The Determinants of Communication and Communication Structure in Large Organizations: A Review of Research

REFERENCES

• ABELSON, R.P. Mathematical models in social psychology. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• ALBAUM, G. Horizontal information flow: An exploratory study. Academy of Management Journal, 1964, 7, 21–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ALEXANDER, C.N., JR. Ordinal position and sociometric status. Sociometry, 1966, 29, 41–51.
   Google Scholar
• ALLEN, T.J., & COHEN, S.I. Information flow in research and development laboratories. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1969, 14, 12–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BACK, K., FESTINGER, L., HYMOVITCH, B., KELLEY, H., SCHACHTER, S., & THIBAUT, J. The methodology of studying rumor transmission. Human Relations, 1950, 3, 307–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BAKAN, D. The test of significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 1966, 66, 423–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BARNLUND, D.C. & HARLAND, C. Propinquity and prestige as determinants of communication networks. Sociometry, 1963, 26, 467–479.
   Google Scholar
• BASS, A.F. Refining the “gatekeeper” concept: A U.N. radio case study. Journalism Quarterly, 1969, 46, 352–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BERKOWITZ, N.H., & BENNIS, W.G. Interaction patterns in formal service-oriented organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1961, 6, 25–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BERNARD, H.H., & KILL WORTH, P.D. Some formal properties of networks. Tech. Rep. Arlington, Va.: Office of Naval Research, January 1975 (Contract No. N00014-73-A-0417-0001-117-949).
   Google Scholar
• BLAU, P.M. Patterns of interaction among a group of officials in a government agency. Human Relations, 1954, 7, 337–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BLAU, P.M. Dynamics of bureaucracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1955.
   Google Scholar
• BLAU, P.M. Patterns of deviation in work groups. Sociometry, 1960, 23, 245–261.
   Google Scholar
• BORGATTA, E.F. Analysis of social interaction and sociometric perception. Sociometry, 1954, 17, 7–31.
   Google Scholar
• BRAGER, G. Commitment and conflict in normative organizations. American Sociological Review, 1969, 34, 482–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BREED, W. Social control in the newsroom. Social Forces, 1955, 33, 326–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BURGESS, R.L. Communication networks and behavioral consequences. Human Relations, 1969, 22, 137–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BURKE, R.J., & WILCOX, D.S. Effects of different patterns and degrees of openness in superior-subordinate communication on subordinate job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 1969, 12, 319–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BURNS, T. The direction of activity and communication in a departmental executive group: A quantitative study in a British engineering factory with a self-recording technique. Human Relations, 1954, 7, 73–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CAPLOW, T. Rumors in wars. Social Forces, 1947, 25, 298–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CARLSON, E.R. Clique structure and member satisfaction in groups. Sociometry, 1960, 23, 327–337.
   Google Scholar
• CARTWRIGHT, D., & HARARY, F. Structural balance: A generalization of Heider's theory. Psychological Review, 1956, 63, 277–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COHEN, A.R. Upward communication in experimentally created hierarchies. Human Relations, 1958, 11, 41–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COHEN, A.M., ROBINSON, E.L., & EDWARDS, J.L. Experiments in organizational embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1969, 14, 208–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COLEMAN, J.S. Introduction to mathematical sociology: New York: Free Press, 1964.
