A Comparative Test of Two Stochastic Process Models of Messages, Mediating Variables, and Behavioral Expectations

REFERENCES

• ANDERSON, T.W. Probability models for analyzing time changes In attitudes. In P. Lazarsfeld (Ed.), Mathematical thinking in the social sciences. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1954, 14–54.
   Google Scholar
• ANDERSON, T.W., & GOODMAN, L.A. Statistical inferences about Markov chains. Annals of the Mathematical Statistical Association; 1957, 28, 89–110.
   Google Scholar
• BARTHOLEMEW, D. Stochastic models for social procsses. New York: Wiley, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• BELLAMY, M., & THOMPSON, W. Stability of attitude as a predeterminer of experimental results. Speech Monographs, 1967, 34, 180–184.
   Google Scholar
• BURHANS, D. The attitude-behavior discrepancy problem: Revisited. Quarterly Journal of Speech. 1971, 57(4), 418–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CATHCART, E. The importance of situational factors: An examination and extension of the Fishbein models. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• COOLEY, W.W., & LOHNES, P.R. Multivariate data analysis. New York: Wiley, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• COHEN, J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• COLEMAN, J.S. The mathematics of collective action. Chicago: Aldine, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• CRAIG, R., & CUSHMAN, D.P. An experimental test of certain attitude change implications of Fishbein's model of attitudes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• CUSHMAN, D.P., (Ed.) Explorations in the message, attitude, behavioral relationship. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, in press.
   Google Scholar
• DESCARTES, R. Letterto Princess Elizabeth, June 28, 1643. In E. Anscombe and P.T. Geach (Eds.), Descartes: Philosophical writings. Edinburgh: Nelson, 1954.
   Google Scholar
• DIESING, P. Patterns of discovery in the social sciences. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• FISHBEIN, M. Attitudes and the prediction of behavior. In M. Fishbein (Ed.), Readings in attitude theory and measurement. New York: Wiley, 1967, 477–492.
   Google Scholar
• FISHBEIN, M. The prediction of behaviors from attitudinal variables. In C.D. Mortensen and K. Sereno (Eds.), Advances in communication research. New York: Harper & Row, 1973, 3–31.
   Google Scholar
• FISHBEIN, M., & AJZEN, I. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• GLASS, G.V., WILLSON, V.L., & GOTTMAN, J.M. Design and analysis of time-series experiments. Boulder, Colo.: Colorado Associate University press, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• HENRY, N.W. The retention model: A Markov chain with variable transition probabilities. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1971, 66, 264–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HEWES, D.E. Finite stochastic modeling of communication processes: An introduction and some basic readings. Human Communication Research, 1975a, 1 (3), 271–283.
   Google Scholar
• HEWES, D.E. A stochastic model of the relationship between attitudes and behaviors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago, 1975b.
   Google Scholar
• HEWES, D.E. Markov chains and sequential, cross-sectional sampling. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association Convention, 1975c, Houston, Texas.
   Google Scholar
• HEWES, D.E. Procedures for estimating “m” and “S.o” in a message mediating variable-behavior model. Unpublished paper, Arizona State University, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• HEWES, D.E. An axiomatized stochastic process theory of the relationships among messages, mediating variables and behaviors. In D.P. Cushman (Ed.), Explorations in the message, attitude, behavior relationship. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, in press.
   Google Scholar
• HEWES, D., & EVANS-HEWES, D. Toward a Markov chain model of attitude change. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Chicago, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• KEMENY, J., & SNELL, J. Finite Markov chains. New York: Van Nostrand, 1960.
   Google Scholar
• KING, S.W. Theory testing: An analysis and extension. Western Speech, 1973, 37(1), 13–22.
   Google Scholar
• MASSY, W.F., MONTGOMERY, D.B., & MORRISON, D.G. Stochastic models of buying behavior. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• McDERMOTT, V. The literature on classical theory construction. Human Communication Research. 1975, 2(1), 83–102.
   Google Scholar
• McNEMAR, Q. Opinion-attitude methodology. Psychological Bulletin, 1946, 4, 43.
   Google Scholar
• McPHEE, R. Derivation and test of a new model of message- attitude-behavior relationship. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• MILLER, G.R. A crucial problem in attitude research. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1967, 53, 235–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MISCHEL, T. Scientific and philosophical psychology: A historical introduction. In T. Mischel (Ed.), Human Action. New York: Academic Press, 1969, 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• MISCHEL, W. Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• NIE, N.H., HULL, C.H., JENKINS, J.G., STEINBRENNER, K., & BENT, D. Statistical package for the social sciences, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• REICHENBACH, H. The theory of probability. Berkeley, Cal.: University of California Press, 1949.
   Google Scholar
• Report of the New Orleans Conference on Research and Instructional Development. In R.J. Kibler and L.L. Barker (Eds.), Conceptual frontiers in speech-communications. New York: Speech Communication Association, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• SCHWARTZ, S., & TESSLER, R. A test of a model reducing measured attitude-behavior discrepancies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 24, 225–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SEIBOLD, D.R. Communication research and the attitude- verbal report-overt behavior relationship: A critique and theoretical reformulation. Human Communication Research, 1975, 2(1), 3–32.
   Google Scholar
• SIMONS, H.W. Psychological theories of persuasion: An auditor's report. Quarterly Journal of Speech. 1971, 57(4), 383–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SINGER, B., & SPILERMAN, S. Social mobility models for heterogeneous populations. In H. Costner (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1973–74. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1974, 356–402.
   Google Scholar
• SUPPES, P., & ATKINSON, R. Markov learning models of multiperson interactions. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1960.
   Google Scholar
• TRIANDIS, H. Exploratory factor analysis of behavioral components of social attitudes. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 1964, 68, 420–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WARNER, L., & DEFLUER, M. Attitude as an interaction concept: Social constraint and social distance as intervening variables between attitudes and action. American Sociological Review, 1969, 34, 153–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WICKER, A. An examination of the other variables' explanation of attitude-behavior inconsistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971, 19(1), 18–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WIGGINS, L. Panel analysis: Latent probability models for attitude and behavioral processes. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• WOELFEL, J. Foundations of Cognitive Theory. In D.P. Cushman (Ed.), Explorations in the message, attitude, behavior relationship. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, in press.
   Google Scholar