Complete mitochondrial genome of the crinoid Poliometra prolixa (Crinoidea: Comatulida: Antedonidae)

References

• Andrews S. 2010. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/.
   Google Scholar
• Ausich WI, Kammer TW, Rhenberg EC, Wright DF. 2015. Early 684 phylogeny of crinoids within the Pelmatozoan clade. Palaeontology. 58(6):937–952. doi: 10.1111/pala.12204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, et al. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 19(5):455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernt A, Donath A, Jühling F, Externbrink F, Florentz C, Fritzsch G, Pütz J, Middendorf M, Stadler PF. 2013. MITOS: improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 69(2):313–319. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.08.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 30(15):2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole SR. 2017. Phylogeny and morphologic evolution of the Ordovician camerata (Class Crinoidea, Phylum Echinodermata). J Paleontol. 91(4):815–828. doi: 10.1017/jpa.2016.137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. 2012. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods. 9(8):772–772. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foote M. 1999. Morphological diversity in the evolutionary radiation of Paleozoic and post-Paleozoic crinoids. Paleobiology. 25(S2):1–115. doi: 10.1017/S0094837300020236.
   Google Scholar
• Guindon S, Gascuel O. 2003. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol. 52(5):696–704. doi: 10.1080/10635150390235520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemery LG, Roux M, Améziane N, Eléaume M. 2013. High-resolution crinoid phyletic inter-relationships derived from molecular data. Cah Biol Mar. 54:511–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess H, Ausich WI, Brett CE, Simms MJ. 1999. Fossil crinoids. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hess H, Messing CG. 2011. Comatulida. In Treatise on invertebrate Paleontology, Echinodermata, Part T, Echinodermata 2, Revised, Crinoidea. Lawrence (KS): University of Kansas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Janies D. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships of extant echinoderm classes. Can J Zool. 79(7):1232–1250. doi: 10.1139/z00-215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroh A, Smith AB. 2010. The phylogeny and classification of post-Palaeozoic echinoids. J Syst Palaeontol. 8(2):147–212. doi: 10.1080/14772011003603556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, et al. 2007. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 23(21):2947–2948. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe TM, Eddy SR. 1997. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 25(5):955–964. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.5.955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer KS, Soltwedel T, Bergmann M. 2014. High biodiversity on a deep-water reef in the eastern Fram Strait. PLoS One. 9(8):e105424. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller R. 2012. The museum collection database, Fisheries and Oceans Canada digital collections. Quebec: Maurice Lamontagne Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Nam S-E, Rhee J-S. 2020. Complete mitochondrial genome of the crinoid echinoderm, Florometra species (Echinodermata, Crinoidea). Mitochondrial DNA. 5:850–851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naughton KM, O'Hara TD, Appleton B, Gardner MG. 2014. Sympatric cryptic species in the crinoid genus Cenolia (Echinodermata: Crinoidea: Comasteridae) delineated by sequence and microsatellite markers. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 78:160–171. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.05.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouse GW, Jermiin LS, Wilson NG, Eeckhaut I, Lanterbecq D, Oji T, Young CM, Browning T, Cisternas P, Helgen LE, et al. 2013. Fixed, free, and fixed: the fickle phylogeny of extant Crinoidea (Echinodermata) and their Permian–Triassic origin. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 66(1):161–181. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.09.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summers MM, Messing CG, Rouse GW. 2014. Phylogeny of Comatulidae (Echinodermata: Crinoidea: Comatulida): a new classification and an assessment of morphological characters for crinoid taxonomy. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 80:319–339. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.06.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summers MM, Messing CG, Rouse GW. 2017. The genera and species of Comatulidae (Comatulida: Crinoidea): taxonomic revisions and a molecular and morphological guide. Zootaxa. 4268(2):151–190. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4268.2.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor KH, Rouse GW, Messing CG. 2017. Systematics of Himerometra (Echinodermata: Crinoidea: Himerometridae) based on morphology and molecular data. Zool J Linn Soc. 18:342–356.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor KH, Rouse GW, Messing CG. 2018. Revising Mariametridae: the genera Dichrometra, Lamprometra, and Liparometra (Echinodermata: Crinoidea). Syst Biodivers. 16(2):142–159. doi: 10.1080/14772000.2017.1375044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telford MJ, Lowe CJ, Cameron CB, Ortega-Martinez O, Aronowicz J, Oliveri P, Copley RR. 2014. Phylogenomic analysis of echinoderm class relationships supports Asterozoa. Proc R Soc B. 281(1786):20140479. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright DF, Ausich WI, Cole SR, Peter ME, Rhenberg EC. 2017. Phylogenetic taxonomy and classification of the Crinoidea. J Paleontol. 91(4):829–846. doi: 10.1017/jpa.2016.142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar