Are BRICS?” Third World Quarterly 35, no. 10 (2014): 1791–1808. doi:10.1080/01436597.2014.971594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wæver, O. “The Sociology of a Not so International Discipline: American and European Developments in International Relations.” International Organization 52, no. 4 (1998): 687–727. doi:10.1162/002081898550725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaman, R. U. “Kautilya: The Indian Strategic Thinker and Indian Strategic Culture.” Comparative Strategy 25, no. 3 (2006): 231–247. doi:10.1080/01495930600956260.
   Google Scholar