Interpersonal Communication Theory and Research: An Overview of Inscrutable Epistemologies and Muddled Concepts

REFERENCES

• ASHBY, W. R. An introduction to cybernetics. New York: Science Editions (Wiley), 1963.
   Google Scholar
• BATESON, G. A theory of play and fantasy. A. P. A. Psychological Research Reports, II, 1955, 39–51.
   Google Scholar
• BATESON, G. Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• BATESON, G. The pattern which connects. Co-Evolution Quarterly, 1978, 18, 4–15.
   Google Scholar
• BECKER, W. C. & KRUG, R. S. A circumplex model for social behavior in children. Child Development, 1964, 35, 371–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BERGER, C. Interpersonal communication theory and research: An overview. In B. Ruben (Ed.) Communication Yearbook I, New Brunswick, N. J.: Transaction Books, 1977a.
   Google Scholar
• BERGER, C. The covering law perspective as a theoretical basis for the study of human communication. Communication Quarterly, 1977b, 25, 7–18.
   Google Scholar
• BERGER P. L. & LUCKMANN, T. The social construction of reality. Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor Books, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• BERTALANFFY, L. VON. General system theory—a critical review. In W. Buckley (Ed.) Modern systems research for the behavioral scientist. Chicago: Aldine, 1968, 11–30.
   Google Scholar
• BOCHNER, A. P. Whither communication theory and research? Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1977, 63, 324–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BOCHNER, A. P. On taking ourselves seriously: An analysis of some persistent problems and promising directions in interpersonal research. Human Communication Research, 1978, 4, 179–191.
   Google Scholar
• BOCHNER, A. P., KAMINSKI, E. P., & FITZPATRICK, M. A. The conceptual domain of interpersonal communication behavior: A factor-analytic study. Human Communication Research, 1977, 3, 291–302.
   Google Scholar
• BUCKLEY, W. Sociology and modem systems theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• CARSON, R. C. Interaction concepts of personality. Chicago: Aldine, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• CARSWELL, E. A. & ROMMETVEIT, R. Social contexts of messages. London: Academic Press, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• CARTER, L. F. Evaluating the performance of individuals as members of small groups. Personnel Psychology, 1954, 7, 477–484.
   Google Scholar
• COOK-GUMPERZ, J. The natural history of an activity. Unpublished ms. Language Behavior Research Laboratory, University of CaliforniaBerkeley, 1977a.
   Google Scholar
• COOK-GUMPERZ, J. Persuasive talks: The social organization of children's talk. Unpublished ms. Language Behavior Research Laboratory, University of California-Berkeley, 1977b.
   Google Scholar
• CRONBACH, L. J. Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 1975, 30, 116–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CRONEN, V. E. & DAVIS, L. K. Alternative approaches for the communication theorist: Problems in the laws-rules-system trichotomy. Human Communications Research, 1978, 4, 120–128.
   Google Scholar
• CUSHMAN, D. P. The rules perspective as a theoretical basis for the study of human communication. Communication Quarterly, 1977, 25, 30–45.
   Google Scholar
• CUSHMAN, D. P. & PEARCE, W. B. Generality and necessity in three types of theory about human communication, with special attention to rules theory. Human Communication Research, 1977, 3, 344–353.
   Google Scholar
• DEETZ, S. Conceptualizing human understanding: Gadamer's hermenuetics and American communication studies. Communication Quarterly, 1978, 26, 12–23.
   Google Scholar
• DELIA, J. Constructivism and the study of human communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1977a, 63, 66–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DELIA, J. Alternative perspectives for the study of human communication: Critique and response. Communication Quarterly, 1977b, 25, 46–62.
   Google Scholar
• DELIA, J. & GROSSBERG, L. Interpretation and evidence. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 1977, 41, 32–42.
   Google Scholar
• DIXON, R. M. A trend in semantics. Linguistics, 1963, 1, 30–57.