   Google Scholar
• COLEMAN, J.S., KATZ, E., & MENZEL, H. Medical innovation: A diffusion study. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• COLLINS, B.E., & RAVEN, B.H. Group structure: Attraction, coalitions, communication, and power. In G. Lindsey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology. Vol. 4. (2nd ed.). Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• CONRATH, D.W. Communications environment and its relationship to organizational structure. Management Science, 1973, 20, 586–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DANOWSKI, J. A. An information processing model of organizations: A focus on environmental uncertainty and communication network structuring. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, New Orleans, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• DANOWSKI, J.A., & FARACE, R.V. Communication network integration and group uniformity in a complex organization. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, New Orleans, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• DAVIS, J.A. Clustering and structural balance in graphs. Human Relations, 1967, 20, 181–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DAVIS, J.A. Clustering and hierarchy in interpersonal relations: Testing two theoretical models of 742 sociograms. American Sociological Review, 1970, 35, 843–852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DAVIS, J.A., & LEINHARDT, S. The structure of positive interpersonal relations in small groups. In J. Berger, M.J. Zelditch, & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress. Vol. 2. New York: Houghlin-Mifflin, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• DAVIS, K. Management communication and the grapevine. Harvard Business Review, 1953a, 31, 43–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DAVIS, K. A method of studying communication patterns in organizations. Personnel Psychology, 1953b, 6, 301–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DAVIS, K. Success of chain-of-command oral communication in a manufacturing group. Academy of Management Journal, 1968, 11, 379–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DEWHIRST, H.D. Influence of perceived information-sharing norms on communication channel utilization. Academy of Management Journal, 1971, 14, 305–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DUBIN, R. Business behavior behaviorally viewed. In G.B. Strother (Ed.), Social science approaches to business behavior. Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey Press, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• DUBIN, R., & SPRAY, S. Executive behavior and interaction. Industrial Relations, 1964, 3, 99–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DUNTEMAN, G.H. Organizational conditions and behavior in 234 industrial manufacturing organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1966, 50, 300–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EDWARDS, J.A. The validation of mathematical indices of communication structure. Unpublished thesis, Department of Speech-Communication, San Jose State University, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• EDWARDS, J.A., & MONGE, P.R. Descriptive communication structure metrics: A preliminary logical and empirical analysis. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• EDWARDS, J.A., & MONGE, P.R. A comparison of data collection procedures for the study of communication networks and structure. Tech. Rep. Arlington, Va.: Office of Naval Research, 1976 (Contract No. N00014-75-C-0445).
   Google Scholar
• EDWARDS, J.A., & MONGE, P.R. The validation of mathematical indices of communication structure. In B.D. Ruben (Ed.), Communication yearbook I. New Brunswick-Transaction-International Communication Association, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• EVAN, W.M. (Ed.) Organizational experiments: Laboratory and field research. New York: Harper & Row, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• FARACE, R.V., & JOHNSON, J.D. Comparative analysis of human communication networks in selected formal organizations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, New Orleans, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• FARACE, R.V., & PACANOWSKY, M. Organizational communication role, hierarchical level and relative status. Paper presented to the Academy of Management Association, Seattle, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• FESTINGER, L., CARTWRIGHT, D., BARBER, K., FLEISCHL, J., GOTTSDANKER, J., KEYSEN, A., & LEAVITT, G. The study of a rumor: Its origin and spread. Human Relations, 1948, 1, 464–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FESTINGER, L., SCHACHTER, S., & BACK, K. Social pressures in informal groups. New York: Harper, 1950.
   Google Scholar
• FLAMENT, C. Applications of graph theory to group structure. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1963.
   Google Scholar
• FORM, W.H. Technology and social behavior of workers in four countries: A sociotechnical perspective. American Sociological Review, 1972, 37, 727–738.
   Google Scholar
• FOSTER, C.C., & HORVATH, W.J. A study of a large sociogram, III: Reciprocal choice probabilities as a measure of social distance. Behavioral Science, 1971, 16, 429–435.
   Google Scholar
• FROST, P.A., & WHITLEY, R.D. Communication patterns in a research laboratory. Journal of R & D Management, 1971, 1, 71–79.
   Google Scholar
• GEMMILL, G. Comments on “Effects of different patterns and degrees of openness in superior-subordinate communication on subordinate job satisfaction” by R. Burke and D. Wilcox—September, 1969. Academy of Management Journal, 1969, 12, 506–507.