   Google Scholar
• DOUGLAS, J.D. (Ed.). Understanding everyday life, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• ERICSON, P.M. & ROGERS, L.E. New procedures for analyzing relational communication. Family Process, 1973, 12, 245–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ERVIN-TRIPP, S. & MITCHELL-KERNAN, C. (Ed.). Child discourse. New York: Academic Press, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• FRENTZ, T.S. & FARRELL, T.B. Language-action: A paradigm for communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1976, 62, 333–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GARFINKEL, H. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• GEERTZ, C. The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• GERGEN, K.J. Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 26, 309–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GOFFMAN, E. Frame analysis, New York: Harper, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• GOLDTHORPE, J. A revolution in sociology? Sociology, 1973, 7, 449–462.
   Google Scholar
• GOTTMAN, J., NOTARIOUS C., MARKMAN, H. BANK, S., YOPPIS B., & RUBIN, M.E. Behavior exchange theory and marital decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 34, 14–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GOTTMAN, J., MARKMAN, H., & NOTARIOUS, C. The topography of marital conflict. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1977, 39, 461–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GUM, G. Pragmatic implications of the relational communication perspective. Unpublished ms., Temple University, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• GUMPERZ, J.J., & HYMES, D. (Eds.). Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• HALEY, J. Strategies of psychotherapy. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1963.
   Google Scholar
• HALEY, J. Development of a theory: A history of a research project. In C. E. Sluzki & D. C. Ransom (Eds.) Double bind: The foundation of the communcattonal approach to the family. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1976, 59–104.
   Google Scholar
• HAMPSHIRE, S. The illusion of sociobiology. New York Review of Books, 1978, 25, No. 15, 64–69.
   Google Scholar
• HARRÉ, R., & SECORD, P.F. The explanation of social behavior. Totowa, N.J.: Roman and Little-field, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• HAWES, L. How writing is used in talk: A study of communicative logic-in-use. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1976, 62, 350–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HAWES, L. Toward a hermeneutic phenomenology of communication. Communication Quarterly 1977a, 25, 30–41.
   Google Scholar
• HAWES, L. Alternative theoretical bases: Toward a presuppositional critique. Communication Quarterly, 1977b, 25, 63–68.
   Google Scholar
• HENRY, J. Pathways to madness. New York: Random House, Vintage Edition, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• HEWES, D.E. Interpersonal communication theory and research: A meta-methodological overview. In B. Ruben (Ed.) Communication Yearbook 2, New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books, 1978, pp. 155–169.
   Google Scholar
• JACKSON, D.D. Family interaction, family homeostasis and some implications for conjoint family psychotherapy. In J. Masserman (Ed.) Individual and Familial Dynamics, New York: Grune & Stratton, 1959.
   Google Scholar
• JURICK, D.M. The enactment of returning: A naturalistic study of talk. Communication Quarterly, 1977, 25, 21–29.
   Google Scholar
• KUHN, T.S. The structure of scientific revolutions (Rev. ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press 1970.
   Google Scholar
• LEARY, T. Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Ronald Press, 1957.
   Google Scholar
• LENK KRUEGER, D., CHMIELEWSKI H., GUM, G., & BOCHNER, A. Accuracy and role discrepancy in marriage: An analysis of multi-level perspectives and marital adjustment. Paper presented at the meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Washington, D.C., 1977.
   Google Scholar
• LITTON-HAWES, E.M. A foundation for the study of everyday talk. Communication Quarterly, 1977, 25, 2–11.
   Google Scholar
• LONGABAUGH, R. The structure of interpersonal behavior. Sociometry, 1966, 29, 441–460.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MANIS, M. Is social psychology really different? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1976, 2, 428–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MANIS, M. Comments on Gergen's “Social psychology as history.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1975, 1, 450–455.
   Google Scholar
• MARUYAMA, M. The second cybernetics: Deviation-amplifying mutual causal processes. American Scientist, 1963, 51, 164–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDERMOTT, V. The literature on classical theory construction. Human Communication Research, 1975, 2, 83–102.
   Google Scholar
• MILLAR, F.E., & ROGERS, L.E. A relational approach to interpersonal communication. In G. R. Miller (Ed.) Explorations in interpersonal communication, Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publica- 1976.
   Google Scholar
• MILLER, G.R. (Ed.). Explorations in interpersonal communication. Beverly Hills, California; Sage Publications, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• MILLER, G.R. The current status of theory and research in interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1978, 4, 164–178.