   Google Scholar
• GESCHWENDER, J.A. Status inconsistency, social isolation, and individual unrest. Social Forces, 1968, 46, 477–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GLANZER, M., & GLASER, R. Techniques for the study of group structure and behavior: I. Analysis of structure. Psychological Bulletin, 1959, 56, 317–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GLANZER, M., & GLASER, R. Techniques for the study of group structure and behavior II. Empirical studies of the effects of structure in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 1961, 58, 1–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GLUCKMAN, M. The judicial process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia (2nd ed.). Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• GRAHAM, G.H. Correlates of perceived importance of organizational objectives. Academy of Management Journal, 1968, 11, 291–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GRAHAM, G.H. Interpersonal attraction as a basis of informal organization. Academy of Management Journal, 1971, 14, 483–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GRANOVETTER, M.S. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 1973, 78, 1360–1380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GREENBERGER, E., & SORENSON, A. Interpersonal choices among a junior high school faculty. Sociology of Education, 1970, 44, 198–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GUETZKOW, H. Communication in organizations, in J.G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1965.
   Google Scholar
• GULLAHORN, J.T. Distance and friendship as factors in the gross interaction matrix. Sociometry, 1952, 15, 123–134.
   Google Scholar
• GUIMARAES, L.L. Network analysis: An approach to the study of communication systems. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Communication, Michigan State University, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• HALLINAN, M. Comment on Holland and Leinhardt. American Journal of Sociology, 1972, 77, 1201–1205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HALLINAN, M. The structure of positive sentiment. New York: Elsevier, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• HALLINAN, M., & FELMLEE, D. An analysis of intransitivity in sociometric data. Sociometry, 1975, 38, 195–212.
   Google Scholar
• HANNAN, M.T. Aggregation and disaggregation in sociology. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Press, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• HAYTHORN, W.W. The composition of groups: A review of the literature. Acta Psychologica, 1968, 28, 97–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HEIDER, F. Attitudes and cognitive organization. Journal of Psychology, 1946, 21, 107–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HINRICHS, J.R. Communications activity of industrial research personnel. Personnel Psychology, 1964, 17, 193–204.
   Google Scholar
• HOLLAND, P.W., & LEINHARDT, S. Some evidence on the transitivity of positive interpersonal sentiment. American Journal of Sociology, 1972, 77, 1205–1209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HOMANS, G.C. The human group. New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1950.
   Google Scholar
• HUREWITZ, P. The neutral isolate—An operational definition: A criticism of the use of the normal curve of distribution. International Journal of Sociometry and Sociatry, 1962, 2, 151–157.
   Google Scholar
• HURWITZ, J.L., ZANDER, A.F., & HYMOVITCH, B. Some effects of power on the relations among group members. In D. Cartwright & A.F. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics: Research and theory. Evanston, Ill.: Row, Peterson, 1953.
   Google Scholar
• INDIK, B.P. The scope of the problem and some suggestions toward a solution. In B.P. Indik & F.K. Berrien (Eds.), People, groups and organizations. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• INGHAM, G. Size of industrial organizations and work behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• JACOB, M.A. The structure and functions of internal communication in three religious communities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Department of Communication, Michigan State University, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• JACOBSON, E., & SEASHORE, S.E. Communication practices in complex organizations. Journal of Social Issues, 1951, 7, 28–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JAMES, L.R., & JONES, A.P. A note on problems related to rationale, models, and methodology in organizational analysis. Tech. Rep. Arlington, Va.: Office of Naval Research, 1974a (Contract No. N00014-72-A-0179-0001).
   Google Scholar
• JAMES, L.R., & JONES, A.P. Organizational climate: A review of theory and research. Psychological Bulletin, 1974b, 81, 1096–1112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JAMES, L.R., & JONES, A.P. Organizational structure: A review of structural dimensions and their conceptual relations with individual attitudes and behavior. Tech. Rep. No. 74–19. Arlington, Va.: Office of Naval Research, 1974c (Contract No. N00014-72-A-0179-0001).
   Google Scholar
• JENNINGS, H.H. Sociometric choice process in personality and group formation. In J.L. Moreno (Ed.), The sociometry reader. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1960.
   Google Scholar
• KATZ, L.B. Statistical methods and models: Introduction. In J.L. Moreno (Ed.), The sociometry reader. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1960.
   Google Scholar
• KELLEY, H.H. Communication in experimentally created hierarchies. Human Relations, 1951, 4, 39–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KELLEY, J. The study of executive behavior by activity sampling. Human Relations, 1951, 4, 39–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KILLWORTH, P.D., & BERNARD, H.R. CATIJ: A new sociometric and its application to a prison living unit. Tech. Rep. No. 102–73. Arlington, Va.: Office of Naval Research, 1973 (Contract No. N00014-73-A-0417-0001).
   Google Scholar
• KIRSTE, K.K., & MONGE, P.R. Proximity: Location, time and opportunity to communicate. Tech. Rep. No. 3. Arlington, Va.: Office of Naval Research, 1974 (Contract No. N00014-73-A-0476-0001).
   Google Scholar
• KLEMMER, E., & SNYDER, F. Measurement of time spent communicating. Journal of Communication, 1972, 22, 142–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LARSEN, K.S. Dogmatism and sociometric status as determinants of interaction in a small group. Psychological Reports, 1971, 29, 449–450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LARSEN, O.N., & HILL, R.J. Social structure and interpersonal communication. American Journal of Sociology, 1958, 63, 497–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LAUMANN, E.O. Bonds of pluralism. New York: Wiley Interscience, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• LAWLER, E., PORTER, L., & TENENBAUM, A. Manager's attitudes toward interaction episodes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1968, 52, 432–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LEWIN, K. Group decision and social change. In H. Proshansky & B. Seidenberg (Eds.), Basic studies in social psychology. New York: Holt, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• LIU, W.T., & DUFF, R.W. The strength in weak ties. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1972, 36, 361–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LYKKEN, D.T. Statistical significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 1968, 70, 151–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MAIER, N.R.F., HOFFMAN, L.R., & READ, W.H. Superior-subordinate communication: The relative effectiveness of managers who held their subordinates' positions. Personnel Psychology, 1963, 16, 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MARTING, B.J. A study of grapevine communication patterns in a manufacturing organization. Academy of Management Journal, 1969, 12, 385–386. (Abstract)
   Google Scholar
• MELCHER, A.J., & BELLER, H. Toward a theory of organization communication: Consideration in channel selection. Academy of Management Journal, 1967, 10, 39–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MEYER, M.W. Size and the structure of organizations: A causal analysis. American Sociological Review, 1972, 37, 434–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MOHR, L.B. Organizational technology and organizational structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1971, 16, 444–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MONGE, P.R., KIRSTE, K.K., & EDWARDS, J.A. A preliminary causal model of the formation of communication structure in large organizations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, New Orleans, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• MONGE, P.R., & LINDSEY, G.N. The study of communication networks and communication structure in large organizations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, New Orleans, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• MORENO, J.L. (Ed.). The sociometry reader. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1960.
   Google Scholar
• MORENO, J.L., & JENNINGS, H.H. Sociometric measurement of social configuration. Sociometry, 1938, 1, 342–374.
   Google Scholar
• PELZ, D.C. Some social factors related to performance in a research organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1956, 1, 310–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PETTIGREW, A. Intergroup conflict and role strain. Journal of Management Studies, 1968, 5, 205–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PHILLIPS, D.P., & CONVISER, R.H. Measuring the structure and boundary properties of groups: Some uses of information theory. Sociometry, 1972, 35, 235–254.
   Google Scholar
• POOL, I. de SOLA Communication systems. In I. de Sola Pool, W. Schramm, N. Maccoby, & E.B. Parker (Eds.), Handbook of communication. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• PORTER, L.W., & LAWLER, E.E. Properties of organization structure in relation to job attitudes and job behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 1965, 64, 23–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• PORTER, L.W., & ROBERTS, K.H. Communication in organizations. Tech. Rep. No. 12. Arlington, Va.: Office of Naval Research, ERIC (microfiche) ED-066-773, 1973. Revised version published in M. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally, in press.
   Google Scholar
• PROCTOR, C.H., & LOOMIS, C.P. Analysis of sociometric data. In M. Jahoda, M. Deutsch, & S.W. Cook (Eds.), Research methods in social relations. New York: Dryden, 1951.
   Google Scholar
• RAPOPORT, A. Mathematical models of social interaction. In R.D. Luce, R.R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology. Vol. 2. New York: Wiley, 1963.