   Google Scholar
• MILLER, G.R. & BERGER, C.R. On keeping the faith in matters scientific. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 1978, 42, 44–57.
   Google Scholar
• MILLER, G.R. & STEINBERG, M. Between People: A new analysis of interpersonal communication. Chicago: Science Research Associates, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• MILLER, S., CORRALES, R., & WACKMAN, D.B. Recent progress in understanding and facilitating marital communication. The Family Coordinator 1975, 24, 143–152.
   Google Scholar
• MINUCHIN, S. Families and family therapy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• MONGE, P.R. Theory construction in the study of human communication: The systems paradigm. Journal of Communication, 1973, 23, 5–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MONGE, P.R. The systems perspective as a theoretical basis for the study of human communication. Communication Quarterly, 1977, 25, 19–29.
   Google Scholar
• MOSCOVICI, S. Society and theory in social psychology. In J. Israel & H. Tajfel (Eds.) The context of social psychology: A critical assessment. New York: Academic Press, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• NOFSINGER, JR., R.E. On answering questions indirectly: Some rules in the grammar of doing conversation. Human Communication Research, 1976, 2, 172–181.
   Google Scholar
• NOFSINGER, JR., R.E. A peek at conversational analysis. Communication Quarterly, 1977, 25, 12–20.
   Google Scholar
• O'KEEFE D.J. Logical empiricism and the study of human communication. Speech Monographs, 1975, 42, 169–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PARKS, M.R. Relational communication: Theory and research. Human Communication Research, 1977a, 3, 372–381.
   Google Scholar
• PARKS, M.R. Issues in the explication of communication competency. Paper presented at annual meeting of the Western Speech Communication Association, Phoenix, Arizona, 1977b.
   Google Scholar
• PEARCE, W.B. The coordinated management of meaning: A rules-based theory of interpersonal communication. In G.R. Miller (Ed.) Explorations in interpersonal communication. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• PEARCE, W.B. Metatheoretical concerns in communication. Communication Quarterly, 1977, 25, 3–6.
   Google Scholar
• ROGERS, L.E., & FARACE, R. Analysis of relational communication in dyads: New measurement procedures. Human Communication Research, 1975, 1, 222–239.
   Google Scholar
• RUESCH, J. & BATESON, G. Communication: The social matrix of psychiatry. New York: W.W. Norton, 1951.
   Google Scholar
• SACKS, H., JEFFERSON, G., & SCHEGLOFF, E.A. A simplex systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 1974, 50, 696–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCHAEFER, E.S. A circumplex model for maternal behavior. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1959, 59, 226–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCHEGLOFF, E.A. Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In D. N. Sudnow (Ed.) Studies in social interaction. New York: Free Press,
   Google Scholar
• SCHLENKER, B.R. Social psychology and science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 29, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCHLENKER, B.L. Social psychology and science: Another look. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1976, 2, 384–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCHUTZ, A. Collected papers: I. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• SCOTT, R.L. Communication as an intentional social system. Human Communication Research, 1977, 3, 258–268.
   Google Scholar
• TOULMIN, S. Concepts and the explanation of human behavior. In T. Mischel (Ed.) Human action. New York: Academic Press, 1969, 71–104.
   Google Scholar
• TRIANDAS, H.C., VASSILIOU, V., & NASSIAKOU, M. Three cross-cultural studies of subjective culture. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monograph Supplement, 1968, 8, No. 4, Part 2, 1–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WATZLAWICK P., BEAVIN, J., & JACKSON, D.D. Pragmatics of human communication. New York: W.W. Norton, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• WATZLAWICK, P., WEAKLAND, J.H., & FISCH, R. Change: Principles of problem formation and problem resolution. New York: W. W. Norton, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• WILDER, C. The Palo Alto group: Difficulties and directions of the interactional view for human communication research. Human Communication Research, 1979 (in press), 5.
   Google Scholar
• WOOTTON, A. Dilemmas of discourse: Controversies about the sociological interpretation of language. New York: Holmes & Meier Publishers, 1975.
   Google Scholar