   Google Scholar
• RAPOPORT, A., & HORVATH, W.J. A study of a large sociogram. Behavioral Science, 1961, 6, 279–291.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• READ, W.H. Upward communication in industrial hierarchies. Human Relations, 1962, 15, 3–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• REDDING, W.C. Communication within the organization: An interpretive review of theory and research. New York: Industrial Communication Council, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• RICHARDS, W.R., JR. A coherent systems methodology for the analysis of communication systems. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Department of Communication, Stanford University, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• ROBERTS, K.H. On looking at an elephant: An evaluation of cross-cultural research related to organizations. Psychological Bulletin, 1972, 74, 327–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ROBERTS, K.H., & O'REILLY, C.A., III. Failures in upward communication: Three possible culprits. Tech. Rep. No. 1. Arlington, Va.: Office of Naval Research, April 1973 (Contract No. N000314-69-A-0200-1054). Revised version published in Academy of Management Journal, 1974, 17, 205.
   Google Scholar
• ROBERTS, K.H., & O'REILLY, C.A., III. Empirical findings and suggestions for future research on organizational communication. Tech. Rep. No. 6. Arlington, Va.: Office of Naval Research, 1974 (Contract No. N000314-69-A-0200-1054).
   Google Scholar
• ROBERTS, K.H., O'REILLY, C.A., III, BRETTON, G., & PORTER, L.W. Organizational theory and organizational communication: A communication failure? Tech. Rep. No. 3. Arlington, Va.: Office of Naval Research, May 1973 (Contract No. N000314-69-A-0200-1054). Revised version published in Human Relations, 1974, 27, 501–524.
   Google Scholar
• ROME, S.C., & ROME, B.K. A Leviathan technique for large-group analysis. Behavioral Science, 1961, 6, 148–152.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ROSENGREN, W.R. Structure, policy, and style: Strategies of organizational control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1967, 12, 140–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SADLER, R.J., & BARRY, B.A. Organizational characteristics of growing companies. Journal of Management Studies, 1967, 4, 204–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCHWARTZ, D.F. Liaison roles in the communication structure of a formal organization: A pilot study. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Society for the Study of Communication, Cleveland, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• SHAW, M.E. Communication networks. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press, 1964.
   Google Scholar
• SIMPSON, R.L. Vertical and horizontal communication in formal organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1959, 4, 188–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SLOTE, L.M. Superior-subordinate role conflict. Dissertation Abstracts International, 1971, 32(A), 538. (Abstract)
   Google Scholar
• SMITH, P.C., KENDALL, L.M., & HULIN, C.L. The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement: A strategy for the study of altitudes. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• SUTTON, H., & PORTER, L.W. A study of the grapevine in a governmental organization. Personnel Psychology, 1968, 21, 223–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• THOMASON, G.F. Managerial work roles and relationships—Part I. Journal of Management Studies, 1966, 3, 270–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• THOMPSON, J.D. Authority and power in “identical” organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 1956, 62, 290–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WADE, L.L. Communications in a public bureaucracy: Involvement and performance. Journal of Communication, 1968, 18, 18–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WAGER, L.W. Organizational “linking pins”: Hierarchical status and communication roles in interlevel conferences. Human Relations, 1972, 25, 307–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WALTON, E. A study of organizational communication systems. Personnel Administration, 1963, 26, 46–49.
   Google Scholar
• WEBBER, R.A. Perceptions of interactions between superiors and subordinates. Human Relations, 1970, 23, 235–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WEICK, K. The social psychology of organizing. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• WEISS, R.S., & JACOBSON, E. The structure of complex organizations. In J.L. Moreno (Ed.), The sociometry reader. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1960.
   Google Scholar
• WHITLEY, R.D., & FROST, P.A. Authority, problem solving approaches, communication and change in a British research laboratory. Journal of Management Studies, 1972, 9, 337–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WICKESBERG, A.K. Communications networks in the business organization structure. Academy of Management Journal, 1968, 11, 253–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WIGAND, R.T. Communication, integration, and satisfaction in a complex organization. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, New Orleans, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• ZAENGLEIN, M.M., & SMITH, C. An analysis of individual communication patterns and perceptions in hospital organizations. Human Relations, 1972, 25, 493–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar